Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Freddie Taylor v. Cumberland County District Attorney's Office Sharon Rippe, Assistant Prosecutor, 896 F.2d 547, 4th Cir. (1990)
Freddie Taylor v. Cumberland County District Attorney's Office Sharon Rippe, Assistant Prosecutor, 896 F.2d 547, 4th Cir. (1990)
2d 547
Unpublished Disposition
Freddie Taylor filed a 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that he was deprived
of his constitutional rights by the actions of the Cumberland County District
Attorney's Office and an assistant district attorney. The district court dismissed
the action as frivolous. Taylor moved for reconsideration, but the motion was
denied. Taylor petitioned the district court for a writ of mandamus, but the
petition was denied on April 10, 1989. Taylor filed a notice of appeal and
petition for writ of mandamus on May 12, 1989, 32 days after the district
court's denial of the petition. Taylor did not move for an extension of time in
which to file his appeal.
2
Taylor's notice of appeal was filed outside of the 30-day appeal period provided
by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a). The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are
"mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434
U.S. 257, 264 (1978). Taylor's failure to note a timely appeal or to move for an
extension of time to appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction; therefore, we
dismiss the appeal.
In his petition for writ of mandamus, Taylor sought reversal of the district
court's dismissal of his Sec. 1983 action. Mandamus cannot be used as a
substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th
Cir.1979). Because the relief sought by Taylor could have been addressed in an
appeal, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal issues are
adequately presented in the material before the Court and argument would not
significantly aid in the decisional process.