Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Special Prosecutor Romeo B. Senson, Complainant, vs. Judge Heriberto M. Pangilinan, MTCC, Puerto PRINCESA CITY, Respondent
Special Prosecutor Romeo B. Senson, Complainant, vs. Judge Heriberto M. Pangilinan, MTCC, Puerto PRINCESA CITY, Respondent
September 8, 2003]
items ordered released by respondent Judge have not yet been offered in
evidence; hence, the prosecution, not the court, could still be deemed to be in
the legal custody and to have the responsibility over such items. The [6]
x x x The outcome of the criminal action will dictate the disposition of the seized
property. If found to be contraband, i.e., articles the possession of which, without
more, constitutes a crime and the repossession of which would subject defendant to
criminal penalties and frustrate the express policy against the possession of such
objects, they will not be returned, but shall be confiscated in favor of the State or
destroyed, as the case may be. If not contraband, the property shall be returned
without undue delay to the person who appears from the evidence to be the owner or
rightful possessor.