Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Louis Bryant, 4th Cir. (2014)
United States v. Louis Bryant, 4th Cir. (2014)
No. 13-7859
BRYANT,
a/k/a
Tinio,
a/k/a
Black,
a/k/a
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.
Norman K. Moon,
Senior District Judge. (3:04-cr-00047-NKM-RSB-1; 3:13-cv-80668NKM)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Louis
Antonio
Bryant
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
affirm
that
part
of
the
district
courts
order
the
reasoning
Bryant,
Nos.
of
the
district
court.
3:04-cr-00047-NKM-RSB-1;
United
States
3:13-cv-80668-NKM
v.
(W.D.
appealable
unless
circuit
certificate of appealability.
A
certificate
of
justice
or
judge
issues
appealability
will
not
issue
absent
on
the
demonstrating
district
debatable
merits,
that
courts
or
prisoner
reasonable
assessment
wrong.
Slack
satisfies
jurists
this
would
of
the
v.
McDaniel,
standard
find
constitutional
529
U.S.
by
that
the
claims
is
473,
484
is
debatable,
and
that
the
motion
states
debatable
at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Bryant has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we
informal
brief
we
as
construe
an
Bryants
application
to
notice
file
of
appeal
second
or
U.S.C.
2255(h)
(2012).
Bryants
claims
do
not
satisfy
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED IN PART;
DISMISSED IN PART