United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
3d 8
Kahill Kashon Thorpe, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., McKay,
McKay, Henry & Foster, P.A., Columbia, SC, for Appellees.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that
this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Thorpe v. Bessinger, No. CA-94-1019 (D.S.C. Oct. 18, 1994).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not