Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jesse Jeter v. Palmetto Health, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    Jesse James Jeter appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment against his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act against Palmetto Health. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated. To the extent Jeter's reply brief contained a motion to amend a previous motion filed in the district court, the Fourth Circuit denied the request. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-03-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1018

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jesse James Jeter appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment against his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act against Palmetto Health. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated. To the extent Jeter's reply brief contained a motion to amend a previous motion filed in the district court, the Fourth Circuit denied the request. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    Jesse Jeter v. Palmetto Health, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jesse James Jeter appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment against his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act against Palmetto Health. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated. To the extent Jeter's reply brief contained a motion to amend a previous motion filed in the district court, the Fourth Circuit denied the request. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1018

    JESSE JAMES JETER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    PALMETTO HEALTH, doing business as Palmetto Health Internal
    Medicine Center,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (3:10-cv-02832-CMC)

    Submitted:

    March 26, 2013

    Decided:

    March 29, 2013

    Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jesse James Jeter, Appellant Pro Se.


    Mason Abram Summers,
    RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jesse James Jeter appeals the district courts order
    accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    granting summary judgment against Jeters claims, which arose
    under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. 1210112213 (West 2005 & Supp. 2012).
    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    Jeter v. Palmetto Health,

    No. 3:10-cv-02832-CMC (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 2012).

    To the extent

    that Jeters informal reply brief contains a motion to amend a


    motion that he had previously filed in the district court, we
    deny his request.
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like