Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Re

Stan J.
Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
717-669-2163
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:
:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
v.
Docket Number: 3576 EDA 2016

Lower Court Docket CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
KATHLEEN KANE
REQUEST THE COURTESY OF THE COURT TO APPEAR PRO SE AND TO FILE

AN AMICUS CURAIE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE FOLLOWING
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:
AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se, and Advanced
Media Group, request for Appearance to file an Amicus in the above captioned case to support the
following:
1.
Quashing the charges in case Montgomery Court Case No.
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
2. In support of any other relief this Court deems just and proper.
The following Amicus should provide this Court with the proper jurisdiction for legal standing
to consider this Amicus according to Rule 531 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Procedure.
Rule 531. Participation by Amicus Curiae.

(a) Briefs.Anyone interested in the questions involved in any matter pending in an appellate court,
excluding Petitions for Allowance of Appeal, although not a party, may, without applying for leave to
do so, file a brief amicus curiae in regard to those questions.
(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, any amicus curiae shall file and serve its brief in the
manner and number required and within the time allowed by these rules with respect to the party
whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief will support, or with respect to the
appellant, if the amicus brief does not support the position of any party.
3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF
Page 1 of 27
November 30, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

(2) In an appeal proceeding under Rules 2154(b), 2185(c) and 2187(b), any amicus curiae shall file
and serve its brief within the time allowed by these rules for service of the advance text of the brief
by the party whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief will support or, if the amicus
brief does not support the position of any party, within the time allowed by these rules for service of
the advance text by the appellant. Alternatively, the amicus curiae may, but is not required to, serve
an advance text and then file and serve a definitive copy of its brief. If the amicus curiae chooses to
serve an advance copy and then file and serve a definitive copy, its deadlines for each are the same
as for the party whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief supports or, if the
amicus brief does not support the position of any party, as for the appellant.
(b) Oral argument.Oral argument may be presented by amicus curiae only as the appellate court
may direct. Requests for leave to present oral argument shall be by application and will be granted
only for extraordinary reasons.
Official Note
Where the amicus cannot comply with the requirements of this rule because of ignorance of the
pendency of the question, relief may be sought under Rule 105(b). The last eight words of the rule
are new. In Piccirilli Bros. v. Lewis, 282 Pa. 328, 336, 127 Atl. 832, 835 (1925) the court noted the
applicability of this rule to public officers who are represented by official counsel with an adverse
position.
The 2011 amendment to the rule clarified when those filing amicus curiae briefs should serve and file
their briefs when the appellant has chosen or the parties have been directed to proceed under the
rules related to large records (Rule 2154(b)), advance text (Rule 2187(b)) and definitive copies (Rule
2185(c)). Under those rules, the appellant may defer preparation of the reproduced record until after
the briefs have been served. The parties serve on one another (but do not file) advance texts of their
briefs within the times required by Rule 2187. At the time they file their advance texts, each party
includes certified record designations for inclusion in the reproduced record. The appellant must then
prepare and file the reproduced record within 21 days of service of the appellees advance text (Rule
2186(a)(2)). Within 14 days of the filing of the reproduced record, each party that served a brief in
advance text may file and serve definitive copies of their briefs. The definitive copy must include
references to the pages of the reproduced record, but it may not otherwise include changes from the
advance text other than correction of typographical errors. Those filing amicus curiae briefs may
choose to serve an advance text and then file and serve definitive copies according to the procedure
required of the parties or they may choose to file a definitive brief without citations to the reproduced
record.
Page 2 of 27
November 30, 2016

November 30, 2016
Respectfully,
____________/S/____________
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-528-2200
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,
defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with
allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa.
(ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992).
Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law
enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We
utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some
communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice.
Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from
our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to
Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control)?
Page 3 of 27
November 30, 2016
ACTIVE COURT CASES

3. J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
4. U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
5. U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
6. U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
7. U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
8.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
9.
10. Superior
Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for

Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary
Injunction Case of 2016
11. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
12. U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Page 4 of 27
Case No. 16-10157
November 30, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography

Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.
In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International
Signal and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted
in 1992 for an elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad
array of weapons, most notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at
that time. I have been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy;
hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts of personal property, extortions, intellectual
property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due process; thefts and modifications of
court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and weapons
that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was
no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District
Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This assault began
after the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with
the same person who declares telepathically she is a known celebrity.
Over the course of 10
years I have been telepathic with at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to
validate and confirm their identities without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to
cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to
comment and act on the numerous formal complaints that are filed in their respective offices.
Most complaints are focused on the routine victimization's of a targeted individual including but
not limited to stalking, harassment, threats, vandalism, thefts, extortion, burglaries, false
imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants or involuntary commitments, pain and torture
to the body, and most often the cause of obstruction of justice is the computer hacking.
I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was
in the U.S. Navy after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Florida, including an
affidavit motorized and authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air
force and was victim to LSD experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.
In 2016 I was the AMICUS for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane in the Pennsylvania
Superior Court Case No. 1164 EDA 2016 in the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Kane
which included perjury charges during the alleged leaking of grand jury information. Kathleen
Kane took on the Good Old Boy network regarding judicial reform in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania in an effort to rid the state of the long standing public corruption ring that was
evident from local law enforcement to Supreme Court Justices, and everyone in between.
In 2015 I filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in 1992 of
the murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her
book titled Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on
Amazon.com.
I am in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT
BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of
Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of
Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes
Page 5 of 27
November 30, 2016
for years. The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed
by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human
research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices,
implants, and directed energy weapons. I again reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General
Assembly in 2015 and frequented the Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor;
which I still do to this day.
In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT"
on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service
financial firm, Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for
his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in
dealing with Fulton Financial. I have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of
Directors with regards to various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank
acquisition and the subprime failures. I believe that Fulton Financial needs management to
become more aggressive in it's strategic planning and the performance it expects from it's
management team in order to increase shareholder value. Expanding the footprint of the regional
bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is consistent with the expectations of
shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking institutions acquired by larger
regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in it's local marketplace as
well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third
District Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania. These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust
violations, and interference of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to this
litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG
Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal
Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion
Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates
back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for
professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil Complaint in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot.
We also proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and
Lancaster Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is
finally under construction with a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after
submission of an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey,
Chief Executive Officer of the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such
organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative,
Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope,
People to People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline,
Schreiber Pediatric Center, and numerous others.
In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an
emphasis on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the
fight against electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to
Page 6 of 27
November 30, 2016
address the convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and
revenues for those creating, promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via
wireless networks.
In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of
the AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the
company wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading
project that lasted until 2004 with success.
In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery,
known as the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was
developed in conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the
Revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the
former Watt & Shand building.
In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the
effects of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the U.S.
Sponsored Y2K symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K
Subcommittee and Senator William Bennett.
In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit
organization promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We
had provided funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The
24/7 Suicide Prevention Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable
organizations and faith based charities. The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to
schools, non profit organizations, faith based initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational
support for the prevention of suicide and to bring awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was
controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to
computerized their accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided
consulting for the computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of
Washington Boro. I was retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the
Informations Technologies of the Jay Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26
Million Dollar headquarters located in West Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay
Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I
was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based real time networking system throughout
the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees some 500 employees with revenues in
excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving
the company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the
company was facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We
were responsible for implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and
procedures, human resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance
measurement reporting, and negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company
was especially problematic, since it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public
contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County demanded a complete accounting of the operations in
order to stave off a default on the notes and loans it was holding. We essentially revamped the
entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its
previous years, and record revenues.
In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program,
which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To
give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively
communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific,
technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F.
Page 7 of 27
November 30, 2016
Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the
program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and
publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments technology
think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article
Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC,
then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy
that technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types
of applications involving telecommunications.
In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic
companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial
companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed
services and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards &
Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft,
AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I also was
working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive mapping
technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of
mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering maps and
directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix,
the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We had brokered a deal and the executives
from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to discuss the deal and perform due
diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield Industrial Park.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive
producer of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a
digital format; the first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and
created the concept for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the
copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording
industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of
Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station
Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown
when he was 15. Tony and Power Station Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the
country, and were responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients
included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones,
Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original
Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was released for distribution and was
the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We
had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the
Digital Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the
commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry
simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie.
I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the
technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power
Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a
portable medium, a compact disc.
Page 8 of 27
November 30, 2016
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a
major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100
million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations
from developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to
raise capital that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity
funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were
retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of their postproduction
Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages
for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the current loan that
was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and discussions with Drew Anton of the
Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were quickly seeking commitments
for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of other prominent local
developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty
Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We were constantly told
that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services
organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a
stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new
firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability
insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate
headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices
in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and
our advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees
from the other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at
about $3 to $4 million.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting
departments. (See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were
dependant on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed
a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all
of the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was
signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver
while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2
years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified
Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the
NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for agents of
the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and associated it with
other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very reason for
our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well
organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming
from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional
production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video. The
well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys,
had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he
looked forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.
In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4
times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial
Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150
Page 9 of 27
November 30, 2016
professionals attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center.
Ms. Armstrong discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work
together in order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals
including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and
investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial planning was the way of the
future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a
Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi
Group (the largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help
advise on the future of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the
investment industry at large. Mr. Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American
Express and IDS (Investors Diversified Services). We were at that time a national leader in the
company in delivering Fee Based Financial Planning Services, which was a new concept in the
investment community and mainstream investors. That concept is now widely held by most
investment advisers.
Page 10 of 27
November 30, 2016
AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF KATHLEEN KANE'S (ATTORNEY GENERAL) MOTION

TO DISMISS CHARGES BASED ON SELECTIVE AND VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:
AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se, and Advanced
Media Group, as Movant, to file an Amicus in the above captioned case.
The Movant has an interest in this case as also being a victim of SELECTIVE AND VINDICTIVE
PROSECUTION by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Lancaster County District Attorney's
Office dating back to the myriad of prosecutions by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1987, 2005,
and 2006 while a resident of the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Most of which have been
dismissed without any convictions, most without any trials, which according to law are false arrests and
false imprisonments. The MOVANT was a Federal Whistleblower in the United States v. International
Signal and Control, Plc., case of 1991.
This amicus provides a voice for the Movant as well as providing another perspective and opinion
that should benefit the courts; the parties; and the public-at-large.
The matters presented in this
amicus have a direct relevancy in the disposition of this case as it does in the Attorney General's
(Kathleen Kane) fight to restore integrity and equity to the Judicial System of Pennsylvania, which
affects all of the residents of the COMMONWEALTH. The
Attorney General has been quoted as saying
she is in a battle with the 'old boys' network' of Pennsylvania and the MOVANT has written extensively
about this same select group over the years beginning in 1998. In an interview with Brian Taff of WPVI
on February 16, 2016 the Attorney General is quoted as saying
Everybody makes mistakes.
I knew there was a good old boy network, everyone does. I had no idea how
deep and how powerful that network actually ran. The fact that I took it on
and I wasn't silent about it and that I am determined to tear that down, I
think that's what my legacy will show.
In a 1998 narrative the MOVANT wrote the following This story was perpetuated through a
gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious wrongdoing by both the law enforcement
community of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as
community leaders. A process that continues to obstruct Stan Caterbone's rights for justice.
It's mannerisms reach into the inner soul of political and judicial corruption. All in the name
of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the status quo of the "Good Ole Boy's" club of
Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping it's disclosure from escaping beyond the
confines of "Pandora's Box". It's a tenure of power that evolved from the days of this
Page 11 of 27
November 30, 2016
country's earliest settlers, but an evolution that has somewhere strayed away from the
intent of our constitution; with total disregard for the law, in total disrespect for the
Constitution, and void of many of our civil liberties. This atrocity, like the Lambert case,
would have made our founding forefathers revel in disgust and bellow in despair. In
fact, their spirits and energies probably are!
In 2009 Opednews.com printed the narrative in full and the MOVANT wishes this said court
to consider it's content in it's final deliberations in support of dismissing all prosecutions against
the Attorney General of Pennsylvania.
In addition attached are supporting documents to
advanced the credibility and integrity of the MOVANT.
These documents are attached as
EXHIBITS.
Diary: Lancaster County, The CIA, and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control ,
http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarypagem.php?f=Lancaster-County-The-CIAby-Stan-Caterbone-091125-169.html
In addition the MOVANT wrote to the ATTORNEY GENERAL on November 12, 2015 and
stated the following Back in 1998 I had a meeting with an NSA (National Security
Agency, Ft. Meade, Md) operative in a parking lot of a former car dealer in York, PA. I
had just attended a job fair and he approached me as I was about to get into my car. He
introduced himself as being from the NSA and I questioned him about why they would
not leave me alone. His response was "It is not US (NSA) it's the Good Ole Boys". I also
have a huge problem with modified, stolen, and planted documents. We parted ways in
an amicable fashion.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL returned a letter the following day that stated Dear Mr.
Caterbone, Thank You for your correspondence to the Office of Attorney General, we
will keep your information in our files.
Page 12 of 27
November 30, 2016
HISTORY AND BACKGROUND OF MOVANT AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

In 2015 the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas began a campaign of DENYING In
Forma Pauperis Applications, and demanding that current cases with legitimate In Forma Pauperis
Status be DENIED in an effort to again subvert the laws of due process and obstruction of justice.
The Superior Court had followed, as did the U.S. District Court in this case by Judge Diamond.
This was an outright effort to extort monies from the MOVANT and in the long term make service
of the complaints cost prohibitive due to the fact that Pro Se Litigants with In Forma Pauperis
Status, by law, receive free service from the Lancaster County Sheriffs and the U.S. Marshalls.
This tactic, in the end, would have effectively dismissed all legitimate claims of the MOVANT. The
Judges used the excuse of monies in bank accounts as the rationale for the illegal tactic, however,
attached are 5 cases of GRANTED In Forma Pauperis applications in both the Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas, the Pennsylvania Superior Court, and the United States District Court
with financial affidavits containing amounts of monies in bank accounts exceeding $10,000.00, all
prior to 2015.
This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the
complexity of the MOVANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to
support the MOVANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide the Court with
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
MOVANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the
MOVANT's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 0523059. The MOVANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however
this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the
government that ignored the MOVANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the
days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive
Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons
under oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.
I am currently a recipient of the following type(s) of Benefits from the Social Security
Administration for Long Term Disability Benefits for illnesses and symptoms relating to U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control as evidenced by my documentation and the fact that no medical reports
or physicians were reported in the entire application process and there was never a psychiatric
evaluation for the same said purposes.
I am receiving a net monthly benefit of $1330.00 and
have been since April of 2008 and was declared disabled in December of 2005, the same said
month that I reported that I became the victim of full-time synthetic telepathy, as well as other
related symptoms and illnesses.
Page 13 of 27
November 30, 2016
If the Court would consider the leqal circumstances surrounding my Whistleblowing activities and
the Federal False Claims Act filing of the Petitioner as it relates to the past 28 years and the
myriad of violations of the Lancaster County District Attorney. The Petitioner wil argue that it is
wholly unfair and unconstitutional not to grant the Petitioner In Forma Pauperis Status. The
Petitioner has filed ample evidence of a pattern and relentless cycle of earning and accumulating
capital and assets, as well building substantial worth through his business interests, only to have
it all extorted through an elaborate civil and criminal scheme to defruad.
Therefore any
attempt to subject the Petitioner to more court related fees is only a continuation of
that same said fraud.
Consideration should be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District,
where the courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due
process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F
2d. 644) have concluded the following:
Even the probability of unfairness can result in a
defendant being deprived of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In
addition the Petioner is the MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals.
The preceding cases have been preserved by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in
case no. 07-4474, see attached.

The prosecutorial misconduct the the Petitioner has been subject to has violated his
constitutional rights, but more importantly the abuse or process has prevented the Petitioner from
completing a wealth of claims in both state and federal Courts. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18
U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting
constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide
for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are
ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from
federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5,
15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
A case can be made for a RICO violation as defined in the case of United States v. Holck,
389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the
following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an
indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which
attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing
acts in furtherance of an overall plan. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to
cover-up my International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
Page 14 of 27
November 30, 2016
The 29 False Arrests, which under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that may be
proved by circumstantial evidence that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant an
inference that the unlawful combination has been in front of
facts formed for the purpose
charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following
was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga) and its police officers were
acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees constitutional rights
by subjecting him to unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two
(2) or more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and August
4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The preceding
pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
13. In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law,
a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to
do an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice
with intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United
States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple
conspiracies by the following: Governments, without committing variance between single
conspiracy charges in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at
continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which
involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil
Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the
scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations
to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations
when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to
strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241,
242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982,
1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
Page 15 of 27
November 30, 2016
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a
performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business
or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The
defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not
one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s)
and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or
State court. http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
Where RICO laws might be applied1
Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for
their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or
retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. The RICO laws can be
alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or
corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or
against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in
an attempt to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations
who utilize the courts as a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to
silence another's speech. RICO could be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or
their clients conspired and collaborated to concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in
retribution and retaliation for themselves having been brought before the courts. These
laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of limitations has run out.
References
RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December

2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya
Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregonriaa-victim-fights-back- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology
Page 16 of 27
November 30, 2016
EXHIBIT FOR
CONSIDERATION
Page 17 of 27
November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-669-2163
November 28, 2016
James Comey, Director
FBI Headquarters
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(202) 324-3000
Re:
ALLEGATION: COINTELPRO PROGRAM WITH HARASSMENT USED TO OBSTRUCT

JUSTICE IN MY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURT PROCEEDINGS
Dear Director Comey,

It comes with great regret and frustration that I must write you this unfortunate letter,
however, I see no other way to stop these attacks against me while I attempt to litigate in
Federal, State, and Local Courts. My most recent case, US Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822.
For your information COINTELPRO is defined as this:
COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of
covert, and at times illegal,[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic
political organizations.[3]
FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI
deemed subversive,[4] including anti-Vietnam War organizers, activists of the Civil Rights
Movement or Black Power movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther
Party), feminist organizations, anti-colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican independence
groups like the Young Lords), and a variety of organizations that were part of the broader New
Left.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives governing COINTELPRO, ordering FBI agents to
"expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or otherwise eliminate" the activities of these
movements and especially their leaders.[5][6] Under Hoover, the agent in charge of
COINTELPRO was William C. Sullivan.[7] Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy personally
authorized some of these programs.[8] Although Kennedy only gave written approval for
limited wiretapping of King's phones "on a trial basis, for a month or so",[9] Hoover extended
the clearance so his men were "unshackled" to look for evidence in any areas of King's life they
deemed worthy.[10]
Obstruction of Justice is defined as this as it relates to me and this dire situation:
(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person with intent to retaliate against any person
for
(A) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or
any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or
(B) providing to a law enforcement officer any information relating to the commission or
possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised
release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings.
Page 18 of 27
November 30, 2016

In the article by By Rahul D. Manchanda, Esq. Dated Aug 22, 2016, The
Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking

Program
linked here:
http://moderndiplomacy.eu/index.phpoption=com_k2&view=item&id=1686:thesurreptitious-reincarnation-of-cointelpro-with-the-cops-gang-stalkingprogram&Itemid=488
Mr. Manchanda writes,
In 1975 Senator Frank Church convened a joint senatorial/congressional
inquiry
into the egregious human rights and civil liberties violations of the
Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), as well
as
the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) against people both foreign and
domestic. Such blatant transgressions included the neutralization and
elimination of political dissidents, enemies of the state, real or imagined
threats to National Security, and anyone else on the proverbial shit list of the
Military Industrial Complex (MIC).
The Church Committee was the United States Senate Select Committee to Study
Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate
committee
chaired by Senator Frank Church (D ID) in 1975. A precursor to the U.S. Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence, the committee investigated intelligence gathering for
illegality
by the aforementioned agencies after certain activities had been revealed by the
Watergate
affair.
Some famous examples which have since emerged include: (1) the FBI sending letters
to
Martin Luther King Jr encouraging him to kill himself or else they would tell the world
about his sexual proclivities; (2) the planned or successful assassinations of foreign leaders
such as Fidel Castro, Patrice Lumumba, and countless other South American, Middle Eastern
or
Asian leaders; (3) the wholesale undermining of entire foreign economies if they
democratically elected someone at odds with the elite power structure deep state of the
United States such as what occurred against Salvatore Allende of Guatemala; (4) the
possible assassination of John F Kennedy; (5) revelations of Christopher Pyle in January
1970 of the U.S. Army's spying on the civilian population; (6) the December 22, 1974
New York Times article by Seymour Hersh detailing operations engaged in by the CIA over
the
years that had been dubbed the "family jewels, involving covert action programs
involving
assassination attempts against foreign leaders and covert attempts to subvert
foreign
governments were reported for the first time; (7) efforts by intelligence agencies
to collect
information on the political activities of US citizens; and (8) countless other
examples, both
overseas and domestically.
The end result of the Church Committee Hearings was the outright banning on CIA
assassinations as well as the FBI/DOJ COINTELPRO gang-stalking programs. In 1975
and
1976, the Church Committee published fourteen reports on various U.S. intelligence
agencies' formation, operations, and the alleged abuses of law and of power that they
had
committed, with recommendations for reform, some of which were later put in place.
According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used four
main methods during COINTELPRO:
(1) Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their
main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and
scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine
activists as agents;
(2) Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad "dirty tricks" to
undermine
progressive movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus
leaflets and other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence,
sent anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation
Page 19 of 27
November 30, 2016

about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run by government
agents,
and manipulated or strong armed parents, employers, landlords, school officials
and others
to cause trouble for activists. They used bad jacketing to create suspicion about
targeted
activists, sometimes with lethal consequences;
(3) Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to
harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave
perjured
testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and
wrongful
imprisonment. They discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government
regulations
and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury
subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters;
(4) Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten
dissidents;
to conduct illegal break ins in order to search dissident homes; and to commit
vandalism,
assaults, beatings and assassinations. The object was to frighten or eliminate
dissidents
and disrupt their movements.
Unfortunately I cannot leave my home with being stalked, harassed and threatened by
neighbors, passerby's, etc., On a daily basis I have someone, or groups of people entering my
home, vandalizing, stealing, and poisoning my food. To make matters worse, this protocol
follows me in federal, state, and local courthouses. Every electronic device that I have and use
is compromised and hacked in some fashion. Every online account is the same, and every
financial account, including checking accounts, vendor accounts, utilities, etc., contains some
form of fraud and theft by deception costing me money.
Well, the following links are my supporting evidence, and NOW I WISH YOU AND YOUR
FAMILY A VERY HAPPY AND MERRY CHRISTMAS. DON'T EVER TAKE YOUR FREEDOM FOR
GRANTED, SIR! I WISH I HAD THE FREEDOM YOU AND YOUR FAMILY ENJOYS.
14. STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION Monday November 14, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/331068312/Stan-J-Caterbone-andConflicts-With-the-Trump-Administration-Monday-November-14-2016
15. FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence
Agencies November 12, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/330869219/False-Imprisonments-andIllegal-Interrogations-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-November-12-2016
16. Stan J. Caterbone LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL COURT DOCKET SHEETS as of
November 12, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330921500/Stan-JCaterbone-Local-State-And-Federal-Court-811-Pages-Bookmarks-DocketSheets-as-of-November-12-2016
17. FEDS PROBE FULTON BANK and 3 other SUBSIDIARY BANKS of FULTON
FINANCIAL with STAN J. CATERBONE CIVIL ACTIONS and Mind Control
Research of Monday November 7, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/330528930/Feds-Probe-Fulton-Bank-
Page 20 of 27
November 30, 2016

and-3-Other-Subsidiary-Banks-of-Fulton-Financial-With-Stan-J-CaterboneCivil-Actions-and-Mind-Control-Research-of-Monday-Novem
18. U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCKET, U.S. SUPREME COURT PEITIION, AND Letter
REQUEST FOR COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to
President Obama, November 15, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/331393349/Supreme-Court-of-theUnited-States-Case-No-16-8822-DOCKET-and-COMMUTATION-LETTER-toOBAMA-Re-CATERBONE-v-Allison-Hallet-Re-Lisa-Lambert-Habeus-Nove
19. Stan J. Caterbone United Nations Human Rights Council of Geneva Switzerland
Complaint and Exhibit re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, Oct 4, 2009.pdf
https://www.scribd.com/document/291083335/Stan-J-Caterbone-United-NationsHuman-Rights-Council-of-Geneva-Switzerland-Complaint-and-Exhibit-re-U-SSponsored-Mind-Control-October-4-2009-pdf
20. CATERBONE v. Unted States of America, et.al., Case No. 16-cv-0414 in the
United States Disctrict Court for Eastern Pennsylvania
https://www.scribd.com/document/318862497/CATERBONE-v-the-United-Statesof-America-Et-al-COMPLAINT-July-20-2016-Ver-2-0-Full
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-669-2163
Page 21 of 27
November 30, 2016

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,
defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with
allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa.
(ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992).
Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law
enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We
utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some
communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice.
Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from
our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to
Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control)?
ACTIVE COURT CASES

21. J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re
ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
22. U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
23. U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
24. U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
25. U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
26. Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
27. Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen
Kane
28. Superior Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for
Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219
Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
29. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
30. U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Page 22 of 27
Case No. 16-10157
November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
T1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-669-2163
August 1, 2016
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, LANCASTER, PA UPDATE: Since the last press release the
NOTICE of COMPLAINT to the United States of America, et.al., has been recorded and
docketed in the United States Eastern District Court in Philadelphia as Case No. 16-cv4014 and is currently listed under the jurisdiction of the Honorable Edward G. Smith in Easton,
Pennsylvania.
The complaint can be viewed at: https://www.scribd.com/document/318998718/16cv-4014-CATERBONE-v-the-United-States-of-America-et-al-COMPLAINT-July-202016-ver-3-0-Full-With-Forms-July-22-2016
On Thursday, July 28, 2016 a COMPLAINT was filed with the OFFICE OF THE
EXECUTIVE in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals against Judge Smith and other
Jurists in Philadelphia for a host of misconduct allegations. A Motion for Recusal will be filed in
the next day or so.
In addition the case outlined below, Court Rejects Man's Claim That Lancaster
County's Residents Are Torturing Him With Mind Control in Superior Court has been
officially appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Case No. 495 MAL 2016 and is
now listed on the permanent docket in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. That case started in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas as CATERBONE v. The Residents of Lancaster
County, et.al.,
Also now listed on the permanent docket in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is Case
No. 496 MAL 2016 in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster City Police, et.al., which is the case
involving the illegal involuntary psychiatric commitment of July 9, 2015 and includes as
Defendants Detective Clark Bearinger of the Lancaster City Police Bureau, staff of the
Lancaster General Hospital, Medical Director Dr. Sylvia Gratz and staff of Fairmount
Behavioral Health System of Philadelphia.
Now listed in the Pennsylvania Superior Court, as of Friday, is Case No. 1219 MDA
2016 in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police. This case is the Preliminary
Injunction for Emergency Relief which was denied by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Judge Leonard Brown III.
Most importantly is the recent SHOOTINGS AT POLICE OF LANCASTER COUNTY which is
major headlines the lase few days. The Lancaster County District Attorney, Mr. Craig Stedman
is quoted as saying The last couple of days in Lancaster County are some of the
darkest days we've had in our justice system, for our police officers, that I can
recall.
Stan J. Caterbone and The Advanced Media Group have been warning and begging
the major stakeholders to settle all disagreements for years and have been warning
of this very same situation to everyone in Lancaster County and through the various
courts, and law enforcement agencies. Chief Kieth Sadler even refused Formal
Page 23 of 27
November 30, 2016

Mediation Negotiations through the Lancaster County Human Rights Commission in
2008. Attached is the LNP News Coverage of the Police Shootings.
In 2009 I had
the Largest Muslim Brotherhood On The Web, http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
following me on twitter and visiting my website on numerous occasions. Two days
ago a Russian Contact has followed me on my Twitter Account. The Twitter Account
is in Russian and I have asked them who they are but have yet to receive a response.
Below is the original PRESS RELEASE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group have given a NOTICE of COMPLAINT to
the United States of America, et.al., regarding a Civil Rights Lawsuit which will be filed in
Federal Courts, the Eastern District Court for Pennsylvania in the near future.
On May 11, 2016 the article Court rejects man's claim that Lancaster County's
residents are torturing him with mind controlBy Matt Miller of Pennlive.com, reported the
following:
Rest easy, residents of Lancaster County. The state Superior Court says Stanley
Caterbone can't sue you for stalking him and messing with his mind (They did not
dispute the allegation). A panel of that court deep-sixed Carterbone's case in an opinion
Judge Paula Francisco Ott issued Tuesday. Quite frankly, Ott wrote, Caterbone gave the state
judges no firm explanation of what he was claiming or what sort of remedy he was after. Her
court's ruling upholds an August 2015 decision by county Judge Jeffery D. Wright to dismiss
Caterbone's lawsuit as frivolous. According to Ott, Caterbone, acting as his own lawyer, filed
the case in county court against the "residents of the county of Lancaster, Pennsylvania,"
seeking an order to halt abuse he claims he was suffering at their hands. The Lancaster man
accused countians of participating in "organized stalking and/or electronic and mind
manipulation torture being committed against him," Ott noted. Also, she wrote, Caterbone
asked the county judge to enlist the local news media in a campaign to inform countians
(Lancaster) to stop mistreating him.
Since that article the "organized stalking and/or electronic and mind manipulation torture
being committed against him (Stan J. Caterbone)," has escalated in a fevered pitch that can
only elicit one outcome if left without countermeasures murder, suicide, and or a
prolonged deep psychosis.
After the collection of authentic transcripts from other Targeted Individuals, including NSA
Whistleblower Karen Stewart , (NSA Analyst of 15 years), Army Intelligence Officer
Julianne McKinney; both of whom experience the same symptomology as Stan J.
Caterbone, and expert, advocate, and world renowned lecturer Dr. Nick Begich, Stan J.
Caterbone is now prepared to file the complaint. In 2009 President Barach Obama, Robert
Gates (former Secretary of Defense and former Director of the CIA and the National Security
Agency or NSA), and countless others, were all named in a similar complaint in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, case no. CI-08-13373, CATERBONE v. the Duke Street
Business Center, et.al.,.
That case is still listed as OPEN in the Lancaster County
Prothonotary Office.
The complaint will be filed under 42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of
rights. In summary the statute reads: Every person who, under color of any statute,
ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of
Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or
other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the
party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for
redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or
omission taken in such officers judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted
unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.
Page 24 of 27
November 30, 2016

For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District
of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
Case law
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
involving the following will be cited:

Federal Sovereign Immunity Harvard Law School Federal Budget Policy Seminar
The Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine
U.S. Intellectual Property Law
RICO - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
United States Bill of Rights
The Legal Prohibition Against Torture
The prohibition against torture is firmly embedded in customary international law,

international treaties signed by the United States, and in U.S. law. As the U.S. Department of
State has noted, the "United States has long been a vigorous supporter of the international
fight against tortureEvery unit of government at every level within the United States is
committed, by law as well as by policy, to the protection of the individual's life, liberty and
physical integrity" [U.S. Department of State, "Initial Report of the United States of America to
the UN Committee Against Torture." Oct 15, 1999. (15 Nov. 2001)]. That commitment should
not be abandoned. Indeed, it must be deepened as the world watches how the U.S. responds to
the challenges before it. If the U.S. were to condone torture by government officials or foreign
governments in its fight against terrorism, it would betray its own principles, laws, and
international treaty obligations. It would irreparably weaken its standing to oppose torture
elsewhere in the world. And it would provide a handy excuse to other governments to use
torture to pursue their own national security objectives (The Legal Prohibition Against Torture
https://www.hrw.org/news/2003/03/11/legal-prohibition-against-torture ).
A DRAFT OF THE COMPLAINT CAN BE VIEWED AND DOWNLOADED AT:
https://www.scribd.com/document/318862497/CATERBONE-v-the-United-Statesof-America-Et-al-COMPLAINT-July-20-2016-Ver-2-0-Full
Page 25 of 27
November 30, 2016
I hereby certify that on or about November 30, 2016 SERVICE VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
WAS SENT TO THE FOLLOWING:
Lock, Joshua D.
Law Firm: Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Address: Goldberg Katzman PC
4250 Crums Mill Rd Ste 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112-2889
Phone No: (717) 234-4161
Served: Amil Michael Minora
Service Method: Email
Email: [email protected]
Service Date: July 13, 2016
Address:
Phone: 570-961-1616
Representing: Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane
Served: Amil Michael Minora
Service Method: eService
Service Date:July 13, 2016
Address: 700 Vine Street
Scranton, PA 18510
Phone: 570--96-1-1616
Served: Assistant Counsel Seth C. Farber
Address:
Phone: 212-294-6700
Served: Gerald L. Shargel
Address:
Phone: 212-294-2637
Served: Kevin R. Steele
Address:
Phone: 610-278-3098
Representing: Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Served: Robert Martin Falin
Page 26 of 27
November 30, 2016

Address:
Phone: 610-278-3102
Served: Robert Martin Falin
Service Method: eService
Service Date:July 13, 2016
Address: Montgomery County Courthouse
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
Phone: 610-278-3104
Served: Ross Mitchell Kramer
Address:
Phone: -Representing:
____________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-528-2200
Page 27 of 27
November 30, 2016
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
9:13 A.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet
Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Page 1 of 2
November 30, 2016
CAPTION
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Appellant
CASE INFORMATION
Initiating Document:
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Active
Case Processing Status:
November 30, 2016
Awaiting Original Record
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
Perjury
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
3575 EDA 2016

Related
Same Case - Diff Docket
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type: Receive Docketing Statement

Next Event Type: Original Record Received
Next Event Due Date: December 14, 2016

Next Event Due Date: January 23, 2017
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Kane, Kathleen Granahan
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
No
No
Lock, Joshua D.
Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Goldberg Katzman PC
(717) 234-4161
Phone No:
Appellee
Pro Se:
Fax No:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Steele, Kevin R.
Montgomery County District Attorney's Office
PO Box 311
(610) 278-3098
Fax No:
Falin, Robert Martin
Montgomery County District Attorney's Office
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404
(610) 278-3102
Fax No: (610) 278-3841
Neither the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
9:13 A.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 2
November 30, 2016
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
11/22/2016
Notice of Appeal
85.50 11/30/2016
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2016-SPR-E-002064
AGENCY/TRIAL COURT INFORMATION
Court Below:
County:
Order Appealed From:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas

Montgomery
Division:
October 24, 2016
Judicial District:
November 30, 2016
Notice of Appeal Filed:
Judgment of Sentence
T6863802
Lower Ct Docket No(s):
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Judge
Montgomery County Criminal Division

38
November 22, 2016
ORIGINAL RECORD CONTENT
Original Record Item
Filed Date
Content Description
Date of Remand of Record:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Docket Entry / Representing
November 30, 2016
Notice of Appeal Docketed
November 30, 2016
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Docketing Statement Exited (Criminal)

Neither the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
85.50
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY

DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Page 1 of 28
Cross Court Docket Nos: 1166 EDA 2016, 440 MT 2016, 108 MM 2016, 3575 EDA 2016
Judge Assigned: Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Date Filed: 11/23/2015
OTN: T 709032-2
Originating Docket No: MJ-38120-CR-0000381-2015
LOTN:
Initiation Date: 10/01/2015
Initial Issuing Authority: Cathleen Kelly Rebar
Final Issuing Authority: Cathleen Kelly Rebar
Arresting Agency: Montgomery County Detective
Arresting Officer: Bradbury, Paul M.
Complaint/Incident #: 1
Case Local Number Type(s)
Case Local Number(s)
RELATED CASES
Related Docket No
Related Case Caption
Related Court
Association Reason
Related
CP-46-MD-0002457-2015
Comm v Kane, Kathleen Granahan
CP-38-46-Crim
Case Transferred to Criminal

Case CR 8423-2015
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status:
CPCMS 9082
Closed
Status Date
11/22/2016
Processing Status
10/24/2016
Sentenced/Penalty Imposed
08/22/2016
Awaiting PSI Completion
08/16/2016
Awaiting PSI
08/16/2016
Awaiting Sentencing
08/08/2016
Awaiting PSI Completion
08/08/2016
Awaiting Sentencing
07/11/2016
Awaiting Trial
04/20/2016
Awaiting Appellate Court Decision
11/27/2015
Awaiting Formal Arraignment
11/27/2015
Awaiting Filing of Information
11/23/2015
Awaiting Formal Arraignment
11/23/2015
Awaiting Filing of Information
11/19/2015
Awaiting Pre-Trial Conference
Arrest Date:
10/01/2015
Complaint Date:
10/01/2015
Awaiting Appellate Court Decision
Printed: 11/30/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
Page 2 of 28
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start
Time
Room
Judge Name
Schedule
Status
Formal Arraignment
01/06/2016
9:30 am
Video Room #1
Judge William T. Nicholas
Scheduled
Miscellaneous
Hearing
01/29/2016
1:00 pm
Scheduled
Miscellaneous
Hearing
02/05/2016
1:00 pm
Scheduled
Miscellaneous
Hearing
03/22/2016
1:00 pm
Scheduled
Miscellaneous
Hearing
04/20/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Miscellaneous
Hearing
07/26/2016
10:00 am
Scheduled
Jury Trial
08/08/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Jury Trial
08/09/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Jury Trial
08/10/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Jury Trial
08/11/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Jury Trial
08/12/2016
9:00 am
Scheduled
Sentencing
10/24/2016
10:00 am
Scheduled
DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Date Of Birth:
06/14/1966
City/State/Zip: Clarks Summit, PA 18411
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Name
Defendant
BAIL INFORMATION
Bail Action
Nebbia Status: None
Date
Bail Type
Percentage
Amount
Bail Posting Status
Set
10/01/2015
Unsecured
$10,000.00
Set
10/24/2016
Monetary
$75,000.00
Set
10/24/2016
Monetary
$37,500.00
Posting Date
Posted
10/01/2015
Posted
10/24/2016
CHARGES
Seq.
Orig Seq.
Grade
Statute
Statute Description
Offense Dt.
OTN
F3
18 4902 A
Perjury
03/16/2014
T 709032-2
M2
18 4903 A1
False Swearing - Offic Proceed
03/16/2014
T 709032-2
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
CHARGES
Page 3 of 28
Seq.
Orig Seq.
Grade
Statute
Statute Description
Offense Dt.
OTN
M2
18 5101
Obstruct Admin Law/Other Govt Func
03/16/2014
T 709032-2
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Credit For Time Served
Start Date
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Sentence Conditions
Defendant Was Present
Held for Court (Lower Court)
Lower Court Disposition
11/10/2015
Not Final
1 / Perjury
F3
18 4902 A
2 / False Swearing - Offic Proceed
M2
18 4903 A1
3 / Obstruct Admin Law/Other Govt Func
M2
18 5101
Proceed to Court
Defendant Was Not Present
Information Filed
08/08/2016
Not Final
1 / Perjury
Held for Court
F3
18 4902 A
Held for Court
M2
18 4903 A1
Held for Court
M2
18 5101
Guilty
Jury Trial
08/08/2016
1 / Perjury
Confinement
Guilty
Final Disposition
F3
18 4902 A
M2
18 4903 A1
M2
18 5101
10/24/2016
Min of 5.00 Months
Max of 11.00 Months
Other
Ct.2 merges with Count 1 for Sentencing purposes

Consecutive to 6239-15
Probation

Min of 3.00 Years

Max of 3.00 Years
Other
Guilty
10/24/2016
Merged
Probation
CPCMS 9082
Guilty
10/24/2016
Min of 2.00 Years
Max of 2.00 Years
Other
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
Page 4 of 28
LINKED SENTENCES:
Link 4
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015 - Seq. No. 3 (18 5101 ) - Probation
Link 5
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015 - Seq. No. 5 (18 5301 1) - Probation
Link 6
Link 7
Link 8
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 - Seq. No. 3 (18 5101 ) - Probation is Concurrent with
Link 1
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 - Seq. No. 1 (18 4902 A) - Probation is Consecutive to
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 - Seq. No. 1 (18 4902 A) - Confinement

Link 2
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015 - Seq. No. 1 (18 4902 A) - Probation is Consecutive to
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015 - Seq. No. 1 (18 4902 A) - Confinement
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION
Thomas W. McGoldrick
Name:
District Attorney
078192
Supreme Court No:

Phone Number(s):
610-278-3126
610-278-3090
610-278-3095
Address:
(Phone)
(Other)
(Other)
Montgomery CO Da's Office

PO Box 311
v.
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
Page 5 of 28
Joshua D. Lock
Private
017092
Supreme Court No:
Name:
Rep. Status:
Active
Phone Number(s):
717-234-4161
(Phone)
Address:
Goldberg Katzman PC
Representing: Kane, Kathleen Granahan
Risa Vetri Ferman
Name:
District Attorney
065228
Supreme Court No:

Phone Number(s):
610-278-3100
610-278-3099
610-292-4950
610-278-3090
610-278-3099
Address:
(Phone)
(Phone)
(Fax)
(Other)
(Other)
Montgomery Cty Da's Office

PO Box 311
Kevin R. Steele
Name:
Assistant District Attorney

066335
Supreme Court No:
Phone Number(s):
610-278-3098
610-278-3095
610-278-3126
Address:
(Phone)
(Other)
(Other)
Montgomery CO Da's Office

PO Box 311
Michelle Ann Henry
Name:
Assistant District Attorney

074839
Supreme Court No:

Phone Number(s):
215-348-6344
CPCMS 9082
(Phone)
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
Page 6 of 28
Address:
Bucks CO Da's Office
55 E Court St
Doylestown, PA 18901-4318
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
10/01/2015
Document Date
Filed By
Rebar, Cathleen Kelly
Bail Set - Kane, Kathleen Granahan

2
10/01/2015
Bail Posted - Kane, Kathleen Granahan

1/1
11/19/2015
Kramer, Ross M.
Entry of Appearance/Arraignment Waived

2/1
11/23/2015
Court of Common Pleas Montgomery County
Original Papers Received from Lower Court

2
11/23/2015
MDJ-38-1-20
Formal Arraignment Scheduled 01/06/2016 9:30AM

Jan 6, 2016, service on 11/10/15
11/10/2015
Hand Delivered
3/1
11/24/2015
MDJ-38-1-20
Notes of Testimony
Preliminary Hearing, Ctrm B
Tuesday November 10, 2015. 1:00 pm
Judge Rebar
4/1
11/27/2015
MDJ-38-1-20
Original Papers Received from Lower Court

5/1
12/02/2015
MDJ-38-1-20
Amended Docket Transcript 12/2/15

6/2
12/21/2015
Order Scheduling Case Management Conference

1/29/16 at 1:00,
Pennsylvania
Kramer, Ross M.
CPCMS 9082
1st
Floor
Chambers
of
the
undersigned,
Montgomery
County
Courthouse,
Norristown,
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Document Date
Page 7 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Issue Date
Service Type
12/21/2015
First Class
Status Date
Service Status
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
12/21/2015
7/1
Interoffice
01/29/2016
Information Filed
8/1
02/02/2016
02/01/2016
02/01/2016
Order Scheduling Pre-Trial Conference

February 5, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom "B"
8a/2
02/02/2016
Scheduling Order
Deadline for Informal Discovery - 02/29/16
Deadline for Filing Pre-Trial Motions - 03/04/16
Deadline for Answers/Replies to Pre-Trial Motions - 03/11/16
Deadline for Briefs - 03/18/16
8b/3
02/02/2016
02/01/2016
02/01/2016
Order Scheduling Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

March 22, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom "B"
8c/4
02/02/2016
Order Scheduling Trial

August 8, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Courtroom "B"
9/1
02/09/2016
Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Conference, Ctrm B
Friday February 5, 2016. 1:35 pm
Judge Demchick-Alloy
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
10/1
02/17/2016
Document Date
Page 8 of 28
Filed By
Response to Motion to Quash Subpoena Direccted to Michael A. Schwartz, Counsel to

Reporter Christopher Brennan and Philadelphia Media Network, PBC
Filed by Thomas W. McGoldrick, DDA
11/2
02/17/2016
Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Conference Errata Sheet, Ctrm B
Friday February 5, 2016. 1:35 pm
12/1
02/26/2016
Memorandum of Law in Support of its Response to Motion to Quash Subpoena Directed to

Michael A. Schwartz, Counsel to Reporter Christopher Brennan and Philadelphia Media Network, PBC
Filed by M. Stewart Ryan, ADA
13/1
03/04/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
03/04/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Memorandum of Law
14/2
Omnibus Pre-Trial Motion
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
15/3
03/04/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Omnibus Pretrial Motions
16/4
03/04/2016
Motion for Pretrial Discovery and Inspection

Filed by Thomas W. McGoldrick, DDA
17/1
03/11/2016
Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Answer to the Commonwealth's Motion for Pretrial Discovey and
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
18/2
03/11/2016
Document Date
Page 9 of 28
Filed By
Response to Defendant's Omnibus Pretrial Motion

CR 6239-15
8423-15
Filed by Kevin R. Steele, DA
19/1
03/16/2016
03/16/2016
Decorum Order Governing Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

Henry, Michelle Ann
First Class
03/16/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
03/16/2016
First Class
03/16/2016
Interoffice
Steele, Kevin R.
03/16/2016
20/1
Interoffice
03/18/2016
Supplemental Pretrial Motions of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane

21/2
03/18/2016
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Omnibus Pretrial Motions
22/3
03/18/2016
Affidavit of Ross M. Kramer

Filed by Ross M. Kramer, Esq.
23/2
03/23/2016
03/22/2016
Order Scheduling Pre-Trial Motion Hearing

April 20, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Courtroom "B"
Kramer, Ross M.
03/22/2016
First Class
03/22/2016
Interoffice
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
24/3
Document Date
Page 10 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
03/23/2016
Status Date
Service Status
03/22/2016
Order Granting Motion for Pre-Trial Discovery and Inspection

Deft to Prepare Report of Examination or Tests by Any Expert Witness Defense Plans to Call to Testify
Deft Must Also Observe Continuing Duty to Disclose All Notices Within the Scope of Discovery
Interoffice
03/22/2016
Minora, Amil Michael
03/22/2016
25/1
First Class
03/25/2016
Gurney, Kaitlin M.
Motion of Philadelphia Media Network, The Morning Call, Alm Media, Block Communications, and
PA Media Group to Intervene for the Limited Purpose of Seeking Access to Judicial Records and Proceedings
26/1
03/29/2016
03/28/2016
Omnibus Pre-Trial Motions Order

1. A Decision on Point 3 is Deferred Until After Argument on Point 2 of the Supplemental Pre-Trial Motions of AG
2. The Relief Requested by Deft in the Remaining Points is Denied
Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
03/28/2016
03/28/2016
Interoffice
27/1
03/30/2016
Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Motions, Ctrm B
Tuesday March 22, 2016. 1:40 pm
28/1
04/06/2016
Response to Defendant's Omniubs Pretrial Motion

Filed by Kevin R. Steele, District Attorney
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
29/1
04/08/2016
Document Date
Page 11 of 28
Filed By
Response to the Motion of Philadelphia Media Network, The Morning Call, ALM Media, Block
Communications, and PA Media Group to Intervene for the Limitd Purpose of Seeking Access to Judicial
Records and Proceedings
30/1
04/12/2016
04/12/2016
Motion Of Philadelphia Media Network Order

1. Moving Parties Granted Leave to Intervene for the Purpose of Seeking
Proceedings
2. Intervenors are Granted Leave to File, on or before 04/15/16, their Proposed
to Permission to File Under Seal, Attached Exhibit A
3. AG Kane and the Commonwealth are Granted Leave to File, on or before
Interveneor's Response in Opposition to Motion to Permission to File Motion Under Seal
4. The Intervenors are Granted Leave to Participate in Oral Argument on Point
Motions of AG
Kane at the Hearing on 04/20/16
Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
04/12/2016
Access to Judicial Records and

Response in Opposition to Motion
04/15/16, a Sur-Response to the
Two of the Supplemental PreTrial
04/12/2016
31/1
Interoffice
04/13/2016
04/12/2016
Decorum Order Governing The Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
04/13/2016
04/13/2016
Interoffice
32/1
04/14/2016
04/13/2016
Amended Scheduling Order

Time Change ONLY for the 04/20/16 Pre-Trial Motions Hearing: Changed to 10:00 a.m.
Kramer, Ross M.
04/25/2016
First Class
04/25/2016
Interoffice
33/1
04/15/2016
Gurney, Kaitlin M.
Response of Philadelphia Media Network, The Morning Call, Alm Media, Block Communications, and
PA Media Group in Opposition to Attorney General Kathleen Kane's Motion for Permission to File Motion Under
Seal
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Page 12 of 28
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Document Date
Filed By
34/1
04/20/2016
04/20/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
04/20/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Notice of Appeal to the Superior Court

34a/2
04/20/2016
Certificate of Service
35/1
04/25/2016
Response to Defendant's Notice of Appeal

36/1
04/27/2016
Motion of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution
FIled by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
37/1
04/29/2016
Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Motions, Ctrm B
Wednesday April 20, 2016. 10:04 am
38/1
05/02/2016
Response to Defendant's Motion to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution

39/1
05/09/2016
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Motion to Quash Based on
Selective and Vindictive Prosecution
Filed by Amil M. Minora, Esq.
40/1
05/13/2016
05/12/2016
05/16/2016
05/16/2016
Opinion
1
Order Striking Motion to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution

Deft Granted 10 Days to File an Amended Motion - with a Support Brief within 10 Days if Commonwealth Files a
Response
Commonwealth is Ordered to File a Response (if Defense Files Amended Motion) within 10 Days
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
Document Date
Page 13 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
Kramer, Ross M.
05/16/2016
First Class
05/16/2016
Interoffice
05/17/2016
Status Date
Service Status
Weiss, Ann Thornburg
List of Documents sent to Superior Court, DA and Attorney

2
05/17/2016
Weiss, Ann Thornburg
Certificate and Transmittal of Record to Appellate Court

1
05/26/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Motion of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane to Quash Based on Selevtive and Vindictive Prosecution
2
05/26/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Memorandum of law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen Kane's Motion to Quash

1
06/06/2016
Response to Defendant's Motion to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution

1
06/13/2016
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Motion to Quash Based on
Selective and Vindictive Prosecution
1
06/20/2016
06/20/2016
Order Denying Motion to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution

Interoffice
06/20/2016
06/20/2016
CPCMS 9082
First Class
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
1
Document Date
Page 14 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
06/30/2016
Status Date
06/28/2016
Service Status
Order Scheduling Trial Management Conference

July 11, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. 1st Floor Chambers
06/28/2016
First Class
Steele, Kevin R.
06/28/2016
1
Interoffice
07/11/2016
Rosenblum, Douglas Keith
Entry of Appearance
8
07/11/2016
07/11/2016
Scheduling Order
Filing of Motions in Limine - 07/20/16
Responses to Motions in Limine - 07/22/16
Hearing on Motions in Limine - 07/26/16 at 10:00 a.m. Courtroom "A"
Voir Dire and/or Points of Charge - 08/03/16
Jury Trial Scheduled for 08/08/16 at 9:00 a.m. Courtroom "A"
Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
07/29/2016
07/29/2016
Interoffice
07/11/2016
07/11/2016
Order Scheduling Jury Trial

August 8, 2016 at 09:00 a.m. Courtroom "A"
07/11/2016
Interoffice

07/11/2016
First Class
07/20/2016
Memorandum of Law in Support of Her Motion to Compel Production of Handwritten Notes of Interviews
Filed by Douglas K. Rosenblum, Esq.
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
07/20/2016
Document Date
Page 15 of 28
Filed By
Memorandum of Law in Support of Her Motion in Limine to Preclude Certain Testimony Regarding
Philadelphia District Attorney R. Seth Williams
3
07/20/2016
Motion to Compel Production of Handwritten Notes of Interviews

4
07/20/2016
Motion in Limine to Preclude Certain Testimony Regarding Philadelphia District

Attorney R. Seth Williams
Filed by Douglas K. Rosenblum
1
07/21/2016
Motion in Limine to Admit Evidence of Prior Conversations by Joshua Morrow

2
07/21/2016
Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Selective and Vindictive Prosecution

3
07/21/2016
07/21/2016
Order Granting Request for Extention of Deadline for Filing Responses to Motions In Limine
Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
07/21/2016
07/21/2016
Interoffice
07/25/2016
Reply in Opposition to Commonwealth's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Selective and

Vindictive Prosecution
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
07/25/2016
Document Date
Page 16 of 28
Filed By
Reply in Opposition to Commonwealth's Motion in Limine to Admit Evidence of Prior Conversations by

Joshua Morrow
3
07/25/2016
Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel Production of Handwritten Notes of Interviews

1
07/27/2016
07/27/2016
Furber, William J. Jr.
07/28/2016
Decorum Order Governing Voir Dire and Jury Trial

Interoffice
07/27/2016
07/27/2016
First Class
07/29/2016
Motions in Limine Order
Commonwealth's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Selective and Vindictive Prosecution is Granted
Commonwealth is Granted Leave to Produce Evidence of Prior Conversations by Joshua Morrow after his
credibility is at issue
Deft's Motion in Limine to Preclude Certain Testimony Regarding DA R. Seth Williams is Denied - Right to Object
Retaines
Deft's Motion to Compel Production of Handwritten Notes of Interviews is Denied in light of Commonwealth's
Statement on Record that investigators made no handwritten notes
Interoffice
07/28/2016
07/28/2016
First Class
08/01/2016
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Eastern District
Superior Court Order

Order Granting Motion to Quash.
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
08/01/2016
Document Date
Page 17 of 28
Filed By
Notes of Testimony
Motions in Limine, Ctrm A
Tuesday July 26, 2016. 10:30 am
1
08/02/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Praecipe to Withdraw Affidavit in Part

Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq
2
08/02/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Defendant's Applicaiton to Seal

3
08/02/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Defendant's Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief

Filed by D. Peter Johnson, Esq.
1
08/03/2016
Proposed Jury Instructions

Filed by Kevin Steele, DA
2
08/03/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Defendant's Proposed Supplemental Voire Dire

08/04/2016
Hand Delivered
08/03/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
Defendant's Proposed Jury Instructions

08/04/2016
Hand Delivered
08/03/2016
Commonwealth's Proposed Voir Dire Questions

Filed by Kevin Steele, DA
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Page 18 of 28
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
08/08/2016
08/08/2016
08/08/2016
08/08/2016
Document Date
Filed By
Information Filed
2
Guilty
3
Sentence Deferred
4
Pre-Sentence Investigation Ordered

1
08/10/2016
08/10/2016
Amended Decorum Order Governing Voir Dire and Jury Trial

Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
08/10/2016
08/10/2016
Interoffice
08/11/2016
08/10/2016
Order Granting Immunity Petition

Joshua Morrow
Kramer, Ross M.
08/15/2016
First Class
08/15/2016
Interoffice
08/11/2016
Immunity Petition
Filed by Thomas W. McGoldrick, ADA
1
08/12/2016
Gurney, Kaitlin M.
Intervenor Phialdelphis Media Network's Motion Seeking Access to Trial Exhibits Into Evidence
Intervenor Phialdelphis Media Network's Motion Seeking Access to Trial Exhibits Into Evidence and Material
Presented to the Jury
Filed by Amy B. Ginensky, Esq.
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
08/12/2016
Document Date
Page 19 of 28
Filed By
Gurney, Kaitlin M.
Memorandum of Law in Support of Intervenor Philadelphia Media Network's Motion Seeking Trial Exhibit
Memorandum of Law in Support of Intervenor Philadelphia Media Network's Motion Seeking Access to Trial
Exhibits Entered Into Evidence and Materials Presented to the Jury
Filed by Amy B. Ginensky, Esq.
1
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury, Ctrm A
Tuesday August 11, 2016. 1:24 pm
2
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury/ A.M. Session, Ctrm A
Wednesday August 10, 2016. 8:49 am
3
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
4
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Monday August 8, 2016. 9:27 am
5
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury/A.M. Session, Ctrm A
Tuesday August 9, 2016. 8:52 am
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
08/15/2016
Document Date
Page 20 of 28
Filed By
Notes of Testimony
7
08/15/2016
Notes of Testimony
Trial by Jury/A.M. Session, Ctrm A
Thursday August 11, 2016. 8:56 am
1
08/16/2016
Montgomery County Court

Administration
Sentencing Scheduled 10/24/2016 10:00AM

2
08/16/2016
Notes of Testimony
Friday August 12, 2016. 8:50 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy and a jury
3
08/16/2016
08/16/2016
Order Scheduling Hearing

Sentencing Hearing October 24, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. Courtroom "A"
Kramer, Ross M.
09/03/2016
First Class
09/03/2016
Interoffice
08/23/2016
Notes of Testimony
Monday August 15, 2016. 9:17 am
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Page 21 of 28
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
08/23/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
08/25/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
08/25/2016
09/13/2016
Steinberg, Marc Robert
10/13/2016
Document Date
Filed By
Exhibits Location Filed

1
2
1
Entry of Appearance
1
Motion to Perform House Arrest Suitability Assessment

Filed by Marc Robert Steinberg, Attorney for Defendant
10/14/2016
Hand Delivered
10/13/2016
10/13/2016
Decorum Order Governing Sentencing

Stew Ryan ADA served via order scanned and sent interoffice mail on 10/12/2016
Gerald L. Shargel, Esq., Seth C. Farber, Esq. served via order scanned and sent via first class mail on
10/12/2016
Henry, Michelle Ann
First Class
10/12/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
10/12/2016
First Class
10/12/2016
Interoffice

10/12/2016
First Class

10/12/2016
First Class
Steele, Kevin R.
10/12/2016
Interoffice

10/12/2016
First Class
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
1
Document Date
Page 22 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
10/14/2016
Status Date
10/13/2016
Service Status
Answer By
Commonwealth - Application for House Arrest Suitabilty Assessment - no later than 4:15 p.m. on 10/14/16
GERALD L SHARGEL ESQ AND SETH C FARBER ESQ SERVED VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL ON 10/13/2016
Henry, Michelle Ann
First Class
10/13/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
10/13/2016
First Class
10/13/2016
Interoffice

10/13/2016
First Class

10/13/2016
First Class
Steele, Kevin R.
10/13/2016
Interoffice

10/13/2016
2
First Class
10/14/2016
Response to Defendant's Motion to Perform House Arrest Suitability Assessment

10/18/2016
Hand Delivered
10/17/2016
10/14/2016
Order Granting Motion to Perform House Arrest Suitability Assessment

Report due on or before 10/21/16
GERALD L SHARGEL ESQ, SETH C FARBER ESQ SERVED VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL 10/14/2016
M RYAN STEWART ADA SERVED VIA INTEROFFICE MAIL 10/14/2016
Henry, Michelle Ann
First Class
10/14/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
10/14/2016
First Class
10/14/2016
Interoffice
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
Document Date
Page 23 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type

10/14/2016
First Class

10/14/2016
First Class
Steele, Kevin R.
10/14/2016
Interoffice
10/17/2016
Status Date
Service Status
Sentencing Memorandum
CR 6239-15
8423-15
Thomas W. McGoldrick Deputy District Attorney
Hand Delivered
10/18/2016
1
10/18/2016
Sentnecing Memorandum
Filed by Marc Robert Steinberg, Esq.
10/18/2016
Hand Delivered
10/24/2016

2
10/24/2016
REGENSBURG, MARY P.
Bail Posted - Kane, Kathleen Granahan

3
10/24/2016
Order - Sentence/Penalty Imposed

4
10/24/2016
10/24/2016
Order Modifying Bail

5

CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Page 24 of 28
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
10/25/2016
10/26/2016
Document Date
Filed By
Order Modifying Bail

1
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel

Fiiled by Douglas K. Rosenblum, Esq.
10/27/2016
Hand Delivered
10/27/2016
10/27/2016
Order Granting Motion to Withdraw as Counsel

Douglas Rosenblum Esq.
11/16/2016
First Class
11/16/2016
1
Interoffice
10/31/2016

Filed by Seth C. Farber, Esq.
2
10/31/2016

3
10/31/2016

Filed by Ross M. Kramer, Esq.
1
11/01/2016
Stipulation re: Waiver under Pa.R.Crim.P. 704(C)(3)

2
11/01/2016
11/01/2016

Seth Farber Esq.
11/16/2016
First Class
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Filed By
Service By
Issue Date
Service Type
11/16/2016
Interoffice
Document Date
Page 25 of 28
11/01/2016
Status Date
Service Status
11/01/2016
11/01/2016

Gerald Shargel Esq.
11/16/2016
First Class
11/16/2016
4
Interoffice
11/01/2016

Ross Kramer Esq.
11/16/2016
First Class
11/16/2016
1
Interoffice
11/02/2016

Filed by Marc Robert Steinberg, Esq.
1
11/03/2016
11/02/2016

Marc Robert Steinberg Esq.
GERALD SHARGEL ESQ, SERVED VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL 11/02/2016
11/02/2016
Henry, Michelle Ann
11/02/2016
11/02/2016
11/02/2016
First Class

11/02/2016
First Class
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Service To
Issue Date
Document Date
Page 26 of 28
Filed By
Service By
Service Type
Status Date
Service Status
Steele, Kevin R.
11/02/2016
11/02/2016
First Class
11/07/2016
Notes of Testimony
Sentencing, Ctrm A
Monday October 24, 2016. 10:03 am
1
11/21/2016

1
11/22/2016
Lock, Joshua D.
11/22/2016
Entry of Appearance
2
Notice of Appeal to the Superior Court

Filed by Joshua D. Lock, Esq.
3
11/22/2016
Certificate of Service
Filed by Joshua D. Lock, Esq.
4
11/22/2016
11/22/2016
11/22/2016

Amil M. Minora Esq.
11/22/2016
Montgomery County District Attorney's
Office
11/22/2016
1
11/23/2016
1925(b) Concise Statement Order
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
11/28/2016
Page 27 of 28
Document Date
Filed By

Filed by Amil M. Minora, Esq.
PAYMENT PLAN SUMMARY

Payment Plan No
Payment Plan Freq.
Next Due Date
Responsible Participant
46-2016-P000016645
Overdue Amt
Suspended
Monthly
Payment Plan History:
CPCMS 9082
Active
09/18/2017
Receipt Date
11/30/2015
Payment
Next Due Amt
Yes
No
Payor Name
$0.00
$15.01
Participant Role
Defendant
Amount
$9.00
Printed: 11/30/2016

DOCKET
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
v.
CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page 28 of 28
Last Payment Date: 11/22/2016

Total of Last Payment: -$9.00

Assessment
Payments
Adjustments
Non Monetary
Payments
Defendant
Total
Costs/Fees
Copies (Montgomery)
Costs of Prosecution - CJEA
$9.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$9.00
$50.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$50.00
$8.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8.00
State Court Costs (Act 204 of 1976)
$13.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$13.55
Appeal to Superior Court (Montgomery)
$71.25
-$71.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Automation Filing Fee (Montgomery)
$5.00
-$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
ATJ
$4.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$4.00
Automation Fee (Act 36 of 2000)

(Montgomery)
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
Judicial Computer Project
$2.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.25
$355.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$355.25
Commonwealth Cost - HB627 (Act 167

of 1992)
$20.30
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$20.30
County Court Cost (Act 204 of 1976)
$29.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$29.65
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
$35.00
-$9.00
$0.00
$0.00
$26.00
$250.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$250.00
$10.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$10.00
CJES
COC Processing Fee Misd/Fel
(Montgomery)
Court Child Care (Act 105 of 2000)

(Montgomery)
Crime Victims Compensation (Act 96 of
1984)
DNA Detection Fund (Act 185-2004)
Domestic Violence Compensation (Act
44 of 1988)
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
JCPS
$21.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21.25
Variable Amount to be Distributed

CVC/VWS (Act 96)
$12.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$12.00
Variable Amount to be Distributed

CVC/VWS (Act 96)
$28.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$28.00
Victim Witness Service (Act 111 of 1998)
$25.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$25.00
Costs/Fees Totals:
$964.50
-$85.25
$0.00
$0.00
$879.25
Grand Totals:
$964.50
-$85.25
$0.00
$0.00
$879.25
Firearm Education and Training Fund
** - Indicates assessment is subrogated
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/30/2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Re

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Re

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Stan J.

Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Freedom From Covert Harassment &

1250 Fremont Street

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Docket Number: 3576 EDA 2016

REQUEST THE COURTESY OF THE COURT TO APPEAR PRO SE AND TO FILE

Quashing the charges in case Montgomery Court Case No.

Rule 531. Participation by Amicus Curiae.

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

1250 Fremont Street

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

ACTIVE COURT CASES

Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for

12. U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

Case No. 16-10157

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF KATHLEEN KANE'S (ATTORNEY GENERAL) MOTION

Most of which have been

The matters presented in this

Attorney General has been quoted as saying

Everybody makes mistakes.

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

In addition attached are supporting documents to

advanced the credibility and integrity of the MOVANT.

These documents are attached as

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

HISTORY AND BACKGROUND OF MOVANT AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

I am receiving a net monthly benefit of $1330.00 and

3576 EDA 2016 AMICUS BRIEF

November 30, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant