Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ocwen Q3Q4
Ocwen Q3Q4
Ocwens Compliance
A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement
September 8, 2016
Introduction
The following pages provide an overview of my
report to the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia on Ocwens compliance with the
servicing standards. Close followers of the National
Mortgage Settlement (NMS or Settlement) will recall
that Ocwen was a successor servicer to one of the
original servicers in the Settlement, ResCap Parties.
As a result of that transaction, I monitored Ocwens
compliance with the Settlement for that portion of its
loan portfolio. Subsequently, in February 2014, Ocwen
joined the Settlement for its entire operation. This
report is my third report on Ocwen with respect to all
the loans it services and covers testing periods for
the third and fourth calendar quarters 2015.
Introduction
Compliance
Testing Results
Update on
Corrective Actions
Conclusion
31. These errors included, among other things, failure to provide the
factual information considered by Ocwen in making its decision
and the timeframe for borrowers to appeal the denial and provide
evidence that the denial was made in error. After Ocwen mailed
corrected loan modification denial notices to affected borrowers
in May 2016 and provided a sufficient timeframe for borrowers to
appeal their denials, I permitted Ocwen to lift the foreclosure hold
in July 2016. Ocwen continues to address and implement other
remediation efforts related to its Metric 31 failure. In August 2016,
I confirmed Ocwen had completed its Metric 31 corrective action
plan (CAP) as of March 2016. I will continue to closely monitor
Ocwens implementation of its Metric 31 remediation plan and its
Introduction
Compliance
Testing Results
MONITORS ROLE
Testing a Metric
The Internal Review Groups tested, and my professional firms retested, the
SunTrusts performance on each metric. The graphic below illustrates the process
by which the metrics were tested.
Update on
Corrective Actions
If SPF results differ from IRG results, SPF follows up with IRG and requests any additional
information. IRG adjusts test results, if necessary.
Conclusion
Step One
Step Two
Servicer implements
servicing standards
Testing by IRG
Step Three
Step Four
Retesting by
SPF, PPF and Monitor
Step Five
Monitor submits
report on metrics to the
D.C. District Court
Whats Next?
The NMS defines a failed metric as a potential violation and gives the servicer a chance to
fix the root causes of its failure. For more information on what happens when a servicer
fails a metric, see the graphic below.
Potential
Violation
Corrective
Action Plan
Borrower
Remediation
Servicer implements
Corrective Action Plan
(CAP) to address root
causes of fail
If potential violation is
widespread, servicer
remediates all
borrowers experiencing
material harm
Retesting
Penalties
Testing by IRG
and Monitor's team
recommences beginning
the quarter after
the CAP is completed
by servicer
Penalties include:
A court order to stop specific behaviors
Up to $1 million civil penalty
Up to $5 million fine for failing particular
metrics multiple times
Appendix
iii
Introduction
Compliance
Testing Results
During the third quarter 2015, Ocwen did not fail any
metrics. However, my testing during the final quarter
2015 uncovered two failed metrics related to forceplaced insurance.
Update on
Corrective Actions
Conclusion
SCORECARD
Ocwen
The Monitors Secondary Professional Firm (SPF) assigned to Ocwen, Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, tested the IRGs work on 27 metrics
during the third quarter 2015 and 28 metrics during the fourth quarter 2015. This chart illustrates the results of the IRGs tests.
METRIC NAME
Foreclosure sale in error
METRIC
NUMBER
1 (1.A)
2 (1.B)
Affidavit of Indebtedness
(AOI) preparation
3 (2.A)
4 (2.B)
5 (2.C)
Pre-foreclosure initiation
6 (3.A)
Pre-foreclosure initiation
notifications
7 (3.B)
8 (4.A)
Adherence to customer
payment processing
9 (4.B)
Reconciliation of certain
waived fees
10 (4.C)
11 (4.D)
12 (5.A)
Customer portal
13 (5.B)
14 (5.C)
Workforce management
Affidavit of Indebtedness
(AOI) integrity
Account status activity
15 (5.D) **
16 (5.E) **
17 (5.F) **
TEST
PERIOD
THRESHOLD
ERROR RATE
RESULT (ERROR
RATE IF FAILED)
Q3 2015
1.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
1.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Under CAP
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Under CAP
Q4 2015
5.00%
Under CAP
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
N/A
Pass
Q4 2015
N/A
Pass
Q3 2015
N/A
Pass
Q4 2015
N/A
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
N/A
Q4 2015
N/A
Q3 2015
N/A
Q4 2015
N/A
Q3 2015
N/A
Q4 2015
N/A
METRIC NAME
Complaint response timeliness
METRIC
NUMBER
18 (6.A)
19 (6.B.i)
20 (6.B.ii)
Loan modification
appeal timeline compliance
21 (6.B.iii)
22 (6.B.iv)
23 (6.B.v)
24 (6.B.vi)
25 (6.B.vii.a)
26 (6.B.viii.a)
27 (6.B.viii.b)
Force-placed insurance
timeliness of notices
28 (6.C.i)
Force-placed insurance
termination
29 (6.C.ii)
30 (7.A)
31 (7.B)
SPOC implementation
and effectiveness***
32 (7.C)
33 (7.D)
34 (6.D.i)
TEST
PERIOD
THRESHOLD
ERROR RATE
Q3 2015
5.00%
RESULT (ERROR
RATE IF FAILED)
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
10.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
10.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
10.00%
Q4 2015
10.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
10.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
10.00%
Pass
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
1.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
1.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Fail - 24.16%
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Fail - 5.14%
Q3 2015
5.00%
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Under CAP
Q4 2015
5.00%
Under CAP
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
3.50%
X*
Q4 2015
3.50%
X*
*Test question 4 only. **Policy and procedure metric that is tested once a year. ***Test Question 1 only. N/A: Threshold error rate not applicable. X: Metric was not tested in that specific test period. Under CAP: Metric was not tested in that specific test period since it
was under a CAP. X*: This Metric was not tested in that specific period because servicer did not have any loans that met the loan testing population criteria.
Introduction
Compliance
Testing Results
Update on
Corrective Actions
Conclusion
OCWEN
Ocwen failed
Metric 28
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Ocwen failed Metric 28 in the fourth Ocwen met with the Monitoring
quarter 2015. As a result, the NMS Committee to report its failure of
required Ocwen to develop a CAP Metric 28.
to ensure future compliance with
the metric, which tests whether
Ocwen is timely in its
communications to borrowers
regarding a lapse in homeowners
insurance coverage and notifies the
borrower that FPI may be obtained
if evidence of the borrowers own
insurance is not submitted.
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Introduction
OCWEN
Update on
Corrective Actions
Conclusion
Ocwen failed
Metric 29
Compliance
Testing Results
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Introduction
Compliance
Testing Results
Metric 8
Ocwen failed Metric 8 in the fourth quarter 2014.
This metric tests whether Ocwen properly collected
default-related fees from borrowers. Those fees
include property preservation fees, valuation fees
and attorneys fees.
Update on
Corrective Actions
Conclusion
OCWEN
Implementing internal controls related to its procedures for updating the loss
mitigation matrix from which PFN letters are populated.
Ocwen failed
Metric 7
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Revising the logic used in its automated processes to order broker's price
opinions (BPOs) every 380 days and for property inspections to prevent
ordering new property inspections within 25 days of a prior property inspection.
Ocwen failed
Metric 8
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Implement
CAP
Introduction
Compliance
Testing Results
OCWEN
Update on
Corrective Actions
Conclusion
Ocwen failed
Metric 19
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Ocwen failed Metric 19 in the first Ocwen met with the Monitoring
quarter 2014. As a result, the NMS Committee to report its failure of
required Ocwen to develop a CAP Metric 19.
to ensure future compliance with
the metric, which measures
whether the servicer complied
with servicing standards regarding
timeliness for responding to
borrowers about missing or
incomplete information relating
to loan modification packages.
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Remediation
Ocwen elected to treat the Metric 19 failure as if it
was widespread. In April 2016, Ocwen reported that
it had remediated all borrowers who could have been
impacted from December 1, 2013, to March 31, 2015,
by providing them with a correct notification of missing
documents and additional time to provide the missing
information. My professionals and I are now testing to
determine if the remediation is complete.
Introduction
Compliance
Testing Results
OCWEN
Implementing a new third-party software program for its short sale review process
that will include system coding to track the date firm offers are received and, in the
interim, repurposing existing system of record coding for firm offers received.
Update on
Corrective Actions
Conclusion
Ocwen failed
Metric 23
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Ocwen failed Metric 23 in the third Ocwen met with the Monitoring
quarter 2014. As a result, the NMS Committee to report its failure of
required Ocwen to develop a CAP Metric 23.
to ensure future compliance with
the metric, which measures
whether servicer complied with the
servicing standards that require the
notification to borrowers of any
missing documents within 30 days
of receipt of a borrowers request
for a short sale.
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Introduction
Remediation
Because the Metric 31 fail was widespread, Ocwen was
required to mail corrected loan modification denial notices
to 17,300 potentially affected borrowers. I required the
company to hold foreclosure sales for all borrowers
who could have received an incorrect loan modification
denial notice until these borrowers received the correct
information and had a chance to appeal. After Ocwen
mailed corrected loan modification denial notices in May
2016 and affected borrowers were afforded a chance to
appeal, I granted Ocwen permission to lift that hold in July
2016. Ocwen is continuing to implement other aspects of
the remediation plan related to this metric. I expect Ocwen
to complete the plan soon, and I will report on Ocwens
progress in future reports.
Compliance Testing
Results
Update on
Corrective Actions
Conclusion
OCWEN
Ocwen failed
Metric 31
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Ocwen failed Metric 31 in the third Ocwen met with the Monitoring
quarter 2014. As a result, the NMS Committee to report its failure of
required Ocwen to develop a CAP Metric 31.
to ensure future compliance with
the metric, which evaluates
whether the servicer sent a loan
modification denial notification to
a borrower that included the
reason for the denial, the factual
information considered by the
servicer in making its decision and
a timeframe by which the borrower
can provide evidence that the
decision was made in error.
Updating and correcting the query logic used to extract income information.
Revising query reports to include appropriate denial reasons and updating the
applicable letter templates.
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
10
Introduction
Compliance
Testing Results
OCWEN
Ocwen developed a Global CAP that outlined steps to correct the letter-dating issues.
THE GLOBAL CAP INCLUDES:
Letter-dating corrective actions, such as:
Update on
Corrective Actions
Conclusion
Letter-dating
issues
discovered at
Ocwen
Identification
of impacted
metrics
Global
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP complete,
testing
resumes and is
extended
1
11
Conclusion
Ocwen has made demonstrable progress in its efforts
to improve its compliance with the Settlement. However,
as evidenced by the two fails reported in the final
quarter 2015, there is still work to be done for Ocwen
to fully comply.
Introduction
Compliance
Testing Results
Update on
Corrective Actions
Conclusion
12
Appendix
MONITORS ROLE
Testing a Metric
If SPF results differ from IRG results, SPF follows up with IRG and requests any additional
information. IRG adjusts test results, if necessary.
Step One
Step Two
Servicer implements
servicing standards
Testing by IRG
Step Three
Step Four
Retesting by
SPF, PPF and Monitor
Step Five
Monitor submits
report on metrics to the
D.C. District Court
14
Appendix
FAILS
Whats Next?
The NMS defines a failed metric as a potential violation and gives the servicer a chance
to fix the root causes of its failure. This graphic shows what happens when a servicer fails
a metric.
Potential
Violation
Corrective
Action Plan
Borrower
Remediation
Servicer implements
Corrective Action Plan
(CAP) to address root
causes of fail
If potential violation is
widespread, servicer
remediates all
borrowers experiencing
material harm
Retesting
Penalties
Testing by IRG
and Monitor's team
recommences beginning
the quarter after
the CAP is completed
by servicer
Penalties include:
A court order to stop specific behaviors
Up to $1 million civil penalty
Up to $5 million fine for failing particular
metrics multiple times
15
Appendix
ii
SCORECARD
Ocwen
The Monitors Secondary Professional Firm (SPF) assigned to Ocwen, Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, tested the IRGs work on 27 metrics
during the third quarter 2015 and 28 metrics during the fourth quarter 2015. This chart illustrates the results of the IRGs tests.
METRIC NAME
METRIC
NUMBER
1 (1.A)
2 (1.B)
Affidavit of Indebtedness
(AOI) preparation
3 (2.A)
4 (2.B)
5 (2.C)
Pre-foreclosure initiation
6 (3.A)
Pre-foreclosure initiation
notifications
7 (3.B)
8 (4.A)
Adherence to customer
payment processing
9 (4.B)
Reconciliation of certain
waived fees
10 (4.C)
11 (4.D)
12 (5.A)
Customer portal
13 (5.B)
14 (5.C)
15 (5.D) **
16 (5.E) **
17 (5.F) **
TEST
PERIOD
THRESHOLD
ERROR RATE
RESULT (ERROR
RATE IF FAILED)
Q3 2015
1.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
1.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Under CAP
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Under CAP
Q4 2015
5.00%
Under CAP
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
N/A
Pass
Q4 2015
N/A
Pass
Q3 2015
N/A
Pass
Q4 2015
N/A
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
N/A
Q4 2015
N/A
Q3 2015
N/A
Q4 2015
N/A
Q3 2015
N/A
Q4 2015
N/A
METRIC NAME
METRIC
NUMBER
18 (6.A)
19 (6.B.i)
20 (6.B.ii)
Loan modification
appeal timeline compliance
21 (6.B.iii)
22 (6.B.iv)
23 (6.B.v)
24 (6.B.vi)
25 (6.B.vii.a)
26 (6.B.viii.a)
27 (6.B.viii.b)
Force-placed insurance
timeliness of notices
28 (6.C.i)
Force-placed insurance
termination
29 (6.C.ii)
30 (7.A)
31 (7.B)
32 (7.C)
33 (7.D)
34 (6.D.i)
TEST
PERIOD
THRESHOLD
ERROR RATE
RESULT (ERROR
RATE IF FAILED)
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
10.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
10.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
10.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
10.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
10.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
10.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
1.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
1.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Fail - 24.16%
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Fail - 5.14%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Under CAP
Q4 2015
5.00%
Under CAP
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q4 2015
5.00%
Pass
Q3 2015
3.50%
X*
Q4 2015
3.50%
X*
*Test question 4 only. **Policy and procedure metric that is tested once a year. ***Test Question 1 only. N/A: Threshold error rate not applicable. X: Metric was not tested in that specific test period. Under CAP: Metric was not tested in that specific test period since it was
under a CAP. X*: This Metric was not tested in that specific period because servicer did not have any loans that met the loan testing population criteria.
Appendix
iii
OCWEN
Ocwen failed
Metric 28
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Ocwen failed Metric 28 in the fourth Ocwen met with the Monitoring
quarter 2015. As a result, the NMS Committee to report its failure of
required Ocwen to develop a CAP Metric 28.
to ensure future compliance with
the metric, which tests whether
Ocwen is timely in its
communications to borrowers
regarding a lapse in homeowners
insurance coverage and notifies the
borrower that FPI may be obtained
if evidence of the borrowers own
insurance is not submitted.
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Appendix
iv
OCWEN
Ocwen failed
Metric 29
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Appendix
OCWEN
Implementing internal controls related to its procedures for updating the loss
mitigation matrix from which PFN letters are populated.
Ocwen failed
Metric 7
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Appendix
vi
OCWEN
Ocwen failed
Metric 8
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Appendix
vii
OCWEN
Ocwen failed
Metric 19
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Ocwen failed Metric 19 in the first Ocwen met with the Monitoring
quarter 2014. As a result, the NMS Committee to report its failure of
required Ocwen to develop a CAP Metric 19.
to ensure future compliance with
the metric, which measures
whether the servicer complied
with servicing standards regarding
timeliness for responding to
borrowers about missing or
incomplete information relating
to loan modification packages.
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Appendix
viii
OCWEN
Ocwen failed
Metric 23
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Ocwen failed Metric 23 in the third Ocwen met with the Monitoring
quarter 2014. As a result, the NMS Committee to report its failure of
required Ocwen to develop a CAP Metric 23.
to ensure future compliance with
the metric, which measures
whether servicer complied with the
servicing standards that require the
notification to borrowers of any
missing documents within 30 days
of receipt of a borrowers request
for a short sale.
Implementing a new third-party software program for its short sale review process
that will include system coding to track the date firm offers are received and, in the
interim, repurposing existing system of record coding for firm offers received.
Implementing control reporting and related testing to evaluate the timeliness of
missing information letters and to better ensure all firm offers are reviewed.
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Appendix
ix
OCWEN
Ocwen failed
Metric 31
Notify
Monitoring
Committee
Ocwen failed Metric 31 in the third Ocwen met with the Monitoring
quarter 2014. As a result, the NMS Committee to report its failure of
required Ocwen to develop a CAP Metric 31.
to ensure future compliance with
the metric, which evaluates
whether the servicer sent a loan
modification denial notification to
a borrower that included the
reason for the denial, the factual
information considered by the
servicer in making its decision and
a timeframe by which the borrower
can provide evidence that the
decision was made in error.
Updating and correcting the query logic used to extract income information.
Revising query reports to include appropriate denial reasons and updating the
applicable letter templates.
Develop
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP
complete
and testing
resumes
Appendix
OCWEN
Letter-dating
issues
discovered at
Ocwen
Identification
of impacted
metrics
Global
Corrective
Action Plan
(CAP)
Implement
CAP
CAP complete,
testing
resumes and is
extended
Appendix
xi