Madgearu Turris Bis
Madgearu Turris Bis
1. See especially H. Ditten, Slawen im Byzantinischen Heer von Justinian I bis Justi
nian II, in Studien zum 7 Jh. in Byzanz (BBA 47), Berlin, 1976, p. 82 ; C. Bonev, Les Antes
et Byzance, Etudes Balkaniques, 19, 1983, 3, p. 110-111.
204 Alexandru Madgearu
Alterthumer, II, Leipzig, 1844, p. 153) said that Turris was wahrscheinlich Turna (sic!)
am Einflsse der Aiuta.
6. G. Florescu, Cetatea Turnu, Revista Istoric Romn, XV, 1945, 4, p. 432-439.
7. Gh. I. Cantacuzino, Ceti medievale din ara Romneasc. Secolele XIII-XVI,
Bucureti, 1981, p. 140-146.
8. D. Tudor, Oltenia roman, 4th ed.. Bucureti, 1978, p. 308.
9. A. D. Xenopoi, Istoria romnilor din Dacia Troiana, II, Bucureti, 1914, p. 66; Radu
Vulpe, La Valachie et la Basse-Moldavie sous les Romains, Dacia, N.S., V. 1961, p. 375;
Idem, Din istoria Dobrogei, II, Bucureti, 1968, p. 121; H. Mihescu, commentary at his
translation of Procopius, Rzboiul cu goii, Bucureti, 1963, p. 13, 157; P. P. Panaitescu,
Introducere la istoria culturii romneti, Bucureti, 1969, p. 72; S. Patoura-Hatzopoulos,
Luvre de reconstitution du limes danubien lpoque de lempereur Justinien 1er (ter
ritoire roumain), Revue des Etudes Sud-Est Europennes, 18, 1980,1, p. 109; Ion Barnea,
Octavian Uiescu, Constantin ce! Mare, Bucureti, 1982, p. 117.
10. J. Bromberg, p. 59; A. A. Bolacov-Ghimpu, p. 688.
11. M. Rusu, Aspects des relations entre les autochtones et les migrateurs (Hle-IXe
sicles). Revue Roumaine d'Histoire, 19, 1980, 2-3, p. 249.
12. About the camp of Pietroasele, see: Gh. Diaconu and others, Lensemble archo
logique de Pietroasele, Dacia, N.S., 21, 1977, p. 199-220; Gh. Diaconu, M. Tzony, Pre
zenta roman la curbura Carpatilor in secolele III-IV. Semnificaia ei istoric in lumina
cercetrilor de Ia Pietroasele, in the collection of studies Spiritualitate i istorie la intorsura
Carpailor, I, Buzu, 1983, p. 69-77.
206 Alexandru Madgearu
too far from the Danube and, by this reason, has no value for the defence of
the Byzantine limes in the Vlth Century.
Like other historians too13, we consider that the most probable solution
of this pi oblem is the placement of Turris at Brboi (Tirighina), a Roman
camp near Galai. The main reason for which we share this idea is the great
strategic value of this place and of its narrow territory (the zone situated bet
ween the bend of the Carpathians and the bend of the Danube). This posi
tion was used many times as an excellent defence line, until to the Second
World War. Its value was remarked also by the Romans, who built here not
only a fortress, but an entire system of earth-walls.
After the first Daco-Roman war of 101-102, two small castella were
constructed near the mouth of the Siret river. One of them was afterwards
included in the surface of a camp, large of 350x100 m., which functioned
until the reign of Gordianus III (238-244). The small fortress (its area was
about 3500 mp.) survived, with its military function, even in the Constanti-
nian Age. The camp was surrounded by a civilian settlement with urban
character, and protected by an earth-wall erected probably under Hadrianus,
between the rivers Siret and Prut (between the present day villages erbeti
and Tuluceti)14. The area behind the wall (of about 300 kmp.) was a pratum,
i.e. a territory subordinated to the camp (like the of a )15. The
erbeti-Tuluceti wall was completed with another one, east of Prut, between
Vadu lui Isac and the Sasik Lake. This southern part of Moldavia between
Prut and Nistru (now. included in Ukraina) was under Roman rule, until
the middle of the Illrd Centuiy and was defended by other camps, like that
one of Orlovka (Aliobrix)16.
The name of the Roman camp and settlement of Brboi is not attested
13. C. Jirecek, Geschichte der Serben, I, Gotha, 1911, p. 82; V. N. Zlatarski, Die Be
siedlung der Balkanhalbinsel durch die Slaven, Revue Internationale des Etudes Balkani
ques, II, 1936, 3-4, p. 362; N. Iorga, Histoire des Roumains, II, Bucarest, 1937, p. 305; Maria
Coma, Einige Betrachtungen ber die Ereignisse im 6-7 Jh. an der unteren Donau, Slavia
Antiqua, 21,1974, p. 63; V. Velkov, Ltat ethnique de la Dobrudza aucoursdu IVe-VIe
sicles, in Dobrudza. Etudes thno-culturelles, Sofia, 1987, p. 17 etc.
14. Archaeological evidence about Brboi, in: Silviu Sanie, Civilizaia roman la est
de Carpati si romanitatea pe teritoriul Moldovei. Sec. II i.e.n.-III e.n.. Iai, 1981, p. 75-
128, 202-224 and Ion Ioni, Din istoria i civilizaia dacilor liberi. Dacii din spaiul est-car-
patic in secolele II-IV e.n., Iai, 1982, p. 18-29. The first researches were made by Gheorghe
Sulescu in 1837.
15. Emilia Doruiu-Boil, Teritoriul militar al Legiunii V Macedonica la Dunrea
de Jos, Studii i cercetri de istorie veche, 23, 1972, 1, p. 56-57.
16. I. Ioni, p. 30-36.
The Placement of the Fortress Turris 207
17. N. Gostar, Cetile dacice din Moldova si cucerirea roman la nordul Dunrii
de jos, Apulum, Alba Iulia, 5, 1964, p. 146-147. See also S. Sanie, p. 18.
18. Radu Vulpe, La civilisation gto-dace et ses problmes la lumire des dernires
fouilles de Poiana, en Base-Moldavie, Dacia, N.S., I, 1957, p. 162; Idem, Les Gtes de la
rive gauche du Bas-Danube et les Romains, Dacia, N.S., IV, 1960, p. 327-329.
19. R. Vulpe, 1957, p. 162; Idem, 1960, p. 331.
20. Gh. Stefan, Dinogetia. A Problem of Ancient Topography, Dacia, N.S., II, 1958,
p. 317-329.
21. See foot-notes 19 and 20. About Dinogetia: Al. Suceveanu, Al. Barnea, La Do-
broudja romaine, Bucarest, ,1991, p. 185-18.7, with the up to date bibliography.
22.. Se,Sanie, p. 79, >.
23. H. Ditten, p. 82; ,C. Bonev, p. 111-112,
m Alexandru Madgearu
24. See, for instance: M. Coma, 1973, p. 213-214; J. Herrmann, Probleme der Heraus
bildung der archaeologischen Kulturen slawischen Stamme des 6-9 Jh., in Rapports du
Ille Congrs International d'Archologie Slave, I, Bratislava, 1979, p. 55.