Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Instructions To Pdri Spreadsheet

    Uploaded by

    sikleb
    263 views2 pages
    The document provides instructions for using an Excel workbook designed to automate scoring in a project planning spreadsheet. The workbook contains spreadsheets for scoring different project phases. Users must provide input on priority levels and weighting factors. The spreadsheets will calculate scores and totals based on users' assessments of element maturity on a scale of 0 to 5 at each project stage. A score of 1000 would reflect fully mature planning just before project implementation.

    Original Description:

    Instrucciones para aplicar el análisis de madurez de un proyecto

    Original Title

    Instructions to Pdri Spreadsheet

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides instructions for using an Excel workbook designed to automate scoring in a project planning spreadsheet. The workbook contains spreadsheets for scoring different project phases. Users must provide input on priority levels and weighting factors. The spreadsheets will calculate scores and totals based on users' assessments of element maturity on a scale of 0 to 5 at each project stage. A score of 1000 would reflect fully mature planning just before project implementation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    263 views2 pages

    Instructions To Pdri Spreadsheet

    Uploaded by

    sikleb
    The document provides instructions for using an Excel workbook designed to automate scoring in a project planning spreadsheet. The workbook contains spreadsheets for scoring different project phases. Users must provide input on priority levels and weighting factors. The spreadsheets will calculate scores and totals based on users' assessments of element maturity on a scale of 0 to 5 at each project stage. A score of 1000 would reflect fully mature planning just before project implementation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    INSTRUCTIONS TO PDRI SPREADSHEET

    The enclosed EXCEL workbook was designed as a tool to automate


    the calculation of scores in the master spreadsheet in Appendix D,
    PDRI Traditional Construction Projects.1
    The workbook is divided into spreadsheets for Critical Decision (CD)
    0, 1, 2, and 3. The PDRI Criteria tab contains the criteria for
    maximum rating for each rating element. The spreadsheets assume
    that the user has provided the input for the Designations of the
    Priority Levels for each sub-element (P Prorated Weighting or H
    High Weighting) and the Weighting Factor Values following the
    disciplines explained in Sections 3.4 and 3.5 of the Guide (this is a
    must for a reliable scoring system). The weight of these priority
    factors may vary by project type; such as, traditional construction
    vs. clean up projects, or other specialized non-traditional
    construction type of project.
    The worksheet has an area for self-assessment by the project team
    as well as the review team of subject matter experts to submit their
    maturity values and the basis. The table below explains the
    maturity value ratings of 0-5. For example, a Maturity Value rating
    of 1 for the Sub-Element Cost Estimate during the PreConceptual Design phase (CD-0) is the expected rating (i.e., the
    element matches expectations for that stage of the project). On the
    other hand, a Maturity Value rating of 1 at the end of the
    Preliminary Design phase (CD-2) indicates a potentially serious
    project deficiency since the expected maturity rating for that SubElement at that project stage is 5. Similarly, a Maturity Value
    rating of 5 is expected to be applied at CD-0 (and for all
    subsequent CDs) for all Sub-Elements that should be fully defined
    during the pre-conceptual phase of the project, such as the SubElement Mission Need Statement in the Management Planning
    and Control Key Element.
    MATURITY VALUE RATING CRITERIA

    1 DOE G 413.3-12A, Project Definition Rating Index Guide for Traditional Nuclear
    and Non-Nuclear Construction Projects.

    Maturity
    Value Rating
    N/A

    Qualitative Criteria
    Not Applicable

    Quantitative Criteria
    (% Complete)
    -

    Work Not Started

    Work Initiated

    1-20

    Concept Defined

    21-50

    Substantive Working Detail

    51-80

    Final Draft

    81-95

    Complete/Fully Meets Definition Criteria

    96-100

    The spreadsheet will calculate the scores and the totals. The overall
    maximum score is 1000 points at the completion of the final project
    phase (CD-3). This score reflects an ideal, fully matured project
    planning at a stage just prior to project implementation with a
    maximum Maturity Value rating (i.e., 5") assigned to each SubElement. The diagram below shows the ideal scores per category
    and Critical Decision.

    You might also like