Superior Court of The State of California For The County of
Superior Court of The State of California For The County of
2
3
4
5
Verada Reynolds
31920 Brookings Drive
Running Springs, CA 92382
(818)641-7159
[email protected]
I
Defendant, In Pro Per
6
7
8
9
Superior Court of the State of California
10
11
12
13
Stuart Hipkins
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
vs.
Verada Reynolds,
Defendant
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
28
- 1 NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT
sustaining a general demurrer to the unlawful detainer complaint filed by Plaintiff without leave to
amend.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
This demurrer is made pursuant to Cal. Civil Code of Proc. 1166(a) that the complaint must
<INSERT GROUNDS FOR DEMURRER EXAMPLE: be properly verified, pursuant to CCCP
430.10 (c) > thus it is fatally defective and will not support an unlawful detainer action.
This demurrer is based upon this notice of demurrer, the attached demurrer, the memorandum
of points and authorities, and upon such oral and documentary evidence as may be presented by
Defendant upon the hearing of the demurrer.
10
11
12
__________________________________________,
Defendant, In Pro Per
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 2 NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT
5
6
1.
the grounds of improper verification of complaint and therefore Defendant alleges that there is no
lawfully verified complaint on file with this court in violation of California Code of Civil Procedure
10
2.
11
12
13
1.
Defendant generally demurs to the unlawful detainer complaint filed by Plaintiff on the grounds
14
15
16
Defendant generally demurs to the unlawful detainer complaint pursuant to <INSERT THIRD
17
18
GROUNDS>
19
20
21
22
23
DATED: __________________
______________________________,
Defendant, In Pro Per
24
25
26
27
28
- 3 NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT
COMPLAINT
I.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
6
7
properly verify the complaint. Verification was available and yet it was
not obtained for the simple reason that Verification is not possible. Plaintiff xxxx and Plaintiffs
9
10
11
counsel are fully aware of the pending appeal on issue of Quiet Title, Declaratory Relief, and Fraud
has not been fully adjudicated to prove legal certainty of standing or jurisdiction. >
<INSERT SPECIFIC POINTS 1 PARAGRAPH PER POINT>
12
<INSERT CLOSING: SAMPLE CLOSING: Therefore, the complaint fails, on its face, as it
13
14
15
For these reasons, this demurrer should be granted in its entirety without leave to amend.
16
17
II.
18
ARGUMENT
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
The period for noticing the hearing on a demurrer is not set forth in the unlawful detainer statutes,
Sections 1159 through 1179a. However, Section 1177 provides that all provisions of law contained in
Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (the ones applicable to regular civil actions) are otherwise
26
generally applicable to unlawful detainer actions, unless other procedures are specified in the
27
unlawful detainer statutes. Since the unlawful detainer statutes do not provide for the timing of a
28
hearing on a demurrer, the timing for demurrers is governed by CCCP 1005, which requires 16
- 4 NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT
court days notice of the hearing on the demurrer, plus five calendar days for notice by mailing.
Thus, this demurrer is properly before the Court and notice is proper.
3
4
5
6
The failure of the pleading to state a cause of action results from the fact that the complaint
appears deficient on the face of the pleading or from judicially noticed matter. Hall vs. Chamberlin,
(1948) 31 Cal.2d 673, 679-680.
If a defendant negates any essential element of a particular cause of action, a judge should
7
8
9
sustain the demurrer as to that cause of action. See Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.(1992) 4 Cal.App.
4th 857, 880. Thus, the Court is authorized to grant this demurrer.
10
11
12
B.
13
14
15
16
The complaint is improperly verified for several reasons and the complaint is subject to a
general demurrer on that basis.
17
18
1. The Summons and Complaint both indicate that the Plaintiff is Deutsche Bank National Trust
19
Company as Trustee for Morgan Stanley Trust 2006-NC2. The Plaintiff must plead with standing and
20
sufficiency. As our Supreme Court has said in Silcox v. Lang, (1889) 78 Cal. 118, 122: The
21
Practice of attorneys verifying for their client should be discouraged, and to that end, the provision
22
23
24
2. The only time the plaintiffs attorney may verify the complaint is when the plaintiff is absent
25
from the county where the attorney has his or her office or is otherwise unable to verify the
26
complaint; or the facts are within the personal knowledge of the attorney verifying the complaint.
27
28
- 5 NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT
3. Civil Code of Procedure 446 does not authorize attorney verification where absence of the
1
2
3
4
5
6
party creates no inability on his part to verify. In DeCamp v. Kensington Corp. (1978) 83 Cal.
App.3d 268, 275: If the client can be reached by mail, no such impossibly existand the attorney
verification is not allowed. NOT ALLOWED. This cannot be any more direct or plain in its
language. Plaintiffs attorneys know this, or should know this.
4. The Complaint is improperly verified by the attorney who represents the Plaintiff, <INSERT
7
8
a.
10
11
c.
12
14
16
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
13
15
Such party is absent from the county of aforesaid where such attorneys have their offices
17
18
(Judical Notice 2)
NAME is an attorney duly licensed in the State of California and HE/SHE was admitted to
19
20
practice law in the state of California on DATE. Her/his verification was signed under penalty of
21
perjury.
22
There is no verified complaint on file with this court in violation of CCCP 1166(a)(1) and
23
24
25
26
C.
27
28
- 6 NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
D.
GROUND THREE:
GROUNDS>
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
III.
14
CONCLUSION
15
Based on the foregoing facts, arguments, and points of law, the Court is urged to sustain
16
17
18
Defendants general demurrer to the unlawful detainer complaint filed by Plaintiff without leave to
amend, and that Defendant have Judgment against Plaintiff for costs, and if applicable, attorney fees.
19
20
21
_____________________________,
Defendant, In Pro Per
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 7 NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT
PROOF OF SERVICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
[ ] (By Facsimile) I served a true and correct copy by facsimile during regular business
hours to the number(s) listed above. Said transmission was reported complete
and without error.
20
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
18
21
22
23
24
_______________________________________
NAME OF PERSON SERVING PAPERS
25
26
27
28
- 8 NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT