United States v. Ellery Dial, 935 F.2d 1288, 4th Cir. (1991)
United States v. Ellery Dial, 935 F.2d 1288, 4th Cir. (1991)
2d 1288
Unpublished Disposition
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR89-48-3)
Carl G. Ivarsson, Jr., Cook & Ivarsson, Fayetteville, N.C., for appellant.
Margaret Person Currin, United States Attorney, John S. Bowler,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
officer. He contends that the district court erred in refusing to give him a
twolevel reduction in offense level for acceptance of responsibility. In a
supplemental brief, Dial also maintains that evidence of juror bias was revealed
to him after the trial, that a government witness testified falsely, that
exculpatory evidence--a tape recording--was not introduced at trial, that he was
denied his right to present his version of the facts to the jury and that he
received ineffective assistance at trial and on appeal. We affirm.
2
AFFIRMED.