Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Garrett Dailey Attorney Misconduct - Perjury Allegations in Marriage of Brooks - Attorney Bradford Baugh, Joseph Russiello
Garrett Dailey Attorney Misconduct - Perjury Allegations in Marriage of Brooks - Attorney Bradford Baugh, Joseph Russiello
., ....:...liJ.
v
"-' ,
Facsimile: (415) 391-7198
;;
5 !-",.
-- -
-
10
19 In Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration, filed on December 16, 2015, Petitioner seeks
20 reconsideration of the Court's October 20, 2015 o rder denying Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify
21 Respondent's counsel. The basis of the Motion to Reconsider is that during the October 2, 2015
22 hearing on the Motion to Disqualify Garrett Dailey testified untruthfully when he said he did not
23 have a phone conversation with Petitioner's counsel, Andrew Westover, on November 11, 2013.
24 Telephone records obtained following Mr. Dailey's testimony at the hearing contradict his
25 assertion that he did not speak with Mr. Westover on November 11, 2013. These records have
26 been submitted with the Motion for Reconsideration. At the time of filing the Motion for
27 d
Reconsideration, the Court Reporter had not yet completed the transcript of the October 2"
28 hearing. Petitioner's brief (at page 2, fn. 2) informed the Court that Petitioner would submit the
592751.1
-1-
SUPPLEMENT TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO RECONSlDER PETITIONER'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT
CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL BRANCH NEWS SERVICE CJBNS.ORG
transcript after receiving it from the Court Reporter. Accordingly, as the transcript is now final, it
3 Below are highlights from the transcript in which Mr. Dailey asserts with certainty that he
6 32:27-33:6, 8 Even though Mr. Dailey's assistant [Brenda Porto] had requested in her October
18, 2013 email that Mr. Dailey call Andrew Westover or Hector Moreno (of the
7 same law office) to discuss the Brooks matter, Mr. Dailey testified: "Yeah, I
didn't return that call ... Right, but I never returned that call."
8
33:11-12 Mr. Dailey based his insistence that he did not speak with Mr. Westover on
9 November 11, 2013 on the absence of any notation in his Conflicts Register.
"[bJecause ifl returned the call and talked to them it would have been in my
10 Conflicts Register period. Period."
11 72:3-7 Mr. Dailey was only reachable by cell phone on November 11, 2013.
12 73:6-12 As to the call that Petitioner alleges occurred on November 11, 2013: He said "I
have absolutely no recollection, no notes, nothing. And I -- physically I don't
13 know how it could of.. .. On that basis l deny it."
14 81:28-82:11 Mr. Dailey states he never had a conversation about the Brooks case with Mr.
Westover or Mr. Moreno before January I, 2015.
15
106:1-2; To paraphrase Mr. Baugh, unless Mr. Westover had Mr. Dailey's cell phone
16 114:16-20 number, "there is no way that conversation could have taken p lace Mr. Baugh
."
further contends that "it is impossible for Mr. Westover to have spoken with
17 [Mr. Dailey] on [November 11, 2013) ."
18
22
By
23 oseph P. Russoniello
Anomeys for Petitioner
24
25
26
27
28
592751 I
-2-
SUPPLEMENT TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER PETITIONER'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT