Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tax - PJI v. CIR
Tax - PJI v. CIR
Issue(s): Whether or not the requirements and procedures laid down in the RMO are only
formal in nature and did not invalidate the waiver that was signed even if the
requirements were not strictly observed.
Decision: The NIRC, under Sections 203 and 222, provides for a statute of limitations on
the assessment and collection of internal revenue taxes in order to safeguard the interest
of the taxpayer against unreasonable investigation. Unreasonable investigation
contemplates cases where the period for assessment extends indefinitely because this
deprives the taxpayer of the assurance that it will no longer be subjected to further
investigation for taxes after the expiration of a reasonable period of time. A waiver of the
statute of limitations under the NIRC, to a certain extent, is a derogation of the taxpayers
right to security against prolonged and unscrupulous investigations and must therefore be
carefully and strictly construed.23 The waiver of the statute of limitations is not a waiver of
the right to invoke the defense of prescription as erroneously held by the Court of
Appeals. It is an agreement between the taxpayer and the BIR that the period to issue an
assessment and collect the taxes due is extended to a date certain. The waiver does not
mean that the taxpayer relinquishes the right to invoke prescription unequivocally
particularly where the language of the document is equivocal. For the purpose of
safeguarding taxpayers from any unreasonable examination, investigation or assessment,
our tax law provides a statute of limitations in the collection of taxes. Thus, the law on
prescription, being a remedial measure, should be liberally construed in order to afford
such protection. As a corollary, the exceptions to the law on prescription should perforce
be strictly construed.