Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Daniel Marroquin-Santiago, 4th Cir. (2015)
United States v. Daniel Marroquin-Santiago, 4th Cir. (2015)
No. 15-4333
No. 15-4346
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (1:10-cr-00232-JAB-1; 1:14-cr-00459-JAB1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
In
appeals
these
the
consolidated
24-month
appeals,
sentence
Daniel
imposed
Marroquin-Santiago
after
he
pled
guilty,
felon,
in
violation
of
U.S.C.
1326
(2012)
(reentry
supervised
release
terms
of
his
prior
illegal
reentry
to
achieve
3553(a) (2012).
the
sentencing
objectives
of
18
U.S.C.
the
24-month
sentence
in
the
reentry
case
resulted
in
case
for
reasonableness,
standard of review.
(2007).
ensure
using
an
abuse
of
discretion
the
procedural error.
(4th Cir. 2008).
procedurally
district
court
committed
no
significant
reasonable
will
we
consider
the
substantive
within
properly
reasonable.
calculated
Sentencing
Guidelines
range
is
Marroquin-Santiago
concedes
that
we
may
presume
have
been
personal
history
district
court
sentenced
and
imposed
of
considerations
of
exercised
arguments
sentence
circumstances
lesser
characteristics.
properly
Marroquin-Santiagos
to
the
that
in
3553(a).
We
its
based
conclude
discretion
mitigation,
reflects
offense,
term
the
as
See
Evans,
and
as
526
his
that
the
to
nature
well
on
reject
that
and
the
F.3d
it
the
other
at
162
has
this
failed
court
to
rebut
affords
the
his
Because
presumption
of
within-Guidelines
Sentences or
the
underlying
offense
conduct.
Therefore,
these
Sentencing
Guidelines
Manual
7B1.3(f),
p.s.
(2014).
sentence
in
the
revocation
case
that
Marroquin-Santiagos
12-month
to
run
Because we
sentence
is
not
with
contentions
before
this
oral
are
court
argument
because
adequately
and
the
presented
argument
would
not
facts
in
aid
and
We
legal
the
materials
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED