Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reyes v. Sedillo, 10th Cir. (2007)
Reyes v. Sedillo, 10th Cir. (2007)
JUAN REYES,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
M .X. SEDILLO, Unit M anager,
USP-Leavenworth; UN ITED STATES
BU REA U O F PRISON S; and UN ITED
STA TES O F A M ER IC A,
No. 06-3234
(D.C. No. 06-CV-3125-SAC)
(D . Kan.)
Defendants-Appellees.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is
not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,
and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value
consistent w ith Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Defendants were not served with the complaint at issue and did not enter an
appearance in this matter.
4
-3-
time to file his brief pro se. It is axiomatic that this court cannot grant M r. Reyes
relief from decisions rendered by a sister circuit.
To the extent M r. Reyes advances claims on appeal based solely on the
Fourteenth Amendment, we note that he did not raise those claims in the district
court thus precluding review by this court. Walker v. M ather (In re Walker),
959 F.2d 894, 896 (10th Cir. 1992).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
David M . Ebel
Circuit Judge
-5-