Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mark Steven Fortier v. George Speedy, Attorney at Law, 36 F.3d 1092, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a pro se plaintiff, Mark Steven Fortier, appealing the denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against his former attorney, George Speedy. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without need for oral argument, finding that the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-10-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 36 F.3d 1092 Docket: 94-6555

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a pro se plaintiff, Mark Steven Fortier, appealing the denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against his former attorney, George Speedy. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without need for oral argument, finding that the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Mark Steven Fortier v. George Speedy, Attorney at Law, 36 F.3d 1092, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a pro se plaintiff, Mark Steven Fortier, appealing the denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against his former attorney, George Speedy. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without need for oral argument, finding that the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    36 F.

    3d 1092

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Mark Steven FORTIER, Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    George SPEEDY, Attorney at Law, Defendant Appellee.
    No. 94-6555.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Aug. 25, 1994.
    Decided: Oct. 5, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South
    Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-93-228618AJ)
    Mark Steven Fortier, appellant pro se.
    D.S.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Fortier v. Speedy, No. CA-93-2286-18AJ
    (D.S.C. May 5, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like