Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Daniel Monroe Flowers v. D. G. Underwood Roanoke City Police Department, 983 F.2d 1056, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Daniel Monroe Flowers' appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal lacked merit. It denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that habeas corpus relief was not warranted. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    Daniel Monroe Flowers v. D. G. Underwood Roanoke City Police Department, 983 F.2d 1056, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Daniel Monroe Flowers' appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal lacked merit. It denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that habeas corpus relief was not warranted. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-12-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 983 F.2d 1056 Docket: 92-7046

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Daniel Monroe Flowers' appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal lacked merit. It denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that habeas corpus relief was not warranted. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Daniel Monroe Flowers v. D. G. Underwood Roanoke City Police Department, 983 F.2d 1056, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Daniel Monroe Flowers' appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal lacked merit. It denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that habeas corpus relief was not warranted. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    983 F.

    2d 1056

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Daniel Monroe FLOWERS, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    D. G. UNDERWOOD; Roanoke City Police Department,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 92-7046.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: November 30, 1992
    Decided: December 23, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-660R)
    Daniel Monroe Flowers, Appellant Pro Se.
    W.D.Va.
    DISMISSED.
    Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Daniel Monroe Flowers seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing
    habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the
    record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the

    appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Flowers v. Underwood, No. CA92-660-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like