COMPLAINT of Judicial Misconduct or Disability by Stan J. Caterbone On July 28, 2016
COMPLAINT of Judicial Misconduct or Disability by Stan J. Caterbone On July 28, 2016
03/16)
THIRD
Circuit
2.
3.
Name of Complainant:
Stanley J. Caterbone
Contact Address:
Daytime telephone:
Name(s) of Judge(s):
Edward Smith and Anita J. Brody and Paul Diamond and Curtis
Court:
717
) 669-2163
Does this complaint concern the behavior of the judge(s) in a particular lawsuit or lawsuits?
Yes
No
Case Number:
Circuit:
Party
Lawyer
Neither
If you are (were) a party and have (had) a lawyer, give the lawyers name, address, and telephone
number:
APPEAR PRO SE
Page 1 of 2
Page
Page11of
of18
7
THIRD
Circuit
4.
Brief Statement of Facts. Attach a brief statement of the specific facts on which the claim of judicial
misconduct or disability is based. Include what happened, when and where it happened, and any
information that would help an investigator check the facts. If the complaint alleges judicial disability,
also include any additional facts that form the basis of that allegation.
5.
Signature:
Date:
Page 2 of 2
Page
Page22of
of18
7
Save As...
07/28/2016
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Page 3 of 18
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Page
Page43of
of18
7
I) FIRST COMPLAINT
On April 14, 2016 the Clerk of Court issued an order transferring this case from The
Honorable Anita J. Brody, of the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to
The Honorable Edward G. Smith of the Larry Holmes Federal Courthouse in Easton Pennsylvania.
The order is item no. 2 in this case' court docket sheet. See Exhibit No. 1. It should be noted
that The Honorable Judge Anita Brody had heard similar appeals for the APPELANT'S
previous Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059.
On July 6, 2016 the APPELLANT filed a MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE and requested
that the Hearing of July 19, 2016 be moved to either the Federal Bankruptcy Court in Reading,
Pennsylvania or the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Motion reads:
AND NOW, on this 5TH day of July, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this MOTION FOR CHANGE OF
VENUE TO PHILADELPHIA for the HEARING of July 19, 2016, according to ORDER of
June 28, 2016 by the Honorable Judge Edward G. Smith. The Allentown Courthouse is an
inconvenience and would place an undo hardship on the APPELLANT.
APPELLANT must visit the Philadelphia Courthouse to copy dockets due to the fact that the
APPELLANT'S Pacer Account has been maliciously and erroneously closed due to computer
hackers,
it
would
appear
that
this
MOTION
FOR
CHANGE
OF
VENUE
TO
Page
Page54of
of18
7
The traveling time is approximately and additional one hour and most
importantly is unfamiliar territory making the computer hacking all that much more devastating to
the APPELLANT.
On July 27, 2018 the COMPLAINTANT again called the Clerk of Judge Edward Smth for
guidance as the the Show Cause ORDER of July 20, 2016. The ORDER states the following:
[AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2016, the appellant having filed an application for leave
to proceed in forma pauperis in connection with this purported bankruptcy appeal; and the court
having entered an order on June 28, 2016, which, inter alia, scheduled a hearing on the
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for July 19, 2016 (Doc. No. 7); and the court
having denied the appellants request to change the venue of the hearing (Doc. Nos. 9, 10); and
the court having reiterated that the appellant must appear in Easton for the hearing, see Order,
Doc. No. 10; and the appellant nonetheless having failed to appear for the hearing because he
claims that the computer hackers WOULD NOT allow mapquest on [his] computer [to] find the
Larry Holmes Building in Easton, PA, see Motion to File Exhibit re Press Release and Executive
Summary re Caterbone v. the United States of America, et[] al., July 16, 2016 at
1, Doc. No. 15;1 accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The appellant shall SHOW CAUSE why this court should not impose sanctions
for his failure to appear for the hearing on July 19, 2016;
2. The appellant shall file any written response with the court electronically by no
later than July 27, 2016;
3.
If the appellant fails to respond to the order to show cause, the court will deem
and
4. The court will hold a hearing on the order to show cause on Thursday, July 28,
2016, at 1:00 p.m. at the Holmes Building, 101 Larry Holmes Drive, 4th Floor, Easton, PA
18042. If the appellant fails to appear for the hearing, the court will dismiss this appeal with
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Page
Page65of
of18
7
prejudice.]
The COMPLAINTANT received a call from a male who directed the COMPLAINTANT to attend
the HEARING on July 28, 2016 WHICH IS PURELEY MALICIOUS AS IT CANNOT BE
INTPRETED
FROM
THE
ORDER
THAT
ATTENDANCE
IS
REQUIRED
SINCE
THE
COMPLAINTANT FILED THE SHOW CAUSE BRIEF THE DAY AFTER THE ORDER WAS
RECORDED.
REQUIRED.
Page
Page76of
of18
7
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Page
Page87of
of18
7
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Page 9 of 18
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
:
:
:
:
MEDIA GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT re
SHOW CUASE BRIEF TO ORDER DATED JULY 20, 2016 in response to the ORDER of July
20, 2016 by the Honorable Judge Edward G. Smith.
Dated July 21, 2016
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF
Page
Page10
1 of 18
9
On July 6, 2016 the APPELLANT filed a MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE and requested
that the Hearing of July 19, 2016 be moved to either the Federal Bankruptcy Court in Reading,
Pennsylvania or the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Motion reads:
AND NOW, on this 5TH day of July, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this MOTION FOR CHANGE OF
VENUE TO PHILADELPHIA for the HEARING of July 19, 2016, according to ORDER of
June 28, 2016 by the Honorable Judge Edward G. Smith. The Allentown Courthouse is an
inconvenience and would place an undo hardship on the APPELLANT.
APPELLANT must visit the Philadelphia Courthouse to copy dockets due to the fact that the
APPELLANT'S Pacer Account has been maliciously and erroneously closed due to computer
hackers,
it
would
appear
that
this
MOTION
FOR
CHANGE
OF
VENUE
TO
16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF
Page
Page11
2 of 18
9
Montgomery County Courthouse. Again, like before the APPELLANT'S GPS mapping system on his
Samsung 6S smartphone was again compromised by a computer hacker that left the APPELLANT
driving around in circles for nearly 2 hours. In addition upon trying to locate the address of the
Montgomery County Courthouse, the address changed from Norristown to Willow Grove. Needless
to say the APPELLANT never did file the Amicus. It will be filed today. In addition the APPELLANT
is recorded as being the AMICUS in Superior Court Case No. 1164 EDA 2016 for Pennsylvania
Attorney General Kathleen Kane.
The APPELLANT is alleging judicial misconduct by the Clerk of Court for
maliciously and purposefully inconveniencing the APPELLLANT in an effort to have the
APPELLANT miss the court hearing of July 19, 2016 in an effort to have this case
dismissed and sanctions imposed. The traveling time is approximately and additional
one hour and most importantly is unfamiliar territory making the computer hacking all
that much more devastating to the APPELLANT.
The computer hacking is well documented this entire conspiracy against the
APPELLANT can be reviewed by Your Honor by visiting the following document:
CATERBONE
v. the United States of America, et.al., COMPLAINT July 20, 2016 Ver 2.0 -
https://www.scribd.com/document/318862497/CATERBONE-v-the-United-States-ofAmerica-Et-al-COMPLAINT-July-20-2016-Ver-2-0-Full
Dated July 21, 2016
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF
Page
Page12
3 of 18
9
:
:
:
:
:
The appellant shall SHOW CAUSE why this court should not impose sanctions
for his failure to appear for the hearing on July 19, 2016;
2.
The appellant shall file any written response with the court electronically by no
The appellant included this assertion despite his attempt to change venue and his call to the undersigneds civil
deputy only a few days prior to the hearing in which he stated that he would not be appearing in Easton for the
hearing unless the court changed the location to Philadelphia.
16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF
Page
Page13
4 of 18
9
3.
If the appellant fails to respond to the order to show cause, the court will deem
The court will hold a hearing on the order to show cause on Thursday, July 28,
2016, at 1:00 p.m. at the Holmes Building, 101 Larry Holmes Drive, 4th Floor, Easton, PA
18042. If the appellant fails to appear for the hearing, the court will dismiss this appeal with
prejudice.
BY THE COURT:
2
16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF
Page
Page14
5 of 18
9
EXIBIT
16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF
Page
Page15
6 of 18
9
16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF
Page
Page16
7 of 18
9
16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF
Page
Page17
8 of 18
9
16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF
Page
Page18
9 of 18
9