Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lane v. Wynne, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Bruce E. Lane appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint against the Secretary of the Air Force and a union for lack of jurisdiction. A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Lane's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-02-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-1853

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Bruce E. Lane appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint against the Secretary of the Air Force and a union for lack of jurisdiction. A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Lane's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Lane v. Wynne, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Bruce E. Lane appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint against the Secretary of the Air Force and a union for lack of jurisdiction. A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Lane's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-1853

    BRUCE E. LANE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL W. WYNNE, Secretary of the Air Force;
    LOCAL UNION 1092, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
    GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Peter J. Messitte, District Judge.
    (8:04-cv-01051-PJM)

    Submitted: February 15, 2007

    Decided: February 20, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bruce E. Lane, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark D. Roth,
    AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, Washington,
    D.C., for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Bruce

    E.

    Lane

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    order

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    See Lane v. Wynne,

    No. 8:04-cv-01051-PJM (D. Md. June 26, 2006).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like