Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Home : WRH Store : Reader Letters : Advertise : Donate

The mysterious deaths of top microbiologists


It all began with Don Wiley.
On November 15th, Harvard Professor Don Wiley left a gathering of friends and colleagues some
time after 10:30 PM. The next morning, Memphis police found his rental car stopped on a bridge,
with a full tank of gas and keys still in the ignition. There was no financial or family trouble. Indeed
Wiley was supposed to meet his family at the Memphis airport to continue on to an Icelandic
vacation. Neither was there any history of depression or mental illness.
In the report printed in the New York Times on November 27th, the FBI's Memphis office distanced
itself from the case saying that the available facts did not add up to a suspicion of foul play. I guess at
the FBI it's a perfectly everyday occurrence for a Harvard Professor to stop his rental car on a bridge
in the middle of the night before he is supposed to leave for Iceland and just walk away into the
Tennessee dark.
The NYT report of November 27th also downplayed Professor Wiley's expertise in virology, quoting
Gregory Verdine, a professor of chemical biology at Harvard, said, "If bioterrorists were to abduct
Don Wiley, they'd be very disappointed," because his research was in studying the component parts
of viruses, and "that doesn't really help you make a more dangerous version of the virus."
But this statement is not consistent with the facts of Professor Wiley's full range of knowledge. Wiley
has, in conjunction with another Harvard Professor, Dr. Jack Strominger, won several academic
prizes for their work in immunology, including a Lasker prize. Don Wiley is a Harvard professor, but
he is also a researcher at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the National Institute of Health.
The Howard Hughes Medical Institute is located in Chevy Chase, Maryland, and performs biological
research, sometimes jointly funded by the Department of Defense and the NIH. Don Wiley's peers at
Harvard include professors such as John Collier performing research on Anthrax.
So, contrary to the dismissive tone of the New York Times report, Professor Wiley would be of great
value to anyone developing biological weapons. This makes the FBI's obvious disinterest in the case
highly questionable, indeed reminiscent of the FBI's obvious disinterest in the numerous witnesses in
Oklahoma City who had seen Tim McVeigh in the company of additional perpetrators not to mention
the witnesses who had seen additional bombs.
Especially in light of the events of 9/11, the vanishing of a scientist with Professor Wiley's expertise in
virology and immunology should have been expected to be an issue of critical national importance, yet
the official tone of the government was that this is nothing to worry about. Move along citizen, nothing
to see.
In the context of the Anthrax letters being sent through the mail, any disappearance of any
microbiologist under questionable circumstances should have set off alarm bells across the nation. but
it didn't. Professor Wiley was assumed to have committed suicide, end of story.
The professor's colleagues expressed doubts about the official "suicide" explanation for his
disappearance.
Then, more biologists started to die under suspicious circumstances.
The Very Mysterious Deaths of Five Microbiologists.
The body count of infections disease experts continued to climb. Connections to weapons research
began to surface.
As many as 14 world-class microbiologists died between 9/11/1 and 3/2/2, and on 6/24/2 yet
another microbiologist was added to the list.
Still the US Government acted as if nothing was amiss, as silent on the question of dead

converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com
microbiologists as they are on the question of the Israeli spies and their connection to 9-11.
In fact, the official silence on the question of how so many top experts in infectious diseases could die
in such a short time span is deafening.
Now, statistically, it's possible, even likely, that one or two of these microbiologists legitimately were
killed in random accidents. But for so many to die in such a short while exceeds all reasonable bounds
of statistics. Prudence would demand an investigation, not the "ho hum" attitude of the government
which even today continues to issue dire warnings to the general population of how much we are all in
danger from "bioterrorism".
So, let's take a moment and step away from the perpetual fear-mongering of the media (and
Rumsfeld) as they assure us another attack IS coming (with a certainty which suggests inside
information on the subject) and assume for a moment that some party has indeed decided to
"liquidate" weapons research infectious disease experts.
There is really only one reason to kill off a bunch of scientists. To keep them from doing something
they are able to do.
What were these scientists able to do? Maybe blow the whistle if an artificially created disease was
about to be used in a manner those who created it did not approve of.
Regardless of the exact reason, there does seem to be a clear pattern of targeted microbiologists, and
paired with it, an obvious government disinterest in the matter.
I leave it to you to figure out why.

See also:
Dead Scientists And Microbiologists - Master List
Anthrax and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened

What Really Happened


Email This Page To A Friend

converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

You might also like