Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RECORDED August 12, 2016 in Clerk of U.S. Supreme Court re FINAL - 16-1001 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Habeus Corpus Case to the Supreme Court of the United States- A PETITION for a WRIT of CERTIORARI, August 7, 2016
RECORDED August 12, 2016 in Clerk of U.S. Supreme Court re FINAL - 16-1001 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Habeus Corpus Case to the Supreme Court of the United States- A PETITION for a WRIT of CERTIORARI, August 7, 2016
English
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tLabels=941080369930...
Customer Service
USPS Mobile
Register / Sign In
Customer Service
USPS Tracking
Features:
Signature Confirmation
Available Actions
Up to $50 insurance included
Proof of Delivery
Restrictions Apply
Text Updates
DATE & TIME
STATUS OF ITEM
LOCATION
Delivered
WASHINGTON, DC 20543
Email Updates
Your item was delivered at 11:10 am on August 11, 2016 in WASHINGTON, DC 20543 to SUPREME
COURT 20543. The item was signed for by J KOUROS.
WASHINGTON, DC 20543
WASHINGTON, DC 20018
CAPITOL
HEIGHTS, MD 20799
CAPITOL
HEIGHTS, MD 20799
LANCASTER, PA 17604
LANCASTER, PA 17603
Acceptance
MILLERSVILLE, PA 17551
1 of 2
8/13/2016 5:48 AM
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Dear Clerk,
I am filing this Petition under duress and am aware of some deficiencies. Would you kindly
docket the Petition and I will cure the deficiencies at a later time. I am in extreme pain and want
to make sure that the assaults on my person are not successful in denying my right to appeal.
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Complaint against Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
P
usps.com
062S0000000101
Click-N-Ship
08/09/2016
0006
C000
STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
SIGNATURE REQUIRED
SHIP
WASHINGTON DC 20543-0001
TO: CLERK
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 1ST ST NE
Instructions
Signature Confirmation :
From:
To:
381172223
08/09/2016
08/09/2016
08/11/2016
$6.45
$2.35
$8.80
STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
CLERK
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 1ST ST NE
WASHINGTON DC 20543-0001
* Retail Pricing Priority Mail rates apply. There is no fee for USPS Tracking service
on Priority Mail service with use of this electronic rate shipping label. Refunds for
unused postage paid labels can be requested online 30 days from the print date.
Thank you for shipping with the United States Postal Service!
Check the status of your shipment on the USPS Tracking page at usps.com
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Page 1 of 190
111
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, August 7, 2016 for Case No. 16-1001
Third Circuit Court of Appeals Habeus Corpus Case To The Supreme Court of the
United States
2. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULES FOR IN FORMA PAUPERIS August 7,
2016
3. ORDER re 16-1001 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Habeus Corpus Case - ORDER re
Petition For Rehearing DENIED Judge Michael Fisher July 8, 2016
1. 16-1001 DOCKET SHEET re Third Circuit Court of Appeals Habeus Corpus Case
- July 13, 2016
4. ORDER DISMISSAL in US District Court December 29, 2015 re Case No. 15-03984
Petitioner Stanley J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus
5. 15-03984 DOCKET as of December 16, 2015 re Petitioner Stanley J. Caterbone
Writ of Habeus Corpus
6. December 10, 2015 - Recorded Docket Entry
7. December 10, 2015 - PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS
8. Avanced Media Group Anti-Harassment Legislation and Executive Summary
1. Letter from Pennsylvania Representative Mike Sturla re Organized Stalking Bill
of June 8, 2009
2. Cover Page for Executive Summary
3. Executive Summary
4. Updates for Executive Summary October 10, 2015
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT
for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Complaint against Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015;
1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
Page 4
2 of 190
111
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Page 5
3 of 190
111
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
punishable by a fine or term of imprisonment. The trial court had sentenced him to a fine and a term of
imprisonment. Lange paid his fine and was imprisoned. The Court held that once Lange had paid the
fine the trial court lost all jurisdiction over the case and thus his confinement was subject to the writ. Ex
parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1880). In Siebold, although the statute in question was found to be within
the power of Congress, the Court held that had the prisoner been convicted under an unconstitutional
law he would have been entitled to discharge upon the writ.
Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417 (1885). The Court held that Wilson was entitled to discharge on the writ
because the trial court had exceeded its jurisdiction when it tried, convicted and sentenced him to
fifteen years hard labor based upon an information filed by the district attorney rather than upon a
grand jury indictment as required by the Fifth Amendment in the case of all capital and otherwise
infamous crimes. In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 (1887). Snow was convicted of three counts of cohabitation
based on the same conduct during three different periods of time. The Court found that the misconduct
was one continuous offense rather than three offenses. Since three sentences would constitute multiple
punishment contrary to the Fifth Amendment, the trial court had acted beyond its jurisdiction and the
writ should issue.
QUESTION NUMBER TWO: Has the Petitioner Exhausted his Appeals in the State Courts?
ARUGUMENT NUMBER TWO: DISCRIMINATION AND CONTEMPT IN THE COMMONWEALTH
OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS.
The PETTITIONER alleges that he has been a prisoner of the state since 1987.
Just the
most recent activities of the PETITIONER are a clear indication of such. The activities surrounding the
PETITIONER'S life since June of 2015 immediately following the filing of an amicus curiae in the Lisa
Michelle Lambert Habeus Case of this same said court, No. 14-02559, in which the PETITIONER was
named MOVANT, has escalated into a daily occurrence of assaults. Unfortunately while the PETITIONER
has made many in person complaints to just about every law enforcement agency, the most recent to
the Manheim Township Substation in Lancaster Township regarding an assault at the Manor Shopping
Center minutes previously (December 9, 2015 9:00pm), the pleas for help and assistance have yielded
nothing but more attacks to the PETITIONER'S person, property, electronics, home, auto, reputation,
intellectual property, and lastly his mental state-of-mind A BRUTAL ARRAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL
TORTURE. The PETITIONER has already made claims of COINTELPRO-like tactics in his filings in the
U.S.C.A. Case No. 15-3400 against these same said actors and perpetrators.
The PETTITIONER has made many failed attempts to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1987
to address these very same issues, specifically the Pennsylvania Securities Commission (Agent Howard
Eisler), the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office (Detective Bodan), the Civile Rights Enforcement
Page 6
4 of 190
111
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Division of the Pennsylvania Attorney General (Investigator ....). The PETITIONER will argue that the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is unable to address these issues without prejudice, without
discrimination, and without corruption. This can be best described in the following Letter to the Editor
of the NEWSLANC organization of recent weeks:
I have been the victim of a widespread civil and criminal conspiracy that dates back to 1987,
made up of the very same actors that Kathleen Kane is up against, the "good old boys". In 1987 I blew
the whistle on a local company, International Signal & Control, or ISC, that was indicted for selling arms
and weapons to Iraq via South Africa with the aid and support of the CIA and the NSA. It was the 3rd
largest white collar crime at that time, valued at $1 Billion Dollars. I was the victim of a widespread
wholesale cover-up through an elaborate slander campaign that included 29 false arrests, multiple false
imprisonments, and a fabricated mental illness record that to this day is still resonating.
Kathleen Kane must be commended for her courage and her determination for taking on this
culture of arrogance and total disregard for the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law that they so
emphatically espouse to uphold. They believe and conduct their affairs in a manner that suggests they
are above the law and we, the Pennsylvania taxpayers, are beneath the law. The sad fact that it reaches
into the judiciary and law enforcement agencies is undeniably the most outrageous and deplorable truth
to this scandal. Case in point, until yesterday I was the APPELLANT in a case before the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals that involves the Habeus Corpus for convicted and imprisoned Lisa Michelle
Lambert. A murder case in the early 1990's that was made famous when in 1997 U.S. District Judge
Stewart Dalzell found her actually innocent due to "one of the worst cases of prosecutorial misconduct
in the English speaking language" and released her from prison. The case drew nationwide attention
when then Pennsylvania Attorney General, then Mike Fischer, enlisted the help of 9 other state attorney
generals to curtail the reach of the federal bench in state matters concerning Habeus Corpus cases. To
make matters worst, 38,000 Lancastrians signed petitions to remove the Honorable Stewart Dalzell
from the federal bench.
Mike Fisher and company won and Lisa Michelle Lambert was back in prison within 9 months
while the case went back to the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The Honorable Judge
Lawrence Stengel held a bench hearing where she was again found guilty and sentenced to life in
prison. The case was covered by the LA Times in a multi-part Sunday series, A&E producer Bill Curtis
did a 48 Hours special, and Lifetime Movies made it into a prime time movie.
This year, these "Good Old Boys" made it so difficult for me to litigate my efforts to free Lisa
Michelle Lambert, that I had to dismiss my appeal and effectively withdraw as her MOVANT and
Advocate. I was trying to persuade the courts that my own demise was the result of the same type of
wholesale prosecutorial misconduct by some of the very same principals that Lisa Michelle Lambert fell
Page 7
5 of 190
111
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
victim to. My efforts were so distasteful to the powers to be that her court appointed attorney
threatened me with criminal prosecution for no other reason than I might actually be successful in
helping her win the Habeus Corpus she filed in May of 2014. I allege the U.S. District Judge was trying
in vain to invalidate and derail my own federal court cases that seek to restore me to whole from a life
of ruin, misery, torture, and financial collapse.
For the record, I founded a financial firm in the 1980's that reached 5 states and raised some 90
million dollars in a matter of 9 months. In the late 1980's and early 1990's I was one of 5 domestic
companies that had the capabilities of manufacturing CDROM's that included a client list that reached
across the globe and included government agencies and fortune 500 companies. And in 1987, myself
and a genius recording engineer named Tony Bongiovi and his famous recording studio, Power Station
Studios of New York, were developing and producing the first "digital movie". The intellectual property
rights and the RICO statutes that apply to my legal claims in federal courts were too much for the
"Good Old Boys" to handle....
Pennsylvania politics regarding the jurisprudence in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania the following
was quoted by the editor of
"Anyone
who
neutrally
Newslanc.com;
looked
at
Pennsylvania
and
tried to
gauge the
quality of
jurisprudence in the state would have to laugh and say, What in the world is going on
there? . . . Our justice system is about as out of control as it can get. "EDITOR: These
matters cannot properly be settled within Pennsylvania. Everybody from the prosecutors, to
the attorney general, to the justices have skin in the game. It is time for these matters to be
given over to U. S. Attorney General so assure as close to a disinterested investigation as
circumstances permit."
Page 8
6 of 190
111
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Present I have been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct
energy weapons since 2005. I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind
control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture
through the use of directed energy devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency
electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster
County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology
is that I am connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl
Crow of Kennett Missouri. Over the course of 10 years I have been telepathic with at least 20 known
actors and have spent 10 years trying to validate and confirm this person without success. Most U.S.
intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S.
Attorney's Office refuse to comment
In 2009 Advanced Media Group Proposed ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY
WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL
Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of
Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these
horrendous crimes for years.
The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being harassed,
stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from
becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed
energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District Court of Appeals, the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court of
Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations included
violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts relating to
several business interests, harassment, extortion, fraud, etc.,. . Central to this litigation is the Digital
Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated
businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of
International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of
selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates back to 1987. I was a shareholder of ISC,
Page 9
7 of 190
111
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Management Information Systems, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human resource
policies and procedures, marketing strategies and programs, performance measurement reporting, and
administrative and office procedures and logistics. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in
profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and recorded record revenues.
In 1991 Advanced Media Group was elected to People to People International and the Citizen
Ambassador Program, which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was
founded to To give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and
effectively communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face
scientific, technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F.
Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the program.
We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing
technologies with scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 Advanced Media Group had worked on a project to develop voice recognition systems for the
governments technology think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology)
and the
Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA of the Department of Defense . I co-authored the
article Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC,
then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that
technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of
applications involving telecommunications.
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
In 1989 I founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic companies
that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's, which at the time was a new and advanced
technology in its early stages of being commercialized from research and development.
We did
business with commercial companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign
companies. I performed services and contracts or prepared proposals for a host of domestic and foreign
companies including but not limited to: for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of
Standards & Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft,
AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, the Library of Congress, Exxon, Tandy
Computers/Radio Shack, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems,
which was developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now Map Quest. Map Quest is
the premier provider of mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in
delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell
American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly & Sons of Chicago, Illinois.
American Helix was later sold to KAO Industries.
partner with a Boston, Massachusetts software engineer in the selling of a software developed to
diagnose and test CD-ROM drives called CD-Diagnostics. The program was sold to both domestic and
foreign companies and was then under review for company-wide distribution by Microsoft Corporation.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York retained my services as executive producer of a motion
picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the first of its
kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the Power
Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula of the
DOLBY technology trademark. We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for
the development and commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to
the recording industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of
Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios
was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was
15. Tony and Power Station Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were
responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce
Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and
many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original
Star Wars motion picture. It was released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track
recording of its time. Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace
technologies. * We had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in
delivering the Digital Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
the commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry
simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie. I also created the concept for the PSDMS
trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the technology, similar to the DOLBY sound
systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the
mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a compact disc.
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major
banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million
dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from
developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital
that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through
private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by Gamillion
Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of their postproduction Film Studio that was looking
to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde
Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National
Bank. We were quickly seeking commitments for real estate
deals from New York to California. We also had a number of other prominent local developers seeking
our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of
The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets), and Drew Anthon of Eden Resort Inn. We were
constantly told that our financing packages were more completive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG) and served as Executive Vice President
and President of FMG Advisory, Ltd., the investment advisory subsidiary.
teams scouting
departments. (See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant
on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of
video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting
departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the
Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL., and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the
leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League
Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my
camp, while we were at a Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page
article about our camp and associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices.
Actually, that was the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the
country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60
participants, with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster
Catholic, with a professional production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and
produced the video. The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of
the Dallas Cowboys, had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him
and
said
he
looked
forward
to
reviewing
the
tapes
for
any
hopeful
recruits.
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times.
We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms.
Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals
attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong
discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most
effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers,
accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has
become evident that financial planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us
from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
From 1982 to 1985 I was a financial planner for IDS/American Express and licensed in both securities
and insurances.
From 1977 to 1981 I operated SJ Caterbone Painting and Renovating and was was a contractor
responsible for painting and renovating residential, commercial and residential properties and facilities
in Lancaster County.
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Karen Stewart's resume at the NSA is as follows: I Worked various projects over the years, not
just USSR/Russia, but various countries researching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances,
weapons development and proliferation, the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron
Curtain and changing relations among newly liberated countries, economic and diplomatic developments
of certain target countries. I researched and wrote a series of intelligence reports in support of
Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian countermeasures sold to Iraq from wreaking havoc on
the American invasion. This ultimately is what got me fired because I questioned why my work was
used to promote another employee who had no experience with but, was credited with my work .
The following transcript of an interview by Karen Stewart in which she describes the lethal
electromagnetic weapons and her experience on being on the receiving end was taken from the article
titled NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light and can be found at:
http://canadafreepress.com/article/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-into-thelight
The article was written by Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives and published March 28, 2016. The byline is
as follows: In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a follow-up to
that column. Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances, the Whistleblower
has decided to come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that she again chose me to
write her story.
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
showing my innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court
with a predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the
judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.
I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my familys hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011.
All was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from
the Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA Executive) who had
broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006 Inspector General request for an
investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well as illegally bugging (burst bug) our
home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and likely search for blackmail material (no
luck for them there).
After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photostalking me by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and
NSA Security personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the Leon
County Sheriffs Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also had
personnel land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property north of
Lake Jackson (near where I now live) for a secret exercise, just before the second round of stalking
harassment began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security to contact the Naval
Security Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland along with NSA) to initially
stalk and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSA could send its own Security
personnel to Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of
the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and its civilian group, InfraGard, made up of
civilians recruited from their Ride-Along programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as
to why the civilians should actively and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious
questions about why laws and due process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group
eagerly jumped at the opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may
add).
Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a cast-iron target, meaning
multiple people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my home
overnight on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my benefit. NSA
also sought out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts, which could be
anything from hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both home (to bug and
monitor short-distance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle GPS trackers to facilitate
car stalking and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active participants, others not assigned to
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
me on a certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a special site the big bad threat to report my
location and time I was there. People even snooped in my shopping carts to be able to tattle to
someone about what I was doing, what I was buying. (God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the
children!).
This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going
for the usual See, shes paranoid, reporting harassment every day now just dismiss her lawsuit!
But I did report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run,
purposely sideswiping my car, (This is exatly what happened to the PETTITIONER on May 9,
2016 enroute to MEDEXPRESS for pain medications) and botching the placement/removal of
a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my spoiler. (They feared my mechanic
would find their tracker so they botched its removal the night before my appointment). I
even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using my hobby art shop on a popular internet
site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. After all, they were mostly nave,
unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they were little James Bonds and that
the greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be
decided, living in Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.
In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not sufficiently
being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my lawsuit to recover
my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level. In 2009 I had
researched gang-stalking and discovered it was a real and growing phenomenon, but when
electrical harassment was mentioned, I could not really grasp the concept and wondered
about its existence. But I was to find out first hand in November 2015 that it does exist and
is a horrific crime against humanity.
NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed Energy
Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons emit
multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves modulated to radio
frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I cant say I understand yet. Now, with the
help of certain mercenary and morally depraved neighbors, the effort is almost 24/7 now
with the intention being torture and slow-kill. These types of weapons over a lengthy time,
cause cancer, autoimmune disease, heart attacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect
stealth murder weapon for a corrupt government.
At this point, when we leave the house, a criminal base of stalkers has been enlisted
by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
to speed up death, with the help of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in my location like
good little sheeple.
The Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department
are dragging their feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when
I try to enlist their help to come up with a strategy to combat this new crime before I or
one of my family is dead. They cant quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and
nothing protects the police or any official from this new weapon held and wielded by
criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have experience using the mobile DEWs in
Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval Security Group headquartered at Ft. Meade
with NSA, is also called the Silent Warriors because they specialize in the use of Directed
Energy Weapons. Im sure the Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand and
may have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a few for their secret exercise in
Tallahassee.
Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they
say you do. If they use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of
simply settling for a tenth of the cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they
can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason and get away with itincluding any leader or
politician.
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case
No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-0603401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
October 2015
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20543
CERTIORARI
I. Introduction
These instructions and forms are designed to assist petitioners who are proceeding in
forma pauperis and without the assistance of counsel. A copy of the Rules of the
Supreme Court, which establish the procedures that must be followed, is also enclosed.
Be sure to read the following Rules carefully:
Rules 10-14 (Petitioning for certiorari)
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
13.3. Filing in the Supreme Court means the actual receipt of documents by the Clerk;
or their deposit in the United States mail, with rst-class postage prepaid, on or before
the nal date allowed for ling; or their delivery to a third-party commercial carrier,
on or before the nal date allowed for ling, for delivery to the Clerk within 3 calendar
days. See Rule 29.2.
IV. What To File
Unless you are an inmate conned in an institution and not represented by counsel,
le:
An original and ten copies of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
an original and 10 copies of an afdavit or declaration in support thereof. See Rule 39.
An original and 10 copies of a petition for a writ of certiorari with an appendix
consisting of a copy of the judgment or decree you are asking this Court to review
including any order on rehearing, and copies of any opinions or orders by any courts or
administrative agencies that have previously considered your case. See Rule 14.1(i).
One afdavit or declaration showing that all opposing parties or their counsel have
been served with a copy of the papers led in this Court. See Rule 29.
If you are an inmate conned in an institution and not represented by counsel, you need
le only the original of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, afdavit or
declaration when needed in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pau
peris, the petition for a writ of certiorari, and proof of service.
If the court below appointed counsel in the current proceeding, no afdavit or declara
tion is required, but the motion should cite the provision of law under which counsel
was appointed, or a copy of the order of appointment should be appended to the motion.
See Rule 39.1.
The attached forms may be used for the original motion, afdavit or declaration, and
petition, and should be stapled together in that order. The proof of service should be
included as a detached sheet, and the form provided may be used.
V. Page Limitation
The petition for a writ of certiorari may not exceed 40 pages excluding the pages that
precede Page 1 of the form. The documents required to be contained in the appendix
to the petition do not count toward the page limit. See Rule 33.2(b).
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
I.
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
decision could be had denied discretionary review, a copy of that order should
follow. If an order denying a timely led petition for rehearing starts the run
ning of the time for ling a petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 13.3,
a copy of the order should be appended next.
As an example, if the state trial court ruled against you, the intermediate court
of appeals afrmed the decision of the trial court, the state supreme court denied
discretionary review and then denied a timely petition for rehearing, the appen
dices should appear in the following order:
Appendix A Decision of State Court of Appeals
Appendix B Decision of State Trial Court
Appendix C Decision of State Supreme Court Denying Review
Appendix D Order of State Supreme Court Denying Rehearing
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
No.
IN THE
Stanley J. Caterbone
PETITIONER
(Your Name)
VS.
Lancaster County Crisis Intervention, et.al.,
RESPONDENT(S)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania; U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District; Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas; Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
(Signature)
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
I, Stanley J. Caterbone
, am the petitioner in the above-entitled case. In support of
my motion to proceed in forma pauperis, I state that because of my poverty I am unable to pay
the costs of this case or to give security therefor; and I believe I am entitled to redress.
1. For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received from each of
the following sources during the past 12 months. Adjust any amount that was received
weekly, biweekly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate. Use gross
amounts, that is, amounts before any deductions for taxes or otherwise.
Income source
Amount expected
next month
You
Spouse
You
Spouse
Employment
Self-employment
Gifts
Alimony
Child Support
$1,357.00
Unemployment payments
Public-assistance
(such as welfare)
Other (specify):
$ $1,357.00
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
2. List your employment history for the past two years, most recent rst. (Gross monthly pay
is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer
Address
Dates of
Employment
$
$
$
3. List your spouses employment history for the past two years, most recent employer rst.
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer
Address
Dates of
Employment
Type of account
Members First
TD Ameritrade
Checking/Savings
Checking
5. List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse owns. Do not list clothing
and ordinary household furnishings.
x Home
D
Value 25% of 80,000.00
x Motor Vehicle #1
D
Year, make & model 2007 Honda CRV
Value $4,000.00
D Motor Vehicle #2
Year, make & model
Value
x Other assets
D
Description 997,000,000 Shares of Advanced Media Group, Ltd., - NON MARKETABLE STOCK
Value
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
6. State every person, business, or organization owing you or your spouse money, and the
amount owed.
Person owing you or
your spouse money
4,295,443.24
7. State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.
Name
Attilio and Angelen Grossi
Relationship
Age
Extended Family
90/89
8. Estimate the average monthly expenses of you and your family. Show separately the amounts
paid by your spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weekly, biweekly, quarterly, or
annually to show the monthly rate.
You
Your spouse
$ 350.00
$ 510.00
300.00
Food
200.00
Clothing
50.00
$
100.00
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
You
Transportation (not including motor vehicle payments)
100.00
200.00
Your spouse
$
$
Homeowners or renters
Life
Health
Motor Vehicle
70.00
200.00
Other:
Office/Computer/Copying/Postage
(specify):
Installment payments
220.00
Motor Vehicle
Credit card(s)
Department store(s)
Other:
Home Improvement
500.00
Other (specify):
2,278.00
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
9. Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or expenses or in your assets or
liabilities during the next 12 months?
x Yes
D
D No
10. Have you paid or will you be paying an attorney any money for services in connection
x No
with this case, including the completion of this form?
D Yes
D
If yes, how much?
11. Have you paidor will you be payinganyone other than an attorney (such as a paralegal or
a typist) any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this
form?
D Yes
x No
D
12. Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the costs of this case.
This Alleged "conspiracy" for lack of a better term, has been extorting real assets, real monies, real businesses,
real property, and real intellectual property since 1987. It is designed to drain even additional assets through
the use of judicial misconduct; public corruption; and the obstruction of justice and due process by making
me pay to have the courts of this country put an end to this once and for all - the charging of court fees
is in itself another means of extorting real monies from A VICTIM!
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on:
August 9,
, 20 16
(Signature)
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
No.
IN THE
Stanley J. Caterbone
PETITIONER
(Your Name)
vs.
RESPONDENT(S)
Stanley J. Caterbone
(Your Name)
1250 Fremont Street
(Address)
Lancaster, PA 17603
(Phone Number)
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED
1. Has the lower courts obstructed my rights to due process and have they recinded my U.S. Constitutional Rights
2. As an "Enemy of the State", Targeted Individual, and Victim of U.S. Mind Control (SSA has granted me disability
benefits in August of 2009 for Symptoms and Illnesses Relating to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control) Will You Grant Me
My LIBERTY AND FREEDOM - As Guarunteed To All U.S. Citizens? I have Amended the Habeus Corpus of the
U.S. District Court in December of 2015 which specifically requests the same; only to be DENIED by the U.S.
Third Circuit. The Amended Habeus is attached and is from Case No. 15-03984 of the U.S. District Court.
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
LIST OF PARTIES
[ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.
[ x] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of
all parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this
petition is as follows:
Lancaster County District Attorney
Detective Clark Bearinger, Lancaster City Police
Lancaster City Police Department
Dr. Silvia Gratz, Medical Director Fairmount Behavioral Health
Fairmount Behavioral Health System
Lancaster General Hospital
Nurse Jane Doe
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
JURISDICTION...................................................................................................................
CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................
INDEX TO APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
APPENDIX F
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
CASES
PAGE NUMBER
OTHER
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
IN THE
OPINIONS BELOW
[ ] For cases from federal courts:
The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at Appendix
the petition and is
to
[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
The opinion of the United States district court appears at Appendix
the petition and is
to
[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
[ ] For cases from state courts:
The opinion of the highest state court to review the merits appears at
Appendix
to the petition and is
[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
The opinion of the
appears at Appendix
court
to the petition and is
[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
1.
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
JURISDICTION
[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was thereafter denied on the following date:
, and a copy of the order denying rehearing
appears at Appendix
.
[ ] An extension of time to le the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted
to and including
(date) on
(date) in
Application No.
A
.
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. 1257(a).
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
CONCLUSION
Respectfully submitted,
Date:
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
No.
IN THE
PETITIONER
(Your Name)
VS.
RESPONDENT(S)
PROOF OF SERVICE
I,
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
, 20
(Signature)
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
A
c
t
i
v
e
Case No.
Court
Case Description
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP-STAN CATERBONE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (42 Active Cases)
Court Venue
Filing
Date
Appeal
Date
Defendants
Judges
Judement
Value
Notes
3/3/2006
Fulton Bank
No. 05-23059
Description
5/23/2005
Lost appeal
05-cv-2288
5/16/2005
CA-05-3689
Chapter 11 Dismissal
6/13/2005
Awarded Appeal
CA 06-5117
8/23/2006
See **
Wenger, et al
ISC/Ferranti/US Attorney
General Gonzales
6
7
8
9
9
Y
Y
10
11
12
06-cv-4154
06-CV-4650
06-cv-4734
06-cv-5138
Case No.
07-cv-2151
06-cv-3955
06-cv-3054
8/25/2006
10/25/2006
10/1/2006
11/20/2006
Date
4/13/2007
07-cv-4474
11/23/2007
14
12
07-cv-4475
11/23/2007
Date
Court Venue
Defendants
Judges
8/25/2006
13
Case No.
Date
See **
Date
Wenger, et al
Defendants
Judges
Description
4/26/2005
8/2/2006
CI-06-03403
PA Common Pleas
4/11/2006
Thomas Grassel
Non Assigned
CI-06-03401
PA Common Pleas
4/11/2006
SRPD;Fiorill,Busser,Fedor
PA Common Pleas
4/10/2006
Lancaster General
HospitalDr. Emily Preston
Non Assigned
CI-05-03644
CI-06-07376
17
18
19
CI-06-03349
20
CI-06-07330
PA Common Pleas
8/1/2006
Harleysville Insurance
Non Assigned
21
CI-O6-04939
PA Common Pleas
5/24/2006
Non Assigned
22
CI-06-02271
PA Common Pleas
3/8/2006
Stanley J. Caterbone
Non Assigned
23
CI-06-07188
PA Common Pleas
7/26/2006
PP&L Electric
Non Assigned
24
CI-06-06658
PA Common Pleas
7/14/2006
Non Assigned
Non Assigned
25
CI-06-08490
26
27
Y
Y
CV-0000207-05
28
Cv-160-06
29
CI-07-00019
PA Common Pleas
9/2/2006
Y. Caterbone
DJ Sheryl Hartman
6/27/2006
Comcast;Susan Gibson
MDJ Ballentine
PA Common Pleas
1/2/2007
Addendum 01/05/2007
Notes
See **
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
Y
Y
Value
15
16
Page 48 of 190
1 of 4
Value
Notes
26.000.00
$10,000 +
Must Collect
Defaulted
$100,000.00 Defaulted
$300,000.00
$50,000.00
$4,958.00 Won and Collected
Awaiting Verdict from July 20th,
$5,000.00 2006
A
c
t
Y
CI-07-00150
31
32
29
No.
Case No.
Court
Case Description
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP-STAN CATERBONE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (42 Active Cases)
Court Venue
Filing
Date
Appeal
Date
Defendants
Judges
Description
Judement
Value
Notes
Date
Defendants
Judges
Description
Value
Notes
PA Common Pleas
1/8/2007
CI-07-00366
PA Common Pleas
1/16/2007
CI-07-03924
Case No.
PA Common Pleas
Court Venue
5/7/2007
Date
33
8/30/2006
Fulton Bank
Judge Georgelis
34
S Caterbone v. PennDOT
8/30/2006
PennDOT
8/30/2006
5/7/2007
Judge Allison
Judge Reinaker
6/1/2006
Judge Cullen
1/4/2007
Judge Farina
3/9/2007
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Y
Y
8/30/2007
Whiteford
Gjurich
2/5/2007
7/20/2007
48
432 MT 2007
CI-07-00366
8/16/2007
49
433 MT 2007
8/16/2007
50
418 MT 2007
51
128 MM 2007
CI-07-00366
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007 PA
Superior Court
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007 PA
Superior Court
Georgelis
Georgelis
8/8/2007
8/8/2007
53
Y
Y
1130 CD 2007
1444 CD 2007
8/2/2007
Docket/Brief Schedule
Docket/Brief Schedule
54
1442 CD 2007
8/2/2007
Docket/Brief Schedule
Case No.
45
Court Venue
Judge Cullen
42
52
Date
Date
Defendants
Judges
Description
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
TR-0000245-06
TR-0003020-06
Stan Caterbone
59
TR-0000085-06
Stan Caterbone
60
SP2421099
Stan Caterbone
TR-0001010-06
Stan Caterbone
55
56
57
58
61
CV-0000207-05
District Justice
No Opinion
Judge Cullen
47
46
4/3/2006
MDJ Eckert
MDJ Eckert to Hamilton
MDJ Eckert to Mylin
Page 49 of 190
2 of 4
Value
Notes
63
64
A
c
t
Y
65
66
67
Case No.
TR-0001011-06
71
72
Court Venue
Filing
Date
MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Eckert to Commins
CR-0000141-06
DUI;Resisting Arrest;Offensive
Weapons
8/8/2006
Stan Caterbone
Disorderly Conduct
Parking Meter Violation
4/12/2006
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Ballentine
7/7/2006
5/26/2006
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Simms
5/19/2006
6/16/2006
10/16/2006
10/25/2006
timeserved
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
No Parking or Stoping
82
83
84
85
86
TR-0004428-06
TR-0003557-06
TR-0000598-06
TR-0002645-06
TR-0002646-06
5/26/2006
4/28/2006
87
88
89
TR-0007528-06
TR-2183-2006
TR-2184-2006
9/13/2006
9/5/2006
9/5/2006
Case No.
Case No.
MD 51-2007
2006-214
2006-215
2006-220
2006-221
2006-222
2006-224
20062005 2007-
Comcast v. S Caterbone
Court Venue
MDJ Simms
MDJ Simms
8/11/2006
5/26/2006
TR-0001517
TR-0005057
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
Notes
89
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
CR-0000385-06
TR-0004428-06
Judement
Value
7/11/2006
4/3/2006
TR-0008503-06
TR-0008735-06
99
Description
TR-0006812-06
TR-0008037-06
TR-0008066-06
TR-0007880-06
TR-0008721-06
TR-0008578-06
TR-0003557-06
Judges
73
74
80
Defendants
Stan Caterbone
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
Appeal
Date
TR-0002658-06
NT-0000220-06
TR-0002645-06
TR-0004428-06
70
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP-STAN CATERBONE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (42 Active Cases)
68
69
Court
Case Description
Stan Caterbone
timeserved
timeserved
timeserved
76.89
76.89
10/25/2006
10/16/2006
87.89
1/7/2007
325 Roth
75
112
7/7/2006
7/7/2006
Date
282.5
DISMISSED 01/18/200
DISMISSED 01/18/200
Date
Defendants
Judges
Description
Value
Description
Value
Notes
1/18/2007
Date
Common Pleas
Date
Defendants
Simms
100
8/11/2006
Burger
101
8/7/2006
Michner
102
8/11/2006
Michner
103
MD-6-2006
Continuance-Eckert Stotzfus
104
105
MD-10-2007
Judges
Cullin
Notes
TR-0008735;TR-0008578;TR-8721;TR0008503;TR-0007528
TR-0002184-06;tr-0002183-06;NT0000569-06;NT-0000561-06;NT-0000562
06
1/15/2006
Page 50 of 190
3 of 4
A
c
t
Case No.
Court
Case Description
Court Venue
Filing
Date
Appeal
Date
Defendants
106
107
MD-11-2007
MD-12-2007
108
CP-36-SA-00001592006
Nunc Pro Tunc
109
MD-0006-2007
SA-158-07
Simms NT-0001707-2006
6/4/2007
Simms/Gjurich
Ballentine TR-0002658-2006
5/30/2007
Ballentine/Whiteford
110
111
Y
Y
SA-154-2007
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP-STAN CATERBONE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (42 Active Cases)
Judges
Description
Judement
Value
Notes
Page 51 of 190
4 of 4
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third1Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
717-669-2163
Court
with
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
APPELLANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the
Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 0523059. The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however
this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the
government that ignored the APPELLANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the
days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive
Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons under
oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.
/s/ Stanley J. Caterbone
Date: December 2, 2015
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third2Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
December 2, 2015
U.S.C.A. 15-3400
E.D.C. 14-02559 Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Corpus Appeal
Re: Outstanding Receivables with Pro Se Billings To Date
Item #1:
Stan J. Caterbone
APPELLANT, Pro Se
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third3Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0008
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
$ 4,202.87
$ 4,202.87
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$35.02
$ 4,237.89
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$35.02
$ 4,272.92
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
UD
Updated Claim
$ 6,911.87
$ 6,911.87
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$ 6,969.47
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$ 7,027.27
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$ 7084.67
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$ 7,142.27
10/01/2009
11/01/2009
10/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
FC
Finance Charge
Finance Charge
$
$
57.60
57.60
$ 7,199.87
$7,257.47
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$7,257.47
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$7,372.67
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$7,430.27
03/01/2010
03/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$7,487.87
04/01/2010
04/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$7,545.47
05/01/2010
05/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$7,603.07
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
FC
Finance Charge
$2,838.00
$10,441.00
6% Compounded Monthly
TOTAL DUE:
$10,441.00
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third4Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0007
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
310.49
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
315.49
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
320.49
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
325.49
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
330.49
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
335.49
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
340.49
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
345.49
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
350.49
11/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
355.49
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
360.49
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
365.49
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
370.49
03/01/2010
03/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
375.49
04/01/2010
04/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
380.49
05/01/2010
05/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
385.49
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
FC
Finance Charge
143.15
528.60
6% Compounded Monthly
TOTAL DUE:
$ 528.60
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third5Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0006
Claim No.'s:
MD-702274
MO-658554-U XC
MO-6546~9-U XC
Phone: 888.595.9876
Fax: 888.492.8954
E-mail: [email protected]
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 14,782.79
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 14,917.93
04/1/2009
04/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,053.07
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,188.21
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,323.35
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,458.49
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,593.63
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,728.77
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,863.91
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,999.05
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 16,134.19
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 16,269.33
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 16,404.47
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 16,539.61
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 16,674.75
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 16,809.89
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
FC
Finance Charge
$ 6,270.00
$ 23,079.97
135.14
6% Compounded Monthly
TOTAL DUE:
$23,079.97
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third6Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0005
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 29,513.83
04/1/2009
04/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 29,783.64
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 30,053.45
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 30,323.26
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 30,593.07
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 30,862.88
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 31,132.69
10/1/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 31,402.50
11/1/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 31,672.31
12/1/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 31,942.12
01/1/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 32,211.33
02/1/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 32,481.14
03/1/2010
03/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 32,751.55
04/1/2010
04/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 33,021.36
05/1/2010
05/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 33,291.17
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
FC
Finance Charge
$12,417.60
$ 45,708.77
269.81
Balance
$ 29,244.02
6% Compounded Monthly
TOTAL DUE:
$45,708.77
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third7Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0003
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 18,724.22
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 18,895.39
04/1/2009
04/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,066.56
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,237.73
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,408.90
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,580.07
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,751.24
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,922.41
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,093.58
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,264.75
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,435.92
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,607.09
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,778.26
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,949.43
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 21,120.60
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 29,233.60
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
FC
Finance Charge
$ 8,113.00
$ 45,708.77
171.17
6% Compounded Monthly
TOTAL DUE:
$29,233.60
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third8Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0004
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 82,170.02
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 82,921.19
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 83,672.36
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 84,423.53
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,174.70
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,925.87
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 86,677.04
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 87,428.21
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,179.38
11/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,930.55
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 89,681.72
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 90,432.85
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 91,184.02
03/01/2010
03/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 91,935.23
04/01/2010
04/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 92,686.40
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
FC
Finance Charge
$ 35,603.38
TOTAL DUE:
751.17
$128,289.78
$128,289.78
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third9Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0004
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 82,170.02
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 82,921.19
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 83,672.36
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 84,423.53
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,174.70
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,925.87
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 86,677.04
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 87,428.21
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,179.38
11/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,930.55
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 89,681.72
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 90,432.85
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 91,184.02
03/01/2010
03/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 91,935.23
04/01/2010
04/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 92,686.40
05/01/2010
05/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 93,437.57
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
FC
Finance Charge
$ 35,603.38
TOTAL DUE:
751.17
$128,289.78
$128,289.78
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
10Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0004
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 82,170.02
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 82,921.19
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 83,672.36
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 84,423.53
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,174.70
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,925.87
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 86,677.04
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 87,428.21
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,179.38
11/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 89,681.72
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 90,432.85
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 91,184.02
03/01/2010
03/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 91,935.23
04/01/2010
04/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 92,686.40
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
FC
Finance Charge
$ 35,603.38
TOTAL DUE:
751.17
$ 88,930.55
$128,289.78
$128,289.78
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
11Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0001
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 2,335.92
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,357.27
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,378.62
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,399.97
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,421.32
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,442.67
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,464.02
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,485.37
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,506.72
11/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,528.07
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,549.42
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,570.77
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,592.12
03/01/2010
03/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,613.47
04/01/2010
04/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,634.82
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
FC
Finance Charge
$ 1,012.10
$ 3,646.92
TOTAL DUE:
21.35
$ 3,646.82
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
12Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0009
Description
Amount
Balance
Outstanding Payments
for Town & Country Lease
Executed on April 31, 1998
For 1994 Ford Explorer as
Per Agreement. See Attached
Exhibits.
$ 14,000.00
$ 14,000.00
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Invoice
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,116.67
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,233.34
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,350.01
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,466.68
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,466.68
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,700.02
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,816.69
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,933.36
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 15,050.03
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 15,166.70
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 15,283.37
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 15,400.04
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
$ 5,744.21
TOTAL DUE:
$ 21,144.25
$ 0.00
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
13Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID: 0010
Date Due
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Balance
Outstanding Invoice
$ 2,600.00
2,618.00
Invoice Discrimination and Harassment during Free Dental Day of May 1, 2009 Patient traveled to
facility at Approx. 6:00 for free dental Services to get at least a Cavity filled after seeing it on
WGAL-T\/8 News at 5:30 am. At approximately 11:00 am patient received a Panoramic X-Ray
and approximately 10 minutes later the patient received a free dental Examination in the
examination room closest to Main Street, New Holland by a Dentist who identified himself as
being from Reading. The dentist examined the patient's mouth and described a large cavity (from
a prior filling falling out) that needed a crown or filling. Patient explained that he wanted a filling
and would opt for a crown at a later time. Dentist agreed and wrote the prognosis and treatment
for a filling on patient's chart. Patient was told to wait for his turn. The Dental Staff broke for
lunch, and patient immediately inquired about the number. Staff had told the yet to be treated
patients that approximately 70 to 80 people were already treated. Patient had number 366,
which meant that 65 persons were to be treated before him. The Staff told patient that he would
be one of first after lunch. It was now approximately 2:15 when 3 females approached the
patient in the waiting room and tried to explain that there was an infection in the area to be
treated, however the examining dentist made no mention of any infection or abscess. The patient
did not know if the girls were authorized, or even if they were part of the dental staff. The
patient demanded his X-Ray and walked out of the facility. The woman and 2 females that
identified themselves as coming from the Mt. Joy Career Technical Institute, namely the darker
student and the teacher were harassing all day.
$600.00
$ 16.00
$ 2.00
$2,000.00
01/1/2010
02/1/2010
03/1/2010
04/1/2010
05/1/2010
09/03/2015
Finance
Finance
Finance
Finance
Finance
Finance
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
$
21.82
$
21.82
$
21.82
$
21.82
$
21.82
$ 1,074.19
TOTAL DUE:
$ 2,770.74
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,792.56
2,814.38
2,836.20
2,858.02
2,879.84
3,953.63
$ 3,953.63
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
14Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0011
Date Due
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
06/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Balance
$ 35,070.00
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
Monthly Disability
$
$
292.25
835.00
$ 35,362.25
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
Monthly Disability
$
$
292.25
835.00
$ 36,489.50
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
Monthly Disability
$
$
292.25
835.00
$ 37,616.75
$ 38,451.75
08/20/2009
08/20/2009
Payment
$21,460.00
$ 16,991.75
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
0.00
$ 16,991.75
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,133.35
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,274.95
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,416.55
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,558.15
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,669.75
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,841.35
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,982.95
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 18,124.55
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
$ 6,760.45
$ 24,885.00
$36,197.25
07/1/2009
$37,324.50
TOTAL DUE:
$ 24,885.00
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
15Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0012
Account of:
Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation
7th Floor, Labor & Industry Building
Date
Date Due
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
Invoice
Invoice
$129,600.00
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$130,680.00
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$131,760.00
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$132,840.00
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$133,920.00
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$135,000.00
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$136,080.00
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$137,160.00
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$138,240.00
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$139,320.00
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$140,400.00
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$141,480.00
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$142,560.00
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
$28,460.88
TOTAL DUE:
$170,020.88
$170,020.88
Tuesday
September
August
3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
16Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0014
Date
Date Due
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Balance
$ 443.00
$ 1,781.40
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
0.00
$ 1,781.40
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,796.25
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,811.10
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,825.95
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,840.80
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,855.65
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,870.50
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,885.36
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,900.21
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,915.05
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,929.90
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,944.75
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
$ 725.39
$ 2,670.14
TOTAL DUE:
$ 2,670.14
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
17Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0015
Account of:
Lancaster Employment Training Agency LETA
1016 North Charlotte Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Date
Date Due
06/1/2009
05/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Balance
$ 14,000.00
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,116.67
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,233.34
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,350.01
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,466.69
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,583.35
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,700.02
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,816.69
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,933.36
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 15,050.03
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 15,166.70
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 15,283.37
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
$ 5,700.69
TOTAL DUE:
$ 20,984.06
$ 20,984.06
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
18Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0016
Date Due
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Balance
7/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,763.90
8/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,861.13
9/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,958.36
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,055.59
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,152.82
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,347.28
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,444.51
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,541.74
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,638.97
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,736.20
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
$ 4,750.60
$ 17,486.80
TOTAL DUE:
$ 17,486.80
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
19Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID: 0017
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Invoice
7/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$11,814.31
8/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$11,911.95
9/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,009.59
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,107.23
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,204.87
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,302.51
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,400.15
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,497.79
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,595.43
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,693.07
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,790.71
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
600.00
$ 13,390.71
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
$ 4,994.73
$ 18,385.44
TOTAL DUE:
$ 18,385.44
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
20Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0018
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Invoice
7/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,763.90
8/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,861.13
9/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,958.36
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,055.59
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,152.82
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,250.05
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,347.28
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,444.51
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,541.74
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,638.97
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,736.20
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
$ 4,750.60
TOTAL DUE:
$ 17,486.80
$ 17,486.60
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
21Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0013
Date
Date Due
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Balance
$10,000.00
$15,920.00
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,052.67
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,185.34
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,318.01
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,450.68
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,583.35
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,716.02
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,848.69
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,981.36
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 17,114.03
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 17,246.70
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 17,379.37
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 17,512.04
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
$ 6,531.99
$ 24,044.03
TOTAL DUE:
$ 24,044.03
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
22Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0020
Date
Date Due
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
02/1/2010
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
$700.00
$ 700.00
Finance Charge
5.83
$ 705.83
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
5.83
$ 711.66
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
5.83
$ 717.49
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
5.83
$ 723.32
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
5.83
$ 729.15
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
$ 271.97
TOTAL DUE:
$1,001.12
$ 1001.12
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
23Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0021
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Balance
$2,300,000.00
See attached:
Federal Whistleblower and Targeted Individual of U.S Sponsored Mind
Control
5.CIA Torture Investigations EIT Program & SERE and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control by Stan J. Caterbone,
October 2, 2009 Used as Exhibit in Human Rights Complaint to U.N. Council for Human Rights
6.http://www.scribd.com/doc/23900626/CIA-Torture-Investigations-EIT-Program-SERE-and-U-SSponsored-Mind-Control-by-Stan-Caterbone-October-2-2009
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
19,166.66
$2,300,019.66
03/1/2010
03/1/2010
Finance Charge
19,166.66
$2,740,671.74
04/1/2010
04/1/2010
Finance Charge
19,166.66
$2,357.499.98
05/1/2010
05/1/2010
Finance Charge
19,166.66
$2,376,666.54
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
$88,495.46
$3,263,162.00
Finance Charge
TOTAL DUE:
$3,263,162.00
Fee for service does not include interest, penalties, or any damages to health and welfare of Stanley J.
Caterbone.
Advanced
DRAFT-PETITION
Media Group
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 74
22 of 119
190
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
24Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
0022
Date
Date Due
Reference
02/16/2010
03/01/2010
$6.000.00
$15,550.00
$21,550.00
$8,038.15
$ 29,588.15
04/01/2010
04/01/2010
09/03/2015
09/03/2015
Finance Charge
Description
Amount
TOTAL DUE:
Balance
$ 29,588.15
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
25Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:
Re:
Account of:
City of Lancaster
Attention: Housing and Neighborhood Revitalization Unit
120 North Duke Street
Lancaster City Rehab Program Application & Denial
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
0023
Balance
On May 19, 2015 Stan Caterbone visited City Hall with the application for the Lancaster City Rehab
Program as instructed By an employee of the City of Lancaster. Stan Caterbone had met with the
employee on several occasions regarding the Application and approval process.
The week before Stan Caterbone had delivered a Contractors Application from a local Contractor
named Mark Nuchi, ($2,700 estimate for a new roof; which is in dire need of repair) a local roofer. The
employee had told Stan Caterbone to complete the application in advance Of transferring the Deed of
1250 Fremont Street from the Estate of Yolanda Caterbone. On May 19, 2015 Darren Palmer, the
Inspector and Marrisol Torres reviewed the application and Stan Caterbone questioned them on
whether the review process included any sort of requirements regarding the amount of assets listed on
the application. They both told Stan Caterbone that all financial assets receive a multiple of 2.5 times
the amount and that amount is included in the income analysis for the income requirements as
outlined on the website under HUD requirements.
Stan Caterbone became frustrated because the website lists In detail all requirements for financial
review. No where on the website does it mention any analysis or limits of assets. Marrisol Torres
responded that the asset analysis is included in the handbook from HUD. Stan Caterbone asserted that
he spent some 25 hours preparing the application.
Stan Caterbone does not believe that the City of Lancaster was being truthful and it was another case
of trying to avert his rights to enter the Lancaster City Rehab Program. The City of Lancaster has
failed to present any such requirement in writing and Stan Caterbone pressed the employees on why
such requirement is omitted on the website. That is not fair and may be A violation of HUD policy.
06/22/2015
TOTAL DUE:
$2,675.00
$2,700.00
$5,375.00
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
26Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Advanced Media Group 2007
Aged Receivables
As of May 31, 2007
Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by ID. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Customer ID
Customer
Contact
Telephone 1
Invoice No
0001
S.N. Lombardo Development
Ralph Mazzocchi
717-394-3422
7001
0 - 30
31 - 60
0001
S.N. Lombardo Development
0002
Yolanda Caterbone
7002
0002
Yolanda Caterbone
0003
High Industries
S. Dale High
7003
0003
High Industries
0004
Fulton Bank/Lanc Co Sheriff
Terry Bergman
7004
0004
Fulton Bank/Lanc Co Sheriff
0005
Drew Anthon - Eden Resort Inn
Drew Anthon
7005
0005
Drew Anthon - Eden Resort Inn
0006
Harleysville Insurance Company
Claims Department
7006
7007
0006
Harleysville Insurance Compan
0007
7008
Over 90 days
Amount Due
1,871.00
1,871.00
1,871.00
1,871.00
1,545.00
1,545.00
1,545.00
1,545.00
15,221.40
15,221.40
15,221.40
15,221.40
67,147.45
67,147.45
67,147.45
67,147.45
24,118.00
24,118.00
24,118.00
24,118.00
7,898.19
6,878.25
7,898.19
6,878.25
14,776.44
14,776.44
944.90
944.90
61 - 90
Page 1 of 39
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
27Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Advanced Media Group 2007
Aged Receivables
As of May 31, 2007
Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by ID. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Customer ID
Customer
Contact
Telephone 1
Invoice No
0 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
Over 90 days
Amount Due
Chris Reed
0007
Lancaster County Treasurer
Report Total
944.90
106,986.79
944.90
16,766.40
Page 2 of 39
1,871.00
125,624.19
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900
Page:
76Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
717-669-2163
Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lisa Michelle Lambert
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
Lynn Bissonnette, et al.,
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
Stanley J. Caterbone
APPELLANT
:
:
:
:
day of November, 2015, submit for considerations in the above captioned case the
attached document as an EXHIBIT, Advanced Media Group Pro Se Billings and Sales Journal
From January 1, 2007 to August 31, 2008.
appropriate law that would grant the APPELLANT at least this amount $284,702.50 in pro se billings considering
the magnitude and duration of the APPELLANTS pain and suffering.
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
AMG Chapter 11
3/1/2007 Bankruptcy
003112143900
Page: 77
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Item Description
May 2005 Research Filing of Petition for Bankruptcy,
Russell Kraft, Nettleton & Fenefrock
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
May 23 2005 File for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Protection in Federal Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, Reading
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
June 21 2005 Notice of Appeal Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone Regarding 6/13/2005 Order Dismissing
Case for Debtor's Failure to Timely File Required
Documents to
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$625.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$125.00
$625.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$125.00
$375.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$150.00
$1,050.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
Qty
$1,250.00
$25,800.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$1,750.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
003112143900
Page: 78
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
June 2 2005 Order Granting Application To Pay Filing
Fees In Installments. (Related Doc # 4);
June 13 2005 Order Dismissing Case for Debtor's
Failure to Timely File Required Documents. (P.,
Cathy) (Entered: 06/13/2005)
June 21 2005 Summary of Schedules, Schedules A-J,
Statement of Financial Affairs Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (Attachments: # J. Statement of
Financial Affai
06/21/2005 Summary of Schedules, Schedules A-J,
Statement of Financial Affairs Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (Attachments: # J. Statement of
Financial Aff
07/01/2005 Appellant Designation of Contents For
Inclusion in Record On Appeal, and Findings of Fact
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone . (Attachments: # I
Findi
09/21/2005 District Court Order entered within Civil
Action # 05-CV-3689 Notice of Appeal Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding 6/13/2005 Order
Dismissing
10/05/2005 Final Order By District Court Judge Anita
B. Brody - RE: Notice of Appeal (CA-05-3689)
Regarding 6/13/2005 Order Dismissing Ca
11/08/2005 Notice of Hearing to Show Cause why
this case should
not be not be Dismissed for
Debtor's Failure to Timely Pay Filing Fees for Chapter
1
Item Description
Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$875.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$375.00
3
6
$125.00
$150.00
$375.00
$900.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
25
$125.00
$3,125.00
$125.00
$500.00
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
$125.00
$500.00
$150.00
$900.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
003112143900
Page: 79
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Item Description
05/03/2006 Order (copy) entered in District Court
within Appeal CV-06-1538 ; Ordered that the
Appellant's motion for continuance is Denied as Moot
(con
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
05/30/2006 05/30/2006 05/30/2006 Motion to
Convert Case to Chapter 7 . Fee Amount $15.00,
Motion to Dismiss Case Filed by United States Trustee
Represente
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$150.00
$900.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$375.00
11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$125.00
11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$125.00
11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$125.00
11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
003112143900
Page: 80
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Item Description
02/20/2007 Notice of Appeal to District Court of
Order entered 2/7/2007 DENYING Debtor's Motion to
Reconsider Order DENYING Debtor's Application to
Wa
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
02/26/2007 Corrective Entry - RE: Notice of Appeal
of Order DENYING Debtor's Motion to Reconsider
Order and Debtor's Application to Waive Fee Filed by
Stanl
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$125.00
$23,825.00
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$3,000.00
10
$125.00
$125.00
$1,250.00
$1,000.00
$2,250.00
10
$125.00
$125.00
$1,250.00
$250.00
$1,500.00
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$250.00
$3,750.00
$125.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$1,125.00
Unit
Price
Qty
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$500.00
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$375.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Name
Line Description
Item Description
Jun 15 2006 Reponsive Brief to Preliminary Objections
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation Hours
Civil Case
Billed
Jul 25 2006 Appealed to Superior Court of
Hours Billed For Civil
Pennsylvania General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
Appeals
Aug 09 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Time For Court Appearance and Litigation Shawn
Long Appeared at Defendants Table before Court,
walked out
Court Time Hours Billed
Oct 30 2006 Filed Amended Complaint from Bausman
Post Office, General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Hours Billed For Civil
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
Appeals
Nov 7 2006 Filed for Continuance from Lancaster
Civil Litigation Hours
County Prison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Billed
Caterbone v. Southern Regional
Sep 1 2006 Complaint & In Forma Pauperis Filed
Caterbone v. Millersville General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation Hours
Poli
Civil Case IFP Granted Judge Ashworth
Billed
Mar 26 2007 File Response to Preliminary Objections
to Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas General
Civil Litigation Hours
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Billed
Case
Caterbone v. Millersville Poli
Sep 11 2006 Filed Complaint & In Forma Pauperis
Caterbone v. Benjamin General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation Hours
Roda
Civil Case IFP Denied by Judge Reinaker
Billed
Caterbone v.
Harleysville et
Caterbone v. Grassell,
Thomas
Caterbone v. Lancaster
General
Caterbone v.
Pflumm,Mike et al
Common of PA v. S.
3/17/2007 Caterbone
3/18/2007
003112143900
Page: 81
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$150.00
$600.00
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
$125.00
$250.00
$12,100.00
15
$125.00
20
$125.00
$1,875.00
$2,500.00
$4,375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$500.00
$1,500.00
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$875.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$875.00
$5,500.00
15
$125.00
$125.00
$1,875.00
$500.00
$2,375.00
25
$125.00
$125.00
$3,125.00
$1,000.00
$4,125.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$150.00
$625.00
$450.00
$1,075.00
$125.00
$150.00
$625.00
$450.00
$1,075.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$1,875.00
$125.00
$250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
003112143900
Page: 82
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Jan 19 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case Refiled, Denied
Again
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
Jul 5 2006 PrelimiHearing General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case MDJ
Hamilton, Fire M. Bomberger, Public Defender, MDJ
Hamilton Guilty
Oct 12 2006 Pretrial Conference Case Continued
Judge Allison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case $75$3733$$A M2
Nov 09 2006 Pretrial Conference Case Continued
Judge Allison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case From Lanc Co Prison
Dec 14 2006 Call of the Trial List Continued Judge
Ashworth (Cullen) General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case From Lanc Co
Prison
Jan 22 2007 Call of the Trial List Scheduled for Trial
Judge Farina (Cullen) General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case Janice Longer
Appo
Time For Court Appearance and Litigation
Feb 23 2006 Complaint Filed to Lancaster County Bar
v. Janice Longer General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Feb 26 Call of the Trial List Scheduled for Trial
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Feb 28 2006 Filed Response to Longer Petition to
Withdraw From Case General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Mar 1 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Criminal Case Meeting with Janice Longer
To Prepare
Mar 4 2007 Trial Court Judge Cullen Continued Case
to April Court ScheduleTime For Court Appearance
and Litigation
Mar 4 2007 File Supreme Court Diciplinary Complaint
v. Janice Longer General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Mar 22 2007 Research & Review Pa Consolodated
Statutes Annotated at Law Library General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Mar 26 Letter to Janice Longer & Review Motion to
Dismiss QuashGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
Dec 5 2005 Preliminary Hearing Judge Reuter,
Bezzard had to Refile or Dismiss General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case East
Lampeter Twp
May 18 2006 Lancaster County DA Office Refile
Charges General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case 4 Charges-Harras Dis
Ord,Theft,Harrasment
Time For Court Appearance and Litigation
Jun 23 2006 Meeting with Matt Bomberger, Public
Defender General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Criminal Case
Jul 26 2006 Fromal Arraignment Lanaster County
Court of Common PleasTime For Court Appearance
and Litigation
Jul 26 2006 File In Forma Pauperis Granted General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Aug 2 2006 File Motion Bill of Particulars Discovery
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Sep 14 2006 Pretrial Conference Judge AllisonTime
For Court Appearance and Litigation
Oct 20 2006 Call of the Trial List Judge Farina Time
For Court Appearance and Litigation
Nov 27 2006 Call of the Trial List Judge FarinaTime
For Court Appearance and Litigation From Lancaster
County Prison
Nov to Dec 2006 Research Billed For Case From
Lancaster County Prison Law Library
Dec 4 2006 Trial Judge Farina Sent to 1250 Fremont
& 220 Stone Hill Rd to get files Time For Court
Appearance and Litigation Dismiss Harassment,
Change to Summa
Dec 5 2007 Trial Time For Court Appearance and
Litigation Guilty Harrasment & Disorderly Conduct,
Not Guilty Thef of Service
Dec 2007 Filed Appeals & Motions General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case From Lancaster County Prison
Jan 4 2007 Notict of Appeal to Superior Court Case
No. MDA 125 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 26 2007 Meet with Court Reporters Office to Get
Electronic Version of Transcript & ReGeneral Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Item Description
Hours Billed Criminal
Appeal
Qty
2
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$125.00
Credit
Amount
$250.00
$500.00
Hours Billed For Criminal
Case
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
$150.00
$600.00
$150.00
$600.00
$150.00
$600.00
4
4
$150.00
$150.00
$600.00
$600.00
$125.00
$625.00
$150.00
$600.00
$125.00
$750.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$375.00
2
0.1
$125.00
$150.00
$250.00
$15.00
$8,990.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
2
10
$125.00
$150.00
$250.00
$1,500.00
$125.00
$500.00
$150.00
$600.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$500.00
$150.00
$600.00
$150.00
$750.00
$150.00
$750.00
$75.00
$525.00
$150.00
$1,050.00
$150.00
$750.00
$125.00
$750.00
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00
$375.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
Common of PA v S.
Caterbone
003112143900
Page: 83
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Feb 7 2007 Meet with Andrew Wagner of Court
Collections Office for Payment of Fines and Costs and
Remove Payment Due
Feb 23 2007 Meet with Andrew Wagner of Court
Collections to Have Payment Due Removed General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
Aug 2006 Filed U.S. Post Office Correspondence &
Complaint to SRPDTime For Court Appearance and
Litigation
Oct 30 2007 Plead Not Guilty to MDJ Eckert Picked Up
by Constables General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Nov 14 2006 File Habeus Corpus to U.S. District Court
of Eastern District of PA General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Lanc Pri
Dec 2006 Research Billed For Case From Lancaster
County Prison Law Library
Dec 8 2006 Filed Writ of Mandamus From Lancaster
County PrisonGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Item Description
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$125.00
$125.00
Credit
Amount
$500.00
$250.00
$11,650.00
10
$150.00
$1,500.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$875.00
$75.00
$375.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$375.00
$150.00
$900.00
$125.00
3/20/2007
Qty
$125.00
$125.00
$625.00
$375.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00
$375.00
$75.00
$375.00
$150.00
$600.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$500.00
$3,600.00
$625.00
$6,275.00
For Criminal
For Criminal
For Criminal
For Criminal
$125.00
$750.00
$125.00
$750.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00
$500.00
$2,875.00
For Criminal
$125.00
$250.00
$250.00
Criminal
$125.00
$500.00
$500.00
$125.00
$500.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
003112143900
Page: 84
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File Nunc Pro Tunc
for MDJ Simms Citations General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File Nunc Pro Tunc
for MDJ Simms Citations General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File In Forma
Pauperis for MDJ Simms Citations General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Item Description
Common of PA v S.
3/22/2007 Caterbone
Debit
Amount
$500.00
$125.00
Credit
Amount
$500.00
$125.00
$500.00
$500.00
$125.00
$250.00
$250.00
Unit
Price
$500.00
Chapter 11 Dismissal
Appeal
Qty
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$3,125.00
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$625.00
1.5
$125.00
$187.50
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$3,312.50
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
Common of PA v. S.
Caterbone
003112143900
Page: 85
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Item Description
Mar 27 2007 Meeting with Lancaster County Clerk of
Courts Review & Correct Index of RecorGeneral Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Hours Billed Criminal
Case
Appeal
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jun 28 2006 Hearing Preparation General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Jun 28 2007 Hearing at 1281 S 28th St. Harrisburg
Guilty MDJ Smith Time For Court Appearance and
Litigation
Oct ?? 2006 Phone Call & Letter For Payment of Fine
& Costs General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case
Jan 1 2007 Letter to MDJ Smith Re Payment of Fines
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 15 2007 Filed Application For Leave Nunc Pro
TuncGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Criminal Appeal Case
Feb 15 2007 Filed In Forma Pauperis In Dauphin
County Court of Common Pleas Granted General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
Mar 8 2007 Filed Notice of Appeal to Superior Court in
Dauphin County Court MDA 435-2007 General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$125.00
Credit
Amount
$375.00
$2,625.00
$125.00
$500.00
$150.00
$750.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$500.00
$3,250.00
$125.00
$500.00
$500.00
$125.00
$375.00
$375.00
$125.00
$750.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
Mar 24 2007 Letter to Senator Specter General Hours Civil Litigation Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Billed
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$3,875.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
003112143900
Page: 86
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Chapter 11 PP&L
Dismissal Appe
Item Description
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00
$250.00
$4,750.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$2,375.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$750.00
$125.00
$250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
Caterbone v.
Lombardo/Office M
003112143900
Page: 87
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Chapter 11 PP&L Dismissal Appe
May 1, 2007 - File Complaint and In Forma Pauperis
Application
Item Description
Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$2,375.00
Credit
Amount
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$3,250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$2,500.00
$250.00
$1,875.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$625.00
30
$125.00
$3,750.00
30
$125.00
$3,750.00
$11,250.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
003112143900
Page: 88
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
February 21, 2007 - Judge Allison ORDER DENIED
Appeal for Reconsideration
February 26, 2007 - Rule 236 Notice from
Prothonatary of ORDER dated January 24, 2007 which
was DENIED.
February 28, 2007 - File ANSWER to Fulton Bank's
Preliminary Objections
March 9, 2007- Filing Fees Remained Unpaid for 10
Days after Rule 236 - Judgement of Non Pros Filed by
Prothonatary
March 12, 2007- Christine Munion, Esq., files Entry of
Appearance for Donald Totaro, Lancaster County
Commissioners, Lancaster County Sheriff, Lancaster
County
March 13, 2007 - Praecipe filed to DEFENDANT
FULTON BANK'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TO THE COURT FOR
DISPOSITION WITH CERTIFICATE OF SER
Item Description
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
Obstruction of Justice - EI
January 8, 2007 - (Emergency) for emergency food
stamp benefits and other benefits filed by stanley j.
8/9/2007 Emergency Food Stamps Caterbone, plaintiff, pro se. And affidavit of financial
January 9, 2007 - Filed: and now, jan 8, 2007, upon
consideration of defendant's request to proceed in
forma pauperis,it is ordered that such request is
granted
January 16, 2007 - Praecipe for Appearance by Diana
Clark, for the Pennsylvania Department of Welfare
January 29, 2007 - Preliminary Objections Filed by
Diana Clark of DPW
January 30, 2007 - Brief in Support of Preliminary
Objections filed by Diana Clark and DPW
February 15, 2007 - File Answer to Preliminary
Objections
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
May 30, 2007 - Notice of Appearance before Business Civil Litigation Hours
Judge, Judge Farina, refused to hear case
Billed
Emergency Food Stamps
January 2, 2007 - To proceed informa pauperis with
affidavit of financial service filed by Caterbone, pro
se. In support of petition to set aside sale
January 2, 2007 - Caption Caterbone v. Fulton Bank,
Lancaster County Sheriff Department
January 4, 2007 - In Forma Pauperis GRANTED by
Judge Dennis E. Reinaker
January 5, 2007 - Addition to Compliant (Please Add
To Complaint)
January 31, 2007 - Response Of fulton bank to
stanley j. Caterbone's petition to set aside sale of real
estate. Filed by: shawn m. Long, esq. Certificate of
ser
$250.00
$7,375.00
May 29, 2007 - Notice of Appearance Before Business Civil Litigation Hours
Judge for Food Stamps to Reinaker, Recusal
Billed
Credit
Amount
Qty
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Hours
$250.00
$2,500.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
January 31, 2007 - Notice of Meeting Before Business Civil Litigation Hours
Judge Michael Georgelis filed by Shawn Long
Billed
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$500.00
Hours
Hours
Hours
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
Fulton v. Caterbone
Foreclosur
003112143900
Page: 89
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Item Description
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$125.00
$250.00
$3,875.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$625.00
Civil Litigation
$1.00
Hours Billed $125.00
2
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$500.00
Credit
Amount
$250.00
Civil Litigation
$1.00
Hours Billed $125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
Caterbone v. Lanc Co
3/1/2007 Prison et
Qty
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
$500.00
$5,375.00
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
003112143900
Page: 90
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Feb 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Mar 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Apr 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
May 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Item Description
6/17/2007
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
60
$75.00
$4,500.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
30
$125.00
$3,750.00
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
30
$150.00
$4,500.00
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
$125.00
$625.00
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
$125.00
Qty
$625.00
$77,375.00
For Civil
For Civil
For Civil
For Civil
For Civil
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date
Name
003112143900
Page: 91
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Line Description
Dec 1 2006 In Forrma Pauperis Application Granted
Apr 30 2007 Addendum to Appeal filed; Letter to
McLaughlin, DARPA, Parula Property Stolen
Caterbone v. Lanc Co Prison et
Item Description
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$125.00
$125.00
Credit
Amount
$375.00
$625.00
$4,500.00
$284,702.50
$283,952.50
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.15
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
92Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 1a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
3/1/07
7001
05-2288
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
120.00
75.00
9,000.00
120.00
75.00
9,000.00
120.00
75.00
9,000.00
120.00
75.00
9,000.00
60.00
75.00
4,500.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
30.00
125.00
3,750.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.26
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
93Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 2a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
3/1/07
Invoice
7002
Customer ID
05-23059
Line Description
Item Description
30.00
75.00
2,250.00
30.00
150.00
4,500.00
30.00
75.00
2,250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
30.00
75.00
2,250.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
Qty
Credit Amn
77,375.00
20.00
125.00
2,500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.26
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
94Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 3a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00 November
1,250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.32
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
95Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 4a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Jun 29 2006 Hearing Held - RE:
Motion to Dismiss Case, or
Conversion of Case to Chapter 7
Filed by United States Trustee (
Jul 2006 Administration,
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Aug 2006 Administration,
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Sep 2006 Administration,
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Jan 2007 Administration,
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
AMG Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
3/16/07
3/16/07
06-cv-5138
1462-MDA-2006
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
7.00
150.00
1,050.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
25,800.00
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
3,000.00
3/16/07
CI-06-07376
Aug 2 2006 General
Hours
Billed
DRAFT-PETITION
Advanced
Media Group
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
98
19
of
of 190
44Civil Litigation Hours
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
2,250.00
10.00
125.00 November
1,250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.37
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
96Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 5a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Filed Complaint
Aug 24 2006 General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case Filed Default
Notice
Caterbone v. Caterbone,Michael
3/16/07
3/16/07
3/16/07
CI-06-06658
CI-06-07188
CI-06-03401
Item Description
Qty
2.00
125.00
Credit Amn
250.00
1,500.00
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3,750.00
1,125.00
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
20.00
125.00
2,500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.42
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
97Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 6a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
3/16/07
3/16/07
Invoice
Customer ID
CI-06-08490
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
12.00
125.00
1,500.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
12.00
125.00
1,500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
20.00
125.00
2,500.00
12,100.00
4,375.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
20.00
125.00
2,500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
7.00
125.00
875.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
125.00
250.00
3/16/07
CI-06-08742
Line Description
CI-06-07330
1,500.00
2.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.42
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
98Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 7a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
3/16/07
3/16/07
3/17/07
3/17/07
3/18/07
CI-05-03403
CI-06-03349
CI-06-04939
TR-0003557-2006
TR-0004428-2006
CP-36-SA0000141-2005
Qty
7.00
125.00
Credit Amn
875.00
5,500.00
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
25.00
125.00
3,125.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
8.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
150.00
450.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
150.00
450.00
2,375.00
4,125.00
125.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
1,075.00
1,075.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.59
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
99Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 8a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
3/18/07
3/18/07
CP-36-MD0000010-2007
CP-36-CR0003179-2006
Credit Amn
1,875.00
Hours Billed Criminal
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
500.00
12.00
125.00
1,500.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
125.00 November
375.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.64
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
100
12/02/2015
Page: 9a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Pa Consolodated Statutes
Annotated at Law Library
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Mar 26 Letter to Janice Longer & Hours Billed For Crim
Review Motion to Dismiss
QuashGeneral Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Court Time Hours Bill
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
3/18/07
CP-36-CR0002843-2006
Qty
2.00
125.00
0.10
150.00
Credit Amn
250.00
15.00
8,990.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
10.00
150.00
1,500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
5.00
150.00
750.00
5.00
150.00
750.00
7.00
75.00
525.00
7.00
150.00
1,050.00
5.00
150.00
750.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.75
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
101
12/02/2015
Page: 10a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Criminal Appeal Case From
Lancaster County Prison
Jan 4 2007 Notict of Appeal to
Superior Court Case No. MDA
125 General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 26 2007 Meet with Court
Reporters Office to Get
Electronic Version of Transcript
& ReGeneral Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Feb 7 2007 Meet with Andrew
Wagner of Court Collections
Office for Payment of Fines and
Costs and Remove Payment Due
Feb 23 2007 Meet with Andrew
Wagner of Court Collections to
Have Payment Due Removed
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
3/18/07
3/18/07
CP-36-SA0000028-2007
CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
4.00
125.00
500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
11,650.00
Court Time Hours Bill
10.00
150.00
1,500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
7.00
125.00
875.00
5.00
75.00
375.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
6.00
150.00
900.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
6,275.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.86
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
102
12/02/2015
Page: 11a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
3/18/07
CP-36-CR0000160-2006
CP-36-MD0000006-2007
Qty
3.00
125.00
Credit Amn
375.00
1,000.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
5.00
75.00
375.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
3,600.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.97
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
103
12/02/2015
Page: 12a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
3/18/07
3/20/07
3/20/07
3/20/07
3/20/07
3/20/07
3/20/07
CP-36-CR0000055-2006
CP-36-CR0000051-2007
CP-36-CR0000012-2007
CP-36-CR0000011-2007
CP-36-CR0000010-2007
CP-36-CR0000011-2007
05-3689
Credit Amn
2,875.00
Hours Billed For Crim
2.00
125.00
250.00
250.00
4.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
500.00
125.00
500.00
500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.03
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
104
12/02/2015
Page: 13a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
BANKRUPTCY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE
REINSTATED by UNITED
STATES TRUSTEE,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
October 6, 2005 - ORDER THAT Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
THIS CASE IS REINSTATED
IN THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY
COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT PROVIDED THAT
DEBTOR- APPELLANT
COMPLY WITH THE RULES
November 7, 2005 - Original
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
Bankruptcy Record returned to
the Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
(afm, ) (Entered: 1 1/08/2005)
November 14, 2005 - Letter from Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT
re: received original record on
11/10/05. (afm, ) (Entered:
11/14/2005)
Chapter 11 Dismissal Appeal
3/20/07
3/20/07
06-1538
06-4154
Qty
Credit Amn
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3,125.00
20.00
125.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.50
125.00
187.50
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.08
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
105
12/02/2015
Page: 14a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN THE
ABOVE-CAPTIONED CAS
April 13, 2007 - MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE. (SEE 05-2288, PAPER
NO. 50).(ac, ) (Entered:
04/13/2007)
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Appeal Case
Item Description
Qty
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
3/22/07
MDA 125-2006
TR-0000085--2006
Credit Amn
375.00
3,312.50
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
12.00
125.00
1,500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2,625.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
5.00
150.00
750.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.14
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
106
12/02/2015
Page: 15a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
3/28/07
3/28/07
MDA 435-2007
06-cv-4734
Credit Amn
3,250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
375.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.25
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
107
12/02/2015
Page: 16a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
6/1/07
Invoice
Customer ID
06-4650
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Credit Amn
3,875.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.30
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
108
12/02/2015
Page: 17a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
6/1/07
Invoice
Customer ID
06-3955
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Credit Amn
4,750.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00 November
125.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.36
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
109
12/02/2015
Page: 18a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
behalf of Appellee Fulton Bank,
filed, (clc)
September 19, 2006 - FOLLOW
UP LETTER to Robert W.
Hallinger, Walter H. Swayze,
Patricia Baxter, George M.
Gowen and Stuart A. Weiss
requesting the following do
September 25, 2006 APPEARANCE from Attorney
William H. Howard on behalf of
Appellee Avalon Pol Dept, filed.
(Iwc)
September 25, 2006 APPEARANCE from Attorney
William H. Howard on behalf of
Appellee Avalon Pol Dept, filed.
(Iwc)
September 29, 2006 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
behalf of Appellee Comm Natl
Bank, filed, (clc)
October 2, 2006 APPEARANCE from Attorney
Robert W. Hallinger on behalf of
Appellee Lancaster Cty Prison,
filed, (clc)
October 11, 2006 - RESPONSE
to Legal Division letter for
possible dismissal, on behalf of
Appellee Manheim Twp Pol,
filed. Certificate of Service dated
10/6/06
December 1, 2006 - Notice
received from district court that
IFF has been granted to Stanley J.
Caterbone . (clc)
April 30, 2007 - Document filed
by Appellant titled "Addendum to
Appeal, filed, (clc)
Appeal Order Amend 2288
Compl
6/1/07
6/1/07
06-5117
7003
CI-07-03924
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2,375.00
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
5.00
125.00
625.00
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
2.00
125.00
250.00
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
2.00
125.00
250.00
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
2.00
125.00
250.00
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
6.00
125.00
750.00
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
2.00
125.00
250.00
2,375.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00 November
250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.47
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
110
12/02/2015
Page: 19a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Pauperis Application
May 9, 2007 - In Forma Pauperis
Granted
May 24, 2007 - Entry of
Appearence Samuel Cortes of
Rothschild, LLP for Sam
Lombardo
May 29, 2007 - Entry of
Appearence and Answer from
Kirsten Worley for Office Max
May 31, 2007 - Preliminary
Objections filed by Samuel
Cortes for Lombardo
June 25, 2007 - File Motion For
Continuance
June 29, 2007 - ORDER by
Judge Cullen Denial of Motion
for Continuance Requested to
Resubmit with Reason
July 19, 2007 - Request for
Interogatories and Request to
Produce Documents Filed by
Kirsten Worley for Office Max
July 24, 2007 - File Answer to
Office Max Interrogatories
Item Description
Qty
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
Caterbone v. Lombardo/Office M
6/17/07
6/17/07
05-2288
05-23059
Credit Amn
125.00
3,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
4,500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.58
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
111
12/02/2015
Page: 20a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
6/17/07
Invoice
Customer ID
05-23059
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
2.00
125.00
250.00
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
3.00
125.00
375.00
1,750.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
7.00
125.00
875.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.63
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
112
12/02/2015
Page: 21a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
6.00
150.00
900.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
25.00
125.00
3,125.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
12.00
125.00
1,500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
6.00
150.00
900.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.74
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
113
12/02/2015
Page: 22a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
6.00
150.00
900.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
(related d
04/10/2006 Request for
Continuance of Chapter 11 Case
Filed'by Stanley J. Caterbone .
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 04/10/2006)
Credit Amn
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.85
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
114
12/02/2015
Page: 23a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.96
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
115
12/02/2015
Page: 24a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
1.00
125.00
07-2151
Credit Amn
125.00
23,825.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:52.02
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
116
12/02/2015
Page: 25a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
8/7/07
8/7/07
06-1538
1130 CD 2007
CI-07-00366
Credit Amn
2,500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
30.00
125.00
3,750.00
30.00
125.00
3,750.00
1,875.00
11,250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:52.13
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
117
12/02/2015
Page: 26a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
Obstruction of Justice - EI
8/9/07
CI-07-00150
Credit Amn
250.00
7,375.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00 November
250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:52.24
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
118
12/02/2015
Page: 27a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Objections Filed by Diana Clark
of DPW
January 30, 2007 - Brief in
Support of Preliminary
Objections filed by Diana Clark
and DPW
February 15, 2007 - File Answer
to Preliminary Objections
May 29, 2007 - Notice of
Appearance Before Business
Judge for Food Stamps to
Reinaker, Recusal
May 30, 2007 - Notice of
Appearance before Business
Judge, Judge Farina, refused to
hear case
Emergency Food Stamps
8/9/07
CI-07-00019
Item Description
Qty
1.00
125.00
125.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2,500.00
Civil Litigation Hours
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
CI-06-02271
Credit Amn
250.00
3,875.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:52.35
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
119
12/02/2015
Page: 28a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
1.00
125.00
125.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
complaint wit
May 1, 2006 - Complaint Served,
Civil action complaint upon
stanley caterbone by personal
service at lancaster county
sheriff's office,50 north duke
street, lan
May 8, 2006 - Answer to
Complaint filed
June 6, 2006 - Brief In support
of plaintiff's motion for judgment
on the pleadings. Filed by shawn
m. Long, esq. Certificate of
service of same.
June 6, 2006 - Motion by Fulton
for judgement on the pleadings
filed by Shawn M. Long
June 28, 2006 - Praecipe filed to
assign Plaintiff fulton bank's
motion for summary judgment to
the court for disposition as
unopossed with certific
June 29, 2006 - ORDER Filed:
and now, this 29th day of june,
2006, upon consideration of
plaintiff's motion for judgment on
the pleadings, as well as
defendants
July 20, 2006 - Enter judgment
on behalf of plaintiff and against
defendant, stanley j. Caterbone in
the amount of $97,425.07, plus
continuing interest after ma
July 25, 2006 - Filed Notice of
Appeal to Superior Court Case
No.
July 28, 2006 - A hearing on the
defendant's application for in
forma pauperis status will be held
in curtroom 5 at 9:00 a.m. on
wednesday, august 9, 2006. By t
July 31, 2006 - Filed. Writ issued.
Affidavit of non-military service.
Principal: $88,568.53; interest to
03/02/2006 at a rate of $14.56 per
diem: $4,442.96; ne
July 31, 2006 - Affidavit - rule
3129 7/31/2006 Concerning the
real property located at 220 stone
hill road a/k/a lot #5 stone hill
road, township of conestog
July 31, 2006 - Notice of
7/31/2006 Sheriff's sale of real
property to stanley j. Caterbone at
220 stone hill road, conestoga, pa
17516. Filed by shawn m. Long
August 1, 2006 - 220 stone hill
road, a/k/a lot #5 stone hill rd.,
conestoga, conestoga township
56 December 20, 2006. Received
check from barley snyder i
Credit Amn
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:52.40
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus
Document:
Corpus
Case
003112143900 Page:
120
12/02/2015
Page: 29a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
enters order granting in forma
pauperis status. Mich
August 11, 2006 - Filed. The
defendant has appealed my june
29, 2006 order granting the
plaintiff's motion for judgment on
the pleadings. He is directed to
file
August 17, 2006 - Of notice of
sheriff's sale by mail to
lienholders on aug. 11, 2006.
Filed by shawn m. Long, esq. Of
the notice of sheriff sale upon
defenda
August 31, 2006 - Served Writ of
Execution
September 5, 2006-OPINION
Pursuant to pa.r.a.p. 1025(a)
filed. By the court: michael a.
Georgelis, judge. Copies w/236
notice sent to: stanley j.
Caterbone, pro
September 6, 2006-The superior
court of pennsylvania - no. 1463
mda 2006. Copy of the list of
record documents sent to: stanley
j. Caterbone, pro se and shawn m
January 8, 2006-Certified copy of
Order from the superior court of
pennsylvania - no. 1463 mda
2006 filed. And now, this fourth
day of january, 2007
Fulton v. Caterbone Foreclosur
Item Description
Qty
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
Total
Credit Amn
5,375.00
284,327.50
284,327.50
Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
1 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?290428435764926-L_1_0-1
V.
Respondent
LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS
INTERVENTION
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
CRAIG STEDMAN
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
DET. LT. CLARK BEARIWGER
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
LANCASTER CITY POLICE
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
FAIRMONT BEHAVIOR SYSTEM
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
SILVIA GRATZ
CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER
Respondent
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Date Filed
Docket Text
07/17/2015
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE (NO IFP, NO FEE PAID). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jwl, )
(Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2015: # 2 Envelope) (jwl, ). Modified on 7/21/2015 (afm, ). (Entered: 07/20/2015)
07/24/2015
APPLICATION to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. Cert. of Service. (pr, ) (Entered:
07/24/2015)
07/31/2015
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF THE COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD
FORM FOR FILING A PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 2254 AND BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION
NUMBER; PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED; AND PETITIONER SHALL SUBMIT THE FIVE
DOLLAR ($5.00) FILING FEE TO THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER OR THIS ACTION WILL BE
DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 7/28/15. 7/31/15 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF A 2254 PETITION FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS.(pr, ) (Entered:
07/31/2015)
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
12/16/2015 5:08 AM
2 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?290428435764926-L_1_0-1
Copy of Order dated 7/28/15, blank 2254 petition form and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to STANLEY J. CATERBONE for
the following reason: Return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward.(Re-sending to STANLEY J. CATERBONE, 1250 FREMONT ST.,
LANCASTER, PA 17603) (pr, ) (Entered: 08/10/2015)
08/17/2015
08/19/2015
Revised Habeas Petition Forms returned filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(pr, ) (Entered: 08/20/2015)
08/25/2015
ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST CLAIMS; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER;
AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 8/25/15.
8/25/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(pr, ) (Entered: 08/25/2015)
09/04/2015
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO REGISTER AS AN ECF FILING USER IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK OF
COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROCESS PETITIONER'S REGISTRATION PURSUANT TO PROCEDURE 4(b) UNDER L.R.C.P. 5.1.2.. SIGNED BY
HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 9/2/2015. 9/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) (Entered: 09/04/2015)
10/09/2015
Exhibit by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (CATERBONE, STANLEY) Modified on 10/13/2015 (afm, ). (Entered: 10/09/2015)
12/10/2015
Amended Petition for Writ of Habeus Corpus filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.**(FILED IN ERROR, PRO SE TO MAIL IN ORIGINAL FOR
FILING)**(CATERBONE, STANLEY) Modified on 12/14/2015 (tjd). (Entered: 12/10/2015)
12/16/2015
10
Statement "Open Letter to the Editor of Newslanc.com re Kathleen Kane and Old Boys Network" - December 15, 2015 by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
(CATERBONE, STANLEY) (Entered: 12/16/2015)
am6446:3514696:0
Client Code:
Description:
Docket Report
Search Criteria:
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
Billable Pages:
Cost:
0.20
Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
12/16/2015 5:08 AM
1 of 1
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?175217071392167
Motions
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ CATERBONE
v. LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL
HEALTH/ CRISIS
INTERVENTION et al CASE
CLOSED on 08/25/2015
CLOSED,HABEAS,A/R
United States District Court
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 12/10/2015 at 4:09 AM EST and filed on 12/10/2015
Case Name:
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS INTERVENTION et al
Case Number:
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
Filer:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 08/25/2015
Document Number: 9
Docket Text:
Amended MOTION for Writ of Habeus Corpus filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.Writ of Habeus Corpus.(CATERBONE, STANLEY)
[email protected], [email protected]
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
133
541of
of
of111
190
58
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
8, 2015
9,
2016
12/10/2015 4:10 AM
1 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?719972679673354-L_1_0-1
Petitioner
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
V.
Respondent
LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS
INTERVENTION
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
CRAIG STEDMAN
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
DET. LT. CLARK BEARIWGER
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
LANCASTER CITY POLICE
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
FAIRMONT BEHAVIOR SYSTEM
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
SILVIA GRATZ
CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
LANCASTER
Respondent
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Date Filed
Docket Text
07/17/2015
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE (NO IFP, NO FEE PAID). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover
Sheet)(jwl, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2015: # 2 Envelope) (jwl, ). Modified on 7/21/2015 (afm, ). (Entered:
07/20/2015)
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
134
552of
of
of111
190
58
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
8, 2015
9,
2016
12/10/2015 4:12 AM
2 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?719972679673354-L_1_0-1
07/24/2015
APPLICATION to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. Cert. of Service. (pr,
) (Entered: 07/24/2015)
07/31/2015
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF THE COURT'S CURRENT
STANDARD FORM FOR FILING A PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 2254 AND BEARING THE ABOVECAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER; PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED;
AND PETITIONER SHALL SUBMIT THE FIVE DOLLAR ($5.00) FILING FEE TO THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS
OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER OR THIS ACTION WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER..
SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 7/28/15. 7/31/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE
PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF A 2254 PETITION FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS.(pr, ) (Entered: 07/31/2015)
08/10/2015
Copy of Order dated 7/28/15, blank 2254 petition form and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to STANLEY J.
CATERBONE for the following reason: Return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward.(Re-sending to STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, 1250 FREMONT ST., LANCASTER, PA 17603) (pr, ) (Entered: 08/10/2015)
08/17/2015
08/19/2015
Revised Habeas Petition Forms returned filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(pr, ) (Entered: 08/20/2015)
08/25/2015
ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST CLAIMS; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL
CLOSE THIS MATTER; AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY
HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 8/25/15. 8/25/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(pr, )
(Entered: 08/25/2015)
09/04/2015
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO REGISTER AS AN ECF FILING USER IS GRANTED AND
THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROCESS PETITIONER'S REGISTRATION PURSUANT TO PROCEDURE 4(b)
UNDER L.R.C.P. 5.1.2.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 9/2/2015. 9/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) (Entered: 09/04/2015)
10/09/2015
Exhibit by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (CATERBONE, STANLEY) Modified on 10/13/2015 (afm, ). (Entered: 10/09/2015)
12/10/2015
Amended MOTION for Writ of Habeus Corpus filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.Writ of Habeus Corpus.(CATERBONE,
STANLEY) (Entered: 12/10/2015)
am6446:3514696:0
Client Code:
Description:
Docket Report
Search Criteria:
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
Billable Pages:
Cost:
0.20
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
135
563of
of
of111
190
58
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
8, 2015
9,
2016
12/10/2015 4:12 AM
AND NOW, on this 10th day of December 2015, the PETITIONER, Stanley J.
Caterbone/Advanced Media Group, do hereby file the following pursuant to the Federal
Habeas Corpus statutes prescribed in 28 2242 as prescribed by law. The Plaintiff alleges
violations according to the 1867 interpretation of the federal habeas corpus statutes which
states: where any person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the
constitution, or of any treaty or law of the United States.
The Plaintiff alleges that he has been a prisoner of the state since 1987, and
that the activities surrounding the PETITIONER'S life since June of 2015 immediately
following the filing of an amicus curiae in the Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Case of this same
said court, No. 14-02559, in which the PETITIONER was named MOVANT, has escalated into a
daily occurrence of assaults. Unfortunately while the PETITIONER has made many in person
complaints to just about every law enforcement agency, the most recent to the Manheim
Township Substation in Lancaster Township regarding an assault at the Manor Shopping
Center minutes previously (December 9, 2015 9:00pm), the pleas for help and assistance
have yielded nothing but more attacks to the PETITIONER'S person, property, electronics,
home, auto, reputation, intellectual property, and lastly his mental state-of-mind A BRUTAL
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
136
57
14of
of
of55
111
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
consider the fact that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has been complicit in the most
extreme way in these allegations, and therefore should be barred from adjudicating this
Habeus Corpus in any manner.
The PETITIONER acknowledges that this petition may lead to a landmark decision,
however, the intelligence community, the law enforcement community, and the military
industrial complex had it coming for a very long time.
may welcome the purging of these technologies, the technologies and tactics of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control.
deliberations.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
137
58
25of
of
of55
111
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
JURISDICTION
Birth of the Modern Writ. In 1867, Congress substantially increased the jurisdiction
of federal courts to issue the writ by authorizing its issuance in all cases, state or federal,
where any person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the
constitution, or of any treaty or law of the United States.16 Originally, habeas corpus
permitted collateral attack upon a prisoner's conviction only if the sentencing court lacked
subject matter jurisdiction. Shortly after 1867, however, the Supreme Court began to
recognize a growing number of circumstances where courts were said to have acted beyond
their jurisdiction because some constitutional violation had extinguished or "voided" their
jurisdiction.17 This development was of limited benefit to most prisoners, since most were
confined under state convictions and relatively few of the rights guaranteed by the
Constitution were thought to apply against the states. Even when a constitutional claim was
available, state prisoners could not be granted federal habeas relief until all possibility of
state judicial relief trial, appellate, and post conviction had been exhausted.181
FOOTNOTES: 1 16 That the several courts of the United States, and the several justices and
judges of such courts, within their respective jurisdictions, in addition to the authority already
conferred by law, shall have power to grant writs of habeas corpus in all cases where any
person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the constitution, or of any treaty
or law of the United States; and it shall be lawful for such person so restrained of his or her
liberty to apply to either of said justices or judges for a writ of habeas corpus, which
application shall be in writing and verified by affidavit, and shall set forth the facts concerning
the detention of the party applying, in whose custody he or she is detained, and by virtue of
what claim or authority, if known; and the said justice or judge to whom such application
shall be made shall forthwith award a writ of habeas corpus, unless it shall appear from the
petition itself that the party is not deprived of his or her liberty in contravention of the
constitution or laws of the United States, 14 Stat. 385-86 (1867). At the same time,
Congress modified and codified much of the procedure associated with the writ, including an
appellate provision that was soon thereafter repealed, 15 Stat. 44 (1868); see Ex parte
McCardle, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506 (1869).
17 See e.g.: Ex parte Lange, 85 U.S.(18 Wall.) 163 (1874). Lange had been convicted of an
offense punishable by a fine or term of imprisonment. The trial court had sentenced him to a
fine and a term of imprisonment. Lange paid his fine and was imprisoned. The Court held that
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
138
59
36of
of
of55
111
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
once Lange had paid the fine the trial court lost all jurisdiction over the case and thus his
confinement was subject to the writ. Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1880). In Siebold,
although the statute in question was found to be within the power of Congress, the Court
held that had the prisoner been convicted under an unconstitutional law he would have been
entitled to discharge upon the writ.
Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417 (1885). The Court held that Wilson was entitled to discharge
on the writ because the trial court had exceeded its jurisdiction when it tried, convicted and
sentenced him to fifteen years hard labor based upon an information filed by the district
attorney rather than upon a grand jury indictment as required by the Fifth Amendment in the
case of all capital and otherwise infamous crimes. In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 (1887). Snow
was convicted of three counts of cohabitation based on the same conduct during three
different periods of time. The Court found that the misconduct was one continuous offense
rather than three offenses. Since three sentences would constitute multiple punishment
contrary to the Fifth Amendment, the trial court had acted beyond its jurisdiction and the writ
should issue.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
139
60
47of
of
of55
111
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
1.____________________________________________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS has been
served this 24th day of July 2015, by first class mail, Postage prepaid, or by electronic mail upon,
or by hand deliver to:
_____________________________
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
(717) 669-2163
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
140
61
58of
of
of55
111
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: [email protected] and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
141
62
69of
of
1of55
111
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
142
63
710
of
ofof
55
111
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246
District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.
Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
143
64
811
of
ofof
55
111
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
144
65
912
of
of
2of
55
111
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
145
66
10
13
of
of
3of111
55
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
147
68
12
15
of
of
5of111
55
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
148
69
13
16
of
of
8of111
55
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-669-2163
Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
150
71
15
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
118
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010
Date Updated:
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
[email protected]
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
151
72
16
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
219
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.
The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.
In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
152
73
17
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
320
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.
no
MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.
The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
153
74
18
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
421
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
154
75
19
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
522
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.
This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.
This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
INTERNATIONAL
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
155
76
20
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
623
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
156
77
21
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
724
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
157
78
22
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
825
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.
This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
158
79
23
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
926
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
159
80
24
27
of
of
55
190
58
Page
10
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.
He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
160
81
25
28
of
of
55
190
58
Page
11
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.
He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.
His
viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
In 1973 Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.
The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never
entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.
The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.
He was in perfect
health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,
former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
161
82
26
29
of
of
55
190
58
Page
12
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.
By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.
Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.
The
The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.
landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.
James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
162
83
27
30
of
of
55
190
58
Page
13
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.
beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..
Over the
years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.
There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
163
84
28
31
of
of
55
190
58
Page
14
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
164
85
29
32
of
of
55
190
58
Page
15
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
165
86
30
33
of
of
55
190
58
Page
16
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: [email protected]
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
166
87
31
34
of
of
55
190
58
Page
17
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
167
88
32
35
of
of
55
190
58
Page
18
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
168
89
33
36
of
of
55
190
58
Page
19
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
[email protected]
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
169
90
34
37
of
of
55
190
58
Page
20
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:
I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.
The
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.
Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
170
91
21
35
38
of
ofof111
41
55
190
58
Thursday,
Saturday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
October
August10,
11,
8, 2015
9,
2016
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
171
92
36
39
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
172
93
37
40
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
173
94
38
41
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016
[email protected]
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
174
95
39
42
of
of
55
190
58
Page
25
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
175
96
40
43
of
of
55
190
58
Page
26
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
176
97
41
44
of
of
55
190
58
Page
27
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
177
98
42
45
of
of
55
190
58
Page
28
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
178
99
43
46
of
of
55
190
58
Page
29
ofof111
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
! "
"
$% &
!
" #
%
"&#
(
'
!
(
,
"
"
")
"
""
-
)
!
! "
!
'
%
" !
"
!
)
+
!
" *
"
"
,
,
,
*
%
*
(
%
!
/"0
1
1 ,
"
"
4
!
"
"
!
!
#
.
.
&,,0
%
1 ,
2"3
!
)
** ! "
&,,..$/
&,,
%
&,,
%
&
, "
"
00
"
!,
"
6
7
7 , !
&,,-
8,
:
(
$;$
"2
! " ,
, ,
** !
;
5
$
!
&,,@
,
.
&<;=
>
1
9
,
&,,=
$
,
>
A
1 B3
.+
&,,=
1 B3
2
>
%
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
100
179
44
47of
111
190
58
Page
30
ofof55
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
<
1
1
* "
!
"
C#
"
<
*
&, ,
24
#9
; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%
&,,0 4
! %3
"
"
!
&,,
%
"$
'
5
4
D
%
%
"
""
,! "
0 =
0 =9
9
00&9 00
:
9
&,,-
&, , $
!
%
!
D
%
%
=
F
!
))
+
/4
),
"
0 =
/
$
G
3
%
00
3
3
"
%#
$
$
&, ,
&,,4
!- "
.
&,,@
,
*
&,,<
E
&,,
-) !
/ 4
24
/
$
D
&, ,
D
$
&,,-
&,,0
%
D
!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D
$
A
8F
$
%
;
D
.
%
&,,3
E
$
*
00=; 00
$
5
! 7
0 =
00
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
101
180
45
48of
111
190
58
Page
31
ofof55
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
)
A
24
$;$
00
(F
&
%
B
5
00 9
" * <
00=( 00 9
:#
;3
#, " !
&,,-
"
"
"
0 =
&, ,
/
.
$
B
3
3
=
0 =
) "
.
&,,1
0 =
24
" "
3
"
&,,@
" E
""
B
$
<
&,,1
.
&,,-
,-(&&
2
=
@,
"
&,
3
&,,!
&,,@
&,,@
0 =
@, 1
&,,@
9
!
@,
#" !,
0 =
" "1 ,
"
"*
":
" E
F
&,,-
!
B
/
!
"
00=( 00 9
B
:
9
$
'
.
&,,1
9
0 =
&, ,
/
.
00 9
/
&,,9
&,
( "
!
.
00
$
!
&, ,
F
3
7
8
!
&,,
&, ,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
102
181
46
49of
111
190
58
Page
32
ofof55
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
&
, * "
&&
*#
"
&:
;!
&<
:
%
$
&, ,
!-
,
5
%
"
>
$
$
< !-
24
? "
;
>
&,,0
B
&,,%
(
$
&, ,
&-
A
.+ $
&@
! :
&,,$
: , *
&, ,
* @
&,,@
"
E
3
&,,
"
&,,0
7 "!
7 "
0 =
*
&=
) "
":
)"
&,,@
"
&
&0
!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,
00
:,
!6
"
"
" .
9 &,,0
0 = "&#
, *
&,,@
/
" F
0 =
;A
0 =
F
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
103
182
47
50of
111
190
58
Page
33
ofof55
41
0 =
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
3
"
$
+
$
.
0 =
I $
!
0 =
.
$
"2
'
+$;F
D
"$
&,;&,
3
A
00
'
$ 24
"1E1# $
K
E
A
00&
>
L
F
F
B
F
+
0=,K
A
$
$
1
+
>
1
$
>
B
!
3
F
1
00
) % 3
&,,-
!
>
! A !
00,K
1 B3
>
F
F
& 1
F
8
! 4
'
A
! 4
A
0=,K
F
00,K
0 ,K
0<,K
3
/
>
%
&,,
) %$
0@,K
0@,K
$
2!
A
D 1
"
$
0 <9 F
4
A? D!B
#
*
$
7
+
00
D 18
.
E
$
M 1
00= E
0 =
%
0 ,K
$
0 =
M
00
!
&,,9
(
9
!
1
,-(
$ !2B+EF2
(&&
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
104
183
48
51of
111
190
58
Page
34
ofof55
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
") !
"
7!
N
.
!
5
F
(
(
5
G
*
A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!
,
B
A
" " * #" !, " "
$C
* #" !, D
73
8
* 7
,
"
"
&
"
#
.
"
#(
5
7
9
'
5
%
7A
8 !
8 !
'
!
7D .2
O
% 8
'
7
'
(
(
%
%
4
K
K
M %
%
K
'
7E
(
8
"
%
'
%(
(
(
4
;
(
7
7
87
(
(
8
8
- 7 > !,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
105
184
49
52of
111
190
58
Page
35
ofof55
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
* , "
!
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B
@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
B@
)
B@
DD
!
!
))
1"
)
*
!
")
1
3
1
"
)
)
, "
*"
"
, "
!
*
"
")
"
7
"!
"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "
*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !
)
*
"E
DD
")
E DD
%
,
!
!"
, "
"
"
"
1 ,"
DD
*)
PPPPPPP "
>7
%#
'?
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP
15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP
I
&, ,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
106
185
50
53of
111
190
58
Page
36
ofof55
41
24
$
$
Q &, , "!
I
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
107
186
51
54of
111
190
58
Page
37
ofof55
41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 35 of 41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
108
187
52
55of
111
190
58
Page
38
ofof55
41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 36 of 41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
109
188
53
56of
111
190
58
Page
39
ofof55
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
110
189
54
57of
111
190
58
Page
40
ofof55
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
111
190
55
58of
111
190
58
Page
41
ofof55
41
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,