Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Geremew Zeleke Latarsha Zeleke v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 993 F.2d 1542, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Geremew and Latarsha Zeleke brought an action seeking to enjoin the INS from deporting Mr. Zeleke. The district court denied their request for a preliminary injunction. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, as the issues in the Zelekes' case were essentially the same as those in the unpublished and consolidated case Joseph v. INS, where the court also affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction for reasons stated in that opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-05-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 993 F.2d 1542 Docket: 92-1640

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Geremew and Latarsha Zeleke brought an action seeking to enjoin the INS from deporting Mr. Zeleke. The district court denied their request for a preliminary injunction. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, as the issues in the Zelekes' case were essentially the same as those in the unpublished and consolidated case Joseph v. INS, where the court also affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction for reasons stated in that opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Geremew Zeleke Latarsha Zeleke v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 993 F.2d 1542, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Geremew and Latarsha Zeleke brought an action seeking to enjoin the INS from deporting Mr. Zeleke. The district court denied their request for a preliminary injunction. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, as the issues in the Zelekes' case were essentially the same as those in the unpublished and consolidated case Joseph v. INS, where the court also affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction for reasons stated in that opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    993 F.

    2d 1542

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Geremew ZELEKE; Latarsha Zeleke, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    v.
    U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 92-1640.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Argued: February 2, 1993
    Decided: May 20, 1993

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-92-457-CIV-BR)
    Argued: Kenneth Bedford Hatcher, Wilmington, North Carolina, for
    Appellants.
    Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    On Brief: Margaret Person Currin, United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILLIAMS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Geremew and Latarsha Zeleke brought this action seeking to enjoin the INS
    from deporting Mr. Zeleke. Upon denial of their request for a preliminary
    injunction, the Zelekes sought review in this court. Because the issues in this
    case were essentially indistinguishable from those presented in Joseph v. INS,
    No. 92-1641 (4th Cir., 1993) (unpublished), we consolidated the two cases for
    purposes of oral argument. After careful review of the record in the Zelekes'
    case, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
    their request for a preliminary injunction for the reasons stated in Joseph v.
    INS.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like