Economic Systems - Introduction
Economic Systems - Introduction
Economic Systems - Introduction
There are vast differences between the economies of isolated, small, self-
sufficient societies and large-scale ones that are integrated into the modern
system of global commerce. These differences are not only in terms of the scale
of the economies. Their systems of production, distribution, and exchange as
well as concepts of property ownership are often radically different.
Systems of production refer to how food and other necessities are produced.
In other words, they are the subsistence patterns discussed in the last tutorial of
this series--i.e., foraging, pastoralism, horticulture, and intensive agriculture.
Systems of distribution and exchange refer to the practices that are involved
in getting the goods and services produced by a society to its people.
Regardless of the type of subsistence base, all societies need to have
mechanisms of distribution and exchange. These mechanisms, along with
ownership concepts, are the focus of this tutorial.
All of the large-scale societies of the world today have market economies.
These are very impersonal but highly efficient systems of production, distribution,
and exchange that are principally characterized by:
This kind of complex market exchange system does not usually exist in small,
isolated economies, such as those of indigenous foragers, small-scale
horticulturalists, and nomadic pastoralists. These societies rarely use money and
most people produce their own necessities. Their very different non-market
economies are described in the next section of this tutorial.
What is Money?
Before exploring the nature of non-market economies, it
is of value to compare the two broad types of money that
people have used around the world. Anthropologists
refer to them as general purpose and special purpose
money.
When general purpose money is introduced into an economy that previously only
had special purpose money, the effect most often is dramatic for the social
order. Among East African cattle herding cultures, it is now possible for a young
man to get a job outside of his local community and to earn general purpose
money. In these pastoralist societies in the past, young men had little hope of
obtaining wealth before they were in their early middle age. They usually had to
delay marriage for years because of the inability to accumulate a sufficient
number of cattle to pay a bride price. Typically, a man in his late 20's or early
30's had to obtain a loan of cattle from elder men in his family for this purpose.
The continuing obligation to pay off such loans reinforced the traditional authority
of older men and the dependence of younger men. Now it is possible for a young
man to accumulate enough general purpose money to purchase cattle and bring
them back to his tribal homeland. He can then use them to pay a bride price. As
a result, he will not be in financial debt to his elder kinsmen. The result is greater
economic independence for young men. This is likely to be seen as good from
the perspective of democratic, achievement oriented cultures, such as those of
North America and Europe. However, from the perspective of the pastoralist
societies in which these changes are occurring, it can be seen as being bad
because it undermines the traditional authority of elders. This authority has been
a key part of their cultural value system. A major concern of these societies often
is that erosion of the value system will result in social chaos and the destruction
of their traditional culture.
It is clear that the introduction of general purpose money has had a powerful
effect on previously isolated small-scale societies. It facilitates trade and gives
individuals the ability to accumulate wealth. Paradoxically, however, as the use
of general purpose money draws a society into the global economic system, it
does not result in economic independence for the society as a whole. In fact, it
usually results in less self-sufficiency.