BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1 Midterms
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1 Midterms
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Q: What is the definition of Political Law?
A: Political Law is that branch of public law which deals with the organization and operations of
the governmental organs of the State and defines the relations of the State with the inhabitants of
its territory. (People vs. Perfecto)
Q: What are the sources used in the study of Political Law?
A: The main source is the 1987 Philippine Constitution. It also includes pertinent statutes,
executive orders and decrees, judicial decisions, and current political events in which the
purposes of the law are applied (or misapplied). It also includes the previous constitutions of the
Philippines (1935 and 1973).
It also includes the different organic (from the word organ, which refers to the bodies or parts
of the government) laws of the Philippines that were in effect during the American occupation. It
also includes the United States (US) Constitution and the decisions of the US Supreme Court
because they are considered as extrinsic aids. These two (organic laws and US Supreme Court
decisions) can be used in determining the meaning of some of the provisions of our Constitution
that originated from the US Constitution.
Q: What is the scope of Political Law?
A: Constitutional Law I and II, Administrative Law, the Law of Public Officers, Election Law,
and the Law on Municipal Corporations
Q: What is the difference between Political Law and Constitutional Law (aside from the
latter being a branch of Political law)
A: Political Law deals with the organization and operations of the governmental organs of the
State and defines the relations of the State with the inhabitants of its territory. On the other hand,
Constitutional Law deals with the maintenance of the proper balance between authority as
represented by the three (3) inherent powers of the State and liberty as guaranteed by the Bill of
Rights.
Q: What is public law?
A: Public law is understood as dealing with matters affecting the state, the act of state agencies,
and the protection of state interests. (e.g. Political Law, Criminal Law, Public International Law)
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 1
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Page 2
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Q: What is sovereignty?
A: It is the supreme and uncontrollable power inherent in a State by which that State is governed.
(Garner, Political Science and Government)
Juristically speaking, it is the supreme, uncontrollable power, the jures summi imperri, the
absolute right to govern. It is the supreme will of the State, the power to make laws and enforce
them by all means of coercion it cares to employ. (Gonzales, Philippine Political Law)
Q: What are the four (4) kinds of sovereignty?
A: 1. Legal sovereignty is the authority by which a state has the power to issue final
commands. (Gilebrist, Principles of Political Science)
2. Political sovereignty the sum total of all the influences in a State which lie behind the
law; roughly defined as the power of the people; the sovereignty of the electorate, or in its
general sense, the sovereignty of the whole body politic. (Gonzales, Philippine Political Law)
3. Internal sovereignty management of our domestic affairs; the supremacy of a person or
body of persons in the State over the individuals or association of individuals within the area of
its jurisdiction. (Gonzales, Philippine Political Law)
4. External sovereignty freedom from external control. It is the supremacy of the State as
against all foreign wills. (Gonzales, Philippine Political Law)
Q: Who is the legal sovereign?
A: Government and not merely the Congress. After the Congress enacts the law, it will be
enforced by the Executive branch. The law will then be applied by the Judiciary to settle actual
controversies. Without the Executive and Judiciary, laws promulgated by the Congress are
useless.
Q: Who is the political sovereign?
A: People
Q: Is there really a difference between the two?
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 3
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
A: None, it is like a fine diamond with different sides. One side is the legal sovereign and the
other side is the people representing the political sovereign. (Bugayong)
Q: What Article states the provisions on sovereignty?
A: Article 17: Amendments or Revisions
Q: What is an amendment?
A: It refers to isolated or piecemeal change in the Constitution.
Q: What is a revision?
A: It is a revamp or rewriting of the whole Constitution.
Q: What is the difference between amendment and revision?
A: In the case of Lambino vs. COMELEC, it was discussed that revision broadly implies a
change that alters a basic principle in the Constitution, like altering the principle of separation of
powers or the system of checks-and-balances. There is also revision if the change alters the
substantial entirety of the Constitution, as when the change affects substantial provisions of the
Constitution.
On the other hand, amendment broadly refers to a change that adds, reduces, or deletes without
altering the basic principle involved. Revision generally affects several provisions of the
Constitution, while amendment generally affects only the specific provision being amended.
Q: How can people amend/revise the Constitution?
A: Through proposal and ratification
Q: How do you propose amendments?
A: 1. By the Congress, upon a vote of three-fourths (3/4) of all its members/through the Congress
acting as a constituent assembly; or
2. By a constitutional convention; or
3. Direct proposal by the people through initiative/peoples initiative
Q: How do you propose revisions?
A: 1. By the Congress, upon a vote of three-fourths (3/4) of all its members/through the Congress
acting as a constituent assembly; or
2. By a constitutional convention which is called by two-thirds (2/3) vote of all the members
of the Congress, or by a majority vote of all the members of the Congress in case the question of
calling such a convention is submitted to the electorate
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 4
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
to
choose
what
mode
to
use
in
proposing
Page 5
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
CONCEPT OF STATE
Q: What is a State?
A: It is a community of persons, more or less numerous, permanently occupying a definite
territory, independent of external control, and possessing a government to which a great body of
inhabitants render habitual obedience.
Q: What are the elements of a State?
A: People, territory, government, sovereignty (Note: Other legal scholars opined that there are
two other elements. These are recognition by the international community/other states and
sufficient degree of civilization)
Q: Is state the same as nation?
A: No. The state is a political/legal concept while the nation is an ethnic/racial concept. The state
as a political/legal concept means that the state is an abstract, ideal person, existing only in
contemplation of law. It is composed of its elements, to wit, people, territory, government, and
sovereignty. The nation as an ethnic/racial concept means that the people are bound by common
social origin, language, customs and traditions (e.g. Filipinos as coming from the Malay race).
Q: What do you mean by people?
A: It refers to the inhabitants of the State or the mass of population living within the State.
Without people, there can be no functionaries to govern and no subjects to be governed. (Albano,
Philippine Government and Constitution)
Q: How many people are needed to form a State?
A: There is no requirement as to the number of people that should compose a State. They must
be numerous enough to be self-sufficing and to defend themselves and small enough to be easily
administered and sustained.
*Reputedly, the smallest State in point of population is the Vatican. Its estimated five hundred
(500) citizens, mainly clerics and some Swiss guards, are ruled by the Pope. The island Republic
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 6
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
of Nauru has a total population of only nine thousand (9,000). China is the largest state in point
placed at more than one billion (1,000,000,000).
Q: Can you have a State where the people are all men or all women?
A: No. There would be no procreation, thus, the State would not be able to sustain or survive.
The State should be able to maintain its existence, thus, continuity of the race is a must.
Q: What do you mean by territory?
A: It is the fixed portion of the earth inhabited by the people of the State.
Q: Would a classroom be sufficient to be considered as territory?
A: No. The territory should be able to provide the needs of the population. There are no natural
resources in the classroom. There is no source of food in the classroom. Thus, the classroom
cannot be considered as territory.
*The territory should be neither too big as to be difficult to administer and defend nor too small
as to be unable to provide for the needs of the population such as food and natural resources.
Q: Can a ship sailing on the sea qualify as a territory?
A: No. It is not a fixed portion of the earth.
Q: Without Article I, can we claim that we have a territory? What is the purpose of Article
I?
A: Yes. It is not the legal basis of our territory because if it is, then without Article I, we will not
have a territory, therefore, we will not be a State. Our territory existed since time immemorial.
Q: Can we invoke Article I against other States?
A: No because the constitution is a municipal law (enforceable or binding only within the
territorial limits of the sovereignty promulgating the constitution). It does not bind other states.
But if it is further supported by an international treaty or a principle of international law, then it
can bind other States.
Q: What are the components of territory?
A: 1. Terrestrial Domain composed of the land
2. Maritime Domain maritime belt/sea belt/marginal belt
Fluvial Domain inland waters such as rivers, lakes, lagoons, canals
3. Aerial Domain the air space above the land and waters, excluding outerspace
Page 7
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
* Sovereignty over airspace extends only until where outerspace begins. (50-100 miles
from the earth)
Q: What do you mean by archipelago?
A: It is a group of islands, including parts of islands, interconnecting waters and other natural
features which are so closely interrelated that such islands, waters and other natural features form
an intrinsic geographical, economic and political entity, or which historically have been regarded
as such.
Simply stated, it is a body of water studded or surrounded by islands. (Bernas)
Q: Why is the Philippines an archipelago?
A: It is an archipelago because it is located on a body of water surrounded by seven thousand one
hundred seven (7,107) islands.
Q: What is the Archipelagic Doctrine?
A: It is a principle which considers the group of islands as one integrated unit. For this purpose,
it requires that straight baselines be drawn by connecting the appropriate points of the outermost
islands to encircle the islands within the archipelago. We consider all the waters enclosed by the
straight baselines as internal waters.
Q: Is there a part of Article I which confirms that the Philippines adopts the archipelagic
doctrine?
A: Yes. It is found in the last sentence of Article I which states that The waters around,
between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and
dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines.
Q: How do you describe the maritime domain of the Philippines?
A: It consists of its territorial sea, the sea bed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other
submarine areas.
Q: Where do you reckon the twelve (12) nautical miles?
A: It is reckoned from the baseline, the lowest water mark which will then become our maritime
domain.
Q: How do you make the 7,107 islands into one integrated unit?
A: Use the straight baseline method.
Q: What are the two (2) kinds of baseline method?
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 8
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Q: Why do you call the three (3) nautical miles the canon-shot rule?
A: That time, the rule was you can only own what you can defend. In the eighteenth (18th)
century, the strongest weapon was the canon, the effective range of which was only three (3)
nautical miles.
Q: What is government?
A: It is the agency or instrumentality through which the will of the State is formulated,
expressed, and realized.
Q: What you mean by the government is the agency of the State?
A: Since the State is a legal concept, (it is an abstract or ideal person existing only in
contemplation of law), it can only act through the government which is its agent or
representative.
Q: What is the difference between State and government?
A: Both are legal concepts. But the State can only act through the government.
Q: What is the difference between government and administration?
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 9
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
A: Government is a legal concept. It can only act through the administration that runs the
government for the time being.
Q: What do you mean by the State as a legal concept?
A: You cannot see the State. It is an ideal, invisible, intangible, immutable, abstract person,
existing only in contemplation of law. You can only see it through its four (4) elements.
Q: What are the functions of the government?
A: 1. Constituent functions
2. Ministrant functions
Q: What is the difference between constituent functions and ministrant functions?
A: Constituent functions are the basic functions of the government and are thus compulsory
while ministrant functions are those undertaken to advance the general interests of society and
are thus optional.
Q: What are the other names for constituent and ministrant?
A: Constituent governmental, core
Ministrant proprietary
Q: Is the difference between governmental and proprietary functions still relevant?
A: No. In PVTA vs.CIR, the Supreme Court held that such distinction has been blurred because
of the repudiation of the laissez faire policy in the Constitution. The government, under the
Constitution, is under an obligation to promote social justice (Sec 10, Art II)
Page 10
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Page 11
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
(2) Laws Political laws are merely suspended, subject to revival under the jus postliminium
upon the end of the occupation. Non-political laws are deemed continued unless changed by the
belligerent occupant since they are intended to govern the relations of individuals as among
themselves and are not generally affected by changes in regimes or rulers.
However, the rule suspending political laws affects only the civilian inhabitants of the occupied
territory and is not intended to bind the enemies in arms. It also does not apply to the law on
treason although decidedly political in character. This rule only covers the civilian inhabitants of
the occupied territory. It does not bind enemies at war. (Ruffy vs Chief of Staff)
(3) Judicial Decisions They are valid during the occupation and even beyond except those of
a political complexion, which are automatically annulled upon the restoration of the legitimate
authority (Co Kim Chan vs. Valdez Teh).
Thus, a person convicted of treason against the Japanese Imperial Forces was, after the
occupation, entitled to be released on the ground that the sentence imposed on him for his
political offense had ceased to be valid (Peralta vs. Director of Prisons). But if the conviction
was for a non-political offense like, say, defamation, the sentence would not be affected by the
termination of the occupation.
Q: Why are we a republic?
A: It is because of the political sovereignty of the people as provided in Article II, Section 1 of
the Constitution.
Article II, Section 1 provides: The Philippines is a democratic and republican State. Sovereignty
resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them.
Q: What is the Doctrine of Jus Postliminium?
A: It is used for de facto government of the third kind belligerent occupation or government of
paramount force. At the end of the belligerent occupation, when the occupant is ousted from the
territory, the political laws which had been suspended during the occupation shall automatically
become effective again.
Q: Is there an instance of change of sovereignty? When?
A: Spanish government ceded the Philippines to the American government.
Q: What are the effects of change of sovereignty?
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 12
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
A: Where there is a change of sovereignty, the political laws of the former sovereign are not
merely suspended but abrogated. As they regulate the relations between the ruler and the ruled,
these laws fall to the ground ipso facto unless they are retained or re-enacted by positive act of
the new sovereign.
Non-political laws, by contrast, continue in operation, for the reason also that they regulate
private relations only, unless they are changed by the new sovereign or are contrary to its
institutions. (Read the cases of People vs. Perfecto and Macariola vs. Asuncion)
STATE IMMUNITY
Q: What is the Doctrine of State Immunity?
A: It means that the State may not be sued without its consent. This provision reflects nothing
less than a recognition of the sovereign character of the State and an express affirmation of the
unwritten rule insulating it from the jurisdiction of the courts of justice. It is based on the very
essence of sovereignty.
Q: What is the logical reason for the State immunity?
A: There can be no legal right against the authority which makes the law on which the right
depends. (Justice Holmes)
Q: What is the practical reason for the State immunity?
A: The demands and inconveniences of litigation will divert the time and resources of the State
from the more pressing matters demanding its attention, to the prejudice of the public welfare.
Otherwise stated, funds for projects or other legitimate purposes will be used for cases filed
against the State. The practical reason is the service that will be lost if the money will be
diverted.
Q: Is the Doctrine of State Immunity applicable to other States in local jurisdiction? Why
or why not?
A: Yes. Par in parem non habet imperium. An equal has no power over an equal. All States as
sovereign equals cannot assert jurisdiction over one another. The United States of America
cannot be sued here in the Philippines without its consent. (see USA vs. Guinto)
Page 13
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Page 14
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Incorporated Agency
- Has a charter, therefore, has a juridical or separate personality
- Examples: National Power Corporation (NPC); University of the Philippines (UP)
Unincorporated Agency
- Part of the entire government machinery
- Lined agency
- Example: DOJ and all other departments under the Executive branch
- Not chartered, but it does not mean that it is not created by law. It could only mean
that it is not stated whether or not it can sue and be sued.
- Has no separate/juridical personality
- Rule: Distinguish whether function is governmental or proprietary
Governmental suit against the State
Proprietary not suit against the State
Suit against the State:
- Determine whether the agency is incorporated or unincorporated.
- If incorporated, determine whether primary function is governmental or proprietary.
- If governmental, it is a suit against the State. Consent must be determined.
- If proprietary, it is not a suit against the State. Case should not be dismissed.
X vs. NPC Is this a suit against the State?
Look at the charter law creating/establishing the agency
If the charter provides that it can sue and be sued, then it is not a suit against the State.
The Articles of Incorporation is what gives the corporation or agency a juridical
personality. This is what makes it a legal concept.
*Not all agencies created by law are chartered.
*Generally, a charter provides that the agency can sue and be sued.
Why is it that generally, if it is a chartered agency, it is not a suit against the State?
-
Page 15
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
The charter explicitly provides whether the agency can be sued or not.
If the charter does not provide for the agencys suability, then it cannot be qualified as
incorporated.
If it is chartered or incorporated, then it is not a suit against the State.
Page 16
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Q: If the State is liable, does it mean that you can already execute the judgment?
A: No. As held in Republic vs. Villasor, every disbursement of public funds shall be covered by a
corresponding appropriation passed by the Legislature. A judgment against the State, in a case
where it consents to be sued, simply implies that the Legislature will recognize the judgment as
final and make provisions for its satisfaction.
Garnishment
General Rule: Whether the money is deposited by way of general or special deposit, it remains as
government funds and may not be subject to garnishment.
Exception: When a law or an ordinance has been enacted appropriating a specific amount to pay
a valid government obligation, then the money can be garnished.
STATE POLICY
Q: What is the States policy on the family?
A: The first part of Article II, Section 12 states that The State recognizes the sanctity of family
life and shall protect and strengthen the family as a basic autonomous social institution.
It means that the State is enjoined to strengthen the family or is prohibited from adopting
measures which can impair the solidarity of the Filipino family. Calling the family a basic
social institution is an assertion that the family is anterior to the State and is not a creature of the
State. The categorization of the family as autonomous is meant to protect the family against
instrumentalization by the State.
Q: Considering the policy on the family, do you think the Congress can enact a law on
divorce?
A: Yes. The constitutional provisions on marriage do not imply that the Legislature cannot enact
a law allowing absolute divorce. While it is fundamental that marriage must be protected, it is
likewise to be acknowledged that there may be certain cases where the parties might have
undergone a marriage ceremony to bind themselves together but, subsequently, no functional
marital life would exist. Hence, there is no marriage to preserve at all. The Legislature has the
plenary power to decide what sort of situations allowing absolute divorce may be recognized
within the limits allowed by the Constitution. (Sta. Maria)
Q: What is the prime duty of the government?
A: To serve and protect the people.
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 17
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Q: What is the policy of the State with respect to war? Is it contradictory to Section 4 of
Article II which states that The prime duty of the Government is to serve and protect the
people. The Government may call upon the people to defend the State and, in the
fulfillment thereof, all citizens may be required, under conditions provided by law, to
render personal, military or civil service.?
A: Section 2 of Article II states that The Philippines renounces war as an instrument of national
policy xxx.
No. What is renounced by the Philippines through the Constitution is aggressive war, not
defensive war, because of its membership in the United Nations (UN) whose charter renounces
war as an instrument of national policy of its member-States. As a signatory to the UN Charter,
the Philippines adheres to Article 2 (4) of the UN Charter which states: All Members shall
refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial
integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the
Purposes of the United Nations.
It does not renounce defensive war because the Government is duty-bound to protect the people,
as provided in Section 4 of Article II. The power to wage a defensive war is the very essence of
sovereignty.
The Philippines is also a signatory to the Kellog-Briand Pact, a treaty renouncing war as an
instrument of national policy of the signatory States.
Q: Can President Aquino write you a letter ordering you to report to the military
headquarters to render military service? Can you refuse?
A: Yes, and I cannot refuse. As held in the case of People vs. Lagman, the duty of the
Government to defend the State cannot be performed except through an army. To leave the
organization of an army to the will of the citizens would be to make this duty of the Government
excusable should there be no sufficient men who volunteer to enlist therein.
Q: What is the difference between aggressive war and defensive war?
A: In aggressive war, it is the State which initiates the war (the Philippines as an active subject)
as opposed to defensive war in which it is another foreign country which initiates the war and the
State only acts to defend itself (the Philippines as a passive subject).
Q: Without Section 2, do we still renounce war?
A: Yes. Even without Section 2, our policy on renunciation of war can still be traced from our
membership in the United Nations whose charter also renounces war as an instrument of national
policy of its member-States.
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 18
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Page 19
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Page 20
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
the mother and the life of the unborn from conception. The natural and primary right and duty of
parents in the rearing of the youth for civic efficiency and the development of the moral
character shall receive the support of the Government.
Q: What is more important for the State, the life of the mother or the life of the unborn?
A: Both. Section 12, in clear and unequivocal terms, explicitly states that It shall equally protect
the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception.
Q: What is the principle of the separation of Church and State?
A: Section 6 provides that The separation of Church and State shall be inviolable. It means that
on the one hand, the State is prohibited from interfering with purely ecclesiastical affairs and on
the other hand, the Church is prohibited from meddling in purely secular affairs.
But it does not mean that there is total or absolute separation. The better rule is symbiotic
relations between the Church and State. (Albano, Philippine Government and Constitution) (see
Aglipay vs. Ruiz)
Q: Does it mean that the Church is not allowed to express its opinion regarding the affairs
of the State and vice-versa?
A: No. If the Church issues a statement on public and important issues concerning the State, it is
not a violation of the separation of Church and State. It is a part of the exercise of the freedom of
expression because it is in the open market of ideas that the aims of the State of promoting a
peaceful, honest, safe, educated, humane and just society may be attained. The Church and State
are partners in promoting the common good for the people. (Albano, Philippine Government and
Constitution)
Q: What are the two (2) important aspects of the principle of separation of Church and
State?
A: (1) Non-establishment clause No law shall be made respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof... (Sec. 5, Art. III, 1987 Constitution)
(2) Free exercise clause The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and
worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed.
SEPARATION OF POWERS
Q: What is separation?
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 21
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Page 22
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
GRABE-SBC-D
Government of laws, not of men
Rule of Majority
Accountability of Public Officers
Bill of Rights
Election of Public Officers
Separation of Powers
Blending of Powers
Checks and Balances
Delegation
Q: What are the purposes of separation of powers?
A:
(1) intended to prevent a concentration of authority in one person or group of persons that might
lead to an irreversible error or abuse in its exercise to the detriment of our republican institutions
(2) designed to prevent the accumulation of powers in the same hands, which result of tyranny.
(3) to secure action, to forestall overaction, to prevent despotism and to obtain efficiency (Justice
Laurel)
Q: Explain the penumbra
A: The three departments of government are coordinate, co-equal and co-important. While
interdependent, in the sense that each is unable to perform its functions fully and adequately
without the other, they are nonetheless in many instances independent of each other. That is to
say, one department may not control or even interfere with another in the exercise of its
particular functions.
PENUMBRA
Page 23
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Page 24
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
The judiciary, with the SC as the final arbiter, may declare legislative measures or
executive acts unconstitutional [Art. 8, Sec. 4(2)] and determine whether or not there has been a
grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of the Congress
or the President.
Judicial Review ultimate check on the two departments
Q: By judicial review, does it mean that the Judiciary is supreme over the two other
departments?
A: No, what it is upholding is not its own supremacy but the supremacy of the Constitution.
Q: What is a justiciable question?
A: It implies a given right, legally demandable and enforceable, an act or omission, violative of
such right, and a remedy granted and sanctioned by law for said breach of right. (e.g. compliance
with a voting requirement; qualifications of an appointee of the President)
Q: What is a political question?
A: It is a question of policy, that question which under the constitution is to be decided by the
people in their sovereign capacity; or in regard to which, full discretionary authority has been
delegated to the legislative or executive branch of the government. It is concerned with issues
dependent upon the wisdom, not legality, of a particular measure. (e.g. interpretation of phrases
such as other high crimes, disorderly behaviour, etc.)
Illustration:
X power Y; Y cannot delegate such power to Z
Legend:
X= people; Y= government agency (LEJ); Z= anyone
Q: What is the basis of the principle of delegation?
A: The basis is the principle of potestas delegata non potest delegare.
Q: What is the meaning of potestas delegata non potest delegare?
A: Delegated power cannot be further delegated or what has been delegated cannot be delegated.
It means that a delegated power constitutes not only a right but a duty to be performed by the
delegate by the instrumentality of his own judgment and not through the intervening mind of
another.
Q: Why is it that a power delegated cannot be further delegated?
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
Theres no other way but the BTX Way.
Page 25
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Page 26
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Page 27
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
The government of the state is democratic, but it is a representative democracy, and in passing
general laws the people act only through their representatives in the legislature. Such reference
of the law to the people at large for acceptance or rejection is plain surrender of the law making
power.
Referendum: method of submitting an important legislative measure to a direct vote of the whole
people.
Plebiscite: questions submitted in the plebiscite are intended to work more permanent changes in
the political structure, like a proposal to amend the constitution; device to obtain a direct popular
vote on a matter of political importance, but chiefly in order to create some more or less
permanent political condition.
Q: What is delegation to the Local Government Units (LGUs) (Art. 10, Sec.3)?*Local
Government Code
A: This traditional exception is based on the recognition that local legislatures are more
knowledgeable than the national law making body on matters of purely local concerns and are
therefore in a better position to enact the necessary and appropriate legislation thereon.
Q: What is delegation to administrative bodies? *Charter
A: Administrative bodies may implement the broad policies laid down in a statute by filling in
the details which the Congress may not have the opportunity or competence to provide. This is
effected by their promulgation of what are known as Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR),
such as the implementing rules issued by the Department of Labor on Labor Code. These
regulations have the force and effect of law.
Contingent Regulations: They are allowed to ascertain the existence of particular contingencies
and on the basis thereof enforce or suspend the operation of a law. Such also have the force and
effect of law.
Quasi-Legislative Power: It is the authority delegated by the law making body to the
administrative body to adopt rules and regulations intended to carry out the provisions of a law
and implement the legislative policy.
Page 28
BTX
San Beda College-Manila
College of Law
Page 29