Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Battle v. Johnson, 10th Cir. (2010)
Battle v. Johnson, 10th Cir. (2010)
April 2, 2010
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
TENTH CIRCUIT
BOBBY BATTLE,
PlaintiffAppellant,
v.
No. 09-6140
(D.C. No. 5:09-CV-00525-R)
(W.D. Okla.)
DefendantsAppellees.
After examining the parties briefs and the appellate record, this panel has
determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the
determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).
The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
In this case Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brought suit against Defendant, a
member of the Oklahoma State Senate. In his complaint, Plaintiff alleged that
Defendant had violated his civil rights by preventing a bill from proceeding out of
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,
however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th
Cir. R. 32.1.
Accordingly, for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district courts
orders, we AFFIRM.
Entered for the Court
Monroe G. McKay
Circuit Judge
-3-