Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Filed: Patrick Fisher
Filed: Patrick Fisher
JUL 18 2000
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
No. 99-1514
(D.C. No. 98-S-1265)
(D. Colo.)
Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously to grant the parties request for a decision on the briefs without oral
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore
ordered submitted without oral argument.
In this case, the government seeks to effect the forfeiture of an account
held by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., in the name of Ms. Dolores Green. The
district court refused to allow Ms. Green to file an untimely verified claim.
It then granted the governments motion to strike Ms. Greens answer and entered
a default judgment in favor of the government. This appeal followed.
The Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims,
part of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, govern procedure in civil forfeiture
cases. See United States v. 51 Pieces of Real Property
(10th Cir. 1994). Rule C(6) provides that a claimant must file a claim within
10 days after process has been executed, or within such additional time as may be
allowed by the court, and shall serve an answer within 20 days after the filing of
the claim. Fed. R. Civ. P. Supp. Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime
Claims C(6)(hereafter Rule C(6))
its discretion by refusing to allow Ms. Green to file a verified claim well after the
expiration of the statutory ten-day period. We disagree.
Process was served on Ms. Green and her lawyer on September 4, 1998.
On September 10, 1998, Ms. Greens lawyer filed an unverified answer to the
governments complaint but did not file a verified claim within ten days after
-2-
service. After realizing that Ms. Green had failed to comply with Rule C(6),
the government moved to strike her answer and for default judgment and a final
order of forfeiture. Those motions were granted by the district court.
Upon a showing of excusable neglect, a court may allow a claimant to file
an untimely claim in a forfeiture matter.
Michael R. Murphy
Circuit Judge
-3-