Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bombose - World English
Bombose - World English
AYO BAMGBOSE*
ABSTRACT: This paper examines the theoretical concept of world Englishes in light of globalization. The
paper briefly outlines phenomena in the organic spread of English around the globe and raises the issue of
opportunism in English Language teaching. Ethical implications and implications for research on world
Englishes are discussed.
INTRODUCTION
In political and academic discourse, globalization as a concept and a reality has come to be
universally accepted. Even in the most unlikely quarters, where resistance to globalization
could have been expected, such is its irresistible force that its reality is easily conceded. For
example, President Fidel Castro of Cuba felt comfortable in proclaiming at a conference of
Caribbean Heads of State and Government held in the Dominican Republic in 1998 that
``Globalization is an inevitable process. It would be pointless to oppose a law of history''
(Grandma International, 1988). Another matter on which there is consensus is the global
dominance of English. Evidence of such consensus is shown in studies and surveys. In a
survey of the use of English in 20 countries, Fishman (1996: 628) concludes that ``the world
of large scale commerce, industry, technology, and banking, like the world of certain
human sciences and professions, is an international world and it is linguistically dominated
by English almost everywhere, regardless of how well established and well-protected local
cultures, languages, and identities may otherwise be.'' Similarly, the results of a globally
administered questionnaire by the British Council (1995) also confirm the global dom-
inance of English. Three of the questions in this survey on the status and use of English and
the responses to them are given in Table 1.
The results from the 1,398 respondents (see Table 1) show that as many as 79.2% either
disagree or strongly disagree that another language will challenge the role of English as the
world's main language (question 1.1), while 15% either agree or strongly agree. In contrast,
in answer to the claim that English will remain the dominant language of world
communication (question 1.4), only 2.4% either disagree or strongly disagree, while
96.3% either agree or strongly agree. The response to the claim that English will retain
its dominant role in the media (question 1.6) is also similar: Only 3.1% either disagree or
strongly disagree, while 94.4% either agree or strongly agree. In short, there is over-
whelming acceptance of the global dominance of English.
Acceptance of the dominance of English should not, however, blind one to the need for
other languages. Many Anglo-American native speakers tend to be complacent and believe
that English is sufficient for most purposes. We live in a multilingual world and there are
ready pointers to the obvious need for other languages in everyday communication. For
example, the CNN in Atlanta is no longer content with news broadcasts in English but has
A Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2001, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.
d:/1weng/20-3/bamgbose.3d 1/11/1 15:11 disk/sh
1.1 Before the middle of the twenty-first century another language will strongly challenge English for
its role as the world's main language.
1.4 English will remain the world's language for international communication for the next twenty-
five years
1.6 English will retain its role as the dominant language in world media and communications
The main purpose of marketing is to get people's attention and convince them to spend a minute
or two looking into a given product or service . . . Getting someone's attention, if they live in a
non-Anglophone country, must take place in their own language. No two ways around this. Once
their attention and interest are aroused, the next 30 seconds, when a product or service are
described [sic!], can indeed take place either in their own language or in English. If they do not
respond to English, too bad, they click elsewhere . . . An example will make this clear. Certainly
most everyone online in Holland and in Sweden can also read English. But top Internet marketers
from both countries state categorically that people in their country do not, in fact, surf the Web in
English. They access the Web in Dutch and Swedish. No big surprise. After all, the Web is a media
like any other, and people always access media in their own language, not in English . . . even in
Holland and in Sweden (probably the most English literate countries in Europe). No one would
ever think of producing content or advertising in print media in English in these countries, nor in
any non-Anglophone country. Nor would it be thinkable to advertise in English on TV or radio in
non-Anglophone countries. Nor would one ever waste one's money in sending out a direct mailing
in English in these countries. So why should the idea ever be entertained to use English in another
marketing medium the Web to reach people in non-Anglophone countries? The decisive point
here is that: Marketing always takes place in the language of a country, not in English.
There are even some people, no doubt on the fringe, who advocate the replacement of
English as a global language by Esperanto. Advocates of this artificial language claim that
it is ``neutral'' and ``easy to learn'' (Phillipson, 1999: 312) and that the day will come
``when Esperanto will be universally recognized as the international auxiliary language for
the whole world'' (Zaft, 1996, ch. 23: 1). Although this is an unlikely scenario, at least in
the foreseeable future, it does point to the need to recognize that English alone is not
enough in the global setting.
about or Please use one questionnaire for each language that you are going to inform about.
Since a lot of writing is now done with computers, it will be interesting to see how these
conventions affect the style of writing.
In a multilingual context, opportunities for research also extend to the role of world
Englishes in relation to other languages and the implications of this for language policy.
World Englishes researchers have to be sensitive to the role of other languages in relation
to English, since the fortunes of English depend to some extent on the reciprocal
development of other languages with which they coexist and interact.
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
The world Englishes researcher may feel that his or her job has been done if the sort of
research discussed above has been done and reported. Far too often, we publish for the
attention of our colleagues and to advance knowledge but do not care much about the fate
of English in schools. In many countries of the Outer Circle, a constant complaint is that
the standard of English is falling and our research does not have any bearing on such a
question. I have recently gathered some statistics dealing with the performance of students
in the terminal high-school examination in Nigeria (see Table 2). The figures not only show
a massive failure in English, they also show declining performance in the five years (1995
1999) covered. Since at least a Credit in English is required for admission to universities,
colleges and polytechnics, only an average of about 9.7 percent of all students per year may
be said to have done well enough in English to merit admission. The rest either have an
ordinary pass or an outright fail. Failure rate is an average of about 64.3 percent every year
and, allowing for incomplete or unavailable results in 1998 and 1999, the failure rate gets
worse from year to year.
Faced with this dismal picture, how can a world Englishes researcher in Nigeria feel
comfortable with academic or theoretical study of his or her subject and not be seriously
concerned with the fate of thousands of students who fall by the wayside simply because of
English, which is a compulsory subject? In this context, Kachru (1990: 17) observes: ``I do
not see applied linguistics divorced from the social concerns of our times, nor from the
concerns of relevance to the societies in which we live. This view, of course, entails
responsibility.'' If we substitute ``world Englishes research'' for ``applied linguistics,'' this
statement fits the Nigerian situation perfectly. Something has to be done to combat
declining standards of English, and it is part of the social responsibility of scholars of
world Englishes in Nigeria (and elsewhere wherever this problem occurs) to contribute to
the quest for a solution. Such a solution will include not only provision of improved
materials and better classroom instruction but policies regarding quality of teachers and
timing of media transition between a child's first language and English.
Japan and Singapore, I would like to see the conferences move to the Indian subcontinent
(which has a substantial number of English-using populations) and Africa.
Another way IAWE can meet the challenge of globalization is to use World Englishes
consciously to promote concerns of a regional nature. It is possible, for example, to devote
entire numbers to world Englishes concerns and research in certain regions in addition to
specialized themes that cut across several regions. For example, there could be thematic
issues related to standardization, codification, language teaching, language policy, multi-
lingualism, and the role of English in relation to other languages. In this connection, the
question of social responsibility should feature so that some of the activities of scholars can
be focused on issues that affect the community. One such issue, which I have highlighted
above, is the question of falling standards as reflected in performance of school graduates.
In addition to thematic journal issues, the annual conferences could promote special areas
of interest and concern through the choice of conference themes. Happily, since such
themes are selected by Local Organizing Committees, there is ample scope for a variety of
concerns to be addressed in successive years.
Finally, as a way of recognizing the global spread of our discipline and the contributions
made to it by scholars all over the world, I would like IAWE to institute Honorary
Fellowships to be given to outstanding scholars of world Englishes. Such honorees can be
invited to make special presentations at future IAWE conferences. As I look into the
future, I see a vibrant and expanding IAWE whose tentacles will spread across all English-
using Circles and in which scholars and researchers in world Englishes will continue to see
one another as members of a global family.
REFERENCES
Bamgbose, Ayo (1997) IAWE and World Englishes: Which way forward? In World Englishes 2000. Edited by
Larry E. Smith
and Michael L. Forman. Honolulu: College of Languages, Linguistics, and Literature,
University of Hawaii and the East-West Center, pp. 2048.
British Council (1995) English in the World. The English 2000 global consultation report. Manchester: The British
Council.
Brutt-Griffler, Janina (1998) Conceptual questions in English as a world language: Taking up an issue. World
Englishes, 17(3), 38192.
Dunlap, Bill (1998) Aren't Websites in English Sufficient for People Overseas? URL: http://www.euromktg.com/
eng/ed/art/rep-eur8.html
Fishman, Joshua (1996) Summary and interpretation: Post-Imperial English 19401990. In Post Imperial English.
Edited by Joshua Fishman, Andrew W. Conrad, and Alma Rubal-Lopez. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 623
41.
Grandma International (1988) English is inevitable and must be the globalization of fraternity. (Translation of
Speech given by Fidel Castro at the CARIFORUM Summit of Heads of State and Government in the
Dominican Republic, August 21.) Electronic Edition: http://www.granma.cu/documentos/1998/ingles/018-
i.html
Kachru, Braj B. (1990) World Englishes and applied linguistics. World Englishes, 9(1), 320.
Mazrui, Alamin M. and Mazrui, Ali A. (1996) In Post Imperial English. Edited by Joshua Fishman, Andrew W.
Conrad and Alma Rubal-Lopez. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 271302.
Phillipson, Robert (1992) Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Phillipson, Robert (1999) International languages and international human rights. In Language: A Right and a
Resource. Edited by Miklos Kontra, Robert Phillipson, Tove Skutnabb-Kangas, and Tibor Varady. Budapest:
Central European University Press, pp. 2546.
Tsuda, Yukio (1994) The diffusion of English: its impact on culture and communication. Keio Communication
Review, 16, 4961.
Tsuda, Yukio (2000) Hegemony of English vs. ecology of language: Building equality in international com-
munication. In World Englishes 2000. Edited by Larry E. Smith and Michael L. Forman. Honolulu: College of
Languages, Linguistics and Literature, University of Hawaii and the East-West Center, pp. 2131.
West African Examinations Council (1997) Senior Certificate Examination: Nigeria. Statistics of Entries and
Results, 19951997.
West African Examinations Council (1999) Senior Certificate Examination: Nigeria. Statistics of Entries and
Results 19971999.
Widdowson, Henry (1997) EIL, ESL, and EFL: Global issues and local interests. In Across the West African
Divide. Edited by Melvia Hasman, Aymerou Mbaye and Andy Thomas. Dakar: British Council and USIS,
pp. 2234. (Also reproduced in World Englishes, 16(1), 13546.)
Zaft, Sylvan (1996) Esperanto. A Language for the Global Village. http://members.aol.com/sylvanz/gvcont.htm