Suntay Vs Suntay
Suntay Vs Suntay
95 Phil. 500
RESOLUTION
PADILLA, J.:
because according to him the "will was lost before not after
(the) filing of the petition." This slight error, if it is an error
at all, does not, and cannot, alter the conclusions and
pronouncements made in the judgment rendered in the case.
In his alternative petition the appellant alleges:
4. That on October 15, 1934, Maria Natividad
and
They shall govern all cases brought after they take effect,
and also all further proceedings in cases then pending,
except to the extent that in the opinion of the court their
application would not be feasible or would work injustice, in
which event the former procedure shall apply. (Italics
supplied.)
DISSENTING
PARAS, C.J.: