Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mock Final Exams Civpro
Mock Final Exams Civpro
HOKAGE FACTION
MOCK FINAL EXAMS
CIVIL PROCEDURE
OPEN NOTES ALLOWED. PLEASE DO NOT REFER TO SILIMAN Q&A FOR ANSWERS.
I. True or False. The filing of a motion for the reconsideration of the trial courts
entertained.
II. On July 15, 2009, Atty. Manananggol was served copies of numerous unfavorable
judgments and orders. On July 29, 2009, he filed motions for reconsideration which
were denied. He received the notices of denial of the motions for reconsideration on
uniformly instructed him to appeal. How, when and where should he pursue the
i. Appeal should be filed with the RTC via Ordinary Appeal under
(b) Judgment of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) denying his clients petition for
a writ of habeas data?
(c) Order of a family court denying his clients petition for habeas corpus in
i. Ordinary Appeal under Rule 41 filed with the RTC via notice of
(d) Order of the RTC denying his clients petition for certiorari questioning the
proceedings?
i. Petition for Review under Rule 42 filed with the Court of Appeals
(e) Judgment of the First Division of the Court of Tax Appeals affirming the
RTC.
III. Distinguish the two modes of appeal from the judgment of the Regional Trial Court
i. The two modes of appeal from the judgment of the RTC to the
Court of Appeals are those that are made by the RTC on its
Original Jurisdiction and that of made within the RTCs
Appellate jurisdiction.
Rule 42.
IV. After receiving the adverse decision rendered against his client, the defendant, Atty.
Sikat duly filed a notice of appeal. For his part, the plaintiff timely filed a motion
for partial new trial to seek an increase in the monetary damages awarded. The RTC
necessary for Atty. Sikat to file a second notice of appeal after receiving the
amended decision?
V. Compare the certiorari jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under the Constitution
VI. After the prosecution had rested and made its formal offer of evidence, with the
court admitting all of the prosecution evidence, the accused filed a demurer to
evidence with leave of court. the prosecution was allowed to comment thereon.
Thereafter, the court granted the demurer, finding that the accused could not have
committed the offense charged. If the prosecution files a motion for reconsideration
on the ground that the court order granting the demurer was not in accord with law
i. No the Motion will not prosper. Under the Rules of Court the
VII. Distinguish the effects of the filing of a demurrer to the evidence in a criminal case
VIII. On August 13, 2008, A, as shipper and consignee, loaded on the M/V Atlantis in
Legaspi City 100,000 pieces of century eggs. The shipment arrived in Manila totally
damaged on August 14, 2008. A filed before the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC)
of Manila a complaint against B Super Lines, Inc. (B Lines), owner of the M/V
On July 21, 2009, B Lines served on A a "Notice to Take Deposition," setting the
deposition on July 29, 2009 at 8:30 a.m. at the office of its counsel in Makati. A
failed to appear at the deposition-taking, despite notice. As counsel for B Lines, how
would you proceed?
Court.
IX. Continental Chemical Corporation (CCC) filed a complaint for a sum of money
against Barstow Trading Corporation (BTC) for the latters failure to pay for its
pay because CCC misrepresented that the products it sold belonged to a new line,
when in fact they were identical with CCCs existing products. To substantiate its
defense, BTC filed a motion to compel CCC to give a detailed list of the products
ingredients and chemical components, relying on the right to avail of the modes of
discovery allowed under Rule 27. CCC objected, invoking confidentiality of the
X. Amorsolo, a Filipino citizen permanently residing in New York City, filed with the
RTC of Lipa City a complaint for Rescission of Contract of Sale of Land against
Brigido, a resident of Barangay San Miguel, Sto. Tomas, Batangas. The subject
property, located in Barangay Talisay, Lipa City, has an assessed value of 19,700.
forum shopping executed in New York City, duly notarized by Mr. Joseph Brown,
Esq., a notary public in the State of New York. Brigod filed a motion to dismiss the
The verification and certification of non- forum shopping are fatally defective
in New York, authenticating that Mr. Brown is duly authorized to notarize the
The ground for motion to dismiss has no merit. The law does not
at bar Mr. Brown duly notarized the document and therefore the
with.
XI. A files a case against B. While awaiting decision on the case, A goes to the United
States to work. Upon her return to the Philippines, seven years later, A discovers
that a decision was rendered by the court in her favor a few months after she had
left. Can A file a motion for execution of the judgment? Reason briefly.
i. A can no longer file a motion for execution of the judgment. Under the
within 5 years. On the case at bar seven years have already lapsed and
the remedy for A is no longer a motion for execution but an action to
revive judgment.
XII. Cresencio sued Dioscoro for colletion of a sum of money. During the trial, but after
counsel, then filed a motion to dismiss the action on the ground of his clients death.
The court denied the motion to dismiss and, instead, directed counsel to furnish the
court with the names and addresses of Dioscoros heirs and ordered that the
After trial, the court rendered judgment in favor of Cresencio. When the decision
had become final and executory, Cresencio moved for the issuance of a writ of
execution against Dioscoros estate to enforce his judgment claim. The court issued
the writ of execution. Was the courts issuance of the writ of execution proper?
Explain.
XIII. Mike was renting an apartment unit in the building owned by Jonathan. When Mike
failed to pay six months rent, Jonathan filed an ejectment suit. The Municipal Trial
Court (MTC) rendered judgement in favor of Jonathan, who then filed a motion for
(a) How can mike stay the execution of the MTC judgment?
(b) Mike appealed to the Regional Trial Court, which affirmed the MTC
decision. Mike then filed a petition for review with the Court of Appeals. The
CA dismissed the petition on the ground that the sheriff had already executed
the MTC decision and had ejected Mike from the premises, thus rendering
i.
XIV. After trial, the court rendered judgment ordering Roscoe to reconvey the entire
southern half to Salvio. The judgment became final and executory. A writ of
execution having been issued, the sheriff required Roscoe, Carlo and Nina to vacate
the southern half and yield possession thereof to Salvio as the prevailing party. Carlo
and Nina refused, contending that they are not bound by the judgment as they are
On the case at bar Carlo being a co owner before the case was
filed is not a party to the case nor was he joined as party to the
case.
XV. (a) What are the rules on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in
our courts?
i. In case of judgment upon a specific thing it is conclusive upon title
in law or fact.
(b) Can a foreign arbitral award be enforced in the Philippines under those rules?
Explain briefly.
under those rules. As provided for by law foreign arbitral awards may
(c) How about a global injunction issued by a foreign court to prevent dissipation
Explain briefly.
i.
Modesto sued Ernesto for a sum of money, claiming that the latter owed him P1M,
evidenced by a promissory note, quoted and attached to the complaint. In his answer with
counterclaim, Ernesto alleged that Modesto coerced him into signing the promissory
note, but that it is Modesto who really owes him P1.5M. Modesto filed an answer to
Ernestos counterclaim admitting that he owed Ernesto, but only in the amount of P0.5M.
at the pre-trial, Modesto marked and identified Ernestos promissory note. He also
marked and identified receipts covering payments he made to Ernesto, to the extent of
P0.5M, which Ernesto did not dispute.
After pre-trial, Modesto filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, while Ernesto filed
a motion for summary judgment on his counterclaim. Resolve the two motions with
reasons.
trial.
XVI. A defendant who has been declared in default can avail of a petition for relief from
XVII. Having obtained favorable judgment in his suit for a sum of money against Patricio,
Orencio sought the issuance of a writ of execution. When the writ was issued, the
sheriff levied upon a parcel of land that Patricio owns, and a date was set for the
execution sale.
(a) How may Patricio prevent the sale of the property on execution?
assail the validity of the levy if there are legal grounds; or he may
simply pay the amount required by the writ including the other
costs incurred.
(b) If Orencio is the purchaser of the property at the execution sale, how much
i. Orencio should pay the amount that exceeds the value of the
property.
(c) If the property is sold to a third party at the execution sale, what can Patricio
XVIII. Upon termination of the pre-trial, the judge dictated the pre-trial order in the
presence of the parties and their counsel, reciting what had transpired and defining
(a) If, immediately upon receipt of his copy of the pre-trial order, plaintiffs
counsel should move for its amendment to include a fourth (4th) triable issue
which he allegedly inadvertently failed to mention when the judge dictated
amend may be granted before the hearing of the case. Under the
bar the matter is best addressed to the sound discretion of the trial
court.
(b) Suppose trial had already commenced and after the plaintiffs second witness
had testified, the defendants counsel moves for the amendment of the pre-
trial order to include a fifth (5th) triable issue vital to his clients defense.
Reasons.
the case at bar permitting the amendment of the pre trial order
presented its witnesses and would hold the precise purpose of the
i.
XXI. Within the period for filing a responsive pleading, the defendant filed a motion for
bill of particulars that he set for hearing on a certain date. However, the defendant
was surprised to find on the date set for hearing that the trial court had already denied
the motion on the day of its filing, stating that the allegations of the complaint were
sufficiently made.
(a) Did the judge gravely abuse his discretion in acting on the motion without
(b) If the judge grants the motion and orders the plaintiff to file and serve the bill
of particulars, can the trial judge dismiss the case if the plaintiff does not
XXII. Charisse opposed the motion citing the "omnibus motion rule." Rule on the motion.
(3%)
(b) Suppose Charisse did not raise the "omnibus motion rule," can the judge proceed
(c) Suppose the judge correctly denied the second motion to dismiss and rendered
judgment in favor of Charisse, ordering the bank to pay her P100,000 in damages
plus legal interest. The judgment became final and executory in 2008. To date,
Charisse has not moved to execute the judgment. The bank is concerned that its
liability will increase with the delay because of the interest on the judgment award.
XXIV. Give at least three instances where the Court of Appeals may act as a trial court?