Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BUSMHR 4490 3485 Syllabus Final
BUSMHR 4490 3485 Syllabus Final
BUSMHR 4490
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
BUSMHR 4490
Autumn Semester 2016
Instructor:
E-mail:
Office:
Hours:
Phone:
Maria Landekhovskaya
[email protected]
042 Fisher Hall
Tues 10:30AM11:30PM (and by appointment)
614/ 579.4029
Recitation Section(s):
Course Text:
Case Studies:
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi
Apple Inc.
Amazon.com, Inc.
Tesla Motors, Inc.
Walt Disney Co.: The Entertainment King
eBays Strategy in China: Alliance or Acquisition
Bank of America and the New Financial Landscape
Zappos.com (A) and (B)
McDonalds Corporation
711-462
MH0027
MH0031
MH0032
701-035
HKU701
MH0007
INS259 and INS260
MH0037
The required course text is available at the OSU Bookstores at a very special rate, and the case
studies are available on the Harvard Business School publishing website at this link:
http://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cbmp/access/51661017
Course Overview:
Strategic management is an integrative management field that combines the three macro learning
objectives of the coursehow to analyze, formulate and implement strategy in the quest for
competitive advantage.
Strategy is the set of goal-directed actions a firm takes to gain and sustain superior performance
relative to competitors. In any competitive situation, therefore, a good strategy enables a firm to
achieve superior performance.
Learning Objectives:
Part 1 Analysis: Analyze what strategy and strategic leadership are and be able to scan the
internal and external environment. Understand how to manage from the inside out and outside
in and also measure the firms advantage.
Page 1
Strategic Management
BUSMHR 4490
Part 2 Formulation: Explain business strategy; (i.e., differentiation, cost leadership, and blue
ocean), innovation and entrepreneurship; and corporate strategy (e.g., vertical integration and
diversification, alliances and M&A), as well as global strategy.
Part 3 Implementation: Recognize the strategy/structure relationshipincluding organizational
design; structure, culture and control, and the overall relevance of sound corporate governance
and business ethics practices.
Satisfying these objectives involves individual and experiential learning and demonstrating an
understanding of the AFI strategy framework (e.g., by taking quizzes, conducting group case
studies, doing a group presentation, and also completing an individual writing assignment).
Expected Learning Outcomes:
A good strategy consists of three elements. Students taking this class will master the learning
outcomes inherent in these three elements. After taking this class, you will therefore be able to do
the following:
1. Complete a diagnosis of the competitive challenge facing a firm. This element is
accomplished through analysis of the firms external and internal environments.
2. Develop a guiding policy to address the competitive challenge. This element is
accomplished through strategy formulation, resulting in the firms corporate, business,
and functional strategies.
3. Construct a set of coherent actions to implement the firms guiding policy. This element is
accomplished through strategy implementation.
By understanding good strategy, and how to use the analysis, formulation and implementation (/)
framework, we can learn how to develop a strategy/structure relationship that helps the firm
achieve and sustain competitive advantage.
There is nothing so practical as good theory Lewin (1951) wrote. Here we use the practical
applications the literature of strategic management has developed through time, in both our large
lecture and case-based recitation sections.
Course Workload:
The university and college expectation is that students spend two hours outside of class for every
hour spent in class. For example, you should expect to spend approximately 6 hours per week
outside of class on course-related work for the average course.
Class Format:
This course has two main components:
(1) an online lecture component where we cover the theories and background material of
strategy;
(2) a recitation component focused on case analysis, discussion, and the application of the ideas
of strategy. The case-study method brings a real world approach to business education in at
least three important ways:
First, case discussions generate a dynamic process of active questioning and
responding, examination and debate among students and discussion leaders. Because
strategy issues are often complex and uncertain, this class is more about asking the right
questions than it is about knowing the right answers. So the case method helps students
to refine their skills as insightful questioners, rather than just good answers.
Second, the case method trains students to think as administrators rather than scholars.
Page 2
Strategic Management
BUSMHR 4490
Third, the case method requires students to use all of their knowledge, skills and
experience to respond the real time to the questions raised in class and to effectively
communicate their ideas to classmates. Thus, students also become teachers as well as
learners.
Technology:
The use of laptops, smartphones and other electronic devices are not allowed in class.
Where there are benefits to their use, they have considerable negative externalities that
overweigh their advantages.
Lecture and Recitation Grading:
Lecture Component (40% of your final grade):
o
o
o
Exams: There will be three exams based on lecture material. The exams are
multiple-choice.
Your performance on the above exams will determine 30% of your total grade.
Each exam is worth 10% each.
Other: 10% will be based on online LearnSmart assignments and quizzes you
will complete after reading the chapter and watching the lecture videos.
Group cases: There are three group case study write-ups (use a memo format)
each worth 10%, which total 30% of your grade.
Group presentation: Each group will present one of the cases to the class. The
presentation is worth 10%.
Individual writing assignment: 10%.
Other: participation/contribution 10%.
A = 93 100%
A- = 90 92.9%
B+ = 87 89.9%
B = 83 86.9%
B- = 80 82.9%
C+ = 77 79.9%
C = 73 76.9%
C- = 70 72.9%
D+ = 67 69.9%
D = 60 66.9%
E = below 60%
Date
Discussion Topics/Cases
1
2
8/23
8/30
3
4
5
6
9/6
9/13
9/20
9/27
Page 3
Reading and
Assignments
Due: Provide names
of group members by
the end of the class
(write names on paper
and turn into me).
Ch.1
Review Ch.3, Ch.4,
Ch. 6
Ch.6
Ch.7
Strategic Management
BUSMHR 4490
7
10/4
McDonalds Corporation
8
9
11
10/11
10/1
8
10/2
5
11/1
12
13
14
11/8
11/15
11/22
Zappos.com
Bank of America and the New Financial Landscape
Apple Inc.
15
11/29
10
Strategic Management
BUSMHR 4490
the presentation on the assignment area. You will be asked to assess the teamwork in your group
at the end of the semester.
Individual Writing Assignment Guidelines (10%):
A global strategy is part of the firms corporate strategy. When a firm moves into a new country it
must adapt to new conditions. Select a firm that entered a new country market either successfully
or unsuccessfully, or pick a firm and recommend that it enter a new country it hasnt already. Use
the prompts below to write a report to the firms CEO (use a memo format) as to why it
succeeded (or did not succeed) in achieving competitive advantage when entering a new country.
(1) Apply the CAGE distance framework to guide your analysis in terms of costs and risks
associated with cultural, administrative, geographic and economic distance that was (or
would have to be) considered and its impact on the multinational enterprise (MNE).
(2) Next, consider the Integration Responsiveness Framework and where your firm or
aspirational firm is best represented (i.e., whether it has/ had, or should have a
transnational, multi-domestic, international, or global-standardization strategy).
Write a two to three-page 1.5 spaced explanation for its superior performance (or lack thereof).
Please do not select any firm that has been discussed in class as a case study. Take the position
of person in charge of the firms corporate strategy. Clearly state why the firm has or has not
performed well. If you selected a firm that you recommend to enter a new country market, then
show why it would achieve advantage in so doing.
The deadline for the individual writing assignment is on or before the calendar due date (Nov 1),
no exceptions. Please bring a hardcopy of your report to class on the due date. The individual
assignment is worth 10% of your final grade.
Class contribution (10%):
Most of your learning will occur in preparation for and participating in the case discussions. The
entire class learning experience relies on each student taking responsibility for contributing to the
discussion. In order to do so, it is imperative that each of you is present and fully prepared
for every class. To guide you in your preparation, this syllabus includes preparation questions for
each case.
Participating in class can be an intimidating experience, so I will try to help you in any way that I
can. I will evaluate each persons contribution for each and every class and keep a running score
on class contribution.
Attendance Policy:
A major part of your learning in this course will take place in the classroom. Since this class is
designed to help you develop a personal viewpoint and perspective, it is not possible to make up
for an absence, nor can you offer a contribution to classmates when you are not present. The
Professor will excuse absence only in the case of documented serious illness, family emergency,
religious observance, or civic obligation. Recruiting activities are not acceptable reasons of
absence from class. Any student who fails to attend without giving prior notification to the
instructor will be dis-enrolled after the third instructional day of the term, the first Friday of the
term, or the second scheduled class meeting of the course, whichever occurs first.
Page 5
Strategic Management
BUSMHR 4490
Case Study Questions:
Cola Wars Continue: Coke & Pepsi
1. Why, historically, has the soft drink industry been so profitable?
2. Using the competitive forces model compare the attractiveness of the concentrate
business to that of the bottling business.
3. How profitable is the concentrate industry segment versus the bottling segment? Which
competitive forces best explain why profitability is so different between these two industry
segments?
4. How has the competition between Coke and Pepsi affected the industrys profits?
5. How can Coke and Pepsi sustain their profits in the wake of flattening demand and the
growing popularity of non-CSDs?
6. Analyze shareholder return and compare and contrast Pepsi and Coke with each other
and broader market averages in terms of stock price and relevant historical and updated
financial data. Who is wining the cola wars?
Apple Inc.
1. Conduct an internal and external environmental analysis for Apple using the SWOT
matrix.
2. Next, conduct a SWOT analysis for one of the following (Samsung, Google, Xiaomi,
Amazon, or Microsoft) and compare Apple with it, and how the technology changes and
the convergence of markets have increased competition between technology firms.
3. Summarize Apples product segments and suggest where it can pursue continued
growth. Use data in and outside the case to assess Apples profitability in these
segments. Is it likely to continue? If yes, how so? If not, why not?
4. Pick one of Apples product segments and use the VRIO decision tree to decide if the
resources, capabilities, and/ or competencies that underpin it can help Apple achieve and
sustain competitive advantage.
5. Dynamic capabilities (DCs) are essential to move beyond a short-lived advantage and
create a sustained competitive advantage. For a firm to sustain advantage, any fit
between its internal strengths and the external environment must be dynamic. Give an
example of DCs Apple has used or can use to transform itself.
6. Identify the top challenges Tim Cook faces and how he should address them.
Tesla Motors, Inc.
1. Conduct a PESTEL analysis to identify the forces affecting car manufacturing of alternate
energy vehicles.
2. Using VRIO analysis, evaluate whether Tesla has a sustained competitive advantage.
3. How has Tesla departed from existing auto industry practices? Use aspects of the
strategy formulation area of the AFI framework here (e.g., any partnerships and
alliances).
4. What short-term objectives are required in order for Tesla to survive?
5. What are the primary elements of Teslas internal and external environment that need to
be addressed for it to achieve a sustained competitive advantage?
6. Conduct a SWOT analysis to analyze internal and external conditions Tesla must
consider going forward.
Amazon.com, Inc.
1. Assess Amazons resources and capabilities using the VRIO framework. Can Amazon
gain and sustain a competitive advantage? Why or why not?
2. Perform a SWOT analysis for Amazon.com. Pay particular attention to industry
convergence. What are the strategic implications for Amazon?
Page 6
Strategic Management
BUSMHR 4490
3. Which business strategies and business models are being employed by the major
competitors in this case? Which are most successful, and why?
4. Formulate a business strategy and business model that would allow Amazon to become
and remain profitable.
5. What are the implications of your strategy formulation at the business level for Amazons
corporate strategy?
6. How should Jeff Bezos go about implementing any changes to the business and
corporate strategy recommended earlier? What changes to structure and process need
to take place?
Walt Disney Co.: The Entertainment King
1. Why has Disney been successful for so long? What did Michael Eisner do to rejuvenate
Disney? Specifically, how did he increase net income? What are some major things Bob
Iger has done more recently to increase net income?
2. Regarding corporate strategyconsider three dimensions of scope (vertical, geographic,
product). Which expansion modes has Disney been pursuing?
3. How specifically does Disney pursue vertical integration? Give examples from the case.
Apply transaction cost economics to understand Disneys vertical expansion decisions.
4. Is there any evidence of Disney destroying value via diversification?
5. Identify and explain the types of diversification/ integration within Disneys overall
corporate strategy you determine to be successful. Use financial data from the case or
outside sources.
6. Does it make sense for Disney to be expanding domestically or internationally at
present?
eBays Strategy in China: Alliance or Acquisition
1. eBay first entered the Chinese market in 2002 by acquiring a 33% stake in its local
counterpart, EachNet, followed by a full acquisition a year later in 2003. Critically assess
eBays choice of market entry strategy for China, listing both the advantages and
disadvantages of its acquisition strategy.
2. Assess the potential benefits and risks of eBays joint venture with Tom Online.
3. eBay will have a 49% stake in the new joint venture while Tom Online will have 51%
ownership. Critically assess both companies decisions on their respective percentage of
stake.
4. Identify and explain alternative ownership and governance structures that would help to
mitigate the risks of the joint venture with Tom Online. What alternative expansion modes
might mitigate these risks and why?
5. eBays expansion modes in China included acquisition and joint venture. Critically
evaluate each mode of diversification by identifying the advantages and disadvantages
for eBay given the competitive environment within the overall industry and specifically in
China.
6. Why did eBay lose out to Alibaba in China? What lessons can be learned for nonChinese ecommerce companies as a result?
Bank of America and the New Financial Landscape
1. Perform an internal (VRIO) analysis of BACs resources, capabilities, and core
competencies. Which competencies should be the basis of the banks future strategy?
2. What should be BACs corporate-level strategy moving forward? What should the newly
integrated bank look like and do in terms of activities?
3. How did corporate governance policies (or lack thereof) contribute to the financial crisis of
2008?
4. Did BAC breach ethical standards by failing to disclose the extent of Merrills losses and
its agreement to pay year-end bonuses to Merrill executives?
Page 7
Strategic Management
BUSMHR 4490
5. Consider the effects of BACs actions on stakeholders in light of the five questions listed
in the stakeholder analysis framework.
6. Analyze the leadership changes at BAC after the financial crisis. Do you think they will be
effective? Why or why not? Consider the strategy implementation framework.
Zappos.com
1. In 1999, the footwear market in America was sized at US$40 billion. Mail order shoe
sales accounted for 5% of the market. At that time, the online footwear market was worth
a mere US$37 million. What does this imply? Discuss your interpretation of these facts.
2. What is the difference between Zappos and online and brick-and-mortar shoe stores?
Based on your shoe-buying experience, what are the benefits and pain points of the
brick-and-mortar shoe store? Is Zappos a typical online shoe store?
3. What elements of an organic organization are apparent from the case and chapter
material? (Refer to chapter Exhibit 11.3, for example).
4. How did Zappos break the existing value-cost trade-off of the conventional online shoe
store? Out of six paths to create blue oceans, which was (were) used to create Zappos
blue ocean?
5. How did Zappos create trust, commitment and voluntary cooperation deep in the
organization?
6. How easy is it to imitate the Zappos strategy given its culture and people practices?
7. What is holacracy, and how does the organizational structure differ from more traditional
ones?
8. Why is Zappos experiencing significant implementation problems with holacracy? What
else could Zappos do to implement the new structure more effectively? Do you think that
holacracy is a good match with Zappos business strategy? Why or why not? Explain.
McDonalds Corporation
1. Which trends in McDonalds external environment are likely to have the greatest impact
on the companys ability to sustain a competitive advantage?
2. How is McDonalds positioned vis--vis its major competitors?
3. Which business-level strategy does McDonalds employ? Is it effective? How so?
4. Which international strategy does McDonalds employ? Is it effective? How so?
5. How should Easterbrook adapt the organizational structure of McDonalds to achieve his
strategic plan?
6. Among all the roles played by strategic leaders, which ones will be most important as
Easterbrook implements his strategic plan?
Academic Integrity:
Academic integrity is essential to maintaining an environment that fosters excellence in teaching,
research, and other educational and scholarly activities. Thus, The Ohio State University and the
Committee on Academic Misconduct (COAM) expect that all students have read and understand
the Universitys Code of Student Conduct, and that all students will complete all academic and
scholarly assignments with fairness and honesty. Students must recognize that failure to follow
the rules and guidelines established in the Universitys Code of Student Conduct and this syllabus
may constitute Academic Misconduct.
The Ohio State Universitys Code of Student Conduct (Section 3335-23-04) defines academic
misconduct as: Any activity that tends to compromise the academic integrity of the University, or
subvert the educational process. Examples of academic misconduct include (but are not limited
to) plagiarism, collusion (unauthorized collaboration), copying the work of another student, and
possession of unauthorized materials during an examination. Ignorance of the Universitys Code
Page 8
Strategic Management
BUSMHR 4490
of Student Conduct is never considered an excuse for academic misconduct, so I recommend
that you review the Code of Student Conduct and, specifically, the sections dealing with academic
misconduct.
If I suspect that a student has committed academic misconduct in this course, I am
obligated by University Rules to report my suspicions to the Committee on Academic
Misconduct.
If COAM determines that you have violated the Universitys Code of Student Conduct (i.e.,
committed academic misconduct), the sanctions for the misconduct could include a failing grade
in this course and suspension or dismissal from the University.
If you have any questions about the above policy or what constitutes academic misconduct in this
course, please contact me.
Other sources of information on academic misconduct (integrity) to which you can refer include:
Disability Policy:
The University strives to make all learning experiences as accessible as possible. If you
anticipate or experience academic barriers based on your disability (including mental health,
chronic or temporary medical conditions), please let me know immediately so that we can
privately discuss options. You are also welcome to register with Student Life Disability Services
to establish reasonable accommodations. After registration, make arrangements with me as
soon as possible to discuss your accommodations so that they may be implemented in a timely
fashion. SLDS contact information: [email protected]; 614-292-3307; slds.osu.edu; 098 Baker Hall, 113
W. 12th Avenue.
Page 9
Strategic Management
BUSMHR 4490
Appendix I
Maria Landekhovskaya BIO
Maria Landekhovskaya is currently working as a consultant, primarily focused on international
sporting events. Prior to this role, Maria was a Senior Strategy Consultant with the Chicago
Sports Commission (CSC), where she developed a strategic plan to guide CSC forward with clear
goals around priority sporting market segments and strategies to continue to enhance the
reputation of Chicago within the Sport Tourism Industry.
Prior to her experience with the city of Chicago, she was the Communications Leader of Olympic
Operations for The Dow Chemical Company. In her role, she was responsible for leading the
communications strategy for the Carbon Partnership of Dows Olympic Sponsorship.
Maria has over 10 years of experience in sports marketing at two global Olympic partners. Prior
to her experience with Dow, Maria spent five years with Coca-Cola as an Environmental Affairs
and Sustainability Manager within the Public Affairs and Communication Department (Russia,
Ukraine and Belarus Division). She was responsible for developing the Corporate Social
Responsibility Strategy for Coca-Cola, including the integration of sustainability projects with the
sponsorship strategy of major events, such as the Sochi 2014 Olympic Winter Games and the
FIFA World Cup 2014 Trophy Tour.
Maria has other diverse experiences working on major events, including the Coca-Cola hospitality
program for the Vancouver 2010 Olympic Winter Games and the Jet Set Sports for the London
2012 Olympic Games.
In 2004, prior to joining the sports world, Maria spent a year working in the field of waste
management and recycling in the United States, gaining experience as she pursued her Masters
Degree. Her work included experience at the Solid Waste Authority of Central Ohio (SWACO), the
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA), and the Ohio Department of Natural
Resources (ODNR).
Maria has been a guest speaker for numerous national and international Universities, including
the Ohio State University, Moscow State University, Russian Peoples Friendship University, The
State University of Management and Belorusian National Technical University.
Maria holds a Bachelors and a Masters Degree in Environmental Science from the Russian
Peoples Friendship University and an MBA in marketing from The Ohio State University.
Page 10