Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tyrone Arthur Williams v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction, The State of Maryland, Respondent, 831 F.2d 1058, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1987 regarding a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. In a brief 3 sentence opinion, the appellate court: 1) reviewed the record and district court decision; 2) determined the appeal would be without merit because the dispositive issues had already been decisively ruled on; and 3) denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dismissed the appeal, and relied on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-10-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 831 F.2d 1058 Docket: 87-6572

    Original Title

    Tyrone Arthur Williams v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction, the State of Maryland, Respondent, 831 F.2d 1058, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1987 regarding a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. In a brief 3 sentence opinion, the appellate court: 1) reviewed the record and district court decision; 2) determined the appeal would be without merit because the dispositive issues had already been decisively ruled on; and 3) denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dismissed the appeal, and relied on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Tyrone Arthur Williams v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction, The State of Maryland, Respondent, 831 F.2d 1058, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1987 regarding a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. In a brief 3 sentence opinion, the appellate court: 1) reviewed the record and district court decision; 2) determined the appeal would be without merit because the dispositive issues had already been decisively ruled on; and 3) denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dismissed the appeal, and relied on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    831 F.

    2d 1058
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Tyrone Arthur WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN, Maryland House of Correction, the State of
    Maryland,
    Respondent- Appellee.
    No. 87-6572.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 31, 1987.
    Decided Oct. 16, 1987.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, District Judge. (C/A No. 868-3428-HM).
    Tyrone Arthur Williams, appellant pro se.
    J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Jillyn Kaberle Schulze, Assistant
    Attorney General, for appellees.
    D.Md.
    DISMISSED.
    Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
    magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing

    habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and
    dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Warden,
    C/A No. 86-3428-HM (D.Md., April 21, 1987).
    2

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like