Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

43 F.

3d 1465

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sandra MURPHY, Head Nurse, Augusta Correctional Center;
Mark Nelson, LPN, Augusta Correctional Center; Julian
Snyder, LPN, Augusta Correctional Center; R. Smiley,
Sergeant; Edward D. Carey, Augusta Correctional Center; T.
Redman, Lieutenant, Augusta Correctional Center; J. H.
Lyle, Lieutenant, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6891.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Sept. 20, 1994.
Decided Dec. 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-240R).
Anthony Atkins, appellant Pro Se.
Colin James Steuart Thomas, Jr., Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses,
P.C., Staunton, VA; Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of
Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from a magistrate judge's order denying appellant's motion


for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
because the order is not appealable. Miller v. Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 967 (4th
Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 903 (1987). This Court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We deny Appellant's motion for


appointment of counsel on appeal and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

You might also like