Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • John M. Miller v. S.R. Witkowski, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of The State of South Carolina, 51 F.3d 267, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from April 4, 1995. It summarizes that the appellant, John M. Miller, sought to appeal the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal lacked merit. Accordingly, the court denied Miller a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in Miller v. Witkowski, No. CA-94-244-3-19AK (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 1994).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-04-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 51 F.3d 267 Docket: 94-7371

    Original Title

    John M. Miller v. S.R. Witkowski, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, 51 F.3d 267, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from April 4, 1995. It summarizes that the appellant, John M. Miller, sought to appeal the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal lacked merit. Accordingly, the court denied Miller a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in Miller v. Witkowski, No. CA-94-244-3-19AK (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 1994).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    John M. Miller v. S.R. Witkowski, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of The State of South Carolina, 51 F.3d 267, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from April 4, 1995. It summarizes that the appellant, John M. Miller, sought to appeal the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal lacked merit. Accordingly, the court denied Miller a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in Miller v. Witkowski, No. CA-94-244-3-19AK (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 1994).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    51 F.

    3d 267

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    John M. MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    S.R. WITKOWSKI, Warden; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
    General
    of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 94-7371.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: March 15, 1995
    Decided: April 4, 1995

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South
    Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-94-244-319AK)
    John M. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.
    Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for
    Appellees.
    Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses
    that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable
    cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    Miller v. Witkowski, No. CA-94-244-3-19AK (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 1994). We


    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    2

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like