Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S.M Audit Advertisement and Entrp.
S.M Audit Advertisement and Entrp.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 COMPANY HISTORY
1.2 NOKIA’S CHANGE IN FOCUS BETWEEN 1988 AND 2000
1.3 PEST ANALYSIS
2 RESEARCH ANALYSIS
2.1 SWOT ANALYSIS
2.2 ENVIRONMENT POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT IN THE
FUTURE
3 CONCLUSION
4 RECOMMENDATION
5 REFERENCES
5.1 BOOK
5.2 PERIODICAL
5.3 WEBSITE
6 APPENDICES
Executive Summary
This report analyses the impact of external an internal influences on the business
strategies of Nokia Corporation, evaluats the factors, modifers of Nokia’s advancement,
and also considers the environment policies, and technology development in the future.
The purpose of this report is to evaluate how successfully does Nokia advance its
products. Due to the modern trends of social development, whether Nokia’s environment
policy is accurately operated or not will be related to improve its reputation. In addition,
the grow of mobile terminals leads Nokia to modify its changes, therefore, Nokia has to
develop new technology to approach to a new market, which combine with PC market
not only to occupy the position in mobile phone market. Moreover, to connect PC and
mobile phone is a tendency in mobile phone market, even though to combine these two
products together. Because of this trend, Nokia creates new products to match with the
market.
The result of the report finds that Nokia does not only want to occupy the position in
mobile phone market, but also to base on its technology development to approach to the
PC market. In addition, Nokia should not only develop new technology, but also has
other responsibilities for human, such as to reduce pollution and waste, which are
produced by the process of production.
Introduction
The mobile Internet has attracted numerous media attention. We know need to consider
why it is important to create new products of mobile in the market, what does consumers
needs, and what kinds of social activities changes affected Nokia to change its main
product line..
1.1 Company History
Nokia was a manufacturer of paper in 1865. After World War II industrial products
were increased substantially. Nokia had change its function to an industrial enterprise and
produce industrial products, such as chemicals and rubbers. Until 1960s Nokia had set
electronic department and focused on develop transmission systems this was the factor
that Nokia became a famous company in the world.
1.2 Nokia’s change in focus between 1988 and 2000
Business (1988) % Of sales Survived Business (2000)
Floorings 1% No Transmission systems
Chemicals 2% No Fixed networks
Machinery 4% No Access networks
Electrical wholesale 4% No Wireless/mobile data
Mobile telephones 5% Yes Tetra networks and terminals
Telecommunications 5% Yes GSM networks
Rubber 6% No Smart traffic products
Information systems 23% No Multimedia
Cables 9% No Internet
Paper 10% No Digital exchanges
Consumer electronics 31% No Mobile phones Base stations
1.3.1 Political
It is important of a company to acquire resources from government such as economic,
science and technology policy. The success of Nokia has obtained the resources from
Finnish policies which assist Nokia to advance its products.
As Zheng (2001) has observed:
The Finnish policies are the most important factors of Nokia. To operate efficiently in
modern, knowledgeable and technology based economy that is highly specialized,
internationalized and undergoing rapid structural change requires active support from the
public sector.
Finnish government best facilitate the efficient functioning of the economy by directing
its resources to the reduction of market failures.The state must also pursue an industrial
and economic policy that provides a stable macroeconomic environment for enterprises.
General macroeconomic stability, low interest rates, stable currency conditions and the
international competitiveness of the tax system form the foundation for the growth of
business an improvement in employment.
As the result of this, not only Finnish Government but also international companies, such
as Nokia, have play very important roles to develop their information society and national
technology strength.
1.3.2 Economic
According to the fact that Russian Federation was collapsed in early 1990s and it
assaulted with Finnish economics (OECD, 1996). Nokia also face with the problem, and
changed its functions from single market and overall products to global market and
focusing mobile phone market.
2 Research analysis
2.1 SWOT Analysis
Strength and weakness analysis can be defined as internal factor in order to show how
well they are performing inside the company at a moment. The business does not have to
correct all its weaknesses; however it should retain its strength as long as they can. In the
same way, they do have to research and develop their company continuously in order to
achieve the goal.
In contrast, the opportunity can be classified because of their attractiveness. The key
success requirement for operating in the target market is basically depended on the
external factor. In case of Nokia it has numerous opportunities to be able to enlarge their
market share. Nokia still have threats to diminish in sales and gross profit. Nokia have to
create more strength and opportunity then it needs to correct its weakness and threat as
well.
2.1.1 Strength
Global marketing (product)
Nokia is the global product so it should be at least passed worldwide qualification by
ISO. This is the reason of why Nokia can be entrusted around the whole world.
2.1.2 Weakness
High price
After compared the price between Nokia and others it can be established that Nokia has
highest price in every type of its products. It can be conclude that Nokia still have a weak
point as higher price than the competitors.
2.1.3 Opportunity
Product launch continuously
It has determined that Nokia uses Total Quality Management (TQM) which mentions
more about training worker program and makes the higher product quality. All
employees are well-trained and motivated consecutively afterward production processes
also developed as well. Nokia established Research and Development department (R&D)
where developers develops product line into modern modification as well quality as the
existing products.
Users Availability
Mobile phone retail stores, the link, Phone4U and Car phone warehouse, which is spread
around London in every street. Every stores have not missed the opportunity to choose
Nokia as their product line. All the customers can be guaranteed that any damaged or loss
of Mobile phone will be service through those retail shops. In opportunity aspect Nokia
has an opportunity to convince the prospects to buy Nokia in those plenty of stores
around the town. However the key to success of Nokia will be services that are relevant
with flexible changing capabilities .
3 Conclusion
Crainer (1995) said, building business through elasticity may cause risks to disperse the
power of a brand, and to influence consumers’ loyalties. Nokia has been successful at
brand stretching from a paper manufacturer to supply mobile phones and network
service.
This report has argued about the kind of technology consumer need. “How to promote
the future of phones?” Nokia has already joint with Hewlett Packard (HP) Corporation
Company. Nokia has a considerable opportunity for enlarging its market size into PC
users who prefers mobile phone compatible with PC device. Nokia has established some
types of mobile phones that are similar with handhold PC, like Nokia 9210, or Nokia
9110. These kinds of mobile phone have diversified functions such as color screen,
connecting with Internet, and interacting with PC software. For instance, Nokia 9210 and
Nokia 9110 consist of Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft Power Point and
other PC software’s.
Nokia does not promote these kinds of product deeply and widely. It seems that Nokia
can not successfully join into the new market. Comparing with other brands. Nokia is
more expensive than its competitors. As the limited technological resources Nokia can
not improve its technology to attach with new PC age. For example a comparison
between Nokia and Sony in terms of its technological development is that Nokia has less
abilities to develop high technological mobile phones which combine with PDA or
computer than Sony. Sony also has combine with Erisson to produce mobile phones and
to improve its technological development.
The environment policy is also one of the most important business strategies for Nokia
but it seems does not be operated well. Nokia develops recycled batteries but while
customers change different type of mobile phones sometimes the batteries cannot be
used. Nokia is successful in sailing new products and building consumers loyalties.
There is a conflict between the environment policies and promotion activities. Nokia has
responsibilities to change its promotion and development plans.
4 Recommendation
Nokia Company can be classified as market leader in mobile phone market and it can be
easily observe their wide range of product which may be too often to change its model
within one series e.g., Nokia 3210 until now Nokia 3350. Despite the rapid change in
one series it still looks quite similar as the old model which has just launched in the short
period before. Because of this problem in this report it recommends Nokia to launch the
product timely and Nokia should have product life- plan in order to inform and ensure the
end-users who need to buy a really new model. Nobody in the real world is willing to buy
the product which is going to change and obsolete in the next few days. These can be
helping Nokia in the aspect of customer’s satisfaction and give the chance to the users to
select.
Nokia has already become a partner of Hewlett Packard i.e. HP where they specialize at
computer tools so it was a good chance for Nokia to compete with the new competitors
who specialize at computer such as Sony, Samsung and other companies. Nokia mobile
company is too strong for Sony and other new comers to compete with it. In this report it
recommends Nokia to take this emerge opportunity to come over those competitors,
because Nokia & HP are strong enough to be the market leader as well as it was doing
now. Nokia has highest price range compares with all brands we can just recommend
Nokia that if price is floated unreasonably to the end-users it is not the good way for
Nokia to achieve a long term goals. Reasonable price is the best way for Nokia to gain
both profitable and customer’s satisfaction.
5 References
5.1 Books
Crainer, Stuart (1995), “The Real Power of Brands”, published by Great Britain, pp
122-137
Merriden, Trevor (2001), “Business the Nokia Way”, October, published by
Capstone Publishing Limited
Zheng, Wen Bi (2001), “A Strategic Approach of Building National Techonology
Strength – Finland as Case Study”, 30 June
5.2 Periodical
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1996),
“OECD Economic Survey of Finland, 1996”, Paris
Science and Technology policy council of Finland (1996), “Finland: A Knowledge-
based Society”, Science and Technology policy council of Finland, Helsinki
5.3 Website
BBC Online News (2001), “Promoting the future of phones”, 23 December,
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1723738.stm)
Corporation Nokia (2002), “Nokia Connecting People,” 06 Auguest,
http://www.Nokia.com and http://www.Nokiainfo.com
Liu, Wei Yi (2001), “The Global Enterprise of Finnish: Nokia” 26 June
(http://home.kimo.com.tw/liutaho/A54.htm)