Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gerard Kelly Answer For Vishal Rohit Nathani vs. Maelstrom Gaming LLC, Martin Shkreli, & Gerard Kelly
Gerard Kelly Answer For Vishal Rohit Nathani vs. Maelstrom Gaming LLC, Martin Shkreli, & Gerard Kelly
650852/2016
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Affirm
Affirm
Lack enough information to respond to Plaintiff's allegations.
Affirm
Denied. Plaintiff was provided contract on 8/2/2015 for review
Agreed
Denied. Plaintiff was previously employed by Odyssey Gaming LLC, which was absorbed by
Maelstrom Gaming LLC, a mutual agreement had not been made
Lack enough information to respond to Plaintiff's allegations.
Lack enough information to respond to Plaintiff's allegations.
Lack enough information to respond to Plaintiff's allegations.
Lack enough information to respond to Plaintiff's allegations.
Denied. Plantiff was working under previous Odyssey Gaming LLC contract.
Denied. No agreement was made and plaintiff worked as a coach outside of Maelstrom Gaming
LLC during the period
1 of 3
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
2 of 3
I, Gerard Kelly , declare as follows: (name of person serving documents) My address is 320 pin oak ave
Woodstock Ga 30188
where the efiling described below took place
On , I served the documents described as: (3/27/2016)
1. DEFENDANTS ANSWER
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on 3/26/2016
(sign) ____________
Printed name: Gerard Kelly
3 of 3