Mark Steven Fortier v. George Speedy, Attorney at Law, 36 F.3d 1092, 4th Cir. (1994)
Mark Steven Fortier v. George Speedy, Attorney at Law, 36 F.3d 1092, 4th Cir. (1994)
3d 1092
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South
Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-93-228618AJ)
Mark Steven Fortier, appellant pro se.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Fortier v. Speedy, No. CA-93-2286-18AJ
(D.S.C. May 5, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and