Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

70 F.

3d 1262

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
George Hero IGBO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS; Department of Social
Services;
City of Clinton; County of Sampson; Benjamin J. Warrick;
David Sapp; Kathleen Stein Igbo; Howard Hunter; James
Thomas Tart; Janet Tart; Randy Pope, Sr.; Catherine Pope;
Sergeant Annette; Mary M. Hobbs; Dephanie Terado;
Sheriff Powell; Darold Cox; Detective McClain, DefendantsAppellees.
No. 95-6419.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Nov. 27, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94579-5-F)
George Hero Igbo, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the


reasoning of the district court. Igbo v. Church of Latter Day Saints, No. CA-94579-5-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 1995). We note that Appellant also challenged the
validity of his convictions in his Sec. 1983 complaint. Appellant's damages
claim is not cognizable under Sec. 1983 because he has not shown that his
convictions have been overturned. See Heck v. Humphrey, --- U.S. ----, 62
U.S.L.W. 4594, 4597 (U.S. June 24, 1994) (No. 93-6188). We modify the
dismissal of these claims to be without prejudice to Appellant's ability to refile
his claims in the appropriate court if his convictions ever are overturned or
called into question by the appropriate court. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

You might also like