Current Language Teaching Approaches

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Ahmad M.

Altasan

Ahmad M. Altasan

Current Language Teaching Approaches


The spread of English in the era of globalization has led to a growing need for good
communication skills in English. Hence, there is a strong demand for an appropriate teaching
methodology. Language teaching has gone through many changes in terms of methodologies
used. First, the traditional approaches, which focus on the mastery of grammar and then the
communicative language teaching CLT, emerged. According to Richards (2005), there are
different current approaches that can be viewed as falling within the general framework of
communicative language teaching:
1. Process-based CLT approaches (content-based instruction & task-based instruction).
2. Product-based CLT approaches (text-based instruction &competency-based instruction).
Therefore, the main principle of all communicative approaches is that the learner must not
only know how to make a grammatically correct structure, but must also improve the ability
to use language to carry out various real-world tasks (Nunan, 1988). In this essay, I am going
to give a critical overview and comparison of these approaches with examples from English
language teaching settings in Australia.
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) does a lot to expand on the goal of creating
communicative competence compared to earlier methods that professed the same
objective. Teaching students how to use the language is considered to be at least as important
as learning the language itself. Kumaravadivelu (2006) stated The phrase competence in
terms of social interaction sums up the primary emphasis of CLT (p.60).
Moreover, Harmer (1988) argued that when students are engaged in meaning-centered
communicative tasks, then the language will take care of itself and that abundant exposure to
language in use and plenty of chances to practice it are useful for a student's enhancement of
knowledge and skill.
The need for authenticity. Since real communication is a basic characteristic of CLT,
classroom activities should be related to real life and provide opportunities for real
communication. Authentic materials should be the basis for classroom learning and they are
not necessary derived from authentic text as long as the learning processes were authentic
(Richards, 2005). Since the advent of CLT, textbooks and other teaching resources are
designed to similar standard of production as real world sources such as popular magazines.
In CLT, classroom activities often take the form of pair and group work requiring
negotiation and cooperation between learners, fluency-based activities that encourage
2

Ahmad M. Altasan

Ahmad M. Altasan

Bibliography
Baylis, P. (2007). Current Approach to Language Teaching and Learning. UWS, Bankstown,
NSW, Astralia.
Burns, A. (2003).ESL Curriculum Development in Australia: Recent Trends and Debates.
RELC Journal, 34, 261-283.
Burns, A. & Joyce, H. D. (2007). Adult ESL programs in Australia : Prospect, 22(3), 5-17.
Feez, S. (1998). Text -based Syllabus Design. Sydney: National Centre for English Teaching
and Research.
Harmer, J. (1988). The practice of English language teaching. (4th ed.). UK: Pearson
Longman.
Kumaravadivelu , B. (2006). TESOL Methods: Changing Tracks, Challenging Trends.
TESOL QUARTERLY , 40( 1), 59-81.
Loschky, L. & Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). Creating structure-based communication tasks for
second language development. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 9 (1),
161-212.
Nunan, D. (1988). The Learner-Centered Curriculum: A Study in Second language Teaching.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richard, J. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching.
Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative language teaching today. Singapore: RELC,1-44.

You might also like