10chap Audit Working Papers PDF
10chap Audit Working Papers PDF
Section
Contents
Page
1000
Purpose
10-1
1001
10-1
1002
10-1
1003
10-2
1004
10-3
1005
10-3
1006
10-4
1007
10-4
1008
10-6
1009
10-7
1010
Standardized Workpapers
10-7
1011
10-8
1012
10-8
1013
10-9
This chapter prescribes the standards and procedures for the preparation, contents, use,
retention, and disposition of audit working papers.
2.
The diversity of audit assignments does not permit the establishment of a single system or
design of working papers to be used throughout the auditor's office but conformity as to
quality and standards should exist.
Working papers are instruments vital to the successful accomplishment of all audit
assignments performed. The working papers provide documented evidence of an
examination and evaluation and provide a connecting link between the work which is
performed and the final audit report. Hence, their importance cannot be overly emphasized.
2.
To a major extent, every auditor is judged by his skill and ability in preparing working
papers. When working papers are prepared in good form with proper attention to layout,
design, and legibility, with complete headings, explanations of sources, and verification of
work performed, they create a feeling of confidence in the ability of the staff member.
Working papers should always convey an impression of system and order and conscientious
attention to detail, coupled with a clear distinction between the important and the trivial.
3.
Another test of good working papers occurs when it is necessary for one staff member to
leave a partially completed assignment and turn it over to another staff member. If the latter
can proceed without confusion then the working papers have stood the critical test of being
able to stand on their own.
4.
Every auditor will be expected to continuously strive for the highest standards of excellence
in the preparation of working papers.
Information obtained through audits should be treated as confidential not only as to outsiders
but also as to employees of the entity audited who would not otherwise have access to the
information. Further, the working papers include information concerning the scope of the
examination and the extent of selective tests made, and this information should not be
available to the staff of the audited entity. Therefore, audit working papers should be
safeguarded at all times against the possibility of their being examined by unauthorized
persons.
2.
Client or outside agency request to review Audit and Management Services work papers
must be approved by an appropriate official.
Chapter 10
10-1
2.
They constitute a permanent record of the objectives and scope of the audit, as well
as the work performed during the audit. Work papers organize and coordinate all
phases of the audit.
B.
They contain the back-up material in support of the audit findings, conclusions,
opinions, and comments.
C.
They contain the basic material from which the audit report is prepared.
D.
They reflect the quality and reliability of the work performed by the auditor and
substantiate and explain in detail the opinions and findings presented to University
management.
Working papers have a number of additional uses both during and after the audit. These are
to control audit progress by showing the auditor what audit procedures have been completed
and what audit procedures have not been completed. Working papers also provide:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
A permanent record for use in planning and carrying out future audits.
G.
Demonstrate that auditors have complied with the Standards for the Professional
Practice of Internal Auditors.
Chapter 10
10-2
The preparation of audit working papers must be planned so that they will substantively
fulfill the purposes mentioned in Section 1003. An audit program provides much help in the
planning of working papers. The program reflects the objectives of the audit and the nature
of the information required. Thus, many of the areas of inquiry are identified as well as the
general types of working papers that will be needed to record the work performed in those
areas. However, methods of operations are never precisely the same in two "like"
organizational elements, nor are the circumstances under which the operations are carried
out identical. For this reason, audits of similar organizations and activities should not be
performed exactly alike nor should stereotyped working papers be prepared.
2.
Each section of the working papers must be planned to satisfy some requirement of the audit
program. When the audit is completed, the working papers should contain data needed to
fulfill all of the objectives of the audit. Adequate planning of working papers requires the
auditor to:
3.
A.
Determine the nature and extent of the information that will be needed to comply
with the audit objectives and to plan the format and preparation of working papers
that will be needed to record this information.
B.
Index and file all work papers according to Audit Workpaper Checklist. (See Exhibit
10-1.)
C.
Thought should be given in preparation of working papers to their potential use as exhibits in
an audit report.
Working papers are the basis on which the entire audit rests. Since these papers are, in fact,
the documentation of the audit, thoroughness in their preparation is essential.
2.
Describing the Work Performed. By fully describing the work you have performed in your
working papers, you are able to render a complete accounting of the scope and depth of your
coverage. Each working paper should identify the following:
A.
Chapter 10
Scope. Your conclusions usually result from selective tests. By clearly showing the
scope of the work performed, you are able to support your conclusions and where
probability sampling is used, support the projection of conclusions drawn from
selective tests to the entire subject area under audit.
10-3
In the examination of documents, the scope must identify the size of the sample, the
universe from which the sample is drawn, the method of selection, and the basis for
these decisions. When sampling methods are used, the sampling plan must be
carefully explained.
1006. Working Paper Format
1.
The diversity of audit assignment prevents the establishment of a single system or design of
working papers to be used. Therefore, a uniform working paper format may not be used but
work papers for functional areas such as cash receipts should display conformity in various
types of audits.
2.
Workpapers may be in the form of paper, tapes, disks, diskettes, films, etc. There should be
backup copies of electronically generated working papers. The backup copies should not be
stored with the original copies.
Descriptive Heading. Each working paper shall be fully identified by a heading at the top
center containing:
A.
B.
C.
2.
Auditor's Name and Date. Each working paper shall contain the initials of the staff member
preparing it and the date of preparation. This information should be placed in the space
provided in the upper right-hand corner of the standard working paper. These dates will
correspond to the sign-off procedures used for the audit program.
3.
Source of Data. Source of information appearing on the working paper should be shown in
the upper left corner of the working paper. If information is supplied by operating personnel
or results from your observation, show this in the working paper. (Use initials
PBC-Prepared by Client). If you prepare information from records on file, identify these
records.
4.
Purpose and Scope of Audit Work Performed. The purpose of each audit working paper is
to be specifically stated unless otherwise clearly evident from its title.
5.
Auditors Verification Procedures. The nature of verification work performed by the staff
member must be disclosed for each working paper. Mere copying of figures from the
records is not, in itself, verification. The verification procedures performed must be
Chapter 10
10-4
Auditor's Conclusions. Working papers must contain a conclusion with respect to each
objective of the audit whether or not adverse conditions are disclosed. The formulation of
conclusions is one of the most important functions of the auditor. The conclusions are the
basis for the recommendations. They must never be a product of a predisposed mind. All
evaluations should be made with an attitude of professional skepticism. They must spring
from information contained in the auditor's working papers. Conclusions are trustworthy
only if they are reasonable deductions from relevant information developed during the audit.
They are strong only to the extent to which they are buttressed by supporting data.
7.
8.
Other Standards.
A.
B.
To avoid confusion and complications in filing, only one subject should be dealt with
on a working paper.
C.
Index numbers are to be indicated on the lower center of the page. The index
number should be placed on the outside of folded workpapers. The papers should be
indexed according to the Audit Workpaper Checklist (Exhibit 10-1). When
numbering a given area consecutive numbers are to be used (i.e. 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2,
etc.).
D.
Indexing audit fieldwork workpapers should contain the objective letter between the
index number (20) and the workpaper number (i.e. 20-F-1, 20-F-2, 20-G-1, 20-G-2,
etc.)
E.
Chapter 10
10-5
F.
Working papers should be legible and neat. Sloppy workpapers may lose their worth
as documented evidence.
G.
H.
For electronic files, the file naming standards listed in Exhibit 8-8 should be utilized.
An important standard applicable to all of our work is that the evidence of work performed is
to be reviewed on all assignments. The review process is important and must not be carried
out in a superficial or perfunctory manner.
2.
The following instructions apply to all of our audit work, including accounting system
evaluations, surveys, and special studies.
A.
B.
(2)
Accuracy, reliability, relevancy and adequacy of the work performed and the
acceptability of the related working papers as evidence of such work.
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Due professional care was exercised by the Auditors assigned to the audit.
Responsibility for review prior to issuance of audit report. All working papers will be
reviewed for compliance with our prescribed standards for audit working papers.
Working papers for each audit will be retained in two standard files.
Chapter 10
10-6
A.
B.
Current File.
2.
Permanent File. This file provides information which may be used to advantage in
conducting subsequent examinations relating to the same department or activity. It also
supplies new staff members, supervisory personnel and others with a summary of the
auditee's current policies and procedures and organization structure. It should be maintained
on a current basis by updating the file as additional information is obtained as a result of the
audit. This file is predominantly used for the annual reviews performed by our office.
3.
Current File. This file consists of working papers containing information primarily related to
the purposes of the current audit.
4.
The organization of the files should be tailored to each specific assignment. The primary test
is convenience in use and ease with which material can be located and reviewed. Generally,
audit workpapers should be filed as follows:
5.
A.
Planning Folder
B.
C.
D.
Audits involving several organizational elements and functional areas may require that the
current file be divided into subsections for each of the principal segments of the audit.
Generally, in more complex audits, individual segment section files will be set up for the
following:
A.
B.
Each major functional area within such units to be reviewed during the audit.
2.
Matters For Attention of Director - The Matters for Attention of Director is to be completed
by the auditor-in-charge of each engagement. Administratively, the form is used to record,
Chapter 10
10-7
the auditors assigned to the review, client personnel participating in the review, and any
major concern noted during the review. (See Exhibit 10-2).
3.
Audit Findings - During each phase of the audit (i.e. preliminary survey, systems
understanding, and fieldwork), potential findings should be documented on finding sheets
(see standard form at Exhibit 10-3). The auditor-in-charge should submit the finding sheets
(page 1 only) to the department head, discuss the findings with the department head (via
meeting, phone call, e-mail, etc.), and document discussions on the finding sheets (page 2).
At the conclusion of each phase, findings will be reviewed by the Audit Director. (See also
Chapter 12: "Nature and Presentation of Audit Findings and Recommendations".)
Permanent File. Review this file and update it before the completion of each audit. To keep
the active file from becoming too bulky, noncurrent material worth retaining should be
removed, identified, reasons for removal noted and transferred to an "Inactive" permanent
file. Noncurrent material not worth retaining should be removed and referred to the
Director.
2.
Current Working Papers Files. Upon completion of an audit, working papers for the prior
audit should be discarded. However, prior working papers relating to an objective not
performed in the current audit should be carried forward to the current working
papers file. Also, care should be taken to ensure that all relevant material in the preliminary
survey has been carried forward to the current working papers.
When Audit and Management Services is asked to perform a review which has not been
scheduled as part of the audit plan approved by the Audit Committee, the review is called a
Special Project.
Special Project requests can come from the Audit Committee, other Board of Visitors
Members, the President, University Vice Presidents, and other University Managers. The
Director of Audit and Management Services must approve all Special Projects.
Due to the inherent nature of a special project, the working papers that must be prepared to
complete the project depend upon the objectives of the project. However, regardless of the
nature of the project, working papers that document the planning of the engagement, the
information or evidence obtained, the conclusions reached, the audit work paper review
process, the audit report or memorandum, and subsequent follow-up review, if applicable,
should be included in the file. The Audit Workpaper Checklist should be utilized to
document the standard workpapers that were completed and those that were not applicable.
10-8
1.
Each auditor should backup his or her electronic workpaper files to the network common
drive (\auditor name\backup files) at least weekly. However, fraud investigation
workpapers (including those for fraud hotline cases) should not be saved on the
common drive.
2.
At the end of each audit project, the auditor should backup all electronic workpaper files for
the project to the two backup (external) hard drives. One of these drives should be stored in
the office, while the other should be kept offsite until an auditor needs to add files to the
drive.
3.
If Audit and Management Services physical office space becomes unavailable due to a
disaster (or other contingency):
A.
The Audit Director will work to obtain resources (an alternate work location,
computers, printers, supplies, etc.) that would allow the office to resume operations.
The timeframe for resumption of activities would depend on the nature of the
situation and space availability on campus.
B.
The Director will contact office staff once an alternate location and other
resources are available.
C.
Once at the alternate location, auditors will access workpapers from the network
common drive and/or the backup drives in order to resume audit projects.
D.
The Audit Director will evaluate the availability of hard copy workpapers created
prior to the contingency and will determine which workpapers will need to be recreated (i.e., by accessing and printing information from the common drive and
backup drives).
Chapter 10
10-9