Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Johnnie Davenport, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Johnnie Wayne Davenport appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief of judgment under Rule 60(b), challenging his 2011 criminal conviction. A three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The panel affirmed the district court's denial of Davenport's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    United States v. Johnnie Davenport, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Johnnie Wayne Davenport appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief of judgment under Rule 60(b), challenging his 2011 criminal conviction. A three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The panel affirmed the district court's denial of Davenport's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-10-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7018

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Johnnie Wayne Davenport appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief of judgment under Rule 60(b), challenging his 2011 criminal conviction. A three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The panel affirmed the district court's denial of Davenport's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Johnnie Davenport, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Johnnie Wayne Davenport appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief of judgment under Rule 60(b), challenging his 2011 criminal conviction. A three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The panel affirmed the district court's denial of Davenport's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7018

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOHNNIE WAYNE DAVENPORT,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City.
    Malcolm J.
    Howard, Senior District Judge. (2:11-cr-00020-H-1)

    Submitted:

    October 15, 2015

    Decided:

    October 20, 2015

    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Johnnie Wayne Davenport, Appellant Pro Se. Shailika S. Kotiya,


    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ethan A. Ontjes, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Johnnie Wayne Davenport appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for relief of judgment, under Fed. R. Civ. P.
    60(b),

    and

    conviction.
    error.

    related

    motions,

    challenging

    his

    2011

    criminal

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Davenport, No. 2:11-cr-00020-

    H-1 (E.D.N.C. June 10, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like