Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FRBR 2008 PDF
FRBR 2008 PDF
FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS
Final Report
Approved by the
Standing Committee of the
IFLA Section on Cataloguing
September 1997
http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/
CONTENTS
CONTENTS................................................................................................................................... ii
MEMBERS OF THE IFLA STUDY GROUP ON THE FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS ........................................................................................ iv
1.
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1
1.1
Background ................................................................................................................... 1
1.2
Approach ....................................................................................................................... 3
1.3
2.2
Scope............................................................................................................................... 7
2.3
Methodology .................................................................................................................. 9
2.4
3.
ENTITIES........................................................................................................................ 13
3.1
Overview ...................................................................................................................... 13
3.2
The Entities.................................................................................................................. 17
3.3
4.
ATTRIBUTES................................................................................................................. 31
4.1
Attributes of Entities................................................................................................... 31
4.2
Attributes of a Work................................................................................................... 33
4.3
Attributes of an Expression........................................................................................ 35
4.4
Attributes of a Manifestation..................................................................................... 40
4.5
ii
4.6
Attributes of a Person................................................................................................. 49
4.7
4.8
4.9
Attributes of an Object............................................................................................... 52
4.10
4.11
Attributes of a Place................................................................................................ 52
5.
RELATIONSHIPS.......................................................................................................... 55
5.1
5.2
5.3
6. USER TASKS.......................................................................................................................... 79
6.1
6.2
7.2
7.3
iii
Consultants
Tom Delsey
National Library of Canada
Elizabeth Dulabahn
Library of Congress
Elaine Svenonius
University of California, Los Angeles
Barbara Tillett
Library of Congress
iv
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
Almost forty years ago the International Federation of Library Associations and
Institutions (IFLA) initiated a fundamental re-examination of cataloguing theory and
practice on an international level. The first important outcome of that effort was a set of
cataloguing principles agreed to at an international conference held in Paris in 1961 that
have subsequently come to be known as the Paris Principles. A second key undertaking
was initiated at the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts held in Copenhagen in
1969 with the adoption of a resolution to establish international standards for the form
and content of bibliographic descriptions. The first of the standards developed under that
resolution, the International Standard Bibliographic Description for Monographic
Publications, was published in 1971. In the years that have followed those initial
undertakings the Paris Principles and the ISBDs have served as the bibliographic
foundation for a variety of new and revised national and international cataloguing codes.
During that same period, however, the environment within which cataloguing principles
and standards operate has changed dramatically. Key factors contributing to the change
have been the introduction and ongoing development of automated systems for the
creation and processing of bibliographic data, and the growth of large-scale databases,
both national and international in scope, that contain records contributed and used by
thousands of libraries participating in shared cataloguing programs. The growth of
shared cataloguing has been spurred not only by the opportunities that new technologies
bring with them but also by an increasing need to reduce cataloguing costs by minimizing
duplicate cataloguing effort. Economic pressures have also prompted libraries to try to
simplify the cataloguing process and to do more and more minimal level cataloguing in
order to keep pace with the continued growth of publishing output. On the other side of
the coin, there has been an increasing need to adapt cataloguing codes and practices to
accommodate change resulting from the emergence of new forms of electronic
publishing, and the advent of networked access to information resources. Equally
important has been a recognized need to respond more effectively to an increasingly
broad range of user expectations and needs.
It was this changing environment that formed the backdrop to the 1990 Stockholm
Seminar on Bibliographic Records, sponsored by the IFLA Universal Bibliographic
Control and International MARC (UBCIM) Programme and the IFLA Division of
Bibliographic Control. While the participants in the Seminar recognized the economic
realities faced by libraries and the need to reduce the cost of cataloguing, they also
acknowledged the importance of meeting user needs and addressing more effectively the
broad range of needs associated with various types of material and the various contexts
within which bibliographic records are used. It was recognized that continuing pressure
to do minimal level cataloguing required a careful re-examination of the relationship
between individual data elements in the record and the needs of the user. It was also
recognized that in this context the viability of shared cataloguing programs, both
nationally and internationally, required an agreed standard for a basic or core level
record.
There were nine resolutions adopted at the Stockholm Seminar, one of which led directly
to the current study. That resolution called for the commissioning of a study to define the
functional requirements for bibliographic records. The terms of reference that were
subsequently developed for the study stated its purpose and scope as follows:
The purpose of this study is to delineate in clearly defined terms the
functions performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various
media, various applications, and various user needs. The study is to cover
the full range of functions for the bibliographic record in its widest sensei.e., a record that encompasses not only descriptive elements, but access
points (name, title, subject, etc.), other "organizing" elements
(classification, etc.), and annotations.
The aim of the study was to produce a framework that would provide a clear, precisely
stated, and commonly shared understanding of what it is that the bibliographic record
aims to provide information about, and what it is that we expect the record to achieve in
terms of answering user needs.
The terms of reference also gave a second charge to the study group: to recommend a
basic level of functionality and basic data requirements for records created by national
bibliographic agencies. The purpose of formulating recommendations for a basic level
national bibliographic record was to address the need identified at the Stockholm Seminar
for a core level standard that would allow national bibliographic agencies to reduce their
cataloguing costs through the creation, as necessary, of less-than-full-level records, but at
the same time ensure that all records produced by national bibliographic agencies met
essential user needs.
The terms of reference for the study were approved by the Standing Committee of the
IFLA Section on Cataloguing at the September 1992 IFLA Conference in New Delhi.
Members of the study group were appointed from both the Section on Cataloguing and
the Section on Classification and Indexing.
The study group completed its lengthy deliberations for its draft report in the fall of 1995.
The study group consultants were responsible for writing various interim working
documents and the completed draft report. In May 1996 the draft report was sent to the
members of the IFLA Section on Cataloguing and the studys volunteer commentators for
a six-month, world-wide review. The draft report was also available electronically
through the World Wide Web on the IFLA Section on Cataloguings home page for other
individuals and organizations to review and comment on. As a result of the six-month
review, the study group received forty responses from sixteen countries. Most of the
comments involved the draft reports organization, the definition of terms, the
methodology, and conclusions relating to the requirements for specific types of material.
Reviewers recommended that more examples be added in order to clarify various
definitions and concepts.
In February 1997 the study group met to discuss the world-wide review comments and
decide how to revise the report. Following this meeting the consultants incorporated the
final revisions into the report. Ms. Olivia Madison, the study group chair, presented the
final report to the Standing Committee of the IFLA Section on Cataloguing at the 63rd
(1997) General Conference of the International Federation of Library Associations and
Institutions held in Copenhagen, Denmark. The Standing Committee approved the study
groups final report at its meeting on September 5, 1997.
1.2
Approach
The terms of reference for the study called for the development of a framework that
identifies and clearly defines the entities of interest to users of bibliographic records, the
attributes of each entity, and the types of relationships that operate between entities. The
intent was to produce a conceptual model that would serve as the basis for relating
specific attributes and relationships (reflected in the record as discrete data elements) to
the various tasks that users perform when consulting bibliographic records.
The study makes no a priori assumptions about the bibliographic record itself, either in
terms of content or structure. It takes a user-focused approach to analyzing data
requirements insofar as it endeavours to define in a systematic way what it is that the user
expects to find information about in a bibliographic record and how that information is
used. The study uses an entity analysis technique that begins by isolating the entities that
are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records. The study then identifies
the characteristics or attributes associated with each entity and the relationships between
entities that are most important to users in formulating bibliographic searches,
interpreting responses to those searches, and navigating the universe of entities
described in bibliographic records. The model developed in the study is comprehensive in
scope but not exhaustive in terms of the entities, attributes, and relationships that it
defines. The model operates at the conceptual level; it does not carry the analysis to the
level that would be required for a fully developed data model.
For the purposes of the study, the users of bibliographic records are seen to encompass a
broad spectrum, including not only library clients and staff, but also publishers,
distributors, retailers, and the providers and users of information services outside
traditional library settings. The study also takes into account the wide range of
applications in which bibliographic records are used: in the context of purchasing or
acquisitions, cataloguing, inventory management, circulation and interlibrary loan, and
preservation, as well as for reference and information retrieval. As a result, the attributes
and relationships identified in the study reflect the breadth of use that is made of
bibliographic information, and the importance to users of aspects of both content and
form of the materials described in bibliographic records.
The study also endeavours to be comprehensive in terms of the range of materials, media,
and formats that are covered. The study group drew on a wide range of sources
identifying data pertaining to textual, cartographic, audio-visual, graphic, and threedimensional materials; to paper, film, magnetic tape, and optical media; and to acoustic,
electric, digital, and optical recording modes.
The basic elements of the model developed for the study--the entities, attributes, and
relationships--were derived from a logical analysis of the data that are typically reflected
in bibliographic records. The principal sources used in the analysis included the
International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBDs), the Guidelines for Authority
and Reference Entries (GARE), the Guidelines for Subject Authority and Reference
Entries (GSARE), and the UNIMARC Manual. Additional data were culled from other
sources such as the AITF Categories for the Description of Works of Art, from input
provided by experts who were consulted as drafts of the report were being prepared, from
an extensive review of published user studies, and from comments received as part of the
world-wide review of the draft report.
It is important to note that the model developed for the study does not cover the extended
range of attributes and relationships that are normally reflected in authority records. The
model defines the entities that are the focus of authority records--persons, corporate
bodies, concepts, etc.--and depicts the relationships between those entities and the entities
described in the bibliographic record per se. The model also defines attributes of those
entities to the extent that such attributes are typically reflected in the bibliographic record.
But it does not analyse the additional data that are normally recorded in an authority
record, nor does it analyse the relationships between and among those entities that are
generally reflected in the syndetic apparatus of the catalogue. While it is recognized that
an extended level of analysis would be necessary for a fully developed conceptual model,
the terms of reference for the current study, with its focus on bibliographic data, as
distinct from authority data, and the constraints of time available for the study, ruled out
such an extended level of analysis. Nevertheless, the study group recognizes the need to
extend the model at some future date to cover authority data.
The recommendations for a basic level national bibliographic record were arrived at by
assessing the relative importance of the attributes and relationships identified in the
model to the generic user tasks defined for the study. The assessment was based in large
part on the knowledge and experience of the study group members and consultants,
supplemented by evidence in the library science literature gathered from empirical
research, as well as by assessments made by several experts outside the study group.
1.3
The model developed for this study represents an initial attempt to establish a logical
framework to assist in the understanding and further development of conventions for
bibliographic description. It is intended to provide a base for common understanding and
further dialogue, but it does not presume to be the last word on the issues it addresses.
Certain aspects of the model merit more detailed analysis and there are dimensions of the
model that could be extended. To fulfill the second charge in its terms of reference, the
study group used the model as the framework for its recommendations on a basic level
national bibliographic record. It is hoped, however, that the model itself will serve as a
useful starting point for a number of follow-up studies of interest to those involved with
designing cataloguing codes and systems to support the creation, management, and use of
bibliographic data.
The model could be extended to cover the additional data that are normally recorded in
authority records. In particular, further analysis is needed of the entities that are the
centre of focus for subject authorities, thesauri, and classification schemes, and of the
relationships between those entities.
Certain aspects of the model merit more detailed examination. The identification and
definition of attributes for various types of material could be extended through further
review by experts and through user studies. In particular, the notion of seriality and the
dynamic nature of entities recorded in digital formats merit further analysis.
The model developed for this study represents, as far as possible, a generalized view of
the bibliographic universe; it is intended to be independent of any particular cataloguing
code or implementation of the concepts it represents. In certain respects, however, it is
arbitrary in the way it reflects what are usually referred to in such models as business
rules (e.g., in the criteria used to define the boundaries of a work). Those responsible
for the development of national cataloguing codes might find it useful to adapt the model
to reflect the business rules or operative principles that apply within their particular
cultural context and bibliographic tradition. An exercise of that kind might provide
useful insights into the logical concepts that are reflected in national codes, and assist the
designers in articulating those concepts more precisely and in reflecting them more
consistently as the codes are developed to meet new requirements.
At the international level, the models mapping of individual attributes and relationships
to the specific ways in which bibliographic data are used could serve as a useful
framework for re-assessing data recording conventions and standards with a view to
rationalizing the level of effort that is expended in normalizing bibliographic data. It
could also help to frame investigations into the potential for more economic means of
data capture. In the same vein, the recommendations pertaining to the basic level
national bibliographic record could serve as a useful starting point for resumption of
work on a concise ISBD by the Standing Committee of the IFLA Section on Cataloguing.
The entity-relationship analysis reflected in the model might also serve as a useful
conceptual framework for a re-examination of the structures used to store, display, and
communicate bibliographic data. Further study could be done on the practical
implications of restructuring MARC record formats to reflect more directly the
hierarchical and reciprocal relationships outlined in the model. An examination of that
kind might offer a new approach to the so-called multiple versions issue. The model
could also be expanded in depth to create a fully developed data model that would serve
as the basis for the design of an experimental database to assess the efficiency and
effectiveness of a database structure patterned on the model.
2.1
The study has two primary objectives. The first is to provide a clearly defined, structured
framework for relating the data that are recorded in bibliographic records to the needs of
the users of those records. The second objective is to recommend a basic level of
functionality for records created by national bibliographic agencies.
2.2
Scope
For the purposes of this study a bibliographic record is defined as the aggregate of data
that are associated with entities described in library catalogues and national
bibliographies. Included in that aggregate of data are descriptive data elements such as
those defined in the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBDs); data
elements used in headings for persons, corporate bodies, titles, and subjects that function
as filing devices or index entries; other data elements used to organize a file of records,
such as classification numbers; annotations such as abstracts or summaries; and data
specific to the copies in library collections, such as accession numbers and call numbers.
Data associated with persons, corporate bodies, titles, and subjects are analysed only to
the extent that they function as headings or index entries for the records describing
bibliographic entities. The present study does not analyse those additional data
associated with persons, corporate bodies, works, and subjects that are typically recorded
only in authority records.
The study endeavours to be comprehensive in terms of the variety of materials that are
covered. The data included in the study pertain to textual, music, cartographic, audiovisual, graphic and three-dimensional materials; they cover the full range of physical
media described in bibliographic records (paper, film, magnetic tape, optical storage
media, etc.); they cover all formats (books, sheets, discs, cassettes, cartridges, etc.); and
they reflect all modes of recording information (analogue, acoustic, electric, digital,
optical, etc.).
The study assumes that the data included in bibliographic records produced for national
bibliographies and library catalogues are used by a wide range of users: readers, students,
researchers, library staff, publishers, distribution agents, retailers, information brokers,
7
administrators of intellectual property rights, etc. The study takes into account the wide
variety of applications, both within and outside a library setting, in which the data in
bibliographic records are used: collections development, acquisitions, cataloguing, the
production of finding aids and bibliographies, inventory management, preservation,
circulation, interlibrary loan, reference, and information retrieval.
Within the context of such applications users may make use of bibliographic records for a
variety of purposes, for example: to determine what information resources exist, perhaps
on a particular subject or by a particular person, within a given universe (e.g., within
the totality of available information resources, within the published output of a particular
country, within the holdings of a particular library or group of libraries, etc.); to verify the
existence and/or availability of a particular document for purposes of acquiring,
borrowing or lending; to identify a source or sources from which a document can be
obtained and the terms under which it is available; to determine whether a record already
exists for an item being added to a collection or whether a new record needs to be
created; to track an item as it moves through a process such as binding or conservation
treatment; to determine whether an item can be circulated or sent out on interlibrary loan;
to select a document or group of documents that will serve the information needs of the
user; or to determine the physical requirements for use of an item as they relate either to
the abilities of the user or to special requirements for playback equipment, computing
capabilities, etc.
For the purposes of this study the functional requirements for bibliographic records are
defined in relation to the following generic tasks that are performed by users when
searching and making use of national bibliographies and library catalogues:
using the data to find materials that correspond to the users stated search criteria
(e.g., in the context of a search for all documents on a given subject, or a search for a
recording issued under a particular title);
using the data retrieved to identify an entity (e.g., to confirm that the document
described in a record corresponds to the document sought by the user, or to
distinguish between two texts or recordings that have the same title);
using the data to select an entity that is appropriate to the users needs (e.g., to select a
text in a language the user understands, or to choose a version of a computer program
that is compatible with the hardware and operating system available to the user);
using the data in order to acquire or obtain access to the entity described (e.g., to
place a purchase order for a publication, to submit a request for the loan of a copy of
a book in a librarys collection, or to access online an electronic document stored on a
remote computer).
2.3
Methodology
The methodology used in this study is based on an entity analysis technique that is used
in the development of conceptual models for relational database systems. Although the
study is not intended to serve directly as a basis for the design of bibliographic databases,
the technique was chosen as the basis for the methodology because it provides a
structured approach to the analysis of data requirements that facilitates the processes of
definition and delineation that were set out in the terms of reference for the study.
The first step in the entity analysis technique is to isolate the key objects that are of
interest to users of information in a particular domain. These objects of interest or
entities are defined at as high a level as possible. That is to say that the analysis first
focuses attention not on individual data but on the "things" the data describe. Each of the
entities defined for the model, therefore, serves as the focal point for a cluster of data. An
entity diagram for a personnel information system, for example, would likely identify
"employee" as one entity that would be of interest to the users of such a system.
At a high level an entity diagram also depicts the relationships that normally hold
between one type of entity and another type of entity. The model for a personnel
information system, for example, would likely indicate a reciprocal relationship between
the entity "employee" and the entity "position": an employee "occupies" a position; a
position "is occupied by" an employee.
Once the high-level structure for the model has been charted by identifying the principal
entities and the relationships between those entities, the next step in the methodology is
to identify the important characteristics or attributes of each entity. For example, in the
context of a personnel information system, the attributes associated with an employee
might include the employee name, address, birth date, social insurance number, etc.
As an extension of the technique that is used to depict the relationships between entity
types, the entity analysis methodology can also be applied at a more detailed level to
depict the specific relationships that operate between instances of entities. For example,
the model for a personnel information system might show that relationships may exist
between an individual employee and another employee (e.g., a spousal relationship). If
such relationships are significant for the users of information in the domain being
modeled, they will be defined as part of the model.
The entity-relationship structure derived from the analysis of entities, attributes, and
relationships has been used in this study as the framework for assessing the relevance of
each attribute and relationship to the tasks performed by users of bibliographic data. Each
attribute and relationship is mapped to the four generic user tasks defined for the study,
and relative values are assigned to each attribute and relationship with specific reference
to the task performed and the entity that is the object of the users interest.
The entity-relationship structure and the mapping of attributes and relationships to user
tasks are used as the basis for the study groups recommendations on a basic level of
functionality for records created by national bibliographic agencies. The
recommendations are focused on the user tasks that are judged to be the most important
for the national bibliographic record to support. Based on the relative values assigned to
the attributes and relationships that support those tasks, the recommendations identify
specific data requirements for the basic record.
The entity-relationship analysis technique and the conventions for graphic presentation
that are used in this study are based in large part on the methodology developed by James
Martin and outlined in his book Strategic Data-Planning Methodologies (Prentice-Hall,
1982). Graeme Simsions Data Modeling Essentials (Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1994),
Richard Perkinsons Data Analysis: the Key to Data Base Design (QED Information
Sciences, 1984), and Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navanthes Fundamentals of
Database Systems (Benjamin/Cummings, 1989) were also used in shaping the
methodology for the study. All four books are recommended to those who are interested
in additional background and more detail on entity-relationship analysis.
2.4
The entity analysis technique and the mapping of attributes and relationships to user tasks
form the framework for this studys assessment of data requirements for records intended
to serve the needs of users of bibliographic information, and for the study groups
recommendations on basic data to be included in a national bibliographic record. The
remainder of the report is divided into two major segments. The first sets out the entityrelationship model; the second presents the study groups recommendations for a basic
level national bibliographic record.
The first segment of the study contains four chapters:
Chapter 3 of the study identifies the entities that have been used in the model,
naming, defining, and elaborating on their nature and scope.
Chapter 4 analyses the attributes associated with each of the entities defined for the
model, and provides definitions for each attribute. That analysis is then expanded in
Appendix A to give a comprehensive listing of individual data elements associated
with each attribute.
Chapter 5 delineates the relationships used in the model, defining and elaborating on
the nature of relationships that operate at a generalized level in the model as well as
those that operate between specific instances of entities.
Chapter 6 maps the attributes and relationships associated with each entity to the four
generic user tasks the bibliographic record is intended to support, showing the
10
Chapter 7 uses the mapping in Chapter 6 as the frame of reference for the study
groups recommendations regarding basic data requirements for national
bibliographic records.
The report also contains an appendix that correlates the logical attributes defined in
Chapter 4 with the data elements defined in the ISBDs, the Guidelines for Authority and
Reference Entries, and the UNIMARC Manual.
11
3.
ENTITIES
3.1
Overview
The entities that have been defined for this study represent the key objects of interest to
users of bibliographic data. The entities have been divided into three groups. The first
group comprises the products of intellectual or artistic endeavour that are named or
described in bibliographic records: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The
second group comprises those entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content,
the physical production and dissemination, or the custodianship of such products: person
and corporate body. The third group comprises an additional set of entities that serve as
the subjects of intellectual or artistic endeavour: concept, object, event, and place.
Sections 3.1.1 through 3.1.3 present the entities in each of the three groups in a simplified
schematic form, depicting the underlying relationships between each of the entity types.
Sections 3.2.1 through 3.2.10 provide a more detailed explanation of each of the entities
defined in the model.
Chapter 5 (sections 5.2.1 through 5.2.3) provides a more detailed explanation of the
relationships between the different types of entities that are depicted in the entityrelationship diagrams in sections 3.1.1. through 3.1.3.
3.1.1
The entities in the first group (as depicted in Figure 3.1) represent the different aspects of
user interests in the products of intellectual or artistic endeavour. The entities defined as
work (a distinct intellectual or artistic creation) and expression (the intellectual or artistic
realization of a work) reflect intellectual or artistic content. The entities defined as
manifestation (the physical embodiment of an expression of a work) and item (a single
exemplar of a manifestation), on the other hand, reflect physical form.
The relationships depicted in the diagram indicate that a work may be realized through
one or more than one expression (hence the double arrow on the line that links work to
expression). An expression, on the other hand, is the realization of one and only one work
(hence the single arrow on the reverse direction of that line linking expression to work).
An expression may be embodied in one or more than one manifestation; likewise a
manifestation may embody one or more than one expression. A manifestation, in turn,
13
may be exemplified by one or more than one item; but an item may exemplify one and
only one manifestation.
3.1.2
The entities in the second group (outlined in bold in Figure 3.2) represent those
responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, the physical production and
dissemination, or the custodianship of the entities in the first group. The entities in the
second group include person (an individual) and corporate body (an organization or
group of individuals and/or organizations).
The diagram depicts the type of responsibility relationships that exist between entities
in the second group and the entities in the first group. The diagram indicates that a work
may be created by one or more than one person and/or one or more than one corporate
body. Conversely, a person or a corporate body may create one or more than one work.
An expression may be realized by one or more than one person and/or corporate body;
and a person or corporate body may realize one or more than one expression. A
manifestation may be produced by one or more than one person or corporate body; a
person or corporate body may produce one or more than one manifestation. An item may
be owned by one or more than one person and/or corporate body; a person or corporate
body may own one or more than one item.
14
15
16
3.1.3
The entities in the third group (outlined in bold in Figure 3.3) represent an additional set
of entities that serve as the subjects of works. The group includes concept (an abstract
notion or idea), object (a material thing), event (an action or occurrence), and place (a
location).
The diagram depicts the subject relationships between entities in the third group and
the work entity in the first group. The diagram indicates that a work may have as its
subject one or more than one concept, object, event, and/or place. Conversely, a concept,
object, event, and/or place may be the subject of one or more than one work.
The diagram also depicts the subject relationships between work and the entities in the
first and second groups. The diagram indicates that a work may have as its subject one or
more than one work, expression, manifestation, item, person, and/or corporate body.
3.2
The Entities
3.2.1
Work
The first entity defined in the model is work: a distinct intellectual or artistic creation.
A work is an abstract entity; there is no single material object one can point to as the
work. We recognize the work through individual realizations or expressions of the work,
but the work itself exists only in the commonality of content between and among the
various expressions of the work. When we speak of Homers Iliad as a work, our point of
reference is not a particular recitation or text of the work, but the intellectual creation that
lies behind all the various expressions of the work.
Because the notion of a work is abstract, it is difficult to define precise boundaries for the
entity. The concept of what constitutes a work and where the line of demarcation lies
between one work and another may in fact be viewed differently from one culture to
another. Consequently the bibliographic conventions established by various cultures or
national groups may differ in terms of the criteria they use for determining the boundaries
between one work and another.
For the purposes of this study variant texts incorporating revisions or updates to an earlier
text are viewed simply as expressions of the same work (i.e., the variant texts are not
viewed as separate works). Similarly, abridgements or enlargements of an existing text,
or the addition of parts or an accompaniment to a musical composition are considered to
be different expressions of the same work. Translations from one language to another,
17
musical transcriptions and arrangements, and dubbed or subtitled versions of a film are
also considered simply as different expressions of the same original work.
Examples
w1 Henry Grays Anatomy of the human body
e1 text and illustrations for the first edition
e2 text and illustrations for the second edition
e3 text and illustrations for the third edition
.
w1 J. S. Bachs The art of the fugue
e1 the composers score for organ
e2 an arrangement for chamber orchestra by Anthony Lewis
.
w1 Jules et Jim (motion picture)
e1 the original French language version
e2 the original with English subtitles added
.
By contrast, when the modification of a work involves a significant degree of
independent intellectual or artistic effort, the result is viewed, for the purpose of this
study, as a new work. Thus paraphrases, rewritings, adaptations for children, parodies,
musical variations on a theme and free transcriptions of a musical composition are
considered to represent new works. Similarly, adaptations of a work from one literary or
art form to another (e.g., dramatizations, adaptations from one medium of the graphic arts
to another, etc.) are considered to represent new works. Abstracts, digests and summaries
are also considered to represent new works.
Examples
w1 John Bunyans The pilgrims progress
w2 an anonymous adaptation of The pilgrims progress for young readers
.
18
3.2.2
Expression
The second entity defined in the model is expression: the intellectual or artistic
realization of a work in the form of alpha-numeric, musical, or choreographic notation,
sound, image, object, movement, etc., or any combination of such forms.
An expression is the specific intellectual or artistic form that a work takes each time it is
realized. Expression encompasses, for example, the specific words, sentences,
paragraphs, etc. that result from the realization of a work in the form of a text, or the
particular sounds, phrasing, etc. resulting from the realization of a musical work. The
boundaries of the entity expression are defined, however, so as to exclude aspects of
physical form, such as typeface and page layout, that are not integral to the intellectual or
artistic realization of the work as such. When an expression is accompanied by
19
augmentations, such as illustrations, notes, glosses, etc. that are not integral to the
intellectual or artistic realization of the work, such augmentations are considered to be
separate expressions of their own separate work(s). Such augmentations may, or may
not, be considered significant enough to warrant distinct bibliographic identification.
Inasmuch as the form of expression is an inherent characteristic of the expression, any
change in form (e.g., from alpha-numeric notation to spoken word) results in a new
expression. Similarly, changes in the intellectual conventions or instruments that are
employed to express a work (e.g., translation from one language to another) result in the
production of a new expression. If a text is revised or modified, the resulting expression
is considered to be a new expression. Minor changes, such as corrections of spelling and
punctuation, etc., may be considered as variations within the same expression.
Examples
w1 Ellwangers Tennis--bis zum Turnierspieler
e1 the original German text
e2 the English translation by Wendy Gill
.
w1 Franz Schuberts Trout quintet
e1 the composers notated music
e2 the musical work as performed by Rosina Lhevinne, piano,
Stuart Sankey, double bass, and members of the Juilliard
String Quartet
e3 the musical work as performed by Jrg Demus, piano, and
the members of the Collegium Aureum
e4 the musical work as performed by Emanuel Ax, piano,
members of the Guarneri String Quartet, and Julius Levine,
double bass
.
Defining expression as an entity in the model gives us a means of reflecting the
distinctions in intellectual or artistic content that may exist between one realization and
another of the same work. With expression defined as an entity, we can describe the
intellectual or artistic attributes of a particular realization of a work, and use the
differences in those attributes to signal differences in intellectual or artistic content.
Defining expression as an entity also enables us to draw relationships between specific
expressions of a work. We can use the entity called expression to identify, for example,
the specific text on which a translation is based, or the specific score used for the
performance of a musical composition.
20
We can also use the entity defined as expression to indicate that the intellectual or artistic
content embodied in one manifestation is in fact the same, or substantially the same, as
that embodied in another manifestation. If two manifestations embody the same or almost
the same intellectual or artistic content, even though the physical embodiment may differ
and differing attributes of the manifestations may obscure the fact that the content is
similar in both, we can make the common link through the entity defined as expression.
On a practical level, the degree to which bibliographic distinctions are made between
variant expressions of a work will depend to some extent on the nature of the work itself,
and on the anticipated needs of users and on what the cataloguer can reasonably be
expected to recognize from the manifestation being described. Differences in form of
expression (e.g., the differences between the expression of a work in the form of
musical notation and the expression of the same work in the form of recorded sound) will
normally be reflected in the bibliographic record, no matter what the nature of the work
itself may be. Variant expressions in the same form (e.g., revised versions of a text) will
often be indirectly identified as different expressions because the variation is apparent
from the data associated with an attribute used to identify the manifestation in which the
expression is embodied (e.g., an edition statement). Variations that would be evident
only from a more detailed analysis and comparison of expressions (e.g., variations
between several of the early texts of Shakespeare's Hamlet) would normally be reflected
in the data only if the nature or stature of the work warranted such analysis, and only if it
was anticipated that the distinction would be important to users.
Variations within substantially the same expression (e.g., slight variations that can be
noticed between two states of the same edition in the case of hand press production)
would normally be ignored or, in specialized catalogues, be reflected as a note within the
bibliographic record for the manifestation. However, for some applications of the model
(e.g., early texts of rare manuscripts), each variation may be viewed as a different
expression.
3.2.3
Manifestation
The third entity defined in the model is manifestation: the physical embodiment of an
expression of a work.
The entity defined as manifestation encompasses a wide range of materials, including
manuscripts, books, periodicals, maps, posters, sound recordings, films, video recordings,
CD-ROMs, multimedia kits, etc. As an entity, manifestation represents all the physical
objects that bear the same characteristics, in respect to both intellectual content and
physical form.
When a work is realized, the resulting expression of the work may be physically
embodied on or in a medium such as paper, audio tape, video tape, canvas, plaster, etc.
That physical embodiment constitutes a manifestation of the work. In some cases there
may be only a single physical exemplar produced of that manifestation of the work (e.g.,
21
an authors manuscript, a tape recorded for an oral history archive, an original oil
painting, etc.). In other cases there are multiple copies produced in order to facilitate
public dissemination or distribution. In those cases there is normally a more formal
production process involved, and a publisher, producer, or distributor takes responsibility
for the process. In other cases there may be only a limited number of copies made of an
original exemplar for purposes such as private study (e.g., a dubbing of an original
recording of a piece of music), or preservation (e.g., a photocopy produced on permanent
paper of an authors original typescript). Whether the scope of production is broad (e.g.,
in the case of publication, etc.) or limited (e.g., in the case of copies made for private
study, etc.), the set of copies produced in each case constitutes a manifestation. All copies
produced that form part of the same set are considered to be copies of the same
manifestation.
The boundaries between one manifestation and another are drawn on the basis of both
intellectual content and physical form. When the production process involves changes in
physical form the resulting product is considered a new manifestation. Changes in
physical form include changes affecting display characteristics (e.g., a change in
typeface, size of font, page layout, etc.), changes in physical medium (e.g., a change from
paper to microfilm as the medium of conveyance), and changes in the container (e.g., a
change from cassette to cartridge as the container for a tape). Where the production
process involves a publisher, producer, distributor, etc., and there are changes signaled in
the product that are related to publication, marketing, etc. (e.g., a change in publisher,
repackaging, etc.), the resulting product may be considered a new manifestation.
Whenever the production process involves modifications, additions, deletions, etc. that
affect the intellectual or artistic content, the result is a new manifestation embodying a
new expression of the work.
Examples
w1 Harry Lindgrens Geometric dissections
e1 original text entitled Geometric dissections
m1 the book published in 1964 by Van Nostrand
e2 revised text entitled Recreational problems in geometric
dissections ....
m1 the book published in 1972 by Dover
w1 J. S. Bachs Six suites for unaccompanied cello
e1 performances by Janos Starker recorded partly in 1963 and
completed in 1965
m1 recordings released on 33 1/3 rpm sound discs in
1966 by Mercury
22
23
appropriate to their physical needs and constraints, and to identify and acquire a copy of
that manifestation.
Defining manifestation as an entity also enables us to draw relationships between specific
manifestations of a work. We can use the relationships between manifestations to
identify, for example, the specific publication that was used to create a
microreproduction.
3.2.4
Item
The fourth entity defined in the model is item: a single exemplar of a manifestation.
The entity defined as item is a concrete entity. It is in many instances a single physical
object (e.g., a copy of a one-volume monograph, a single audio cassette, etc.). There are
instances, however, where the entity defined as item comprises more than one physical
object (e.g., a monograph issued as two separately bound volumes, a recording issued on
three separate compact discs, etc.).
In terms of intellectual content and physical form, an item exemplifying a manifestation
is normally the same as the manifestation itself. However, variations may occur from one
item to another, even when the items exemplify the same manifestation, where those
variations are the result of actions external to the intent of the producer of the
manifestation (e.g., damage occurring after the item was produced, binding performed by
a library, etc.).
Examples
w1 Ronald Haymans Playback
e1 the authors text edited for publication
m1 the book published in 1973 by Davis-Poynter
i1 copy autographed by the author
w1 Allan Wakemans Jabberwocky
e1 the authors design for the game and text for the notes
m1 the game and accompanying notes for teachers
issued in 1974 by Longman
i1 copy lacking notes for teachers
Defining item as an entity enables us to separately identify individual copies of a
manifestation, and to describe those characteristics that are unique to that particular copy
and that pertain to transactions such as circulation, etc. involving that copy.
24
Defining the entity called item also enables us to draw relationships between individual
copies of manifestations.
3.2.5
Person
3.2.6
Corporate Body
The sixth entity defined in the model is corporate body: an organization or group of
individuals and/or organizations acting as a unit.
The entity defined as corporate body encompasses organizations and groups of
individuals and/or organizations that are identified by a particular name, including
occasional groups and groups that are constituted as meetings, conferences, congresses,
expeditions, exhibitions, festivals, fairs, etc. The entity also encompasses organizations
that act as territorial authorities, exercising or claiming to exercise government functions
over a certain territory, such as a federation, a state, a region, a local municipality, etc.
25
The entity encompasses organizations and groups that are defunct as well as those that
continue to operate.
Examples
cb1 Museum of American Folk Art
cb2 BBC Symphony Orchestra
cb3 Symposium on Glaucoma
cb4 Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton
.
For the purposes of this study corporate bodies are treated as entities only to the extent
that they are involved in the creation or realization of a work (e.g., as the sponsors or
endorsers of a work, etc.), or are the subject of a work (e.g., as the subject of a history,
etc.).
Defining the entity corporate body enables us to name and identify the organization or
group in a consistent manner, independently of how the name of the organization or
group appears on or in any particular expression or manifestation of a work.
Defining corporate body as an entity also enables us to draw relationships between a
specific corporate body and a work or expression of a work for which that corporate
body may be responsible, or between a work and the corporate body that is the subject of
the work.
3.2.7
Concept
The seventh entity defined in the model is concept: an abstract notion or idea.
The entity defined as concept encompasses a comprehensive range of abstractions that
may be the subject of a work: fields of knowledge, disciplines, schools of thought
(philosophies, religions, political ideologies, etc.), theories, processes, techniques,
practices, etc. A concept may be broad in nature or narrowly defined and precise.
26
Examples
c1 Economics
c2 Romanticism
c3 Hydroponics
c4 Supply-side economics
.
For the purposes of this study concepts are treated as entities only to the extent that they
are the subject of a work (e.g., as the subject of a philosophical treatise, of a critique of a
school of thought, etc.). Defining the entity concept enables us to name and identify the
concept in a consistent manner, independently of the presence, absence, or form of the
name for that concept that appears on or in any particular expression or manifestation of a
work.
Defining concept as an entity also enables us to draw a relationship between a work and
the concept that is the subject of the work.
3.2.8
Object
27
Defining the entity object enables us to name and identify the object in a consistent
manner, independently of the presence, absence, or form of the name for that object that
appears on or in any particular expression or manifestation of a work.
Defining object as an entity also enables us to draw a relationship between a work and the
object that is the subject of the work.
3.2.9
Event
3.2.10 Place
The tenth entity defined in the model is place: a location.
The entity defined as place encompasses a comprehensive range of locations: terrestrial
and extra-terrestrial; historical and contemporary; geographic features and geo-political
jurisdictions.
28
Examples
pl1 Howard Beach
pl2 The Alacran Reef
pl3 Morey Peak Wilderness Study Area
pl4 Bristol
.
For the purposes of this study places are treated as entities only to the extent that they are
the subject of a work (e.g., the subject of a map or atlas, or of a travel guide, etc.).
Defining the entity place enables us to name and identify the place in a consistent
manner, independently of the presence, absence, or form of the name for that place that
appears on or in any particular expression or manifestation of a work.
Defining place as an entity also enables us to draw a relationship between a work and the
place that is the subject of the work.
3.3
The examples used in sections 3.2.1 through 3.2.4 to illustrate the entities work,
expression, manifestation, and item showed the entities primarily as integral units (e.g.,
Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet as an example of a work, a particular performance of
Schuberts Trout quintet as an expression, etc.). The structure of the model, however,
permits us to represent aggregate and component entities in the same way as we would
represent entities that are viewed as integral units. That is to say that from a logical
perspective the entity work, for example, may represent an aggregate of individual works
brought together by an editor or compiler in the form of an anthology, a set of individual
monographs brought together by a publisher to form a series, or a collection of private
papers organized by an archive as a single fond. By the same token, the entity work may
represent an intellectually or artistically discrete component of a larger work, such as a
chapter of a report, a segment of a map, an article in a journal, etc. For the purposes of
the model, entities at the aggregate or component level operate in the same way as
entities at the integral unit level; they are defined in the same terms, they share the same
characteristics, and they are related to one another in the same way as entities at the
integral unit level. Sections 5.3.1.1., 5.3.2.1, 5.3.4.1, and 5.3.6.1 provide additional
information on aggregate and component entities in the context of whole/part
relationships.
29
Examples
w1 Robertson Davies The Deptford trilogy
w1.1 Robertson Davies Fifth business
w1.2 Robertson Davies The manticore
w1.3 Robertson Davies World of wonders
w1 Visible speech, edited by Howard Bibb
w1.1 Volume 1: Segmentals, introduced by Alex Hanes-White
w1.2
30
4.
ATTRIBUTES
4.1
Attributes of Entities
Each of the entities defined in the model has associated with it a set of characteristics or
attributes. The attributes of the entity serve as the means by which users formulate
queries and interpret responses when seeking information about a particular entity.
Attributes, as they are defined in the model, generally fall into two broad categories.
There are, on the one hand, attributes that are inherent in an entity, and on the other, those
that are externally imputed. The first category includes not only physical characteristics
(e.g., the physical medium and dimensions of an object) but also features that might be
characterized as labeling information (e.g., statements appearing on the title page, cover,
or container). The second category includes assigned identifiers for an entity (e.g., a
thematic catalogue number for a musical composition), and contextual information (e.g.,
the political context in which a work was conceived). Attributes inherent in an entity can
usually be determined by examining the entity itself; those that are imputed often require
reference to an external source.
A given instance of an entity will generally exhibit only one value for each attribute (e.g.,
the value for the physical medium attribute of a particular object may be plastic). In
some cases, however, a given instance of an entity may have multiple values for a single
attribute (e.g., a book may contain more than one statement indicating the title of the
manifestation). There are also cases where the value for an attribute of a given instance
of an entity may change over time (e.g., the extent of the carrier for a serial will change
as new volumes are issued). The value for an attribute (particularly an imputed attribute)
of a given entity may sometimes be subject to variation, depending on the source that is
used as a point of reference.
The attributes defined for each of the entities in the model will not necessarily be
exhibited by all instances of that particular entity type. In the list of attributes for each
entity, those that are generally applicable to the entity type as a whole are listed first.
Those that are applicable only to a sub-type of the entity are listed after those that are
generally applicable, and are qualified by a term indicating the sub type to which they
apply (e.g., musical work as a sub-type of work). However, not every instance of an
entity type nor every instance of an entity sub-type will exhibit all the attributes listed.
At first glance certain of the attributes defined in the model may appear to duplicate
objects of interest that have been separately defined in the model as entities and linked to
the entity in question through relationships. For example, the manifestation attribute
31
statement of responsibility may appear to parallel the entities person and corporate
body and the responsibility relationships that link those entities with the work and/or
expression embodied in the manifestation. However, the attribute defined as statement
of responsibility pertains directly to the labeling information appearing in the
manifestation itself, as distinct from the relationship between the work contained in the
manifestation and the person and/or corporate body responsible for the creation or
realization of the work. In many cases the information presented in the statement of
responsibility will be substantively the same as that which is reflected through the
relationships between the work and/or expression and the person and/or corporate body
responsible. However, the information may not always be the same. In drawing
responsibility relationships to the entities person and corporate body it is possible to
correct false or misleading information presented in a statement of responsibility or to
expand on that information. Using the responsibility relationship to the entities person
and corporate body also provides a means of identifying the person or corporate body in
a consistent way irrespective of the way in which that person or corporate body is
identified in the statement of responsibility in that particular manifestation.
The model does not, however, parallel entity relationships with attributes in all cases
where such parallels could be drawn. For example, place of publication/distribution is
defined as an attribute of the manifestation to reflect the statement appearing in the
manifestation itself that indicates where it was published. Inasmuch as the model also
defines place as an entity it would have been possible to define an additional relationship
linking the entity place either directly to the manifestation or indirectly through the
entities person and corporate body which in turn are linked through the production
relationship to the manifestation. To produce a fully developed data model further
definition of that kind would be appropriate. But for the purposes of this study it was
deemed unnecessary to have the conceptual model reflect all such possibilities. In cases
such as the place of publication example it was considered sufficient simply to define an
attribute to reflect labeling information as such without taking the analysis further to
delineate a parallel entity relationship. Parallel delineation was done only in cases where
it seemed warranted by the need to provide for controlled or normalized access to the
information reflected in the attribute.
The attributes defined for the study were derived from a logical analysis of the data that
are typically reflected in bibliographic records. The principal sources used in the analysis
included the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBDs), the Guidelines
for Authority and Reference Entries (GARE), the Guidelines for Subject Authority and
Reference Entries (GSARE), and the UNIMARC Manual. Additional data were culled
from other sources such as the AITF Categories for the Description of Works of Art, from
input provided by experts who were consulted as drafts of the report were being prepared,
from an extensive review of published user studies, and from comments received as part
of the world-wide review of the draft report. The scope of attributes included in the
model is intended to be comprehensive but not exhaustive.
For the purposes of this study attributes have been defined at a logical level. That is to
say that attributes have been expressed in terms of the characteristics of an entity as they
might be viewed by a user, rather than as specific data elements defined by those
32
responsible for compiling bibliographic data. In some cases the logical attribute parallels
an individual data element (e.g., the logical attribute manifestation identifier has been
defined in a way that parallels the definition of standard number (or alternative) in the
ISBD(G)). But in most cases the logical attribute represents an aggregate of discrete data
elements (e.g., the logical attribute defined as title of the manifestation encompasses
several ISBD data elements: title proper (including number/name of part), parallel title,
notes giving variant and transliterated titles, and key title). The descriptions of the logical
attributes that are given in this chapter provide an indication of the scope of each logical
attribute. Appendix A provides a detailed mapping of the logical attributes defined in the
model to individual data elements in the ISBDs, the Guidelines for Authority and
Reference Entries (GARE), the Guidelines for Subject Authority and Reference Entries
(GSARE), and the UNIMARC Manual.
For the purposes of this study, the logical attributes for the entities person, corporate
body, concept, object, event, and place include only those that are conventionally
displayed as part of the bibliographic record per se. Additional logical attributes that
might be reflected in an authority record are not included.
4.2
Attributes of a Work
The logical attributes of a work defined for this study are the following:
title of the work
form of work
date of the work
other distinguishing characteristic
intended termination
intended audience
context for the work
medium of performance (musical work)
numeric designation (musical work)
key (musical work)
coordinates (cartographic work)
equinox (cartographic work)
4.2.1
The title of the work is the word, phrase, or group of characters naming the work. There
may be one or more titles associated with a work. If the work has appeared under varying
titles (differing in form, language, etc.), a bibliographic agency normally selects one of
those titles as the basis of a uniform title for purposes of consistency in naming and
referencing the work. Other titles under which the work has appeared may be treated as
variant titles for the work, or in some cases as a parallel uniform title. The title of a work
33
that forms part of a larger work may consist solely of a number or other generic
designation that is dependent on the title of the larger work.
4.2.2
Form of Work
The form of work is the class to which the work belongs (e.g., novel, play, poem, essay,
biography, symphony, concerto, sonata, map, drawing, painting, photograph, etc.).
4.2.3
The date of the work is the date (normally the year) the work was originally created. The
date may be a single date or a range of dates. In the absence of an ascertainable date of
creation, the date of the work may be associated with the date of its first publication or
release.
4.2.4
4.2.5
Intended Termination
Intended termination of a work is a reflection of whether the work has been conceived as
having a finite end or whether it is intended to continue indefinitely.
4.2.6
Intended Audience
The intended audience of the work is the class of user for which the work is intended, as
defined by age group (e.g., children, young adults, adults, etc.), educational level (e.g.,
primary, secondary, etc.), or other categorization.
4.2.7
Context is the historical, social, intellectual, artistic, or other context within which the
work was originally conceived (e.g., the 17th century restoration of the monarchy in
England, the aesthetic movement of the late 19th century, etc.).
34
4.2.8
4.2.9
4.3
Attributes of an Expression
The logical attributes of an expression defined for this study are the following:
title of the expression
form of expression
date of expression
language of expression
other distinguishing characteristic
extensibility of expression
revisability of expression
extent of the expression
summarization of content
35
4.3.1
Title of the expression is a word, phrase, or group of characters naming the expression.
There may be one or more titles associated with an expression. The title of an expression
that forms part of a larger expression may consist solely of a number or other generic
designation that is dependent on the title of the larger expression.
4.3.2
Form of Expression
The form of expression is the means by which the work is realized (e.g., through alphanumeric notation, musical notation, spoken word, musical sound, cartographic image,
photographic image, sculpture, dance, mime, etc.).
4.3.3
Date of Expression
The date of expression is the date the expression was created (e.g., the date the particular
text of a work was written or revised, the date a song was performed, etc.). The date may
be a single date or a range of dates. In the absence of an ascertainable date of expression,
the date of the expression may be associated with the date of its publication or release.
4.3.4
Language of Expression
The language of the expression is the language in which the work is expressed.
The language of the expression may comprise a number of languages, each pertaining to
an individual component of the expression.
36
4.3.5
4.3.6
Extensibility of Expression
Extensibility reflects the expectation that the expression will have additional intellectual
or artistic content added to it (e.g., an expression that is completed one part at a time,
segment by segment, issue by issue, etc.).
4.3.7
Revisability of Expression
Revisability reflects the expectation that the intellectual or artistic content of the
expression will be revised (e.g., a draft or interim report, a directory that is expected to be
updated periodically).
4.3.8
4.3.9
Summarization of Content
37
38
39
4.4
Attributes of a Manifestation
The logical attributes of a manifestation defined for this study are the following:
title of the manifestation
statement of responsibility
edition/issue designation
place of publication/distribution
publisher/distributor
date of publication/distribution
fabricator/manufacturer
series statement
form of carrier
extent of the carrier
physical medium
capture mode
dimensions of the carrier
manifestation identifier
source for acquisition/access authorization
terms of availability
access restrictions on the manifestation
typeface (printed book)
type size (printed book)
foliation (hand-printed book)
collation (hand-printed book)
publication status (serial)
numbering (serial)
playing speed (sound recording)
groove width (sound recording)
kind of cutting (sound recording)
tape configuration (sound recording)
kind of sound (sound recording)
special reproduction characteristic (sound recording)
colour (image)
reduction ratio (microform)
polarity (microform or visual projection)
generation (microform or visual projection)
presentation format (visual projection)
40
4.4.1
The title of the manifestation is the word, phrase, or group of characters naming the
manifestation. There may be one or more titles associated with a manifestation. Titles
associated with a manifestation include all those that appear in the manifestation itself
(e.g., the title on the title page, title frame, etc., a cover title, added title-page title, caption
title, running title, spine title, etc., the title in a colophon, explicit, etc., the title on a
container, on a microfiche header, etc.), as well as those that have been assigned to the
manifestation for purposes of bibliographic control (e.g., key title, expanded title,
translated title, supplied title, etc.).
4.4.2
Statement of Responsibility
4.4.3
Edition/Issue Designation
The edition or issue designation of the manifestation is a word or phrase appearing in the
manifestation that normally indicates a difference in either content or form between the
manifestation and a related manifestation previously issued by the same
publisher/distributor (e.g., second edition, version 2.0, etc.), or simultaneously issued by
either the same publisher/distributor or another publisher/distributor (e.g., large print
edition, British edition, etc.). The edition/issue designation pertains to all copies of a
41
manifestation produced from substantially the same master and issued by the same
publisher/distributor or group of publishers/distributors.
4.4.4
Place of Publication/Distribution
4.4.5
Publisher/Distributor
4.4.6
Date of Publication/Distribution
4.4.7
Fabricator/Manufacturer
4.4.8
Series Statement
42
4.4.9
Form of Carrier
The form of carrier is the specific class of material to which the physical carrier of the
manifestation belongs (e.g., sound cassette, videodisc, microfilm cartridge, transparency,
etc.). The carrier for a manifestation comprising multiple physical components may
include more than one form (e.g., a filmstrip with an accompanying booklet, a separate
sound disc carrying the sound track for a film, etc.).
43
44
45
46
4.5
Attributes of an Item
The logical attributes of an item defined for this study are the following:
item identifier
fingerprint
provenance of the item
marks/inscriptions
exhibition history
condition of the item
treatment history
scheduled treatment
access restrictions on the item
Note: The attributes defined for the purposes of this study do not include those
associated with transactions of an ephemeral nature such as the circulation or processing
of an item.
4.5.1
Item Identifier
The item identifier is a number or code that is uniquely associated with the item, and
serves to differentiate that item from any other item in the same collection and/or
institution (e.g., call number, accession number, bar code, etc.). The number is normally
assigned by the institution that holds the item. The item identifier may also include a
name or code identifying the institution or repository in which the item is housed, and a
47
name or code identifying a particular collection or sub-unit within the institution (e.g., a
rare book collection, a branch library, etc.).
4.5.2
Fingerprint
4.5.3
4.5.4
Marks/inscriptions
4.5.5
Exhibition History
4.5.6
Condition of an item is the physical condition of the item, particularly any variances
between the physical makeup of the item and that of the manifestation it exemplifies
(e.g., missing pages, plates, etc.). Condition may reflect other aspects of the physical
condition of the item as well (e.g., brittleness, faded images, etc.).
4.5.7
Treatment History
The treatment history of an item is a record of the treatment the item has undergone (e.g.,
deacidification, restoration, etc.) Treatment history may also comprise details of the
treatment process (e.g., chemical solutions used, techniques applied, etc.), the date the
treatment was applied, etc.
48
4.5.8
Scheduled Treatment
The scheduled treatment of an item is a plan for future treatment of the item (e.g.,
chemical wash). Scheduled treatment may also comprise details of the planned treatment
process and the scheduled date of application.
4.5.9
Access restrictions on an item are any limitations placed on physical access to the item
(e.g., restricted to supervised on-site use, etc.).
4.6
Attributes of a Person
The logical attributes of a person defined for this study are the following:
name of person
dates of person
title of person
other designation associated with the person
4.6.1
Name of Person
The name of a person is the word, character, or group of words and/or characters by
which the person is known (e.g., Donald Horne, A. A. Milne, Ellery Queen, etc.). A
name may include one or more forenames (or given names), matronymics, patronymics,
family names (or surnames), sobriquets, dynastic names, etc. A person may be known by
more than one name, or by more than one form of the same name. A bibliographic
agency normally selects one of those names as the uniform heading for purposes of
consistency in naming and referencing the person. The other names or forms of name
may be treated as variant names for the person. In some cases (e.g., in the case of a
person who writes under more than one pseudonym, or a person who writes both in an
official capacity and as an individual) the bibliographic agency may establish more than
one uniform heading for the person.
4.6.2
Dates of Person
The dates associated with a person may include the precise or approximate date of the
persons birth and/or death, or dates indicating the period in which the person was known
to be active in a given field of endeavour.
49
4.6.3
Title of Person
The title of a person is a word or phrase indicative of rank, office, nobility, honour, etc.
(e.g., Major, Premier, Duke, etc.), or a term of address (Sir, Mrs., etc.) associated with the
person.
4.6.4
4.7
The logical attributes of a corporate body defined for this study are the following:
name of the corporate body
number associated with the corporate body
place associated with the corporate body
date associated with the corporate body
other designation associated with the corporate body
4.7.1
The name of a corporate body is the word, phrase, character, or group of words and/or
characters by which the body is known (e.g., Royal Aeronautical Society, IBM,
Sminaire europen sur la recherche en ducation, Friedrich Witte, etc.). A corporate
body may be known by more than one name, or more than one form of the same name. A
bibliographic agency normally selects one of those names as the uniform heading for
purposes of consistency in naming and referencing the corporate body. The other names
or forms of name may be treated as variant names for the corporate body. In some cases
(e.g., in the case where a corporate body is known by different names at different periods
in its history) the bibliographic agency may establish more than one uniform heading for
the corporate body.
4.7.2
Number associated with the corporate body is the numerical designation sequencing a
meeting, conference, exhibition, fair, etc. that constitutes one of a series of related
meetings, conferences, exhibitions, fairs, etc., or any other numerical designation
associated with a corporate body.
50
4.7.3
Place associated with the corporate body is the city, town, or other designation of
location in which a meeting, conference, exhibition, fair, etc. was held, or the location
with which the corporate body is otherwise associated (e.g., Los Angeles, Bretton
Woods, Oxford University, etc.). The place may comprise the name of the state,
province, territory, and/or country as well as the local place name.
4.7.4
Date associated with the corporate body is the date or range of dates on which a meeting,
conference, exhibition, fair, etc. was held, or a date with which the corporate body is
otherwise associated (e.g., the date of its incorporation).
4.7.5
4.8
Attributes of a Concept
The logical attributes of a concept defined for this study are the following:
term for the concept
4.8.1
The term for the concept is the word, phrase, or group of characters used to name or
designate the concept (e.g., economics, existentialism, radioactivity, etc.). A concept may
be designated by more than one term, or by more than one form of the term. A
bibliographic agency normally selects one of those terms as the uniform heading for
purposes of consistency in naming and referencing the concept. The other terms or forms
of term may be treated as variant terms for the concept.
51
4.9
Attributes of an Object
The logical attributes of an object defined for this study are the following:
term for the object
4.9.1
The term for the object is the word, phrase, or group of characters used to name or
designate the object (e.g., a building, a ship, etc.). An object may be designated by more
than one term, or by more than one form of the term. A bibliographic agency normally
selects one of those terms as the uniform heading for purposes of consistency in naming
and referencing the object. The other terms or forms of term may be treated as variant
terms for the object.
The logical attributes of an event defined for this study are the following:
term for the event
The logical attributes of a place defined for this study are the following:
term for the place
52
53
5.
RELATIONSHIPS
5.1
Various terms are used by creators and publishers of intellectual and artistic entities to
signal relationships between those entities. Terms such as "edition" and "version" are
frequently encountered on publications and other materials, as are statements such as
based on ... or translated from .... In many cases such terms or statements serve as a
signal to the cataloguer that a relationship should be reflected in the bibliographic record.
The problem with relying on commonly applied terms as a starting point for analyzing
bibliographic relationships is that those terms are neither clearly defined nor uniformly
applied. In this study relationships are examined in the context of the entities defined for
the model, i.e., they are analysed specifically as relationships that operate between one
work and another, between one expression and another, between a manifestation and an
item, etc.
In the context of the model, relationships serve as the vehicle for depicting the link
between one entity and another, and thus as the means of assisting the user to navigate
the universe that is represented in a bibliography, catalogue, or bibliographic database.
Typically the user will formulate a search query using one or more attributes of the entity
for which he or she is searching, and it is through the attribute that the user finds the
entity sought. The relationships reflected in the bibliographic record provide additional
information that assists the user in making connections between the entity found and
other entities that are related to that entity.
Relationships may be reflected in bibliographic records in a number of ways. Some
relationships, especially those depicted in the entity-relationship diagrams in Chapter 3
(Figures 3.1 through 3.3), are often reflected simply by concatenating attributes of one
entity with attributes of the related entity in a single record. For example, a record will
normally couple the attributes of a particular manifestation with the attributes of the
expression that is embodied in that manifestation and with the attributes of the work that
is realized through that expression. Relationships are also frequently reflected implicitly
by appending to the record a heading identifying a related entity. The relationship of the
work to the person or corporate body, for example, is normally reflected implicitly by
appending to the record a heading identifying the person or corporate body responsible
for the work. Relationships are sometimes reflected by layering attributes of one entity
with those of related entities (e.g., in a multi-level record describing both an aggregate
entity and its individual component entities). Relationships are also frequently made
explicit through the use of a note or similar device that indicates not only that a
relationship exists between the entity described in the record and another entity, but also
55
states specifically the nature of the relationship (e.g., Translated from the English text of
the 1891 edition).
It is important to bear in mind that for the purposes of this study a relationship is not
operative unless the entities on each side of the relationship are explicitly identified. For
example, "based on a play by Henrik Ibsen" does not operatively state a work-to-work
relationship; "based on Ghosts by Henrik Ibsen" does.
It is also important to note that within the entity-relationship model relationships can be
depicted either at the level at which they actually operate, or at a more general level when
the precise relationship cannot be easily determined. For example, a concordance to
Joyce's Finnegans Wake in reality will have been based on a particular embodiment (i.e.,
manifestation) of a particular text (i.e., expression); it may not be possible, if the precise
edition of the base text is unknown, to state the relationship of the concordance to the
particular expression and/or manifestation on which it is based. In that case it is possible
only to state the relationship of the concordance to Finnegans Wake (i.e., work). The
model therefore provides an option for certain kinds of relationships to be expressed at
either one of two levels.
The sections that follow describe the relationships used in the model and how they
function.
Sections 5.2 through 5.2.3 describe the logical relationships between entity types that are
shown on the high level entity-relationship diagrams in Chapter 3 (Figures 3.1 through
3.3). In the entity-relationship diagrams those relationships are shown simply to indicate
how at a generalized level the entities are connected with one another (i.e., how works are
connected with expressions, how they are connected with persons and corporate bodies,
how they are connected with concepts, objects, events, etc.; how expressions are
connected with manifestations, how they are connected with persons and corporate
bodies; etc.). At a more specific level, the same relationships are used to link a particular
expression with the work it realizes, a particular manifestation with the expression it
embodies, etc.
Sections 5.3 through 5.3.6.1 describe another set of relationships associated with the four
primary entities (work, expression, manifestation, and item) that operate more specifically
between designated instances of entities (e.g., between one work and another, between
two expressions of the same work, between an expression of one work and an expression
of another work, etc.).
5.2
The entity-relationship diagrams in Chapter 3 (Figures 3.1 through 3.3) show logical
relationships between entities at the highest level of generalization in the model. The
relationships depicted in the diagrams indicate simply how at a logical level the different
56
types of entities in the model are connected with one another (i.e., how works are
connected with expressions, how they are connected with persons and corporate bodies,
etc.). For example, the line labeled realized through that links work with expression
indicates in generalized terms that a work is realized through an expression.
As noted in Chapter 3 (sections 3.1.1 through 3.1.3), the entities in the model fall into
three groups. The primary group comprises the products of intellectual or artistic
endeavour: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group comprises those
entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, the production and
dissemination, or the custodianship of such products: person and corporate body. The
third group comprises an additional set of entities that together with the entities in the
first and second groups may serve as the subject of a work: concept, object, event, and
place.
5.2.1
The relationships depicted in Figure 3.1 that link work to expression, expression to
manifestation, and manifestation to item are central to the structure of the entityrelationship model. Each of the three primary relationships (i.e., the realized through
relationship connecting work and expression, the embodied in relationship connecting
expression and manifestation, and the exemplified by relationship connecting
manifestation and item) is unique and operates between only one pair of entities in the
model. In all three cases, in fact, the relationships reflected in the link are integral to the
definition of the entities involved in the relationship.
The first of those relationships indicates that a work is realized through expression.
Viewed from the reverse direction, the relationship indicates that an expression is a
realization of a work, which is in fact how expression is defined as an entity (the
intellectual or artistic realization of a work....). The logical connection between work
and expression, as reflected in the model through the relationship link, serves as the basis
both for identifying the work represented by an individual expression and for ensuring
that all expressions of a work are linked to the work. Indirectly the relationships between
a work and the various expressions of that work also serve to establish an implicit
sibling relationship between the various expressions of the work.
Example
w1 Charles Dickens A Christmas carol
e1 the authors original English text
e2 a Tamil translation by V. A. Venkatachari
.
57
and those two relationships subsequently carry through to the relationship from
manifestation to item. Thus when a relationship is made between an expression and a
manifestation that embodies the expression, the manifestation is at the same time
logically linked to the work that is realized through the expression, given that the
expression has been linked to the work it realizes.
5.2.2
The entities in the second group (person and corporate body) are linked to the first group
by four relationship types: the created by relationship that links both person and
corporate body to work; the realized by relationship that links the same two entities to
expression; the produced by relationship that links them to manifestation; and the
owned by relationship that links them to item.
The created by relationship may link a work to a person responsible for the creation of
the intellectual or artistic content of the work; it may also link a work to a corporate body
responsible for the work. The logical connection between a work and a related person or
corporate body serves as the basis both for identifying the person or corporate body
responsible for an individual work and for ensuring that all works by a particular person
or corporate body are linked to that person or corporate body.
Example
p1 Edmund Spenser
w1 The shepheardes calender
w2 The faerie queen
w3 Astrophel
.
The realized by relationship may link an expression to aperson or corporate body
responsible for the realization of a work. It is similar in function to the created by
relationship, but it implies a difference in the nature of the relationship that parallels the
difference between work and expression as entities. A person or corporate body
responsible for the intellectual or artistic content of a work is responsible for the
conception of the work as an abstract entity; a person or corporate body responsible for
the expression of the work is responsible for the specifics of the intellectual or artistic
realization or execution of the expression. The logical connection between an expression
and a related person or corporate body serves as the basis both for identifying the person
or corporate body responsible for an individual expression and for ensuring that all
expressions realized by a person or corporate body are linked to that person or corporate
body.
59
Example
cb1 The Tallis Scholars
e1 a 1980 performance of Allegris Miserere
e2 a 1986 performance of Josquins Missa pange lingua
e3 a 1989 performance of Lassus Missa osculetur me
.
The produced by relationship may link a manifestation to the person or corporate body
responsible for publishing, distributing, fabricating or manufacturing the manifestation.
The logical connection between a manifestation and a related person or corporate body
could serve as the basis both for identifying the person or corporate body responsible for
producing or disseminating a manifestation and for ensuring that all manifestations
produced or disseminated by a person or corporate body are linked to that person or
corporate body.
Example
cb1 Coach House Press
m1 the 1965 publication by Coach House Press of Wayne
Cliffords Man in a window
m2 the 1966 publication by Coach House Press of Joe
Rosenblatts The LSD Leacock
m3 the 1966 publication by Coach House Press of Henry
Beissels New wings for Icarus
.
The owned by relationship may link an item to the person or corporate body that is the
owner or custodian of the item. The logical connection between an item and a related
person or corporate body could serve as the basis both for identifying the person or
corporate body that owns or has custodianship of an item and for ensuring that all items
owned by or in the custodianship of a particular person or corporate body are linked to
that person or corporate body.
Example
cb1 Princeton University Library
i1 a copy of the Penkill Proofs of D. G. Rossettis Poems
printed in August 1869, with manuscript annotations by the
60
author
i2 a copy of the A Proofs of D. G. Rossettis Poems printed
in September 1869, with manuscript annotations by the
author
.
5.2.3
Subject Relationships
The entities in all three groups are connected to the work entity by a subject relationship.
The has as subject relationship indicates that any of the entities in the model, including
work itself, may be the subject of a work. Stated in slightly different terms, the
relationship indicates that a work may be about a concept, an object, an event, or place; it
may be about a person or corporate body; it may be about an expression, a manifestation,
or an item; it may be about another work. The logical connection between a work and a
related subject entity serves as the basis both for identifying the subject of an individual
work and for ensuring that all works relevant to a given subject are linked to that subject.
Example
c1 Romanticism
w1 Morse Peckhams Beyond the Tragic Vision
w2 Romanticism reconsidered, edited by Northrop Frye
.
5.3
Tables 5.1 through 5.11 give an overview of additional relationships between group 1
entities that were not depicted on the high level entity-relationship diagram in Figure 3.1.
They identify the major types of relationships that operate between instances of the same
entity type or between instances of different entity types, and they include examples of
specific kinds of entities that are typically involved in each type of relationship, but they
are not meant to be exhaustive. In order to facilitate the description of the relationships,
specific relationships have been grouped into logical relationship types, and each group
has been given a relationship type name. The primary goal of this study, however, is not
to provide higher level groupings for relationships, but rather to describe the nature of
bibliographic relationships by "deconstructing" conventional terms and categories, and to
show how the relationships operate in the context of the four primary entities in the
model (i.e., work, expression, manifestation, and item).
61
The tables (as illustrated below) are set up to show in the left-hand column the various
types of relationships that operate between the entity types specified in the heading for
each table (in this case manifestation-to-manifestation). For each relationship type there
is a pair of relationship statements formulated as they would appear in an entityrelationship diagram. The first statement in the pair indicates the relationship as it would
be drawn from the first entity to the second entity; the second indicates the reciprocal
relationship as it would be drawn from the second entity to the first entity. The column to
the right lists examples of the kinds of entities that would typically occupy the position of
the second entity in each relationship type.
Manifestation-to-Manifestation Relationships
Relationship Type
Reproduction
Manifestation
Reproduction
Microreproduction
Macroreproduction
Reprint
Photo-offset reprint
Facsimile
has a reproduction
is a reproduction of
In the table illustrated above, under the relationship type labeled as reproduction, the
first statement (has a reproduction ) indicates the relationship as it would be drawn from
the first manifestation in the relationship to the second manifestation in the relationship.
In this case the second manifestation would typically be one of the kinds of entities listed
in the right-hand column (a microreproduction, reprint, facsimile, etc.) The reciprocal
relationship statement ( is a reproduction of) indicates the relationship as it would be
drawn from the second manifestation (i.e., from the microreproduction, reprint, facsimile,
etc.) to the first manifestation (i.e., the manifestation that has been reproduced).
Expanding on the notation that has been used in the examples to reflect the implicit
relationships between a work, an expression, a manifestation, and an item, the
relationship in the table above would be illustrated by example as follows:
m1 [first manifestation]
has a reproduction
is a reproduction of
m2 [second manifestation]
In some tables there is only one column of examples; in others the entities have been
divided into two categories (e.g., dependent and independent) and there are two columns
of examples. The reasons for subdividing the examples in some instances into two
categories, and the distinctions between the categories, are explained in the sections that
follow.
62
5.3.1
Work-to-Work Relationships
Referential Work
Autonomous Work
has a successor
is a successor to
Sequel
Sequel
Succeeding work
Supplement
Index
Concordance
Teacher's guide
Gloss
Supplement
Appendix
Supplement
Appendix
Cadenza
Libretto
Choreography
Ending for unfinished work
Incidental music
Musical setting for a text
Pendant
Successor
has a supplement
supplements
Complement
has a complement
complements
Summarization
Digest
Abstract
has a summary
is a summary of
Adaptation
Adaptation
Paraphrase
Free translation
Variation (music)
Harmonization (music)
Fantasy (music)
has adaptation
is an adaptation of
Transformation
Dramatization
Novelization
Versification
Screenplay
has a transformation
is a transformation of
Imitation
Parody
Imitation
Travesty
has an imitation
is an imitation of
A basic premise of the work-to-work relationship is that two different works have been
recognized to exist; that is, the intellectual or artistic content of one work has been judged
sufficiently different from the other to constitute a separate work.
Among the work-to-work relationships shown in Table 5.1 there are two categories:
those involving a work that is referential in nature, and those involving autonomous
works. A referential work is one that is so closely connected to the other work in the
63
relationship that it has little value outside the context of that other work. An autonomous
work is one that does not require reference to the other work in the relationship in order to
be useful or understood.
The centre column in Table 5.1 labeled "referential work" shows the different kinds of
works that will have little use or meaning without reference to the other work in the
relationship. Within this category fall sequels that depend on the preceding work in order
to be understood, indexes and concordances to a work, cadenzas, etc.
Example
w1 Homers Iliad
has a concordance
is a concordance to
w2 G. L. Prendergasts A complete concordance to the Iliad of Homer
The right-hand column of Table 5.1 labeled autonomous work" shows different kinds of
works that have a relationship to another work, but which can be used and understood
without reference to the other work. Within this category fall autonomous successors and
supplements, as well as abstracts, adaptations, dramatizations, parodies, etc.
Example
w1 W. A. Mozarts Don Giovanni
has an adaptation
is an adaptation of
w2 Joseph Loseys film Don Giovanni
w1 Ordnance Survey map of Wales
has an adaptation
is an adaptation of
w2 Map of administrative areas in Wales
Three types of relationships cut across the referential and autonomous categories:
successor, supplement, and complement. The successor type of relationship involves a
kind of linear progression of content from one work to the other. In some cases, the
content of the successor may be closely connected to the content of the preceding work,
which would result in a work that is referential. In others, such as with loosely connected
parts of a trilogy, the successor will be autonomous. Serial publications that result from
the merger or split of their predecessors and stand on their own without requiring
64
reference to the predecessor are also examples of autonomous works that fall within the
successor relationship type.
Example
w1 The British journal of social and clinical psychology
is continued in part by
continues in part
w2 The British journal of social psychology
The supplement relationship type involves works that are intended to be used in
conjunction with another work. Some of these, such as indices, concordances, teachers
guides, glosses, and instruction manuals for electronic resources will be so closely
associated with the content of the related work that they are useless without the other
work. Such works are by definition referential. Supplements and appendices also
frequently fall within the referential category, but if they can be used without reference to
the related work they fall within the autonomous category.
Example
w1 Annual report of the Librarian of Congress
has a supplement
is a supplement to
w2 The Library of Congress Quarterly journal of current acquisitions
The third relationship type, complement, involves works that are intended to be combined
with or inserted into the related work. In other words, they are intended to be integrated
in some way with the other work, but were not part of the original conception of that prior
work. As with successors and supplements, some complements can be used or understood
on their own without reference to another work (i.e., they are autonomous), others require
an understanding of another work (i.e., they are referential).
Example
w1 William Plomers Curlew River
has a musical setting
is a musical setting for
w2 Benjamin Brittens musical setting for Curlew River
65
Also in the autonomous category are groupings of four additional relationship types:
summarization, adaptation, transformation, and imitation.
The kinds of works
represented in these groupings all involve the modification of an original work that is
sufficient in degree to warrant their being considered as new
works, rather than
simply different expressions of the same work. Any work falling into one of these four
groupings is by definition considered autonomous.
Examples
w1 Karl Rosenkrantzs Paedagogik als System
has a paraphrase
is a paraphrase of
w2 Anna C. Bracketts The science of education
w1 Charles Dickens Pickwick papers
has a dramatization
is a dramatization of
w2 W. T. Moncrieffs Sam Weller
The significance of the distinction that has been made between works that fall within the
referential category and those in the autonomous category becomes clear when evaluating
the relative importance of reflecting relationships in a bibliographic record. In terms of
the relative utility of work-to-work relationships, it would be most important to provide
information about a relationship between a referential successor, supplement, or
complement and the work to which it is related, since meaningful use of the successor,
supplement, or complement is highly dependent on the content of the other work. On the
other hand, with an autonomous work an understanding of the predecessor work, while
useful, would not be indispensable to understanding or using the successor, supplement,
or complement. The same holds true for summarizations, adaptations, transformations,
and imitations. Consequently, for autonomous works making the relationship explicit in
the bibliographic record is less critical.
It should be evident from the examples above that the terms applied by publishers often
may not be sufficient to indicate clearly whether a work should be considered referential
or autonomous. Works characterized as sequels, supplements, and appendices can fall
under either category. The cataloguer must judge whether the work can be used only
with reference to the related work or if it can be used and understood independently.
66
Dependent Part
Independent Part
Whole/Part
Monograph in a series
Journal article
Intellectual part of a multipart
work
has part
is part of
Within the whole/part relationships there are two categories: those involving dependent
parts, and those involving independent parts. Dependent parts are component parts of a
work that are intended to be used in the context of the larger work and as such depend on
the context provided by the larger work for much of their meaning. Dependent
components are often difficult to identify without reference to the larger work as they
generally do not have distinctive names/titles. Independent parts are those that do not
depend to any significant extent on the context provided by the larger work for their
meaning. Typically, independent components have distinctive names/titles. It is assumed
that in both cases, the work that represents the whole is an independent work.
The dependent category can itself be divided into two subcategories: segmental parts;
and systemic parts of the works content. Segmental parts are discrete components of a
work whose content exists as a distinct identifiable segment within a whole. Among
discrete components of works would be included prefaces, chapters, sections, parts, and
so on.
Example
w1 Precis in a multilingual context
w1.1 Part 1: Precis - an overview, by Derek Austin
w1.2 Part 2: A linguistic and logical explanation of the syntax,
by Jutta Sorensen and Derek Austin
w1.3 Part 3: Multilingual experiments, proposed codes, and
procedures for the Germanic languages, by Jutta Sorensen
and Derek Austin
A systemic part of a work, on the other hand, cannot be viewed as a bounded segment of
the content of the work. Rather, a systemic part is an integral aspect that extends across
and is interwoven with the rest of the content of the work. Illustrations for a text or the
cinematography of a film are examples of the integral aspect; they can be identified and
discussed as intellectual or artistic parts of the whole, but do not represent separate
sequential segments of the content as segmental components do.
67
There often will be no reason for a dependent part of a work to be separately identified or
described in a bibliographic record. In certain instances, however, such as when a
preface or introduction has been written by a well-known author who is not the author of
the main text, it may be considered useful to identify and describe the component in its
own right. Because dependent parts by definition need to be placed in the context of the
larger work, the relationship, if formally articulated, is typically done by appending an
added entry for the component to the record describing the larger work; alternatively, the
relationship can be reflected less formally through a contents note.
Independent parts of a work are much more apt to be identified and described in their
own right. The category includes monographs in a monographic series (where the series
represents the whole); articles in a journal or issues of a journal (where the journal
represents the whole); or independent intellectual components of a multipart work or kit,
where that component can have value outside the context provided by the other
components of the kit. The independent category also includes commonly recognized
parts of larger works such as books of the Bible, etc.
Example
w1 D. Bruce Sealeys multimedia Tawow
w1.1 Emma La Rogues Defeathering the Indian
.
5.3.2
Expression-to-Expression Relationships
68
Referential Expression
Autonomous Expression
Abridgement
has an abridgement
is an abridgement of
Abridgement
Condensation
Expurgation
Revision
Revised edition
Enlarged edition
State (graphic)
has a revision
is a revision of
Translation
has a translation
is a translation of
Literal translation
Transcription (music)
Arrangement (music)
has an arrangement
is an arrangement of
Arrangement (music)
Relationships between expressions of the same work (Table 5.3) occur when one
expression has been derived from another. In these types of relationships, one expression
is seen to be a modification of the other. The modification may be a literal translation, in
which the intent is to render the intellectual content of the previous expression as
accurately as possible (note that free translations are treated in the model as new works);
a revision, in which the intent is to alter or update the content of the prior expression, but
without changing the content so much that it becomes a new work; an abridgement, in
which some content of the previous expression is removed, but the result does not alter
the content to the extent that it becomes a new work; or an arrangement of a musical
composition.
The expressions resulting from such modification are generally
autonomous in nature (i.e., they do not normally require reference to the prior expression
in order to be used or understood).
69
Complement
has a complement
complements
Referential Expression
Autonomous Expression
Sequel
Sequel
Succeeding work
Index
Concordance
Teachers guide
Gloss
Supplement
Appendix
Supplement
Appendix
Cadenza
Libretto
Choreography
Ending for unfinished work
Incidental music
Musical setting for a text
Pendant
Summarization
Digest
Abstract
has a summary
is a summary of
Adaptation
Paraphrase
Free translation
Variation (music)
Adaptation
has an adaptation
is an adaptation of
Transformation
Dramatization
Novelization
Screenplay
has a transformation
is a transformation of
Imitation
Parody
Imitation
has an imitation
is an imitation of
Examples
w1 Charles Dickens A Christmas carol
e1 the authors original English text
has a translation
is a translation of
e2 a Tamil translation by V. A. Venkatachari
70
Dependent Part
Table of contents, etc.
Volume/issue of serial
Illustration for a text
Sound aspect of a film
Amendment
71
Independent Part
Monograph in a series
Journal article
Intellectual part of a multipart
work
5.3.3
Expression-to-Work Relationships
Table 5.6 shows the kinds of relationships that can be drawn between an expression of
one work and a different work.
The relationships are of the same general type as for work-to-work relationships;
successor, supplement, and complement relationships will exist, as will summarization,
adaptation, transformation, and imitation. In each case, however, the more specific level
of expression is being related to the more general level of work. Drawing the relationship
from the expression level to the work level is done quite commonly, most often because a
specific expression-to-expression relationship cannot be readily determined. For
example, it may be difficult to determine the specific text (i.e., expression) that was used
as the basis for a dramatization or screenplay. In such cases the relationship is often
expressed simply in the form of a note or added entry referring only to the related work
rather than to a specific expression of that work.
As with work-to-work relationships, it will be the nature of the work that the expression
represents that will determine the importance of reflecting the expression-to-work
relationship in the bibliographic record. If the work represented by the expression is
referential, then it will be more important to state its relationship to the other work; if the
work is autonomous, stating the relationship is less critical.
72
Referential Expression
Successor
has a successor
is a successor to
Supplement
has a supplement
supplements
Complement
has a complement
complements
Sequel
Sequel
Succeeding work
Index
Concordance
Teachers guide
Gloss
Supplement
Appendix
Supplement
Appendix
Cadenza
Libretto
Choreography
Ending for unfinished work
Incidental music
Musical setting for a text
Pendant
Summarization
Digest
Abstract
has a summary
is a summary of
Adaptation
Paraphrase
Free translation
Variation (music)
Adaptation
has an adaptation
is an adaptation of
Transformation
Dramatization
Novelization
Screenplay
has a transformation
is a transformation of
Imitation
Parody
Imitation
has an imitation
is an imitation of
5.3.4
Autonomous Expression
Manifestation-to-Manifestation Relationships
73
Alternate
has an alternate
is an alternate to
Manifestation
Reproduction
Microreproduction
Macroreproduction
Reprint
Photo-offset reprint
Facsimile
Mirror site
Alternate format
Simultaneously released edition
The alternate relationship involves manifestations that effectively serve as alternates for
each other. The alternate relationship obtains, for example, when a publication, sound
recording, video, etc. is issued in more than one format or when it is released
simultaneously by different publishers in different countries.
Example
w1 Lyle Lovetts The road to Ensenada
e1 the song-writers performance recorded for the album
m1 the recording released in 1996 by MCA Records
on tape cassette
has an alternate
is an alternate to
m2 the recording released in 1996 by MCA Records
on compact disc
Manifestation
Volume of a multivolume manifestation
Soundtrack for a film on separate
medium
Soundtrack for a film embedded in film
Physical content as represented by manifestation can be divided in much the same way
that intellectual content can be divided in the case of work and expression. A component
at the manifestation level may be a discrete physical unit of the manifestation. Volume 2
of a three-volume set of War and Peace would be a manifestation component. Similarly
an instruction manual accompanying a CD ROM would be a manifestation component.
A component of a manifestation may also be an integral part of the manifestation that is
physically inseparable from the whole, such as the soundtrack of a film that is embedded
in the film.
75
Example
w1 Minnesota politics and government
e1 the multi-media learning resource
m1 the kit published in 1976 by the Minnesota
Historical Society
w1.1 People serving people, by Judy A. Poseley
e1.1 the authors text for the booklet
m1.1 the 30 page booklet included in the kit
w1.2 Voices of Minnesota politicians
e1.2 excerpts from recorded speeches of the politicians
m1.2 the sound disc included in the kit
It is important to remember that manifestation, while representing intellectual content as
it has been expressed in a physical form, is still an abstraction. Therefore the parts and
relationships articulated at this level represent generalizations that would be true for all
instances of the manifestation that had been produced, and do not represent the parts of a
particular copy held by an institution, which would be components at the item level.
5.3.5
Manifestation-to-Item Relationships
Manifestation
Reproduction
Microreproduction
Macroreproduction
Reprint
Photo-offset reprint
Facsimile
76
Example
w1 Jean Jolivets Vraie description des Gaules....
e1 the cartographers original rendering
m1 the map issued in 1570
i1 a copy in the Dpartement des Cartes et
plans at the Bibliothque nationale in Paris
has a reproduction
is a reproduction of
m2 a facsimile reproduction published in 1974 by Hier
et demain
5.3.6
Item-to-Item Relationships
Item
Bound with
Split into
Extracted from
Reproduction
Microreproduction
Macroreproduction
Facsimile
The reproduction relationship states that one particular item has been derived in some
way from another item. As with manifestation, there can be varying levels of fidelity of
the reproduction to the original item. Unlike the replication of manifestations, however,
which in some cases will result in a change in the type of carrier, the replication of one
item from another always results in an item of the same physical characteristics as the
original.
The reconfiguration relationship is one in which one or more items are changed in such a
way that a new item or items result. Most commonly, an item of one manifestation is
bound with an item of a different manifestation to make a new item. For monographs,
this is the typical "bound with" situation. For serials, reconfiguration happens when
several unbound copies representing different issues are bound together to make a single
new item. Less frequently, a single physical item may be split and rebound as two
separate items.
77
Examples
i1 a copy of Adam Lillies Canada--physical, economic, and social published
in 1855 by MacLear & Company
is bound with
is bound with
i2 a copy of Alexander Morris Canada and her resources published in 1855
by John Lovell
Item
Physical component of copy
Binding of a book
78
6. USER TASKS
6.1
The entity-relationship model that has been developed in Chapters 3, 4, and 5 provides a
structure within which data requirements can be analysed in a systematic way. The
structure provided by the model serves as a framework for analyzing the uses that are
made of bibliographic data with specific reference to the entity that is the object of the
users interest, and to the attributes and relationships that are relevant to the task being
performed by the user. Each attribute and relationship can be mapped directly to the user
tasks they support.
As noted in Chapter 2, four generic user tasks have been defined for the purposes of this
study. The tasks are defined in relation to the elementary uses that are made of the data
by the user:
6.2
to find entities that correspond to the users stated search criteria (i.e., to locate either
a single entity or a set of entities in a file or database as the result of a search using an
attribute or relationship of the entity);
to identify an entity (i.e., to confirm that the entity described corresponds to the entity
sought, or to distinguish between two or more entities with similar characteristics);
to select an entity that is appropriate to the users needs (i.e., to choose an entity that
meets the users requirements with respect to content, physical format, etc., or to
reject an entity as being inappropriate to the users needs);
to acquire or obtain access to the entity described (i.e., to acquire an entity through
purchase, loan, etc., or to access an entity electronically through an online connection
to a remote computer).
Tables 6.1 through 6.4 list the attributes and relationships associated with each of the four
primary entities in the entity-relationship model (i.e., work, expression, manifestation,
and item). Plotted against each attribute and relationship are the four generic user tasks
(i.e., find, identify, select, and obtain), and each task is in turn broken out into four sub-
79
tasks defined in relation to the entity on which the task is focused (i.e., find work, find
expression, find manifestation, find item, identify work, identify expression, etc.). The
symbols used in the tables ( ) indicate the relative value of each attribute or
relationship in supporting a specific user task focused on a particular entity. The symbol
signifies that an attribute or relationship is highly important for supporting the
designated task; the symbol signifies moderate importance; and the symbol signifies
relatively low importance. The absence of a symbol indicates that the attribute or
relationship has no discernible relevance to that particular user task or sub-task.
The tables for each entity contain two segments: the first is a list of attributes of that
entity; the second is a list of relationships between that entity and other entities. To
support a particular user task both attributes of the entity and relationships between that
entity and other entities may be important. For example, to assist the user in identifying a
work both the attributes of the work and the relationships of the work to other entities
(e.g., to a person or corporate body responsible for the work) are important. The
attributes segment and the relationships segment of each table are complementary and
must be read in conjunction with one another in order to view the full range of
information that is important in supporting a particular user task.
The relationships segment of each table also serves as a means of indicating the
importance of relationships in assisting the user to relate one entity to another or to
navigate the universe of entities represented in a bibliographic file or database. In a
sense relate could be viewed as a fifth user task. The way the tables are set up the
symbols in the matrix of the relationships segment indicate both the importance of a
particular relationship to each of the four defined user tasks (as the symbols are read
vertically in each column) as well as the importance of a relationship to assisting the user
to relate one entity to another or to navigate a database (as the symbols are read
horizontally across each row).
The assessment of importance of each attribute or relationship to a given user task that is
reflected in the tables was based in large part on the knowledge and experience of the
study group members and consultants, supplemented by evidence in the library science
literature gathered from empirical research, as well as by assessments made by several
experts outside the study group.
The criteria that were used by the study group in assigning the relative values for each
attribute and relationship varied to some degree depending on the nature of the user task.
The principal criteria applied for each task are outlined below.
6.2.1
Find an Entity
For the user tasks find work, find expression, find manifestation, and find item, the
highest value was assigned to attributes and relationships that meet one or more of the
following criteria:
1. the attribute by definition serves to identify the entity (e.g., manifestation identifier,
item identifier);
80
2. the attribute or relationship is typically used as a primary search term for locating the
entity (e.g., the title of a manifestation, the relationship between a work and the
person or corporate body principally responsible for the work).
Moderate value was assigned to attributes and relationships falling within one or more of
the following categories:
1. the attribute or relationship serves to provide a useful means of subdivision within a
predictably lengthy file of entities that match the users primary search term (e.g., the
medium of performance for musical works with non-distinctive titles);
2. the attribute or relationship is typically used as a secondary search term to qualify a
search under a primary term that yields a large results set (e.g., language of
expression);
3. the attribute or relationship is one that will serve to direct the user from an entity
found to another entity that is closely related (e.g., the relationship between a
supplement and the work it supplements).
Low value was assigned to attributes and relationships that under more limited
circumstances might be used to subdivide further a file or to qualify a search.
6.2.2
Identify an entity
For the user tasks identify work, identify expression, identify manifestation, and identify
item, the highest value was assigned to attributes and relationships that meet one or more
of the following criteria:
1. the attribute by definition serves to identify the entity (e.g., manifestation identifier,
item identifier);
2. the attribute or relationship forms part of the minimal set of attributes and
relationships that for the majority of cases will serve, in the absence of a unique
identifier, to differentiate entities that have a number of common characteristics (e.g.,
the minimal set of attributes sufficient to differentiate one manifestation from another
in the majority of cases comprises title, statement of responsibility, edition/issue
designation, publisher/distributor, date of publication/distribution, series statement,
and form of carrier).
Moderate value was assigned to attributes and relationships that fall within one or the
other of the following categories:
1. the attribute or relationship is one which under specified circumstances will often
serve to differentiate entities for which the minimal set of attributes and relationships
that normally serves to identify an entity is insufficient (e.g., the extent or physical
medium of the carrier in certain circumstances may serve to signal differences
between two manifestations that have the same title, statement of responsibility,
edition/issue designation, etc.);
2. the attribute is specifically associated with a sub-type of an entity (e.g., hand- printed
books, sound recordings, etc.), and for that sub-category the attribute will often serve
to differentiate between otherwise identical entities (e.g., polarity for microforms,
presentation format for visual projections, etc.).
81
Low value was assigned to attributes and relationships that in more limited cases might
be used to differentiate between entities with otherwise identical characteristics.
6.2.3
Select an Entity
For the user tasks select work, select expression, select manifestation, and select item, the
highest value was assigned to attributes and relationships that meet one or the other of the
following criteria:
1. the attribute or relationship serves in most cases as a significant indicator of
intellectual or artistic content (e.g., the subject of a work, language of expression,
etc.);
2. the attribute is one that normally signals a specific technical requirement for viewing,
playback, operating, etc. (e.g., systems requirements for electronic resources, etc.), or
other conditions restricting access or use.
Moderate value was assigned to attributes and relationships falling within one or the
other of the following categories:
1. the attribute or relationship is a significant indicator of intellectual or artistic content
only in limited cases (e.g., intended audience for a work);
2. the attribute or relationship is one that under specified circumstances may signal a
specific technical requirement for viewing, playback, operating, etc., (e.g.,
dimensions of the carrier).
Low value was assigned to attributes and relationships that are only marginally
significant indicators of intellectual or artistic content or signals of special technical
requirements.
6.2.4
Obtain an Entity
For the user tasks obtain manifestation, and obtain item, the highest value was assigned to
attributes and relationships that meet one or more of the following criteria:
1. the attribute by definition serves to identify the entity (e.g., manifestation identifier,
item identifier);
2. the attribute or relationship forms part of the minimal set of attributes and
relationships that for the majority of cases will serve, in the absence of a unique
identifier, to differentiate entities that have a number of common characteristics (e.g.,
the minimal set of attributes sufficient to differentiate one manifestation from another
in the majority of cases comprises title, statement of responsibility, edition/issue
designation, publisher/distributor, date of publication/distribution, series statement,
and form of carrier);
3. the attribute or relationship is in the majority of cases significant for locating the
source from which the entity may be obtained (e.g., place of publication/distribution,
access address for a remote access electronic resource, etc.); 4. the attribute or
relationship is significant as an indicator of restrictions on access to the entity (e.g.,
access restrictions on the manifestation, access restrictions on the item).
82
Moderate value was assigned to attributes and relationships falling within one or the
other of the following categories:
1. the attribute or relationship is one which under specified circumstances will often
serve to differentiate entities for which the minimal set of attributes and relationships
that normally serves to identify an entity is insufficient (e.g., the extent or physical
medium of the carrier in certain circumstances may serve to signal differences
between two manifestations that have the same title, statement of responsibility,
edition/issue designation, etc.);
2. the attribute is specifically associated with a sub-type of an entity (e.g., hand- printed
books, sound recordings, etc.), and for that sub-category the attribute will often serve
to differentiate between otherwise identical entities (e.g., polarity for microforms,
presentation format for visual projections, etc.).
Low value was assigned to attributes and relationships that in more limited cases might
be used to differentiate between entities with otherwise identical characteristics. Low
value was also assigned to attributes and relationships that may be significant for locating
the source from which the entity may be obtained, but only if the data is kept current
(e.g., source for acquisition/access authorization).
Note that the obtain task is not applicable to works and expressions.
Note also that the structural relationships that link work to expression (realized
through), expression to manifestation (embodied in), and manifestation to item
(exemplified by) are assumed to be always reflected in the bibliographic record and are
not shown in the tables.
83
Attributes of a work
Title of the work
Form of work
Date of the work
Other distinguishing characteristic
Intended termination
Intended audience
Context for the work
Medium of performance (musical work) (note 1)
Numeric designation (musical work) (note 1)
Key (musical work) (note 1)
Coordinates (cartographic work)
Equinox (cartographic work)
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Obtain
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Select
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Identify
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Find
1 Medium of performance, numeric designation, and key have a higher value for identifying musical works with non-distinctive titles indicative only of
the musical form (e.g. Symphony, Concerto, etc.)
= high value
= medium value
84
= low value
= high value
= medium value
85
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Obtain
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Select
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Identify
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Find
= low value
Attributes of an Expression
Title of the expression
Form of expression
Date of expression
Language of expression (note 1)
Other distinguishing characteristic
Extensibility of expression
Revisability of expression
Extent of the expression (note 2)
Summarization of content
Context for the expression
Critical response to the expression
Use restrictions on the expression
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Obtain
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Select
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Identify
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Find
1 Language of expression has value only if the linguistic content of the expression is significant.
2 Extent of the expression may have a prime value for audio and visual materials (i.e., when expressed as duration).
= high value
= medium value
86
= low value
= high value
= medium value
87
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Obtain
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Select
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Identify
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Find
= low value
= high value
= medium value
88
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Obtain
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Select
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Identity
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Find
= low value
(note 5)
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Obtain
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Select
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Manifestation
Identity
Item
Expression
Attributes of a Manifestation
Title of the manifestation
Statement of responsibility
Edition/issue designation
Place of publication/distribution
Publisher/distributor
Date of publication/distribution
Fabricator/manufacturer (note 1)
Series statement
Form of carrier
Extent of the carrier (note 2)
Physical medium (note 3)
Capture mode
Dimensions of the carrier (note 4)
Manifestation identifier
Source for acquisition/access authorization
Terms of availability
Access restrictions on the manifestation
Work
Find
1 Fabricator/manufacturer may have a higher value for early printed books, limited production graphics, castings, etc.
2 Extent of the carrier may have a higher value in cases where the extent may signal differences between one manifestation and another.
3 Physical medium may have a higher value in cases where the medium is potentially important to users (e.g. nitrate-based film).
4 Dimensions of the carrier may have higher value in cases where the dimensions are significant for playback equipment, etc.
5 Source for acquisition/access authorization may have a higher value if the manifestation is likely to be difficult to obtain through normal trade
sources.
= high value
= medium value
89
= low value
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Obtain
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Select
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Identity
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Find
1 Typeface and type size may have a higher value for differentiating between issues of early books and also for helping users choose materials for the
visually impaired.
2 Playing speed may have a higher value for historic recordings that require special playback equipment.
= high value
= medium value
90
= low value
= high value
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Obtain
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Select
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Identity
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Find
= medium value
91
= low value
Attributes of an Item
Item identifier
Fingerprint
Exhibition history
Condition of the item
Treatment history
Scheduled treatment
Access restrictions on the item
Relationships Between and Item
And other items
Reconfiguration
Reproduction
Physical component of copy
Integral part
And persons/corporate bodies responsible for
ownership/custodianship
= high value
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Obtain
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Select
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Identity
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Work
Find
= medium value
92
= low value
7.1
The mapping of attributes and relationships to user tasks in Chapter 6 serves as the frame
of reference for the study groups recommendations regarding basic data to be included
in records created by national bibliographic agencies.
Of the various tasks and sub-tasks identified in Tables 6.1 through 6.4, the study group
recommends that at a basic level the national bibliographic record should assist the user
to do at least the following:
when the name(s) of the person(s) and/or corporate body(ies) responsible for
the work(s) embodied in the manifestation is (are) known
Identify a work
Identify a manifestation
Select a work
Select an expression
93
Select a manifestation
Obtain a manifestation
It should be noted that inasmuch as the recommendations in this chapter relate to records
created for listing in a national bibliography and such records normally do not reflect data
pertaining to the item, the user tasks related to the item are not addressed.
7.2
Tables 7.1 through 7.9 specify the data requirements for a basic level national
bibliographic record. In the left-hand column of each table are listed the basic user tasks
to be supported by the record as identified in section 7.1 above. The centre column lists
opposite each basic task the high value logical attributes and relationships identified in
Tables 6.1 through 6.4 for that particular task. The right-hand column specifies opposite
each logical attribute or relationship the individual data elements the study group
recommends as the minimum data requirement. The terms used to identify individual
data elements correspond to the terms used in the International Standard Bibliographic
Descriptions (ISBDs) and the Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries (GARE).
In cases where the data requirement is more narrowly defined than the ISBD or GARE
data element, the data element name is qualified to indicate more specifically the type of
data to be recorded.
The data element(s) associated with each logical attribute are those where information
about the attribute would most commonly be positioned in a bibliographic record. In
some cases the same information may be recorded in more than one place in the record
(e.g., language of expression may be recorded both as a note and as an addition to a
uniform title). In those cases both data elements have been listed opposite the logical
attribute, but the basic requirement can be considered to be met if either of the data
elements is included in the record.
One data element that has not been listed in the right-hand column is other title
information. Because the data element is defined in the ISBDs largely in terms of its
proximity to the title of a manifestation, and may encompass a broad range of different
kinds of information, it can be associated with a number of different logical attributes
(e.g., form of work, intended audience, medium of performance, language of expression,
etc.). The data element as such has therefore not been included in the tables.
Nevertheless, it should be understood that information pertaining to a logical attribute
identified as one that should be reflected in the basic level record may be recorded as
other title information, if applicable, even though the data element associated with the
logical attribute may be identified differently in the right-hand column of the tables (e.g.,
as a note).
94
It should be noted also that in the tables that follow, the structural relationships linking
work to expression and expression to manifestation are assumed always to be reflected in
the record (i.e., data pertaining to an expression are assumed always to be linked to data
pertaining to the work realized by the expression, and data pertaining to a manifestation
are assumed always to be linked to data pertaining to the expression embodied in the
manifestation). Thus when a relationship between a work or expression and the person or
corporate body responsible for the content of that entity is identified as a requirement, it
is assumed that the relationship extends through to the manifestation embodying the
expression by virtue of the structural relationships from work to expression and from
expression to manifestation. Similarly when a relationship between a work and its
subject is identified as a requirement, it is assumed that the relationship extends through
to the expression and the manifestation by virtue of the structural relationships from work
to expression and from expression to manifestation. The structural relationships between
work, expression, and manifestation are therefore implicit, and are not stated explicitly as
requirements.
Finally, it should be noted that the data elements identified in Tables 7.1 and 7.2 as
enabling the user to find an entity are limited to those that would normally be used as
filing devices and/or index entries in a non-automated environment. That does not,
however, preclude other data elements that are identified as requirements for the identify,
select, or obtain tasks from serving to support the find task as well in an automated
environment. Virtually any data element included in the record has the potential for
assisting the user to find an entity if the record is accessed in an automated environment
in which keyword searching is supported, providing that the data element is indexed.
95
96
manifestation identifier
Notes:
1
Parallel titles should be included in the basic record to the extent that the national bibliographic agency considers them important to users.
97
intended termination
Notes:
1
Medium of performance, numeric designation, and key are considered a basic requirement only for musical works with non-distinctive titles indicative only of the musical form (e.g.,
Symphony, Concerto, etc.).
2
The relationship between the work and the parent work is considered a basic requirement only in cases where the work is a dependent component of the parent.
98
form of expression
language of expression 2
frequency statement
Notes:
1
2
3
A note on form of expression is considered a basic requirement only if the form of expression cannot be inferred from other data in the record.
Language of expression is considered a basic requirement only if the linguistic content of the expression is significant.
Extent of the expression is considered a basic requirement only for audio and visual materials.
99
statement of responsibility
edition/issue designation
edition statement
additional edition statement
publisher/distributor
date of publication/distribution
series statement
Notes:
1
2
Parallel titles of series should be included in the basic record to the extent that the national bibliographic agency considers them important to users.
Statement of responsibility for the series is considered a basic requirement only in cases where the series title alone is insufficient to identify the series.
100
form of carrier
extent of carrier 1
extent
manifestation identifier
numbering (serial)
numbering
Notes:
1
Extent of the carrier is considered a basic requirement only in cases where it has the potential to signal differences between one manifestation and another (e.g., number of pages).
101
form of work
Notes:
1
The relationship between the work and its predecessor, successor, supplement, or complement is considered a basic requirement only if the relationship between the entities is
referential.
102
form of expression
language of expression 2
note on language
frequency statement
Notes:
1
2
A note on form of expression is considered a basic requirement only if the form of expression cannot be inferred from other data in the record.
Language of expression is considered a basic requirement only if the expression has significant linguistic content.
103
Notes:
1
The relationship between an expression and its predecessor/successor, supplement, or complement is considered a basic requirement only if the relationship is referential. If the
expression cannot be related to the specific expression it precedes, succeeds, supplements or complements, or to the specific expression on which a revision, arrangement, or
translation is based, or if identification of the specific expression on which it is based is not considered to be important, the expression may simply be related to the relevant work.
104
statement of responsibility
edition/issue designation
edition statement
additional edition statement
date of publication/distribution
form of carrier
physical medium 1
dimensions of carrier 2
dimensions
Notes:
1
Physical medium is considered a basic requirement only in cases where the medium is potentially important to users (e.g., nitrate-based film).
Dimensions of the carrier are considered a basic requirement only in cases where the dimensions may be significant in terms of the equipment required for playback, etc. (e.g.,
diskettes, cassettes, etc.).
105
title proper
statement of responsibility
edition/issue designation
edition statement
additional edition statement
place of publication/distribution
publisher/distributor
date of publication/distribution
series statement
form of carrier
manifestation identifier
Notes:
1
Statement of responsibility for the series is considered a basic requirement only in cases where the series title alone is insufficient to identify the series.
106
frequency statement
numbering (serial)
numbering (serial)
Notes:
1
Source for acquisition/access authorization is considered a basic requirement only in cases where the manifestation is likely to be difficult to obtain through normal trade sources.
107
7.3
parallel title(s)
108
extent
dimensions
Series area
title proper of series
4
note on language
109
Parallel titles should be included in the basic record to the extent that the national bibliographic agency
considers them important to users.
Extent of the carrier is considered a basic requirement only in cases where it has the potential to signal
differences between one manifestation and another (e.g., number of pages). Extent of the expression
(playing time/duration) is considered a basic requirement for audio and visual materials.
Dimensions of the carrier are considered a basic requirement only in cases where the dimensions may
be significant in terms of the equipment required for playback, etc. (e.g., diskettes, cassettes, etc.).
Parallel titles of series should be included in the basic record to the extent that the national
bibliographic agency considers them important to users.
Statement of responsibility for the series is considered a basic requirement only in cases where the
series title alone is insufficient to identify the series.
110
6.
A note on form of expression is considered a basic requirement only if the form of expression cannot
be inferred from other data in the record.
7. A note on language is considered a basic requirement only if the linguistic content of the expression is
significant.
8. Notes on preceding/succeeding works or expressions, supplements, and complements are considered a
basic requirement only if the relationship between the entities is referential.
9. A note on the relationship between the work and the parent work is considered a basic requirement
only in cases where the work is a dependent component of the parent.
10. Physical medium is considered a basic requirement only in cases where the medium is potentially
important to users (e.g., nitrate-based film).
11. A note on source for acquisition/access authorization is considered a basic requirement only in cases
where the manifestation is likely to be difficult to obtain through normal trade sources.
Organizing Elements
Name headings
name heading(s) for person(s) and/or corporate body(ies) with principal
responsibility for the work(s)
name heading(s) for person(s) and/or corporate body(ies) with principal
responsibility for the expression(s)
Title headings
title heading(s) for the work(s)
1
111
An addition to the uniform title indicating language is considered a basic requirement only if the
addition is needed to differentiate between multiple expressions of the same work in different
languages.
Medium of performance, numeric designation, and key are considered a basic requirement only for
musical works with non-distinctive titles indicative only of the musical form (e.g., Symphony,
Concerto, etc.).
7.3.1 Application
Application of the basic requirement as stated above assumes the following:
1. A data element specified as a requirement for a basic level record is to be included
only when applicable to the entity described in the record (e.g., if the manifestation
described in the record lacks an edition statement, no edition statement will be
recorded in the record).
2. A technical data element such as coordinates for a cartographic image or object, or
system requirements for an electronic resource, although specified as a requirement
for a basic level record, may be omitted if the information required cannot be readily
determined from an examination of the entity.
3. A whole/part relationship (e.g., the relationship between a work and the series to
which the work belongs, or between a dependent part of a work and its parent work) is
a requirement for a basic level record only in cases where the national bibliographic
agency chooses to analyse the larger work. The basic requirement does not imply that
all works must be analysed into their component parts.
4. If the basic data elements are insufficient to differentiate a particular entity from
another entity with similar characteristics, additional elements associated with the
entity as indicated under the identify column in Tables 6.1 through 6.4 should be
added as necessary.
It is also assumed that while the recommended basic level of functionality and the basic
data requirements will be applied as the norm for records included in the national
bibliography, they will not necessarily be applied as an absolute requirement. It is
recognized that national bibliographic agencies may choose to include certain categories
of material in the national bibliography that they treat as listed materials only, and that
for those categories of material they may establish a minimal level of functionality and
minimal data requirements that do not conform with those recommended for the basic
level record. By the same token, it is recognized that national bibliographic agencies may
112
choose to provide a fuller level of treatment than the basic requirement to certain
categories of material.
113
APPENDIX A
115
NOTE
116
1.
ATTRIBUTES OF A WORK
117
Intended termination
[Not defined]
Intended audience
Notes relating to use/audience - [note relating to intended audience]
General processing data - target audience code
(UNIMARC 100 a/17-19)
Context for the work
Notes on nature, scope, literary form [etc.] - [note relating to context]
Medium of performance (musical work)
Addition to uniform title - medium of performance (for music)
Numeric designation (musical work)
Addition to uniform title - numeric designation (for music)
Key (musical work)
Addition to uniform title - key (for music)
Coordinates (cartographic work)
Mathematical data statement - [coordinates]
Notes on the mathematical data area - [note relating to coordinates]
Coded data field: cartographic materials coordinates
(UNIMARC 123 d-g, i-m)
Equinox (cartographic work)
Mathematical data statement - [equinox]
118
2.
ATTRIBUTES OF AN EXPRESSION
Title of expression
[Not defined]
Form of expression
Notes on nature, scope, literary form [etc.] - [note relating to form of expression]
Date of expression
Addition to uniform title - date [of expression]
Date of publication, distribution, etc. - [copyright date, phonogram date, etc.]
Notes on the publication, distribution, etc. area - [note relating to date of recording,
etc.]
General processing data - publication date [copyright date, phonogram date, etc.]
(UNIMARC 100 a/8-16)
Language of expression
Addition to uniform title - language
Note on nature, scope, literary form [etc.] - [note on language]
Language codes (UNIMARC 101 a, d-j)
Other distinguishing characteristic
Addition to uniform title - other additions [version, arrangement (for music), etc.]
119
Extensibility of expression
[Not defined]
Revisability of expression
[Not defined]
Extent of the expression
Extent of file (electronic resource) - [number of records, statements, etc.]
Extent of item - [playing time/duration]
Notes relating to ... extent of file - [note on number of records, statements, etc.]
Coded data field: visual projections [etc.] - length (UNIMARC 115 a/1-3)
Coded data field: duration of sound recordings (UNIMARC 127 a)
Summarization of content
Notes relating to the contents - [list of contents]
Notes providing a summary
Context for the expression
Notes on nature, scope, literary form [etc.] - [note relating to context for the
expression]
Critical response to the expression
Notes on nature, scope, literary form [etc.] - [note relating to critical response to the
expression]
Use restrictions on the expression
Notes relating to ... availability - [note relating to use restrictions]
120
122
3.
ATTRIBUTES OF A MANIFESTATION
123
Edition/issue designation
Edition statement
Parallel edition statement
First statement of responsibility relating to the edition
Subsequent statement of responsibility relating to the edition
Additional edition statement
First statement of responsibility following an additional edition statement
Subsequent statement of responsibility following an additional edition statement
Notes on the edition area - [note relating to the edition/issue designation]
Place of publication/distribution
First place of publication and/or distribution
Subsequent place of publication and/or distribution
Notes on the publication, distribution, etc. area - [note relating to the place of
publication/distribution]
Country of publication or production codes (UNIMARC 102 a-b)
Publisher/distributor
Name of publisher and/or distributor
Statement of function of publisher, distributor, etc.
Notes on the publication, distribution, etc. area - [note relating to the
publisher/distributor]
Date of publication/distribution
Date of publication, distribution, etc.
Notes on the publication, distribution, etc. area - [note relating to the date of
publication/distribution]
124
125
Coded data field: graphics - specific material designation (UNIMARC 116 a/0)
Coded data field: cartographic materials - form of cartographic item (UNIMARC
124 b)
Coded data field: sound recordings - form of release [etc.] (UNIMARC 126 a/0; b/0)
Coded data field: microforms - specific material designation (UNIMARC 130 a/0)
Extent of the carrier
Extent of item
Notes on the physical description area - [note relating to extent of carrier]
Physical medium
Other physical details - [physical medium]
Notes on the physical description area - [note relating to physical medium]
Coded data field: textual material - physical medium designator (UNIMARC 106 a)
Coded data field: visual projections [etc.] - base on emulsion material [etc.]
(UNIMARC 115 a/17, 18; b/4, 6)
Coded data field: graphics - primary support material [etc.]
(UNIMARC 116 a/1, 2)
Coded data field: cartographic materials - physical medium (UNIMARC 121 a/3-4)
Coded data field: sound recordings - kind of material
(UNIMARC 126 b/1)
Coded data field: microforms - emulsion on film [etc.]
(UNIMARC 130 a/8, 10)
Coded data field: antiquarian - support material (UNIMARC 140 a/20, 21)
Capture mode
Other physical details [capture mode]
Notes on the physical description area - [note relating to capture mode]
126
127
128
129
130
4.
ATTRIBUTES OF AN ITEM
Item identifier
[Not defined]
Fingerprint
Standard number (or alternative) - [fingerprint]
Provenance of the item
Note relating to the copy in hand - [note on provenance]
Marks/inscriptions
Note relating to the copy in hand - [note on marks/inscriptions]
Exhibition history
[Not defined]
Condition of the item
Coded data field: antiquarian - state of preservation codes (UNIMARC 141 a/5, 6-7)
131
Treatment history
[Not defined]
Scheduled treatment
[Not defined]
Access restrictions on the item
[Not defined]
5.
ATTRIBUTES OF A PERSON
Name of person
Personal name heading - name subelements
Dates of person
Additions to the name - dates of birth, death, etc.
Title of person
Additions to the name - title of nobility, honour, address, etc.
Other designation associated with the person
Additions to the name - other additions
132
6.
7.
ATTRIBUTES OF A CONCEPT
133
8.
ATTRIBUTES OF AN OBJECT
9.
ATTRIBUTES OF AN EVENT
10.
ATTRIBUTES OF A PLACE
134
INDEX
This index covers only terms that are defined specifically for the purposes of the study. The page number following
the term indicates the page on which the term is defined.
corporate body, 24
critical response to the expression, 37
abridgement relationship, 71
access address (remote access electronic resource),
48
access restrictions
on the item, 50
on the manifestation, 45
adaptation relationship
expression-to-expression, 73
expression-to-work, 74
work-to-work, 68
aggregate entity, 28
alternate relationship, 77
arrangement relationship (music), 72
attribute, 9
attributes
of a concept, 53
of a corporate body, 52
of a manifestation, 40
of a person, 50
of a place, 54
of a work, 32
of an event, 54
of an expression, 35
of an item, 48
of an object, 53
autonomous work, 66
fabricator/manufacturer, 43
file characteristics (electronic resource), 48
find, 82
fingerprint, 49
foliation (hand-printed book), 45
form of carrier, 43
form of expression, 36
form of work, 33
generation (microform or visual projection), 47
geodetic, grid, and vertical measurements
(cartographic image/object), 39
groove width (sound recording), 46
135
referential work, 66
relationship, 9
relationship between expression and manifestation,
59
relationship between work and expression, 58
relationships to corporate bodies, 60
relationships to persons, 60
representation of relief (cartographic image/object),
39
reproduction relationship
item-to-item, 80
manifestation-to-item, 78
manifestation-to-manifestation, 76
revisability of expression, 37
revision relationship, 71
identify, 82
imitation relationship
expression-to-expression, 73
expression-to-work, 74
work-to-work, 68
independent parts
of works, 69
intended audience, 34
intended termination, 34
item, 23
item identifier, 49
item-to-item relationships, 79
key (musical work), 34
kind of cutting (sound recording), 46
kind of sound (sound recording), 47
language of expression, 36
manifestation, 20
manifestation identifier, 44
manifestation-to-item relationships, 78
manifestation-to-manifestation relationships, 76
marks/inscriptions, 49
medium of performance (musical notation or
recorded sound), 38
medium of performance (musical work), 34
mode of access (remote access electronic resource),
48
name of person, 51
name of the corporate body, 52
number associated with the corporate body, 52
numbering (serial), 46
numeric designation (musical work), 34
object, 26
obtain, 82
person, 23
physical medium, 44
place, 27
place associated with the corporate body, 52
place of publication/distribution, 42
playing speed (sound recording), 46
polarity (microform or visual projection), 47
presentation format (visual projection), 48
presentation technique (cartographic image/object),
39
projection (cartographic image/object), 39
provenance of the item, 49
publication status (serial), 46
publisher/distributor, 42
reconfiguration relationship, 80
recording technique (remote sensing image), 39
reduction ratio (microform), 47
136
work-to-work, 68
translation relationship, 71
treatment history, 50
type of score (musical notation), 38
type size (printed book), 45
typeface (printed book), 45
use restrictions on the expression, 38
whole/part relationships
at the expression level, 73
at the item level, 80
at the manifestation level, 77
at the work level, 69
work, 16
work-to-work relationships, 64
137