Conclusion
Conclusion
CONCLUSION
Kamala Markandaya and Jhumpa Lahiri, the two significant
wheels of Indian English fiction, are passionately interested not
only in presenting the important aspects and varied colours of
human life but also in depicting the socio-cultural conflicts in their
fiction. Both the writers are in tremendous love with life and
naturally, both intend to celebrate life. It is their subtle observation
of society and culture which makes them examine the prevailing
sicknesses, sorrows and miseries and bring to the fore the factors
which prohibit us to live our life joyously. Life is so full of meaning
to them that they find a possibility of divine song in the chaos of
life. However in an attempt to discover that divine song, they try to
diagnose and treat the illnesses inflicted by human beings, society
and environment sympathetically.
In the wide spectrum of her novels, Kamala Markandaya has
successfully presented almost all the important aspects and the
varied colours of human life viz., family life of poor persons in
183
Lahiri
as
diaspora
writer,
deals
with
Relationship
have
the
unmistakable
tinge
of
an
man-made
whims
like
rapid
industrialization
and
lure
for
fictionist
probes
into
various
maladies
that
disrupt
maladies
in
her
protagonists
192
entangled
in
multiple
be
within
my
control,
shall
sterile
their
roots
into
unaccustomed earth".
In the title story, "Unaccustomed Earth" through the garden
metaphor, Lahiri examines the maladies in the relationship
between Ruma and her father. After her mother's death, retiring
from a pharmaceutical company, he began travelling to Europe
193
194
195
realizes the damage she caused her daughter. "She understood now
what it meant to walk away from her child. It had been her own act
of killing. ... It was a crime worse than anything Udayan had
committed." (The Lowland)
The Lowland dwells in complex territory. Gauri realizes the
Naxals are oblivious to an oppression much closer to home: that of
women. Udayan had wanted a revolution, but at home he'd
expected to be served; his only contribution to meals was to sit and
wait for her or her mother-in-law to put a plate before him.
These insights point toward an unspoken question: Is it
irresponsible -- or even criminal -- to risk your life for a political
cause that may not be realized in your lifetime? The Lowland
stutters in response: Yes -- no -- maybe.
Indeed,
bearings
of
the
the
psychological
primary
ties
implications
make
the
and
works
sociological
of
Kamala
198