Professional Documents
Culture Documents
White and Ward v. Warner-Tamerlane - Ain't No Fun Complaint PDF
White and Ward v. Warner-Tamerlane - Ain't No Fun Complaint PDF
Business Address:
800 S. Figueroa Street
Justice Entrepreneur Initiative
5 Suite 1160
Los Angeles, CA 90017
6 Telephone: (424) 258-5049
Facsimile: (213) 480-6807
4
7
8
28
-1COMPLAINT OF ANTONIO WHITE AND CRAIG WARD AGAINST WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING
CORPORATION, ET AL. FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND FRAUD AS TO MARION KNIGHT
JURISDICTION
The United States District Court has original jurisdiction on the basis of
federal question 28 U.S.C. 1331, to enforce the Copyright Act, Title 17 U.S.C. 101
et seq. and it has pendant jurisdiction over the California State claims that arise
from the same events or transactions, that naturally would be tried together. All
defendants who each reside in California, or have minimum contacts with the State
by way of their major offices in Los Angeles, California, from which they
10
11
this lawsuit.
12
THE PARTIES
13
14
1.
15
recording containing both musical composition and lyrics, entitled Volume Iout
16
to get a grip registered with the U.S. Copyright Office February 18, 1992.
17
2.
Plaintiff Antonio (Tony) White is the joint author of the music and
18
lyrics on said album, and therefore holds the copyright for the whole work with
19
Craig Ward as owners in common. (Antonio White and Craig Ward will be
20
21
3.
Plaintiffs allege that the events that gave rise to this lawsuit, in which
22
Defendants infringed Plaintiffs copyright with the derivative work Aint No Fun
23
(If The homies Cant Have None) recorded and released in 1993, took place in
24
25
4.
26
Music, Inc. is the exclusive worldwide administrator for Nathaniel Hale d/b/a Nate
27
Dogg Musics copyright interest in, and to, the musical composition entitled Aint
28
No Fun (If The Homies Cant Have None). This contact with Los Angeles,
-2COMPLAINT OF ANTONIO WHITE AND CRAIG WARD AGAINST WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING
CORPORATION, ET AL. FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND FRAUD AS TO MARION KNIGHT
California, which is essential to the claim, as well as the fact that the corporation
maintains local offices here, continuing to administer the very intellectual property
that is the subject of this claim, fulfills the requirements of Specific Jurisdiction.
5.
and performer who included the infringing work on his album Doggy Style and
is the person primarily credited with the authorship of that album including the
track at issue. On information and belief, Plaintiffs allege that Mr. Broadus
resides, and carries on substantial business, in Los Angeles, California, giving the
10
6.
11
12
13
thus engaging in contributory infringement and fraud. In addition, Mr. Knight was
14
a principal of Death Row Records which applied for copyright in the album
15
Doggy Style in 1996, making him vicariously liable. Plaintiffs allege that Mr.
16
Knight is currently incarcerated in Los Angeles County, giving the district court
17
18
7.
19
the later derivative versions of the infringing work Aint No Fun and therefore
20
21
and belief that Andre Young resides within California, giving the district court
22
23
8.
24
additional singer or writer of lyrics on the later derivative versions of the infringing
25
work Aint No Fun and therefore copied Plaintiffs original work to their
26
detriment. Plaintiffs allege on information and belief that Richardo Brown resides
27
within California, giving the district court personal jurisdiction over him.
28
9.
additional singer or writer of lyrics on the later derivative versions of the infringing
work Aint No Fun and therefore copied Plaintiffs original work to their
detriment. Plaintiffs allege on information and belief that Warren Griffin III
resides within California, giving the district court personal jurisdiction over him.
10.
the named defendants, or enabled or were in some manner responsible for the
conduct complained of herein. Their true names and identities are unknown to
Plaintiffs at this time, but Plaintiffs will amend this pleading with their true names
10
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
11
12
13
14
11.
album in about 1991 containing both original words and original musical elements.
12.
15
18, 1992 number PAu001603686 under the title: Volume Iout to get a grip
16
17
13.
18
hire because the form was not filled out correctly. In fact, the authors Craig Ward
19
and Antonio White were working independent of any label at the time, and no
20
other person has come forward to claim, or can claim, ownership of either words
21
22
23
copyright.
24
14.
Plaintiff Antonio White shares creative authorship over all the aspects
25
of said album, so that they come before the Court as equal tenants in common of a
26
27
28
15.
Aint No Fun with the hook/chorus Aint No Fun, It Aint No Fun If The
-4COMPLAINT OF ANTONIO WHITE AND CRAIG WARD AGAINST WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING
CORPORATION, ET AL. FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND FRAUD AS TO MARION KNIGHT
Homies Cant Have None. This is the first line of lyrics, repeated twice during the
body of the song, sung as call-and-response in four-block sets, and repeated a third
16.
The song Aint No Fun (If The Homies Cant Have None) featuring
Style produced by Dr. Dre and released by Suge Knight, uses the title with
the exact words as Plaintiffs work, as well as a variation, But see, it ain't no fun,
if my homies can't get a taste of it. More significantly, the infringing work uses
the complete sentence Aint No Fun If The Homies Cant Have None multiple
10
times as the hook/chorus that holds together the whole work thematically.
11
12
13
Infringement Of Copyright
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
The lyrics and title Aint No Fun, It Aint No Fun If The Homies
Analyzing the significance to Plaintiffs work, we can look at both the qualitative
and quantitative significance to the Plaintiffs work as a whole. Quantitatively the
28
-5COMPLAINT OF ANTONIO WHITE AND CRAIG WARD AGAINST WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING
CORPORATION, ET AL. FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND FRAUD AS TO MARION KNIGHT
Qualitatively the hook/chorus unifies the song and delivers the theme or
21.
cultural significance during the years since the release by Death Row Records,
quoted in countless books, songs, and scholarly articles, offering further evidence
of the intrinsic value of Plaintiffs copyrighted material, separate and apart from
22.
Plaintiffs allege that the value of their original work was sensibly
10
11
12
work. Craig Ward always intended to release his Volume Iout to get a grip
13
with Aint No Fun as the main single, but he can no longer to so, after Doggy
14
15
23.
16
17
18
Defendants wanted to express, and unified the song and theme in the exact same
19
20
24.
Plaintiffs further allege that the versus of the two songs that were not
21
literally copied are also substantially similar. The versus of both songs are
22
concerned with homies relaxing one night, getting high and having a dialogue
23
addressed to a female who previously had sex with the speaker, followed by
24
suggesting an elaborate scenario, that the female should be sexually shared among
25
26
25.
Plaintiffs allege that some protectable musical elements also exist that
27
are common to both works and are evidence of copying. Plaintiffs will continue
28
26.
direct access to the works of Plaintiffs Craig Ward and Antonio White, and did
willfully copy, appropriate, and steal both the key hook/chorus of the song and also
27.
During the time that Chronic was being produced by Death Row
Records, around 1992, Marion Suge Knight invited Plaintiffs Mr. Ward and Mr.
White to the studio to play some of Volume Iout to get a grip, allegedly
because he wished to purchase a skit or some tracks out of it, to use on one of the
10
28.
11
Andre Young (Dr. Dre), and Ricardo Brown (Kurupt) as well as Marion
12
Suge Knight. Each of these defendants listened to the track that is the subject of
13
14
29.
Sometime after the Chronic time period, Mr. Knight was involved
15
in a business agreement with Mr. Ward and Mr. White in which they turned over
16
the masters of their work Volume Iout to get a grip including the track that is
17
the subject of this copyright action, to Mr. Knights company. Mr. Knights
18
company at that time, Death Row Records, was working with each of the other
19
defendants named herein, and therefore Plaintiffs allege on information and belief
20
that all the defendants had direct access to Plaintiffs work, and did access it.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-7COMPLAINT OF ANTONIO WHITE AND CRAIG WARD AGAINST WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING
CORPORATION, ET AL. FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND FRAUD AS TO MARION KNIGHT
1
2
3
31.
33.
and Andre Young (Dr. Dre), had actual and constructive knowledge of the direct
infringement, and both facilitated and encouraged that infringement in the song
10
11
creative guidance.
34.
12
spoke with each other and shared musical elements and lyrics while working on
13
the album Doggy Style such that they each had knowledge, whether actual or
14
15
16
17
18
Fraud
19
20
21
22
35.
23
representations to them around the period of 1992-1994 that they would enter into
24
business relations, that Mr. Knight would buy Volume Iout to get a grip, or
25
that Mr. Knight would enter into a recording contract with one or both of them, or
26
27
28
37.
During the time period after Death Row Records released the
Chronic album and before the Doggy Style album, Mr. Knight entered into an
-8COMPLAINT OF ANTONIO WHITE AND CRAIG WARD AGAINST WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING
CORPORATION, ET AL. FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND FRAUD AS TO MARION KNIGHT
agreement whereby Plaintiffs would enter into an imprint deal for Craig Wards
called for a CD pressing and release date within 60 days, in return for their
masters. After Antonio White turned over the masters, but before Mr. Knight
performed his side of the agreement, the Plaintiffs heard the infringing track Aint
No Fun from the Doggy Style album. The agreement that Plaintiffs thought
they had with Mr. Knight and Death Row Records fell apart.
8
9
10
11
38.
Records would eventually sign him and promote him, going so far as to pay him a
small amount of money, characterized at the time as an advance.
39.
For a decade or more Mr. Knight invited Craig Ward to parties, award
12
shows, and events at Death Row Records, always holding out the hope that Craig
13
Ward would get the help he needed for his career to take off.
14
40.
15
Craig Ward, that he should not make a big deal about the similarity between their
16
songs. He said that Snoop didnt steal your song, and Mr. Knight asked them
17
not to go after Calvin Broadus, Jr., saying Dont mess with Snoop.
18
41.
19
20
respective companies, or to give either of them credit for the song at issue, or any
21
22
42.
Further, Plaintiffs allege that Mr. Knight knew that his various
23
statements to the contrary were false when he made them, and that he made them
24
for the purpose of having Plaintiffs believe them, and to act or forebear to act in
25
26
27
43.
28
-9COMPLAINT OF ANTONIO WHITE AND CRAIG WARD AGAINST WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING
CORPORATION, ET AL. FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND FRAUD AS TO MARION KNIGHT
1
2
3
4
5
6
44.
Plaintiffs allege that that Pooh is a misprint of actual street name Pook and
quote clearly refers to them, and their playing of Volume Iout to get a grip for
9
10
11
Defendants.
45.
misled them the whole time and was liable for copyright infringement and fraud.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
A.
Plaintiffs Damages;
20
B.
Defendants Profits;
21
C.
22
D.
23
fraudulent conduct;
24
E.
25
F.
26
G.
27
H.
For such other and further relief the Court may deem proper.
28
-10COMPLAINT OF ANTONIO WHITE AND CRAIG WARD AGAINST WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING
CORPORATION, ET AL. FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND FRAUD AS TO MARION KNIGHT
1
2
3
Respectfully Submitted,
Law Offices of Thomas Scully
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
By:________________________________
Thomas H. Scully, Esq.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-11COMPLAINT OF ANTONIO WHITE AND CRAIG WARD AGAINST WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING
CORPORATION, ET AL. FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND FRAUD AS TO MARION KNIGHT