Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Re
Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Re
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
v.
KATHLEEN KANE
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
2. In support of any other relief this Court deems just and proper.
The following Amicus should provide this Court with the proper jurisdiction for legal standing
to consider this Amicus according to Rule 531 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Procedure.
Page 1 of 27
Page 2 of 27
____________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,
defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with
allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa.
(ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992).
Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law
enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We
utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some
communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice.
Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from
our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to
Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control)?
Page 3 of 27
8.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
9.
10. Superior
Page 4 of 27
Page 5 of 27
for years. The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed
by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human
research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices,
implants, and directed energy weapons. I again reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General
Assembly in 2015 and frequented the Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor;
which I still do to this day.
In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT"
on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service
financial firm, Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for
his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in
dealing with Fulton Financial. I have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of
Directors with regards to various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank
acquisition and the subprime failures. I believe that Fulton Financial needs management to
become more aggressive in it's strategic planning and the performance it expects from it's
management team in order to increase shareholder value. Expanding the footprint of the regional
bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is consistent with the expectations of
shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking institutions acquired by larger
regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in it's local marketplace as
well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third
District Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania. These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust
violations, and interference of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to this
litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG
Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal
Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion
Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates
back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for
professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil Complaint in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot.
We also proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and
Lancaster Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is
finally under construction with a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after
submission of an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey,
Chief Executive Officer of the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such
organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative,
Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope,
People to People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline,
Schreiber Pediatric Center, and numerous others.
In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an
emphasis on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the
fight against electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to
Page 6 of 27
address the convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and
revenues for those creating, promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via
wireless networks.
In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of
the AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the
company wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading
project that lasted until 2004 with success.
In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery,
known as the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was
developed in conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the
Revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the
former Watt & Shand building.
In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the
effects of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the U.S.
Sponsored Y2K symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K
Subcommittee and Senator William Bennett.
In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit
organization promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We
had provided funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The
24/7 Suicide Prevention Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable
organizations and faith based charities. The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to
schools, non profit organizations, faith based initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational
support for the prevention of suicide and to bring awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was
controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to
computerized their accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided
consulting for the computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of
Washington Boro. I was retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the
Informations Technologies of the Jay Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26
Million Dollar headquarters located in West Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay
Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I
was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based real time networking system throughout
the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees some 500 employees with revenues in
excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving
the company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the
company was facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We
were responsible for implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and
procedures, human resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance
measurement reporting, and negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company
was especially problematic, since it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public
contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County demanded a complete accounting of the operations in
order to stave off a default on the notes and loans it was holding. We essentially revamped the
entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its
previous years, and record revenues.
In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program,
which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To
give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively
communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific,
technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F.
3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF
Page 7 of 27
Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the
program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and
publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments technology
think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article
Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC,
then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy
that technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types
of applications involving telecommunications.
In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic
companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial
companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed
services and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards &
Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft,
AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I also was
working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive mapping
technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of
mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering maps and
directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix,
the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We had brokered a deal and the executives
from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to discuss the deal and perform due
diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield Industrial Park.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive
producer of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a
digital format; the first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and
created the concept for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the
copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording
industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of
Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station
Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown
when he was 15. Tony and Power Station Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the
country, and were responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients
included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones,
Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original
Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was released for distribution and was
the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We
had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the
Digital Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the
commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry
simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie.
I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the
technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power
Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a
portable medium, a compact disc.
Page 8 of 27
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a
major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100
million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations
from developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to
raise capital that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity
funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were
retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of their postproduction
Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages
for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the current loan that
was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and discussions with Drew Anton of the
Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were quickly seeking commitments
for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of other prominent local
developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty
Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We were constantly told
that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services
organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a
stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new
firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability
insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate
headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices
in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and
our advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees
from the other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at
about $3 to $4 million.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting
departments. (See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were
dependant on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed
a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all
of the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was
signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver
while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2
years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified
Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the
NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for agents of
the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and associated it with
other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very reason for
our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well
organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming
from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional
production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video. The
well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys,
had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he
looked forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.
In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4
times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial
Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150
Page 9 of 27
professionals attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center.
Ms. Armstrong discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work
together in order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals
including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and
investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial planning was the way of the
future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a
Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi
Group (the largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help
advise on the future of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the
investment industry at large. Mr. Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American
Express and IDS (Investors Diversified Services). We were at that time a national leader in the
company in delivering Fee Based Financial Planning Services, which was a new concept in the
investment community and mainstream investors. That concept is now widely held by most
investment advisers.
Page 10 of 27
dismissed without any convictions, most without any trials, which according to law are false arrests and
false imprisonments. The MOVANT was a Federal Whistleblower in the United States v. International
Signal and Control, Plc., case of 1991.
This amicus provides a voice for the Movant as well as providing another perspective and opinion
that should benefit the courts; the parties; and the public-at-large.
amicus have a direct relevancy in the disposition of this case as it does in the Attorney General's
(Kathleen Kane) fight to restore integrity and equity to the Judicial System of Pennsylvania, which
affects all of the residents of the COMMONWEALTH. The
she is in a battle with the 'old boys' network' of Pennsylvania and the MOVANT has written extensively
about this same select group over the years beginning in 1998. In an interview with Brian Taff of WPVI
on February 16, 2016 the Attorney General is quoted as saying
I knew there was a good old boy network, everyone does. I had no idea how
deep and how powerful that network actually ran. The fact that I took it on
and I wasn't silent about it and that I am determined to tear that down, I
think that's what my legacy will show.
In a 1998 narrative the MOVANT wrote the following This story was perpetuated through a
gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious wrongdoing by both the law enforcement
community of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as
community leaders. A process that continues to obstruct Stan Caterbone's rights for justice.
It's mannerisms reach into the inner soul of political and judicial corruption. All in the name
of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the status quo of the "Good Ole Boy's" club of
Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping it's disclosure from escaping beyond the
confines of "Pandora's Box". It's a tenure of power that evolved from the days of this
Page 11 of 27
country's earliest settlers, but an evolution that has somewhere strayed away from the
intent of our constitution; with total disregard for the law, in total disrespect for the
Constitution, and void of many of our civil liberties. This atrocity, like the Lambert case,
would have made our founding forefathers revel in disgust and bellow in despair. In
fact, their spirits and energies probably are!
In 2009 Opednews.com printed the narrative in full and the MOVANT wishes this said court
to consider it's content in it's final deliberations in support of dismissing all prosecutions against
the Attorney General of Pennsylvania.
EXHIBITS.
Diary: Lancaster County, The CIA, and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control ,
http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarypagem.php?f=Lancaster-County-The-CIAby-Stan-Caterbone-091125-169.html
In addition the MOVANT wrote to the ATTORNEY GENERAL on November 12, 2015 and
stated the following Back in 1998 I had a meeting with an NSA (National Security
Agency, Ft. Meade, Md) operative in a parking lot of a former car dealer in York, PA. I
had just attended a job fair and he approached me as I was about to get into my car. He
introduced himself as being from the NSA and I questioned him about why they would
not leave me alone. His response was "It is not US (NSA) it's the Good Ole Boys". I also
have a huge problem with modified, stolen, and planted documents. We parted ways in
an amicable fashion.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL returned a letter the following day that stated Dear Mr.
Caterbone, Thank You for your correspondence to the Office of Attorney General, we
will keep your information in our files.
Page 12 of 27
knowledge
of
the
MOVANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the
MOVANT's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 0523059. The MOVANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however
this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the
government that ignored the MOVANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the
days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive
Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons
under oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.
I am currently a recipient of the following type(s) of Benefits from the Social Security
Administration for Long Term Disability Benefits for illnesses and symptoms relating to U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control as evidenced by my documentation and the fact that no medical reports
or physicians were reported in the entire application process and there was never a psychiatric
evaluation for the same said purposes.
have been since April of 2008 and was declared disabled in December of 2005, the same said
month that I reported that I became the victim of full-time synthetic telepathy, as well as other
related symptoms and illnesses.
Page 13 of 27
If the Court would consider the leqal circumstances surrounding my Whistleblowing activities and
the Federal False Claims Act filing of the Petitioner as it relates to the past 28 years and the
myriad of violations of the Lancaster County District Attorney. The Petitioner wil argue that it is
wholly unfair and unconstitutional not to grant the Petitioner In Forma Pauperis Status. The
Petitioner has filed ample evidence of a pattern and relentless cycle of earning and accumulating
capital and assets, as well building substantial worth through his business interests, only to have
it all extorted through an elaborate civil and criminal scheme to defruad.
Therefore any
attempt to subject the Petitioner to more court related fees is only a continuation of
that same said fraud.
Consideration should be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District,
where the courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due
process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F
2d. 644) have concluded the following:
defendant being deprived of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In
addition the Petioner is the MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals.
The preceding cases have been preserved by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in
Page 14 of 27
The 29 False Arrests, which under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that may be
proved by circumstantial evidence that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant an
inference that the unlawful combination has been in front of
charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following
was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga) and its police officers were
acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees constitutional rights
by subjecting him to unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two
(2) or more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and August
4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The preceding
pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
13. In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law,
a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to
do an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice
with intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United
States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple
conspiracies by the following: Governments, without committing variance between single
conspiracy charges in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at
continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which
involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil
Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the
scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations
to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations
when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to
strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241,
242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982,
1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
Page 15 of 27
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a
performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business
or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The
defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not
one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s)
and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or
State court. http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
Where RICO laws might be applied1
Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for
their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or
retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. The RICO laws can be
alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or
corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or
against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in
an attempt to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations
who utilize the courts as a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to
silence another's speech. RICO could be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or
their clients conspired and collaborated to concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in
retribution and retaliation for themselves having been brought before the courts. These
laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of limitations has run out.
References
Page 16 of 27
EXHIBIT FOR
CONSIDERATION
Page 17 of 27
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Page 18 of 27
Page 19 of 27
16. Stan J. Caterbone LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL COURT DOCKET SHEETS as of
November 12, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330921500/Stan-JCaterbone-Local-State-And-Federal-Court-811-Pages-Bookmarks-DocketSheets-as-of-November-12-2016
17. FEDS PROBE FULTON BANK and 3 other SUBSIDIARY BANKS of FULTON
FINANCIAL with STAN J. CATERBONE CIVIL ACTIONS and Mind Control
Research of Monday November 7, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/330528930/Feds-Probe-Fulton-Bank-
Page 20 of 27
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Page 21 of 27
26. Commonwealth
Page 22 of 27
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Page 23 of 27
Page 24 of 27
Page 25 of 27
I hereby certify that on or about November 30, 2016 SERVICE VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
WAS SENT TO THE FOLLOWING:
Lock, Joshua D.
Law Firm: Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Address: Goldberg Katzman PC
4250 Crums Mill Rd Ste 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112-2889
Phone No: (717) 234-4161
Served: Amil Michael Minora
Service Method: Email
Email: [email protected]
Service Date: July 13, 2016
Address:
Phone: 570-961-1616
Representing: Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane
Served: Amil Michael Minora
Service Method: eService
Email: [email protected]
Service Date:July 13, 2016
Address: 700 Vine Street
Scranton, PA 18510
Phone: 570--96-1-1616
Representing: Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane
Served: Assistant Counsel Seth C. Farber
Service Method: Email
Email: [email protected]
Service Date: July 13, 2016
Address:
Phone: 212-294-6700
Representing: Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane
Served: Gerald L. Shargel
Service Method: Email
Email: [email protected]
Service Date: July 13, 2016
Address:
Phone: 212-294-2637
Representing: Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane
Served: Kevin R. Steele
Service Method: Email
Email: [email protected]
Service Date: July 13, 2016
Address:
Phone: 610-278-3098
Representing: Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Served: Robert Martin Falin
Service Method: Email
Email: [email protected]
Service Date: July 13, 2016
3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF
Page 26 of 27
____________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Page 27 of 27
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
9:13 A.M.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Appellant
CASE INFORMATION
Initiating Document:
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Active
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
Perjury
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
No
No
Lock, Joshua D.
Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Goldberg Katzman PC
4250 Crums Mill Rd Ste 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112-2889
(717) 234-4161
Phone No:
Appellee
Pro Se:
Fax No:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Steele, Kevin R.
Montgomery County District Attorney's Office
PO Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
(610) 278-3098
Fax No:
Falin, Robert Martin
Montgomery County District Attorney's Office
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404
(610) 278-3102
Fax No: (610) 278-3841
Neither the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
9:13 A.M.
Fee Dt
Fee Name
11/22/2016
Notice of Appeal
85.50 11/30/2016
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2016-SPR-E-002064
Court Below:
County:
Order Appealed From:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Judge
Filed Date
Content Description
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Neither the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
85.50
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
CASE INFORMATION
Page 1 of 28
Cross Court Docket Nos: 1166 EDA 2016, 440 MT 2016, 108 MM 2016, 3575 EDA 2016
Judge Assigned: Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
OTN: T 709032-2
LOTN:
Complaint/Incident #: 1
Case Local Number Type(s)
RELATED CASES
Related Docket No
Related Court
Association Reason
Related
CP-46-MD-0002457-2015
CP-38-46-Crim
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status:
CPCMS 9082
Closed
Status Date
11/22/2016
Processing Status
10/24/2016
Sentenced/Penalty Imposed
08/22/2016
08/16/2016
Awaiting PSI
08/16/2016
Awaiting Sentencing
08/08/2016
08/08/2016
Awaiting Sentencing
07/11/2016
Awaiting Trial
04/20/2016
11/27/2015
11/27/2015
11/23/2015
11/23/2015
11/19/2015
Arrest Date:
10/01/2015
Complaint Date:
10/01/2015
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Page 2 of 28
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start
Time
Room
Judge Name
Schedule
Status
Formal Arraignment
01/06/2016
9:30 am
Video Room #1
Scheduled
Miscellaneous
Hearing
01/29/2016
1:00 pm
Scheduled
Miscellaneous
Hearing
02/05/2016
1:00 pm
Scheduled
Miscellaneous
Hearing
03/22/2016
1:00 pm
Scheduled
Miscellaneous
Hearing
04/20/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Miscellaneous
Hearing
07/26/2016
10:00 am
Scheduled
Jury Trial
08/08/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Jury Trial
08/09/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Jury Trial
08/10/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Jury Trial
08/11/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Jury Trial
08/12/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Sentencing
10/24/2016
10:00 am
Scheduled
DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Date Of Birth:
06/14/1966
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Name
Defendant
BAIL INFORMATION
Kane, Kathleen Granahan
Bail Action
Date
Bail Type
Percentage
Amount
Bail Posting Status
Set
10/01/2015
Unsecured
$10,000.00
Set
10/24/2016
Monetary
$75,000.00
Set
10/24/2016
Monetary
$37,500.00
Posting Date
Posted
10/01/2015
Posted
10/24/2016
CHARGES
Seq.
Orig Seq.
Grade
Statute
Statute Description
Offense Dt.
OTN
F3
18 4902 A
Perjury
03/16/2014
T 709032-2
M2
18 4903 A1
03/16/2014
T 709032-2
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
CHARGES
Page 3 of 28
Seq.
Orig Seq.
Grade
Statute
Statute Description
Offense Dt.
OTN
M2
18 5101
03/16/2014
T 709032-2
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Credit For Time Served
Start Date
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Sentence Conditions
Defendant Was Present
11/10/2015
Not Final
1 / Perjury
F3
18 4902 A
M2
18 4903 A1
M2
18 5101
Proceed to Court
Information Filed
08/08/2016
Not Final
1 / Perjury
F3
18 4902 A
M2
18 4903 A1
M2
18 5101
Guilty
Jury Trial
08/08/2016
1 / Perjury
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Confinement
Guilty
Final Disposition
F3
18 4902 A
M2
18 4903 A1
M2
18 5101
10/24/2016
Min of 5.00 Months
Max of 11.00 Months
Other
Merged
3 / Obstruct Admin Law/Other Govt Func
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Probation
CPCMS 9082
Guilty
10/24/2016
Min of 2.00 Years
Max of 2.00 Years
Other
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Page 4 of 28
LINKED SENTENCES:
Link 4
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015 - Seq. No. 3 (18 5101 ) - Probation
Link 5
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015 - Seq. No. 5 (18 5301 1) - Probation
Link 6
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015 - Seq. No. 6 (18 5301 1) - Probation
Link 7
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015 - Seq. No. 7 (18 5301 2) - Probation
Link 8
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 - Seq. No. 3 (18 5101 ) - Probation is Concurrent with
Link 1
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 - Seq. No. 1 (18 4902 A) - Probation is Consecutive to
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION
Thomas W. McGoldrick
Name:
District Attorney
078192
(Phone)
(Other)
(Other)
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
Page 5 of 28
Joshua D. Lock
Private
017092
Supreme Court No:
Name:
Rep. Status:
Active
Phone Number(s):
717-234-4161
(Phone)
Address:
Goldberg Katzman PC
4250 Crums Mill Rd Ste 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112-2889
Representing: Kane, Kathleen Granahan
Name:
District Attorney
065228
(Phone)
(Phone)
(Fax)
(Other)
(Other)
Name:
(Phone)
(Other)
(Other)
Name:
(Phone)
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Page 6 of 28
Address:
Bucks CO Da's Office
55 E Court St
Doylestown, PA 18901-4318
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
10/01/2015
Document Date
Filed By
Rebar, Cathleen Kelly
10/01/2015
11/19/2015
Kramer, Ross M.
11/23/2015
11/23/2015
MDJ-38-1-20
Hand Delivered
3/1
11/24/2015
MDJ-38-1-20
Notes of Testimony
Preliminary Hearing, Ctrm B
Tuesday November 10, 2015. 1:00 pm
Judge Rebar
4/1
11/27/2015
MDJ-38-1-20
12/02/2015
MDJ-38-1-20
12/21/2015
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
1st
Floor
Chambers
of
the
undersigned,
Montgomery
County
Courthouse,
Norristown,
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Document Date
Page 7 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Issue Date
Service Type
12/21/2015
First Class
Status Date
Service Status
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
12/21/2015
7/1
Interoffice
01/29/2016
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
Information Filed
8/1
02/02/2016
02/01/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
02/01/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
02/02/2016
Scheduling Order
Deadline for Informal Discovery - 02/29/16
Deadline for Filing Pre-Trial Motions - 03/04/16
Deadline for Answers/Replies to Pre-Trial Motions - 03/11/16
Deadline for Briefs - 03/18/16
8b/3
02/02/2016
02/01/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
02/01/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
02/02/2016
02/09/2016
Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Conference, Ctrm B
Friday February 5, 2016. 1:35 pm
Judge Demchick-Alloy
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
10/1
02/17/2016
Document Date
Page 8 of 28
Filed By
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
02/17/2016
Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Conference Errata Sheet, Ctrm B
Friday February 5, 2016. 1:35 pm
Judge Demchick-Alloy
12/1
02/26/2016
03/04/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
03/04/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Memorandum of Law
14/2
Omnibus Pre-Trial Motion
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
15/3
03/04/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Omnibus Pretrial Motions
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
16/4
03/04/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
03/11/2016
Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Answer to the Commonwealth's Motion for Pretrial Discovey and
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
18/2
03/11/2016
Document Date
Page 9 of 28
Filed By
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
03/16/2016
03/16/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
03/16/2016
Interoffice
Steele, Kevin R.
03/16/2016
20/1
Interoffice
03/18/2016
03/18/2016
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Omnibus Pretrial Motions
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
22/3
03/18/2016
03/23/2016
03/22/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
03/22/2016
Interoffice
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
24/3
Document Date
Page 10 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
03/23/2016
Status Date
Service Status
03/22/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
03/25/2016
Gurney, Kaitlin M.
Motion of Philadelphia Media Network, The Morning Call, Alm Media, Block Communications, and
PA Media Group to Intervene for the Limited Purpose of Seeking Access to Judicial Records and Proceedings
26/1
03/29/2016
03/28/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Interoffice
27/1
03/30/2016
Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Motions, Ctrm B
Tuesday March 22, 2016. 1:40 pm
Judge Demchick-Alloy
28/1
04/06/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
29/1
04/08/2016
Document Date
Page 11 of 28
Filed By
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Response to the Motion of Philadelphia Media Network, The Morning Call, ALM Media, Block
Communications, and PA Media Group to Intervene for the Limitd Purpose of Seeking Access to Judicial
Records and Proceedings
Filed by M. Stewart Ryan, ADA
30/1
04/12/2016
04/12/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
04/12/2016
31/1
Interoffice
04/13/2016
04/12/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Interoffice
32/1
04/14/2016
04/13/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
04/25/2016
Interoffice
33/1
04/15/2016
Gurney, Kaitlin M.
Response of Philadelphia Media Network, The Morning Call, Alm Media, Block Communications, and
PA Media Group in Opposition to Attorney General Kathleen Kane's Motion for Permission to File Motion Under
Seal
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Page 12 of 28
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Document Date
Filed By
34/1
04/20/2016
04/20/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
04/20/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
04/20/2016
Certificate of Service
35/1
04/25/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
04/27/2016
Motion of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution
FIled by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
37/1
04/29/2016
Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Motions, Ctrm B
Wednesday April 20, 2016. 10:04 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy
38/1
05/02/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
05/09/2016
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Motion to Quash Based on
Selective and Vindictive Prosecution
Filed by Amil M. Minora, Esq.
40/1
05/13/2016
05/12/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
05/16/2016
05/16/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Opinion
1
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
Document Date
Page 13 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
Kramer, Ross M.
05/16/2016
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
05/16/2016
Interoffice
05/17/2016
Status Date
Service Status
05/17/2016
05/26/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Motion of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane to Quash Based on Selevtive and Vindictive Prosecution
2
05/26/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
06/06/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
06/13/2016
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Motion to Quash Based on
Selective and Vindictive Prosecution
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
1
06/20/2016
06/20/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
CPCMS 9082
First Class
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
1
Document Date
Page 14 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
06/30/2016
Status Date
06/28/2016
Service Status
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
Steele, Kevin R.
06/28/2016
1
Interoffice
07/11/2016
Entry of Appearance
8
07/11/2016
07/11/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Scheduling Order
Filing of Motions in Limine - 07/20/16
Responses to Motions in Limine - 07/22/16
Hearing on Motions in Limine - 07/26/16 at 10:00 a.m. Courtroom "A"
Voir Dire and/or Points of Charge - 08/03/16
Jury Trial Scheduled for 08/08/16 at 9:00 a.m. Courtroom "A"
Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
07/29/2016
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
07/29/2016
Interoffice
07/11/2016
07/11/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Interoffice
First Class
07/20/2016
Memorandum of Law in Support of Her Motion to Compel Production of Handwritten Notes of Interviews
Filed by Douglas K. Rosenblum, Esq.
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
07/20/2016
Document Date
Page 15 of 28
Filed By
Kane, Kathleen Granahan
Memorandum of Law in Support of Her Motion in Limine to Preclude Certain Testimony Regarding
Philadelphia District Attorney R. Seth Williams
Filed by Douglas K. Rosenblum, Esq.
3
07/20/2016
07/20/2016
07/21/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
07/21/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
07/21/2016
07/21/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Order Granting Request for Extention of Deadline for Filing Responses to Motions In Limine
Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
07/21/2016
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
07/21/2016
Interoffice
07/25/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
07/25/2016
Document Date
Page 16 of 28
Filed By
Kane, Kathleen Granahan
07/25/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
07/27/2016
07/27/2016
07/28/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
07/29/2016
Motions in Limine Order
Commonwealth's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Selective and Vindictive Prosecution is Granted
Commonwealth is Granted Leave to Produce Evidence of Prior Conversations by Joshua Morrow after his
credibility is at issue
Deft's Motion in Limine to Preclude Certain Testimony Regarding DA R. Seth Williams is Denied - Right to Object
Retaines
Deft's Motion to Compel Production of Handwritten Notes of Interviews is Denied in light of Commonwealth's
Statement on Record that investigators made no handwritten notes
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
Interoffice
07/28/2016
Rosenblum, Douglas Keith
07/28/2016
First Class
08/01/2016
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
08/01/2016
Document Date
Page 17 of 28
Filed By
Court of Common Pleas Montgomery County
Notes of Testimony
Motions in Limine, Ctrm A
Tuesday July 26, 2016. 10:30 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy
1
08/02/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
08/02/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
08/02/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
08/03/2016
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
08/03/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Hand Delivered
08/03/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Hand Delivered
08/03/2016
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Page 18 of 28
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
08/08/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
08/08/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
08/08/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
08/08/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Document Date
Filed By
Information Filed
2
Guilty
3
Sentence Deferred
4
08/10/2016
08/10/2016
Interoffice
08/11/2016
08/10/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
08/15/2016
Interoffice
08/11/2016
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
Immunity Petition
Filed by Thomas W. McGoldrick, ADA
1
08/12/2016
Gurney, Kaitlin M.
Intervenor Phialdelphis Media Network's Motion Seeking Access to Trial Exhibits Into Evidence
Intervenor Phialdelphis Media Network's Motion Seeking Access to Trial Exhibits Into Evidence and Material
Presented to the Jury
Filed by Amy B. Ginensky, Esq.
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
08/12/2016
Document Date
Page 19 of 28
Filed By
Gurney, Kaitlin M.
Memorandum of Law in Support of Intervenor Philadelphia Media Network's Motion Seeking Trial Exhibit
Memorandum of Law in Support of Intervenor Philadelphia Media Network's Motion Seeking Access to Trial
Exhibits Entered Into Evidence and Materials Presented to the Jury
Filed by Amy B. Ginensky, Esq.
1
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury, Ctrm A
Tuesday August 11, 2016. 1:24 pm
Judge Demchick-Alloy
2
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury/ A.M. Session, Ctrm A
Wednesday August 10, 2016. 8:49 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy
3
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury, Ctrm A
Tuesday August 10, 2016. 1:37 pm
Judge Demchick-Alloy
4
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury, Ctrm A
Monday August 8, 2016. 9:27 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy
5
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury/A.M. Session, Ctrm A
Tuesday August 9, 2016. 8:52 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
08/15/2016
Document Date
Page 20 of 28
Filed By
Court of Common Pleas Montgomery County
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury, Ctrm A
Tuesday August 9, 2016. 1:43 pm
Judge Demchick-Alloy
7
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury/A.M. Session, Ctrm A
Thursday August 11, 2016. 8:56 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy
1
08/16/2016
08/16/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury, Ctrm A
Friday August 12, 2016. 8:50 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy and a jury
3
08/16/2016
08/16/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
09/03/2016
Interoffice
08/23/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury, Ctrm A
Monday August 15, 2016. 9:17 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Page 21 of 28
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
08/23/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
08/25/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
08/25/2016
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
09/13/2016
10/13/2016
Document Date
Filed By
Hand Delivered
10/13/2016
10/13/2016
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
10/12/2016
Interoffice
First Class
First Class
Steele, Kevin R.
10/12/2016
Interoffice
First Class
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
1
Document Date
Page 22 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
10/14/2016
Status Date
10/13/2016
Service Status
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Answer By
Commonwealth - Application for House Arrest Suitabilty Assessment - no later than 4:15 p.m. on 10/14/16
GERALD L SHARGEL ESQ AND SETH C FARBER ESQ SERVED VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL ON 10/13/2016
Henry, Michelle Ann
First Class
10/13/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
10/13/2016
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
10/13/2016
Interoffice
First Class
First Class
Steele, Kevin R.
10/13/2016
Interoffice
First Class
10/14/2016
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Hand Delivered
10/17/2016
10/14/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
10/14/2016
Interoffice
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
Document Date
Page 23 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
First Class
First Class
Steele, Kevin R.
10/14/2016
Interoffice
10/17/2016
Status Date
Service Status
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Sentencing Memorandum
CR 6239-15
8423-15
Filed by Kevin R. Steele, District Attorney
Thomas W. McGoldrick Deputy District Attorney
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Hand Delivered
10/18/2016
1
10/18/2016
Sentnecing Memorandum
Filed by Marc Robert Steinberg, Esq.
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
10/18/2016
Hand Delivered
10/24/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
10/24/2016
REGENSBURG, MARY P.
10/24/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
10/24/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
10/24/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Page 24 of 28
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
10/25/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
10/26/2016
Document Date
Filed By
Hand Delivered
10/27/2016
10/27/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
11/16/2016
1
Interoffice
10/31/2016
10/31/2016
10/31/2016
11/01/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
11/01/2016
11/01/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Filed By
Service By
Issue Date
Service Type
11/16/2016
Interoffice
Document Date
Page 25 of 28
11/01/2016
Status Date
Service Status
11/01/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
11/01/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
11/16/2016
4
Interoffice
11/01/2016
First Class
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
11/16/2016
1
Interoffice
11/02/2016
11/03/2016
11/02/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
First Class
First Class
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
Document Date
Page 26 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
Status Date
Service Status
Steele, Kevin R.
11/02/2016
Steinberg, Marc Robert
11/02/2016
First Class
11/07/2016
Notes of Testimony
Sentencing, Ctrm A
Monday October 24, 2016. 10:03 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy
1
11/21/2016
11/22/2016
Lock, Joshua D.
11/22/2016
Entry of Appearance
2
11/22/2016
Certificate of Service
Filed by Joshua D. Lock, Esq.
4
11/22/2016
11/22/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
11/22/2016
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
11/23/2016
1925(b) Concise Statement Order
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
11/28/2016
Page 27 of 28
Document Date
Filed By
Kane, Kathleen Granahan
Responsible Participant
46-2016-P000016645
Kane, Kathleen Granahan
Overdue Amt
Suspended
Monthly
CPCMS 9082
Active
09/18/2017
Receipt Date
11/30/2015
Payment
Yes
No
Payor Name
Kane, Kathleen Granahan
$0.00
$15.01
Participant Role
Defendant
Amount
$9.00
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page 28 of 28
Payments
Adjustments
Non Monetary
Payments
Defendant
Total
Costs/Fees
Copies (Montgomery)
Costs of Prosecution - CJEA
$9.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$9.00
$50.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$50.00
$8.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8.00
$13.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$13.55
$71.25
-$71.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
-$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
ATJ
$4.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$4.00
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
$2.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.25
$355.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$355.25
$20.30
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$20.30
$29.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$29.65
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
$35.00
-$9.00
$0.00
$0.00
$26.00
$250.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$250.00
$10.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$10.00
CJES
COC Processing Fee Misd/Fel
(Montgomery)
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
JCPS
$21.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21.25
$12.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$12.00
$28.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$28.00
$25.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$25.00
Costs/Fees Totals:
$964.50
-$85.25
$0.00
$0.00
$879.25
Grand Totals:
$964.50
-$85.25
$0.00
$0.00
$879.25
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.