Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marx - Pre-Capitalist Economic Formations PDF
Marx - Pre-Capitalist Economic Formations PDF
KARL MARX
PRE-CAPITALIST ECONOMIC FORMATIONS
\
I
KARL MARX
PRE-CAPITALIST
ECONOMIC
FORMATIONS
translated by
JACK C O H E N
INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHERS
NEW YORK
(1964 ) ( ), (
y ' Hobsbawn Introduction y . Cohen Translation )
fiVrt U nited States E dition, International Publishers, 1965
/4W R igh ts R eserved
Contents
I ntrodu ction , by E. J. Hobsbawm 9
I ndex 149
;
Introduction
I
II
Let us next follow the evolution of M arxs and
Engels views on historical periodisation and evolution.
T he first stage of this is best studied from the German
Ideology of 1845-6, which already accepts (what was of
course not in itself new) that various stages in the social
division of labour correspond to varioui~Torms of
property. T he first of these was communal, and corres
ponded to the undeveloped stage of production where
a people sustains itself by hunting, fishing, cattle-
raising or at most by farming .1 A t this stage social
structure is based on the development and modification
of the kinship group and its internal division of labour.
This kinship group (the family) tends to develop
within itself not only the distinction between chieftains
and the rest, but also slavery, which develops with the
increase in population and needs, and the growth of ex
ternal relations, whether of war or barter. T he first main,
advance of the social division of labour consists of the
separation of industrial and commercial from agricul-
turaH abour, and therefore leads to_the distinction be
tween and^ppositiorToftown and country. This in turn
leadsToThe seconcfhistoric phase of property relations,
the communal and state property of antiquity. M arx
and Engels see its origins in the formation of cities by
the union (by agreement or conquest) of tribal groups,
slavery continuing to subsist. Communal city property
(including that of the citizens over the city slaves) is
the main form of property, but side by side with this
private property emerges, though at first subordinate
to the communal. W ith the rise first of mobile, later
1 fVerke, III, 22.
28 PRE-CAPITALIST ECONOMIC FORMATIONS
Ill
T he next point to be considered is the internal
dynamic of these systems: what makes them rise and
decline? This is relatively simple for the oriental
system, whose characteristics make it resistant to
disintegration and economic evolution, until wrecked
by the external force of capitalism. M arx tells us too
little about the Slavonic system at this stage to permit
much comment. On the other hand his views of the
internal contradiction of the ancient and feudal system
are complex, and raise some difficult problems.
Slavery is the chief characteristic of the ancient
INTRODUCTION 39
IV
W e must next consider how far M arxs and E ngels
subsequent thinking and study led them to modify,
amplify and follow up the general views expressed in
the Formen.
This was notably the case in the field of the study of
primitive communalism. It is certain that M arxs own
historical interests after the publication of Capital
(1867) were overwhelmingly concerned with this stage
of social development, for which M aurer, Morgan,
and the ample Russian literature which he devoured
from 1873 on, provided a far more solid base of study
than had been available in 1857-8. A part from the
agrarian orientation of his work in Capital III, two
reasons for this concentration of interests may be
suggested. First, the development of a Russian revolu
tionary movement increasingly led M arx and Engels
to place their hopes for a European revolution in
Russia. (No misinterpretation of M arx is more
grotesque than the one which suggests that he expected
a revolution exclusively from the advanced industrial
countries of the W est.1) Since the position of the
village community was a matter of fundamental
theoretical disagreement among Russian revolution
aries, who consulted M arx on the point, it was
natural for him to investigate the subject at greater
length.
It is interesting, that somewhat unexpectedly
his views inclined towards those of the Narodniks, who
believed that the Russian village community could
1 Engels records their hopes of a Russian revolution in the late 1870s, and in 1894
specifically looks forward to the possibility of the Russian revolution giving the
signal for the workers' revolution in the W est, so that both supplement each other .
JVerkey X V I I I , 668. For other references: M arx to Sorge, 27.9.1877} Engels to
Bernstein, 22.2.1882.
50 PRE-CAPITALIST ECONOMIC FORMATIONS
1 fVerke, I I I , 29-30.
2 A nti-D iihring, Origin o f the Family, the little essay on The M a rk, and The
German Peasant W a r are the chief published works, but drafts and notes (mostly
incomplete) exist about medieval Germ an and Irish history. Cf. W erke, X V I ,
4.59-50; X I X , 425-521} X X I , 392-401,
INTRODUCTION 53
V
Finally, it is worth surveying briefly the discussion
on the main socio-economic formation among Marxists
since the death of M arx and Engels. This has in many
respects been unsatisfactory, though it has the advan
tage of never regarding M arxs and Engels texts as
embodying final truth. They have, in fact, been
1 A nti-D uhring, loc. cit., 252.
60 PRE-CAPITALIST ECONOMIC FORMATIONS
INTRODUCTION 6 l
(A)
T h e way in which men produce their means of sub
sistence depends first of all on the nature of the actual
means they find in existence and have to reproduce.
This mode of production must not be considered
simply as being the reproduction of the physical
existence of the individuals. Rather it is a definite form
of activity of these individuals, a definite form of
expressing their life, a definite mode o f life on their part.
As individuals express their life, so they are. W hat they
are, therefore, coincides with their production, both
with what they produce and with how they produce.
T he nature of individuals thus depends on the material
conditions determining their production.
This production only makes its appearance with the
increase of population. In its turn this presupposes
the intercourse of individuals with one another. The
form of this intercourse is again determined by
production.
The relations of different nations among themselves
depend upon the extent to which each has developed its
productive forces, the division of labour and internal
intercourse. This statement is generally recognised.
But not only the relation of one nation to others, but
also the whole internal structure of the nation itself
depends on the stage of development reached by its
production and its internal and external intercourse.
How far the productive forces of a nation are developed
122 PRE-CAPITALIST ECONOMIC FORMATIONS
(B)
The greatest division of material and mental labour
is the separation of town and country. T he antagonism
between town and country begins with the transition
from barbarism to civilisation, from tribe to State, from
locality to nation, and runs through the whole history
of civilisation to the present day (the Anti-Corn Law
League). The existence of the town implies, at the same
time, the necessity of administration, police, taxes,
etc., in short, of the municipality, and thus of politics
in general. Here first became manifest the division of
the population into two great classes, which is directly
based on the division of labour and on the instruments
of production. The town already is in actual fact the
concentration of the population, of the instruments of
production, of capital, of pleasures, of needs, while the
country demonstrates just the opposite fact, their isola
tion and separation. The antagonism of town and
country can only exist as a result of private property. It
is the most crass expression of the subjection of the
individual under the division of labour, under a definite
activity forced upon him a subjection which makes
one man into a restricted town-animal, the other into
a restricted country-animal, and daily creates anew the
conflict between their interests. Labour is here again
the chief thing, power over individuals, and as long as
the latter exists, private property must exist. The aboli
tion of the antagonism between town and country is
one of the first conditions of communal life, a condition
which again depends on a mass of material premises
and which cannot be fulfilled by the mere will, as any
128 PRE-CAPITALIST ECONOMIC FORMATIONS
M A R X T O E N G E L S , M A R C H 1 4 , 1868
M A R X T O E N G E L S , M A R C H 2 5 , 1 86 8
M A R X T O Z A S U L I C H , M A R C H 8, 1 8 8 1
ENGELS TO MARX,
D E C E M B E R 15, 1882
ENGELS TO MARX,
D E C E M B E R 16, 1882
ENGELS TO MARX,
D E C E M B E R 2 2 , 1882
it> ^
i
Index
Index
(Figures in italic type refer to texts by Marx or Engels, others to the
Introduction.)
Africa, 6 3 , 1 4 0 Communalism, Primitive (or
Agriculture, 3f-, 43, 52, 53f., 73, Primitive Communism, or
9 1 . 9 3 , 9 4 , 1 1 2 , 1 1 6 - 1 7 ,1 4 5 Primitive Communities), 24,
America, 25, 26, 30, 8 8 , 1 1 9 , 1 3 5 , 2 5 > 27 > 28, 32f., 49f., 62-3,
J 37 6 f . , 1 2 2 ., 1 4 4 L
Ancient (or Classical, or Greco- Constantinople, 1 1 6
Roman) social structure, 11, Crafts, 29f., 37, 46f., 9s, 102>
19, 2of., 25, 27f., 32, 35, 108, H 2 , 117, u s , i 30
37 . 3 8 > 4 1 62> 77 84, 95,
9 7 ,1 2 3 -5 Dobb, M. H., 45
Asia (or Orient), 22, 7 7 -8 , 88,
Dominion-and-Servitude, rela
103, 119, 139, 145 tions of, 1 0 2 - 3 ,1 0 4
Asiatic (or Oriental) social struc
ture, 11, 19, 25, 32f., 35-6,
Economic formation of society,
37 , 3 8 5 1 5 8 6 l> 64 , 75, 11, 14, igf., 8 0 f.
79, S3, 95, 97 Egypt, 21
Aztecs, 63 Engels, F., 18, 20, 23, 25-8, 45,
50-9, 62, 63, 65
Bourgeoisie (or Burghers), 3of., Exchange, 13, 14, 47, 8 3 , 9 4 , 9 6 ,
131L 1 0 4 ,1 1 3 -1 4 ,1 1 5
Britain (or England), 21, 30, 62,
88, n o - 1 1 , 115, 133, 135, Feudalism, 11, 19, 22f., 32, 38,
1 3 7 - 8 ,1 4 6 4if-> 43> 44f-> 62f., 8 8 , 1 1 4 ,
Byzantium, 4 6 , 1 0 9 , 1 2 4 1 2 4 ,1 2 5 - 6
origin, 28f., 44, 52f.
Capital, and Capitalism, 11, 14, proto-feudalism, 62f.
15, 19, 20, 32, 38, 44, 50, Flanders, 30, 1 1 6 , 13 3
84, 86, 106, 118, 130 France, 24, 30, 63, 8 8 , 1 1 9 , 1 3 3 ,
accumulation, 1 1 2 , 1 1 7 137, 1 4 0
development, 25f., 1 3 7 f.
origins, 29^, 41, 44, 46f., 48, Gaels, 77
6 7 , 9 7 L , 99f., 1 0 7 U 1 2 8 , Germanic social structure, 25, 32,
133?- 35. 37 38 43-, 47 75f-
Celts, 34, 7 0 , 8 8 , 1 4 0 7 8 ., 9 5 , 9 7 , 1 2 5 , 1 3 9 , 1 4 ^ - ,
China, 64 1 4 4 .
Cities (or Towns), 2 j ( . , 34, 35, Germany, 23,24,52,1 3 9 - 4 0 ,1 4 6 ,
41, 7 1 ., 7 7 f., 1 2 7 L 147
Class, 11,31,32,37, 5 5,63, 1 2 2 L , Gilds, 29f., 98, 101, 103, 10 8 ,
132 1 0 9 , 1 1 2 , 1 2 8 ., 1 3 3 -4
1^2 PRE-CAPITALIST ECONOMIC FORMATIONS
Manufacture, 3of., 33, 37, 48, Rome, 2of., 28, 39, 44, 46, 58,
73, 91> 94, 98, 109, 116, 63. 73, 74, 75, 7 6 , 77, 7 8 ,
79, 80, 83, 87, 9 2 ,1 0 2 ,1 0 9 ,
I 33
Mao Tse-tung, 6on. 1 1 9 ,1 2 4 ,1 2 5 ,1 4 0
Maurer, G. von, 22f., 24,49, 56, Rumania, 22, 70
1 4 0 - 1 ,1 4 4 ,1 4 5 ,1 4 7 Russia, 23, 49-50, 1 3 9 , 1 4 2 .
Mexico, 34, 7 0 , 1 4 0
Middle Ages (or Medieval), 23, Schumpeter, J., 16
INDEX
1 5 3
Serfs, and Serfdom, 23, 29, 40, despotic, 69, 77
41, 42f., 52f., 59, 8 7 , 8 9 , Sweezy, P. M ., 46
9 1 , 95, 9 9 ,1 0 1 - 2 ,1 2 5 - 6 ,1 2 8 ,
1 4 0 ,145L
T own and Country, division and
Slavery, 27f., 32, 38f., 41, 42, conflict of, 27, 3 5 , 1 2 7 L
53 6z>8 3 , 8 7 , 8 9 , 9 1 - 2 , 9 3 , irade (or Commerce), 23, 29f.,
9 5 -6 , 9 9 , 1 0 1 - 2 , 1 2 3 , 1 4 5
4 0 46, 8 4 , 1 0 7 , 1 1 3 , 1 1 5 ,
Slavonic social structure, 25, 32, i 3o f.
37. 38, 7 0 , 95, 97 Tribes, 27, 28, 62, 6 8 f., 76L, 82,
Slavs, 8 8 , 9 7 8 8 -9 , 9of., 1 2 2 , 1 2 7
Spain, 1 1 6
Smith, Adam, 1 1 2 War, 27, 30, 31, 3 4 , 3<?> 4 4 ) 53,
Stalin, J. V., 18, 61 54 7 1 , 8 3 , 8 9 , 9 3 , 94,
State, 55, 8 0 , 1 2 7 , 1 3 8
123-4, 135,137
community as state, 7 2 L Wealth, 15, 8 4 L , io 7 f.
SOURCES CITED IN INTRODUCTION,
AVAILABLE IN
INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHERS EDITIONS