Organic Chemistry Word
Organic Chemistry Word
Halaman
56.2.1 E1 vs E2
Reaction rates
E1 and E2 are two different pathways to creating alkenes from haloalkanes. As with
S N1
and SN2 reactions, one of the key differences is in the reaction rate, as it provides
great
insight into the mechanisms.
E1 reactions, like SN1 reactions are 2-step reactions. Also like SN1 reactions, the
ratelimiting
step is the dissociation of the halide from its alkane, making it a first-order reaction,
depending on the concentration of the haloalkane, with a reaction rate of:
Rate = k[RX]
On the other hand, E2 reactions, like SN2 reactions are 1-step reactions. And again,
as
with SN2 reactions, the rate limiting step is the ability of a nucleophile to attach to
the
alkane and displace the halide. Thus it is a second-order reaction that depends on
the
concentrations of both the nucleophile and haloalkane, with a reaction rate of:
Rate = k[Nu :][RX] (where Nu: is the attacking nucleophile)
Zaitsevs Rule
Zaitsevs rule11 (sometimes spelled Saytzeff) states that in an elimination
reaction, when
multiple products are possible, the most stable alkene is the major product. That is
to say,
the most highly substituted alkene (the alkene with the most non-hydrogen
substituents) is
the major product.
Both E1 and E2 reactions produce a mixture of products, when possible, but
generally
follow Zaitsevs rule. Well see below why E1 reactions follow Zaitsevs rule more
reliably
and tend to produce a purer product.
Figure 160 Dehydrohalogenation reaction of (S)-2-bromo-3-methylbutane
The above image represents two possible pathways for the dehydrohalogenation of
(S)-
2-bromo-3-methylbutane. The two potential products are 2-methylbut-2-ene and 3-
methylbut-1-ene. The images on the right are simplified drawings of the molecular
product
shown in the images in the center.
As you can see on the left, the bromine is on the second carbon and in an E1 or E2
reaction,
the hydrogen could be removed from either the 1st or the 3rd carbon. Zaitsevs rule
says
that the hydrogen will be removed predominantly from the 3rd carbon. In reality,
there will
be a mixture, but most of the product will be 2-methylbut-2-ene by the E1
mechanism. By
the E2 reaction, as well see later, this might not necessarily be the case.
56.2.2 E2
Reactivity Due to Structure of E2RCH 2X > R2CHX >> R3CX
The E2 mechanism is concerted and higly stereospecific, because it can occur only
when
the H and the leaving group X are in an anti-coplanar position. That is, in a Newman
projection, the H and X must be 180, or in the anti-configuration. This behaviour
stems
from the best overlap of the 2p orbitals of the adjacent carbons when the pi bond
has to
be formed. If the H and the leaving group cannot be brought into this position due
to the
structure of the molecule, the E2 mechanism will not take place.
Figure 161 Mechanism of E2 elimination. Note the anti-coplanarity of the
X-C-C-H atoms
Therefore, only molecules having accessible H-X anti-coplanar conformations can
react via
this route. Furthermore, the E2 mechanism will operate contrary to Zaitsevs rule if
the
only anti-coplanar hydrogen from the leaving group results in the least stable
alkene. A
good example of how this can happen is by looking at how cyclohexane and
cyclohexene
derivatives might operate in E2 conditions.
Figure 162 E2 with preferential elimination
Lets look at the example above. The reactant were using is 1-chloro-2-
isopropylcyclohexane. The drawing at the top left is one conformation and the
drawing
below is after a ring flip. In the center are Newman projections of both
conformations and
the drawings on the right, the products.
If we assume were treating the 1-chloro-2-isopropylcyclohexane with a strong base,
for
example CH3CH2O- (ethanolate), the mechanism that dominates is E2 . There are 3
hydrogens off of the carbons adjacent to our chlorinated carbon. The red and the
green
ones are two of them. The third would be hard to show but is attached to the same
carbon
as the red hydrogen, angled a little down from the plane and towards the viewer.
The red
hydrogen is the only hydrogen thats 180 from the chlorine atom, so its the only
one eligible
for the E2 mechanism. Because of this, the product is going to be only 3-
isopropylcylcohex-
1-ene. Notice how this is contrary to Zaitsevs rule which says the most substituted
alkene
is preferred. By his rule, 1-isopropylcyclohexene should be our primary product, as
that
would leave the most substituted alkene. However it simply cant be produced
because of
the steric hindrance.
The images below shows the molecule after a ring flip. In this conformation, no
product is
possible. As you can see from the Newman projection, there are no hydrogens 180
from
the chlorine atom.
So its important, when considering the E2 mechanism, to understand the geometry
of the
molecule. Sometimes the geometry can be used to your advantage to preferentially
get a
single product. Other times it will prevent you from getting the product you want,
and
youll need to consider a different mechanism to get your product.
Note: Often the word periplanar is used instead of coplanar . Coplanar implies
precisely
180 degree separation and peri-, from Greek for near, implies near 180
degrees. Periplanar
may actually be more accurate. In the case of the 1-chloro-3-isopropylcyclohexane
example, because of molecular forces, the chlorine atom is actually slightly less
than 180
degrees from both the hydrogen and the isopropyl group, so in this case,
periplanar might
be a more correct term.
56.2.3 E1
Figure 163 E1 elimination of an alkyl halide by a base
The E1 mechanism begins with the dissociation of the leaving group from an alkyl,
producing
a carbocation on the alkyl group and a leaving anion. This is the same way the
SN1 reaction begins, so the same thing that helps initiate that step in SN1 reactions,
help
initiate the step in E1 reactions. More specifically, secondary and tertiary
carbocations
are preferred because theyre more stable than primary carbocations. The choice of
solvent
is the same as SN1 as well; a polar protic solvent is preferred because the polar
aspect
stabilizes the carbocation and the protic aspect stabilizes the anion.
What makes the difference between whether the reaction takes the SN1 or E1
pathway then,
must depend on the second step; the action of the nucleophile. In SN1 reactions, a
strong
nucleophile thats a weak base is preferred. The nucleophile will then attack and
bond to the
carbocation. In E1 reactions, a strong nucleophile is still preferred. The difference is
that a
strong nucleophile thats also a strong base, causes the nucleophile to attack the
hydrogen at
the -carbon instead of the -carbocation. The nucleophile/base then extracts the
hydrogen
causing the bonding electrons to fall in and produce a pi bond with the carbocation.
Because the hydrogen and the leaving group are lost in two separate steps and the
fact that
it has no requirements as to geometry, the E1 mechanism more reliably produces
products
that follow Zaitsevs rule.