Guide To Contentious Probate
Guide To Contentious Probate
www.lelaw.co.uk
There are a number of grounds on which it may be possible to challenge the validity
of a will. The main grounds are:
1. That the testator (the person making the will) did not have sufficient mental
capacity at the time the will was made;
2. Undue influence was placed on the testator at the time the will was made;
3. The testator did not approve or have knowledge of the contents of the will;
4. The necessary formalities of the Wills Act 1837 were not observed when the
will was made (e.g. because the will was not properly witnessed).
It will usually be the case that the provisions of the will are not known until the
testator dies. At that stage the executors will begin taking steps towards obtaining
probate of the will; anyone wishing to dispute its validity will want to prevent the
executor proving the will and commencing the administration of the estate. It is
possible to block probate of a will by registering a caveat.
Once a caveat has been registered, it is then possible to negotiate with the executor
and beneficiaries in order to attempt to resolve any dispute; for example by the
beneficiaries agreeing to divide the estate differently than provided for by the will. If
the resolution is not possible, the next step would be to begin a claim in court to have
the provisions of the will set aside.
Alternatively, the executor of the will can issue a warning to the person who entered
the caveat, requiring them to set out why they object to probate being granted. The
executor can then begin a claim in court for a declaration that the will is valid and for
probate to be granted.
As with other types of litigation, the court will decide the case based on hearing
evidence and considering legal arguments. Medical evidence (e.g. on whether the
testator had sufficient mental capacity) is often especially important but other types of
expert evidence such as handwriting (e.g. where it is disputed whether the testator
actually signed the will him or herself) may be required.
People who knew the testator may also need to give evidence about the testators
apparent state of mind, and the relationship between the testator and those claiming an
interest in the estate.
The court will either decide that the will is valid and therefore grant probate to the
executor, or declare that the will is invalid. If the court rules that the will is invalid the
outcome is dependent on whether or not the testator had made a previous will. Where
there is a previous will, it will replace the will that was found to be invalid. Where
there was no previous will, the estate will be divided according to the rules of
intestacy.
Whether the deceased has made a will or dies intestate, the Inheritance (Provision for
Family and Dependants) Act 1975 allows certain categories of person to make a claim
for reasonable financial provision out of the estate.
1. Spouses;
2. Former spouses who have not remarried;
3. Co-habitants;
4. Children of the deceased;
5. Any person treated as a child of the deceased;
6. Any other person who was maintained by the deceased.
The right to make a claim arises regardless of whether the deceaseds will makes
provision for the person making a claim. For example, if the deceased had two
children and left 90% of his estate to the elder child and 10% to the younger, the
younger child would still be able to make a claim on one of the grounds permitted by
the Act.
On what grounds can a claim be made under the Inheritance Act 1975?
A claim under the Act is for reasonable financial provision for the person making
the claim. In order to decide what amounts to reasonable financial provision, the court
will take account of the following:
1. The financial needs and resources of the person or persons making the claim;
2. The financial needs and resources of the beneficiaries of the estate;
3. Any obligations and responsibilities the deceased had towards any person
making a claim or any beneficiaries of the estate;
4. The size and nature of the estate;
5. Any physical or mental disability of any person making a claim or any
beneficiary of the estate;
6. Any other matter the court considers relevant, including the conduct of any
person making a claim or any other relevant person.
In the case of a spouse or a former spouse who makes a claim, the court will also
consider:
1. The age of the person making the claim and the duration of the marriage;
2. The contribution made by the person making the claim to the welfare of the
deceased, including looking after the home or family of the deceased.
A claim under the Inheritance Act 1975 follows a similar process to other litigation
(see our guide to litigation). Any claim must usually be started within 6 months of the
grant of probate or letters of administration (see our guide to probate for more
information on these terms). Permission is required for any claim made outside this
time limit.
Even where there is no dispute over who is entitled to benefit from an estate, there
may be disagreement about how the estate is managed. Often, the beneficiaries of an
estate will become frustrated with an executors slow progress in dealing with the
estate, a failure to keep the beneficiaries updated with the progress, or because the
executor and the beneficiaries do not get along. In these circumstances, there is
sometimes little formal action that can be taken other than a letter of complaint.
However, in more serious cases, it may be appropriate to apply to the court to remove
an executor and substitute a new one. Such circumstances include where:
- The executor is stealing funds from the estate;
- The executor is not keeping proper accounting records;
- The executor has failed to comply with a court order;
- The executor is otherwise wasting or mismanaging estate funds.
Where the executor is also a trustee of part of the estate, or where trustees have been
appointed to manage part of the estate for child beneficiaries who will inherit once
they reach the age of 18 (or older), the risk of mismanagement will be greater.
Interest actions
Usually occurring where a deceased dies intestate, there may be a dispute as to who is
entitled to take out the Grant of Representation to administer the estate. This may be
the case where the person thought to be entitled is the deceaseds spouse but the
validity of the marriage is doubted by another relative.
Rectification
Where a person has been excluded from a will but believes this to have been the result
of either:
(a) A clerical error; or
(b) A failure to understand the testators wishes;
they may be able to make a claim for rectification of the will. Such an application
should normally be made within 6 months of a grant of probate being taken out,
although permission can be obtained for a claim outside this time limit.
The court has a wide discretion in all cases as to what orders to make in respect of
costs. The usual rule is that the loser pays most if not all of the winners legal costs.
Probate cases are often treated somewhat differently. It is not uncommon for both
sides in a probate dispute to have their costs awarded out of the estate, e.g. where the
deceased has changed his will very frequently, and the court takes the view in effect it
was the deceaseds fault that the proceedings had to be brought to clarify the legal
position.
In other cases, e.g. where there is doubt about mental capacity, the court may award
costs to the losing party out of the estate, for all steps up until the obtaining of medical
evidence, at which point the likely outcome of the action became clearer.
However no guarantees can ever be given about what costs orders the court will make,
and generally costs will be dealt with only at the very end of the case.
Disclaimer
This information sheet is for guidance only and does not remove the need to take
professional legal advice relevant to the specific facts of any individual case. No
responsibility will be accepted for any losses occasioned as a result of any action
taken in reliance on the contents of this document.
Contact Details
Neil Lloyd-Evans
LE Law and LE Law Solicitors are trading names of LE Law Services Ltd
L E Law Services Ltd is a limited company registered in England and Wales with
registered number 07676752
We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number
562428).
Our registered office and address for service of documents is 127 High Road,
Loughton, Essex IG10 4LT.