Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Clarence Sutton v. United States of America, Warden, Maryland House of Correction, 934 F.2d 320, 4th Cir. (1991)
Clarence Sutton v. United States of America, Warden, Maryland House of Correction, 934 F.2d 320, 4th Cir. (1991)
2d 320
Unpublished Disposition
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (CA-88-2031HM)
Clarence Sutton, appellant pro se.
Breckinridge Long Willcox, United States Attorney, John Joseph Curran,
Attorney General, Mary Ellen Barbera, Assistant Attorney General,
Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Sutton appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus
relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241. Our review of the record and the district
court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses
that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Sutton v. United States, CA-88-2031-HM (D.Md. Sept. 7,
1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.