Project Identification PC I II
Project Identification PC I II
Project Identification PC I II
Identification and
Feasibility
1
Content
This lecture gives introduction and approaches to
project identification. It looks at:
the context within which projects are developed including
national and sectoral plans
e.g. Energy Vision 2025, PSDP, 5 year plans, annual plans, NGOs,
and Donor initiatives.
the types of surveys and data available for project
identification purposes.
Pre-feasibility of projects
Feasibility of the projects
2
Introduction
A project may be seen as an investment activity where
financial resources are expended to create capital
assets that produce benefits over extended period of
time.
3
Essential characteristics of projects
For projects to be properly conceived, the
characteristics below must be clearly defined:
Objectives
Expected outputs
Intended beneficiaries
Planned lifespan
Extended outcome of the project
Principle stakeholders
Financial plan and source of financing
4
Project ideas conceived by:
Individuals
Groups of individuals (community)
Local leaders
NGOs
Policy makers
Planners
Relevant energy bodies such as ministry, PC, Finance division
International development agencies
Government pronouncements
5
Project identification
Clear project identification allows you to answers
questions like:
6
Approaches to project
identification
There are two major approaches to project
identification
(a) Top-down approach
(b) Bottom-up approach
7
Top-Down Approach
9
Limitations of Top-Down
Approach
Does not help in modifying strongly established ideas and
beliefs of people.
Assumes external individuals know better than the
beneficiaries of the service.
Communities have little say in planning process rendering
approach devoid of human resource development.
Community develops dependency syndrome on outside
assistance and does not exploit their own potential.
The development workers (change agents) become
stumbling blocks to people-led development
tendency to impose their own biases, etc. on people.
10
Top-down approaches to project
identification
11
Top-down approaches to project
identification
2. Rapid appraisal
Called Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA) when carried out
in a rural areas, and Rapid Urban Appraisal (RUA) in
an urban area.
Method collects and assesses data quickly using any
data collection techniques.
Primary purpose is to acquire the information in the
shortest time possible and it lowers the cost.
It is rapid because investigation, assessment and
identification of projects are done at the same time.
12
Rapid appraisal uses the following data collection
techniques:
Analysis of secondary data sources
Interviews
Direct observation at site
Visualization of Resources like fuels,
transmission and distribution network,
finances, human resource, other physical
allied infrastructure, social organizational
maps and time series maps.
13
3. Needs Assessment Survey
Also referred to as situation analysis (SITAN).
It involves:-
Fact finding about problems or needs in a given
area or community.
Finding out what is lacking in a given area or
community.
Investigating a situation in a given area.
14
NAS is carried out to:
15
Bottom-Up Approach
16
Advantages of Bottom-Up
Approach
Interveners accomplish more with limited resources
since people tend to safeguard what they have provided
for themselves.
Develops peoples capacity to identify problems and
needs and to seek possible solutions to them.
Provides opportunities of educating people.
Helps people to work as a team and develop a WE
attitude - makes project progressive and sustainable.
Resources are effectively managed; dependence
reduces, there is increased equity, initiative,
accountability, financial and economic discipline.
17
Limitations of Bottom-Up
Approach
Not always effective for projects that require urgency to
implement
Time-consuming and requires patience and tolerance.
People sometimes dislike approach because they do not
want to take responsibility for action.
The agency using this approach is never in control and
cannot guarantee the results it would want.
The priorities of communities may not fit with national or
international priorities that seek to have a broader
impact
18
Bottom-up approaches to project
identification
1. Animation
Process of stimulating people to become more aware
and conscious of problems they suffer from.
to gain confidence in their ability to deal with these problems
and take initiatives to improve situation.
Animation makes the community better understand and
be prepared to overcome its problems and take
decisions with full responsibility.
Carried out by Animators / Helpers / Change agents.
(Internal Animators if they come from within the
community or External Animators if from outside.)
19
2. Facilitation/Community action
20
3. Participatory Appraisal
Project identification should be participatory, and
should involve local communities in identifying and
prioritizing their needs.
The views of the communities should be considered
during the screening and selection of various project
proposals and the selection of the preferred
proposals for implementation.
21
PRA (participatory rural appraisal) when carried out in
rural areas; and PLU (participatory urban appraisal) when
carried out in urban areas
PRA/ PUA can be described as a family of approaches,
methods and behaviours that enable people to express
and analyze the realities of their lives and conditions, to
plan for themselves what action to take, and to monitor
and evaluate the results.
The key to PRA/PUA is that the only external involvement
is in facilitation. The communities themselves determine
the issues, priorities and courses of action.
22
The problem statement
The process of project identification ends with the
formulation of a problem statement.
It takes the form of:
Listing all the problems/needs in the community/area/
organization.
Prioritizing the problems and selecting 1 3 core (major)
problems.
Finding out the root causes of the problems.
Sitting the likely effects of the problems on the community.
Suggesting the probable solutions to the problems.
Identifying the (projects) from the solutions.
23
Screening Process of identified
projects (PC I)
Is the technology appropriate to the projects objectives or
local capabilities?
Is the risk involved manageable?
Is the demand for the expected outputs adequate, and does
the project actually have a comparative advantage?
Will the supply of raw materials or skills be adequate?
Is the design in agreement with the institutional and
managerial capabilities available?
Will the recurrent costs be adequately met given the available
financial resources?
Is there adequate commitment by the intended beneficiaries
and support from District and central government authorities?
24
The screening process of projects, inter alia,
responds to the following concerns (cont.):
25
Pre- feasibility study
Learning objective:
1. Identify pre feasibility study
a. preparing environment study.
b. preparing legal study
pre-feasibility study