Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Arentzen E S.naval Architectural .1960.TRANS
Arentzen E S.naval Architectural .1960.TRANS
Submarine Design
By Capt. :E. S. Arentzen, USN, 1 Member, a n d Philip M a n d e l , ~ Member
Summarized in this paper are the basic naval architectural aspects of recent attack
submarine designs. In a brief historical section each submarine discussed is placed in
its proper chronological setting. It is shown that volume and deck-area considerations
are even more important than those of weight in establishing dimensions of current sub-
marines. The over-all favorable aspects of single-screw body revolution submarines
with particular regard to improved propulsive characteristics, smaller size and enhanced
maneuverability submerged are demonstrated. Volume and weight requirements of
diesel-electric versus nuclear power are discussed along with the large space demands
made by improved electronic equipment and by present-day habitability standard~.
The vital function of permanent fixed ballast needed for stability, space requirements,
allowance for design error and allowance for future growth is clarified. An attempt is
made in the structural section to develop a measure of the relative efflciencies of different
designs. Considerable discussion is devoted to the stability and control of present-day
high-speed submarines and it is concluded that excellent motion stability characteristics
can be made to be quite compatible with rapid entry and exit from radical maneuvers.
Finally, a limited look into the future with respect to the relatively incompatible features
of reducing submarine size and increasing operating depths is undertaken.
Nomenclature
ru )
M L =" weight of margin, lead ~b = also angle of heel measured from the vertical
N D T ffi normal diving trim
p ffi p~opeller pitch Po
~b -- pressure factor = euh/R
P = Sea pressure, psi :~-,
Pc = static collapse pressure f" =ffi.also yaw angle ':'~"
PC --.propulsive coefficidnt •ffi ep X eh X e,, = E H P / Note: " The foregoing nomenclature does not in general
SHP apply tO Section 7 of this paper. SN'AME Bulletin 1-5
Q = propeller torque contains the nomenclature for that section.
tO
350
9
s- l 300
w
7 ~
w
250
~6 -~--
.
200
z S
4 150
IOO
50
~695 tStS 19t9 . t920 IS30 BOaT 5S576 SS580 SStNJ57t" SS(N}578 $5(N}585 SS(N)S93
1940'S ~ • " "~%r~-- _ __,.~1
POST WW'I~ DIESEL*ELEC NUCLEAR SUBS
Referring to Fig. 1, it should be noted that the S-boat's length-to-beam ratio had increased to
length-to-beam ratio of 5.26 of the Holland is not 10.7, a ratio finer than most high-speed surface
far from the optimum as shown, in Fig..6. Hol: ships possess.
land also had essentially a body of revolution hull Near the end of World War I the Germans de-
form, a minimum of reserve buoyancy, very little veloped the so-called large cruiser type submarine
superstructure and no "sail," all of which contrib- and completed four of them b y the time of the
uted towards minimizing her submerged resist- armistice. Its principal characteristics were as
ance. Holland had a large-diameter, slow-turn- follows:
ing propeller located on the axis of revolution en- Length, ft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
hancing her propulsive efficiency. Finally Hol- Beam, ft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291~
land had stern planes located at the vertical cen- Submerged displacement, tons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500
terline and did not employ forward hydroplanes. Surface speed, knots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.8
Submerged speed, knots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.7
All of these "advanced concepts" are now em-
ployed in present day United States submarines This submarine, the largest t h a t had ever been
.except that the latter still possess "sails" and for- built until then, exercised considerable influence
ward hydroplanes. After one of her future altera- on submarine development b y the victorious pow-
tions, it is expected that the AIbacore will finally ers in the period between World War I .and World
resemble the Holland in these latter aspects. War II. While the approach of the United States
In the development of military submarines toward producing a better submarine t h a n the
prior to World War I the trend was towards en- German cruiser t y p e was more moderate than
hancing surface characteristics. When viewed t h a t of the English and the French, it still re-
, in retrospect, it is obvious that little attention was sulted in constructing four V-boats which, as
paid towards submerged speed or maneuverabil- noted in Fig. 1, are 371 ft in length. With long
ity. The famous U-boats employed b y Germany length, high reserve buoyancy and reasonable sur-
in World War I possessed essentially the same di-., face power, these .submarines possessed good sur-
mensions and general characteristics as the S- face characteristics. However, with inadequate
boats of the United States. eleetric-stgrage-battery capacity t h e y were woe-
Referring to Fig. 1, it should be noted that the fully underpowered submerged. With low sub-
..... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---~7._.2
merged power coupled with a large, highly resist- fective antisubmarine attacks, or else the Fleet
ful submerged hull form they reached a new low Boat's poor submerged characteristics would
in submerged performance and maneuverability. have led to numerous losses.
Later U. S. submarine development resulted in In World War I I the Germans encountered
the famous Fleet Boats that fought the war in the very strong antisubmarine forces, so strong that
Pacific. Referring to Fig. 1, one can note that late in the war their submarine force suffered
this design approximated the dimensions of the prohibitive losses. In 1943 realizing that the
German cruiser-type. Except for a considerable submarine that spends a large percentage of
increase in surface speed the remaining principal its time on the surface was no longer effective, the
characteristics of the early Fleet Boats were nearly Germans developed the snorkel, the design for
identical with those of the German cruiser-type. the Type X X I submarine and the experimental
~IcKee [113 has described this design in consider- closed-cycle power plants using hydrogen perox-
able detail and has noted that the fleet submarine's ide as the oxidant under the leadership of Mr.
surface performance took precedence over sub- Walter.
merged performance whenever the two conflicted. The T y p e X X I submarine, described in [2],
With little consideration having been given to sub- never saw combat. As in the case of the World
merged speed, the submerged resistance was War I German cruiser type, the Type X X I again
extremely large. Fortunately for U. S. subma- served as the pattern for U. S. submarine de-
riners the Japanese never mounted sustained ef- velopment in the immediate post World War I I
3 Numbers in brackets designate References at the end era. The first step taken by the U.S. was to con-
of the paper. vert many of t h e Fleet Boats to Guppies (greater
7!/E
SSlN)593
.. B , ~ _ ~ ..... ifTn n i i r T T - T . . _ . 2 ~ Z Z 2 E Z Z - 2 1 ~ 2 _ ~ . ..... ~................ II
underwater propulsive power), described in [1]. were initiated in about 1948 t h a t the United
In the late 1940's the U. S. developed the SS States finally stepped out from under the shadow
563 (Tang) class, Fig. 2, whose general charac- of G e r m a n y in the field of submarine design and
teristics are essentially the same as those of the donned the mantle of leadership in this field--a
T y p e X X I submarine. The Darter, SS 576, the leadership t h a t this nation, it is fervently hoped,
last submarine of this class and one which incor- will never relinquish again.
porated improvements in the original design is con- T h e Nautilus was developed to test the first
siderably shorter t h a n the Fleet Boats as shown pressurized-water nuclear power plant at sea.
in Fig. 1. M a n y new ideas in hull structures, tankage ar-
Beginning with the Tang-class submarines, rangement and internal general arrangements
some attention was paid towards enhancing sub- were employed for the first time. Her hull form
merged performance. However, their length-to- was not, however, too unlike her predecessors.
beam ratio, nearly 10, was almost as high as a Referring to Fig. 1, it can be seen t h a t her length-
high-speed surface ship. Also the propellers were to-beam ratio is essentially the same as the famous
still located below the ship's centerline as in the Fleet Boats. The Nautilus, SS(N) 571, shown
case of the Fleet Boats with the stern diving in Fig. 3, still has a large bridge fairwater and a
planes in similar positions. Directional stability, considerable superstructure although Figs. 6 and
particularly in the vertical plane, while somewhat 8 in Section 3 indicate t h a t these are not as dele-
improved over her predecessors, is still inade- terious to submerged resistance as might be ex-
quate based on present-day standards. pected. At the stern, however, a principle recog-
I t was not, then, until the nuclear power plant nized by Holland in the last decade of the 19th
development for the Nautilus and the develop- century was finally incorporated in a modern
m e n t work leading to the design of the Albacore s u b m a r i n e - - t h e two propellers were located a t the
w
I1:
L/O =5 / J
s
LX'= O ' - ~ ' ~ ' * ~"" s "~
~ s
%ART,RG
L/D= 5
~.6o
o~ 1
~O4o
LID=6
Lr°-'.,',
/ ~ s
/
l =I k l=VAR....s
•
L,O.,
' 'Lx1~285 L/O=IZ5
,. -/ .-- Is/ :x..LL,o.,o • . xl=.60 .
~ - - - 4 -~ --I/ ~Lx,=.30 ~ ~r'" f ~ .x'=.60
--,,'~'_2"~L~1:3,:'2~. -- -- "IC-L,O->,o:
" x ' VAR,',NG
0
~ •
~ ,
iL/O=IO
LxI=O
deeply submerged bodies. In fact for deeply sub- mately to the body of revolution shapes de-
merged bodies, the residual resistance in nondi- scribed in [3]. In that reference a sixth-degree
mensional form is almost entirely shape depend- polynomial is used to describe Useful streamlined
e2at. There is theoretically a small dependency on shapes for submarine applications. With these
Reynolds number, so small, however, that it is polynomials, independent selection or variations
usually ignored in submarine resistance work. It of such shape parameters as nose radius, tail ra-
is, therefore, possible to present a fairly complete dius, position of maximum section, prismatic
picture of total submarine submerged resistance coefficient, and length/diameter ratio can be
in compact form with its universality only im- made. Submerged bare-hull resistance data for
paired by the slight dependency of the viscous several series of body of revolution models incor-
drag coefficient, Ct, onspeed and length. porating single-parameter variations have been
The current utilization of fairly streamlined reported by Gertler. Later work by Larson re-
bodies of revolution for submarines further sim- ported resistance data for several of the original
plifies the matter of presentation. The body of models split at the maximum section and incor-
revolution shape parameters that appear to be sig- porating various lengths of parallel middle body.
nificant as far as resistance is concerned are very This later work forms a very useful extension of
few in number. Two of the parameters that the series and permits some interesting compari-
strongly influence submarine size, hull costs and sons of the effect of sectional area curve shape
arrangements, namely, the length-diameter ratio which will be made subsequently.
and the prismatic coefficient, are also happily the The shape parameters of the body of revolution
two most significant parameters for resistance. models used in this paper are shown in Table 1.
Furthermore, since the majority of the appendages Comparative residual resistance data for these
on body of revolution submarines are easily dis- models are shown in Fig. 4. The symbols used are
tingnishable and separable from the basic body for defined in the nomenclature given at the begin-
model test purposes, separate treatment of the ning of the paper. From these definitions the
drag of the basic bare hull is both possible and following useful relationships can be derived:
logical.
Several current submarines conform approxi- L/D = LJD - ( 1 - L/) (1)
/
/
z
.N
I.O .9 .8 .7 .6 .5 ~ .3 .2
DISTANCE AFT OF NOSE + LENGTH, X/L
Fig. 5 Comparative sectional-area curves for different body of revolution forms with Cp = 0.70
120
I00
80
t~ 6 0 :
40
20
4 6 8 I0 12 14 16
L E N G T H / D I A M E T E R , RATIO
Fig. 6 Variation in total resistance with LID and Cp for submarine forms
of 100,000 c u f t volume
300 zz
250
~ " ,sg
/
2OO
I- SURFACE
uJ
I/d
U.
z 150
~IOO: / / i4 ~
50
/./ 12
0 2 4 6 B I0 12 14 t6
LENGTH/DIAMETER RATIO
Fig. 7 Variation in length and wetted surface with L/D and C~ for submarine
forms o f 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 cuft volume
mum residual drag, a C~, = 0.60 was empirically of 31.5 ft increasing C~ from 0.60 to 0.80 yields
associated with L~' = 0, a Cp, = 0.65 with L / = such virtues as (a) length decreased by 25 per
0.30 and C~e = 0.70 with L~' = 0.60 which repre- cent from 267 to 200 (LID from 8.47 to 6.35),
sents a linear relationship between C~, and L / . (b) wetted surface decreased by 10 per cent from
If this empirical relationship which is based on 19,360 to 17,500 and (c) constant section diame-
the data shown in Fig. 4 is used in conjunction ter for a length of 80 ft, with a drag penalty of only
with equation (2), the characteristics of the" spe- about 1 per cent. However, as a cautionary
cific forms shown in Fig. 6 can be computed and item, it should be noted t h a t if a Ct of 0.80 were
are shown in Table 2 for all values of L/D. used without parallel middle body but utilizing
offsets directly from [3], the drag increase would
Table 2 be on the order of 20 or 30 per cent. Therefore,
c, c,. L/ C, G,. L=' while a large range of prismatic coefficients is
0.00 0.000 0 0.64 0.012 0.068 favorable for over-all economical design, particu-
O. 68 O. 025 O. 143 O. 72 O. 038 O. 225
0.70 0.652 0.311 0.80 0.007 0.40 lar care must be exercised in the shaping of the
O. 84 O. 682 O. 495 O. 88 O. 70 O. 60 hull when a large C~ is used. The conclusions
reached in this paragraph are not unlike those ap-
In turn L/D can be varied for any C~ and L / plicable to slow-speed surface ships whose hy-
by varying Le/D. Other combinations also drodynamic characteristics are quite similar to
might have been used, but these would most likely deeply submerged submarines.
result in some additional residual drag. Also shown in Fig. 6 for comparative purposes
Fig. 6 shows the residual drag of submarine are the total bare-hull resistance of six representa-
forms in its true perspective as a very small part tive submarines, discussed in Section 2, expanded
of the total drag. Furthermore, the penalty for or contracted as the case m a y be, to a uniform sub-
wide departures in C~ and LID from the mini- merged volume of 100,000 cu ft. The first
mum drag combination need not be large. T h e three submarines shown are basically bodies of
advisability from the point of view of economical revolution, but the data for the latter two of these
design of utilizing large prismatic coefficients is three submarines include deck structure in addi-
also evident from Fig. 6. For example, with a tion to the basic body. These three submarines
fixed volume of 125,000 cu ft and a fixed diameter all have a single propeller located on the axis of
1
BRIDGE (SAIL) DRAG
STERN PLANES, RUDDER, STABILIZERS,
SHAFT a STRUT DRAG
ADDITIONAL ROUGHNESSDRAG (~CF=JOOt2|
-(ACF =L)O04I
PROPULSION LOSSES WITH ACF,JOOl2
17"7] PROPULSION LOSSES WITH ACF=~OO4
o
t~
,<
OU
I.-z
Fig. 8 Comparative appendage resistance, roughness drag, and propulsion losses for
submarine forms of 100,000 cuft volume
revolution. The bare hulls of the last three sub- planes both forward of the propeller similar to
marines (which are all twin screw) incorporate Barbd, (SS 580), shown in Fig. 3. T h e general
extensive deck structure and some unseparable configurations of the other submarines are shown
integrated hull appendages t h a t add appreciably in Figs. 2, 3 and the frontispiece.
to their resistance. It is important to note t h a t Specific comments on each of the appendages
such extraneous protuberances can change the are as follows:
submerged drag of submarines by larger amounts Bow Planes. While in all cases these append-
than large changes in hull proportions and coef- ages add only 1 per cent, or less to the bare hull
ficients, a reflection of the fact t h a t we are deal- wetted surface, the relative added drag is much
ing with very low drag forms. greater than this amount, although less iu the case
of the body of revolution types than in the others.
Appendages The principal reason for this is that,the bow planes
As a corollary to the last statement it follows are mounted with their principal axes normal to
t h a t items such as control surfaces, bridge fair- the hull on Albacore and Barbd (they are mounted
waters, shafts, struts o.r additional hull roughness on the bridge fairwater or sail on the Skipjack),
are of tremendous importance to submerged drag. while on the other submarines they are mounted in
T h e relative magnitudes of these added resistances a horizontal position high up on the hull where
are shown in graphical form in Fig. 8, for the six they introduce a good deal of interference drag
submarines previously considered. Two separate with the hull. The sail planes of the Skipjack
versions of the USS Albacore, AGSS 369, are in- are seen to be quite favorable in terms of low
eluded in these data designated I and II. Alba- added drag.
core I utilizes a large structure both forward and Bridge Fair,rater (Sail). The drag of these
around the single propeller to support a set of rud- large appendages is on the order of 15-30 per cent
ders and stern planes aft of the propeller, Fig. 2, of the bare hull drag. Systematic drag tests of
while Albacore I I has a set of rudders and stern this appendage indicate some decrease in resist-
~ ~:~:....~... I ....."":"~:":":'......
:,:.'.. I "
~ m m l
i G~
comes a very large part of the total weight does quired over the older submarine. Of the three
the submarine become "weight limited." An ex- nuclear submarines shown, the Nautilus and Skip-
ceUent example is the submarine described in [4]. jack develop the same total shaft horsepower while
One of the methods generally employed in de- Skate develops considerably less. Skipjack's sin-
veloping the first approximate dimensions for a gle-screw machinery plant requires somewhat less
new submarine design is to list all the items re- volume than does t h a t for the twin-screw Nautilus
quired to meet the characteristics of the new ship installation, and is the major reason w h y less
and then estimate the volumes required for each total machinery volume is. required on Skipjack
item. While better arrangement of items within than on Nautilus. For the diesd-eleetric sub-
spaces sometimes permits a reduction in the esti- marines, Fig. 10 also ~hows the a m o u n t of volume
mated volume required, on the whole the total devoted to diesel oil. I t is interesting to note
volume estimated b y such a means is apt to be on t h a t the total volume within the ship's envelope
the low side. Hence it is a good starting point for devoted to machinery and fuel in the diesel-
a design since it usually extends the arranger to the electric submarine is greater than t h a t required
utmost of his ability to accommodate all required for Skate, a nuclear-powered submarine developing
items in a limited volume and also serves as an considerably more shaft horsepower. If this
early brake against the usual pressures for growth chart were reduced to volume per shaft horse-
in size. To this total are added the volumes re- power developed, the Skipjack would have the
quired for the variable tanks and the volume to be shortest bar and those for the diesel-electric sub-
used for main ballast tankage with the sum total marines Would be approximately five times its
equal to the first estimate of the new ship's sub- height.
merged displacement. Fig. 11 drawn to the same scale as the preceding
Fig. 10 shows how the volume required to con- figure shows the remaining volume that can be
tain the machinery has varied in attack-type sub- used for hotel facilities for the crew, electronics
marines since World War n . Among the three installations, ship control, a r m a m e n t and lesser
diesel-electric type submarines of this period, the but essential activities. This volume will be
Guppy develops more shaft horsepower on the referred to as the payload volume throughout
surface while the Darter and Barbd develop more this paper. Each of the two diesegelectric sub-
submerged. Darter and Barbd have aclditional marines following the Guppy increased the volume
auxiliary machinery and this aceotmts primarily employed for these purposes, partly to remedy
for the small increase in machinery volume re- inadequacies in the Ouppies and partly to ac-
,~ [] OFFIG[RS
marine and her diameter is near the minimum in effect sets an upper limit on maximum beam
for this number of levels. It is then not at all for military submarines. There is also a distinct
surprising to note in Fig. 13 that Skipjack has advantage in minimizing length from the point
more deck area available for arrangements even of view of economic design and good maneuvering
though more volume is assigned to this purpose in characteristics. Based on these concepts a hull
Nautilus. This feature as much as any other diameter and a length can generally be estab-
enabled building Skipiack to a displacement con- lished for an attack-type submarine that (a) will
siderably less than Nautilus. not be far from the optimum from the point of
view of resistance, (b) will be an optimum from
length, Beam, Draft
an arrangement point of view, and (c) will also
The first approximation of the submerged dis- possess good maneuvering qualities. Special pur-
placement can be made as suggested in the dis- pose submarines, such as those that carry the
cussion on volumes. One could then select the Polaris missiles, require considerable length to
length, diameter and prismatic coefficient on the perform their unique functions and of necessity
basis of the information shown in Fig. 6 and must depart considerably from optimum values
utilizing equation (4) of Section 3. Such a se- and so suffer somewhat in both submerged speed
lection of dimensions would rarely best suit other and maneuverability.
conditions such as employing a hull diameter
near the minimum for the'number of levels con- Growth in SpaceRequirements
templated for arrangement spaces, providing a Referring again to Figs. 11 and 13 the growth
hull diameter in way of the reactor compartment in volume and deck area employed for arrange-
that will be most efficient from both a power out- ments is easily discernible. Much of this growth
put and shielding-weight consideration, and pro- has been required to accommodate new facilities
viding requisite lengths for major portions of the that are required in this age of complexity.
ship (propulsion machinery, torpedo room, reactor O n e could list many items that have encroached
space, living spaces, and so on). upon the limited volume within a submarine but
From the discussion on speed and power it is this paper will confine itself to an over-aU survey
evident that reasonable departures from the of personnel accommodations and the growth in
optimum length to beam ratio and the submerged communication and fire-control-type electronics,
prismatic have only a small effect on the sub- two of the more important factors iff any present-
merged speed. Therefore, in "volume-limited" day submarine. In Fig. 14 the deck areas as-
submarines, maximum utilization of internal signed for berthing, messing and washroom
volume should generally have a considerable in- facilities for the officers and crew on various
fluence in selecting the hull diameter. Likewise diesel-electric and nuclear submarines are shown
large lengths of parallel middle body add to the relatively. The fleet boat's complement in-
efficiency of the arrangements, probably .lower creased considerably during World War II with a
construction costs and as shown in Fig. 4 have a resulting reduction in the ship's over-all living
favorable effect on minimizing resistance at large standards. In converting fleet boats to Guppies
values of Cp. There does seem to be a very real additional space was required to contain the
draft limitation for military submarines and this larger battery and in the resulting rearrangement
I
B CRE*
~ ' 7 ~ OFFICERS
Fig. 18 A v e r a g e d e c k area p e r m a n
1945
i
FLEET BOAT FLEET GOAT G U P P Y
DIESEL-ELECTRIC
NUCLEAR
I
SS(N)593
to reduce the ship size, a similar study was made Quarter-Scale Mockups
of a relatively small combatant-type surface Being volume limited, submarines have always
ship not known for unusually "plush" living, presented difficult arrangement problems b o t h
namely the f. K. Taussig, DE1030. I t can be for large and small items of equipment as well as
seen t h a t each man and each officer on J. K. the numerous ventilation, hydraulic and high-
Taussig has about twice the amount of deck area pressure air piping runs, electrical cable runs and
as is available on the best submarine. In addi- other items t h a t compete for the same location
tion topside decks on the J. K. Taussig provide in the ship. In fact the a t t e m p t at building the
considerable freedom of movement and there are first submarine for the U. S. Navy, the Plunger,
also numerous other facilities below decks. By was abortive and the submarine was never p u t to
contrast the submariner has a 27-30 in. passage- test, because among her m a n y other faults the
way to permit access to his watch or battle sta- installation of a t t h a t time enormous steam power
tion. in a very limited space rendered her practicall.y
T o d a y we are in an electronic age. In no type uninhabitable [5].
of naval ship is this more apparent than in the T h e success of a submarine design depends to a
nuclear submarine. The constantly increasing great measure on operability of equipment and
need for electronics equipment for both old and accessibility to it for maintenance and repairs.
new functions has been one of the major items in- T o assist in this m a t t e r full-scale mockups have
fluencing the growth in size of submarines. Fig. been used for m a n y years for the most important
19 shows how both the deck area and 'internal areas; namely, machinery spaces and control
volume required for communications, attack, and rooms. In some cases mockups have been con-
defensive electronics (radio, radar, and sonar) structed for the entire ship. Besides assisting,
has steadily increased. The fleet boat at the end design personnel in arriving at solutions to their
of World W a r ' I I had more than twice as much area various problems, they have been of considerable
and volume devoted to these.purposes as in 1940. assistance to production personnel who have made
The latest diesel-electric submarine, Barbel has use of them for varied purposes ranging from
more than double this volume and area compared instruction of new workers to construction of
to the post-war fleet boat. The trend has con- piping jigs.
tinued in the nuclear submarines with Thresher Full-scale mockups have been expensive. Gen-
representing the high point in this respect to date. erally the space they occupy requires some loca-
How great an effect this equipment exerts on ship tion t h a t is distant from both the drafting room
size can best be expressed b y noting t h a t it and the building ways which reduces their use
occupies almost as much volume inside the hub- t o a considerable extent: In m a n y cases they
marine as t h a t devoted to the berthing and have taken so long to build or change that they
messing of the entire crew. have lagged well behind ship construction, par-
Fig. 21 Quarter-scale mockup USS Thresher, engine room, lower level forward
port
/ / / / / / / / / / / / SURFADE
BY FLOODINGBALLAST TANKS, SUBMARINESUBMERGES.
BY BLOWING BALLAST TANKS, SUBMARINESURFACES. NEGATIVE TANK
COMPENSATINGWATER SYSTEM
FWO g~%ANN
AFTER TRIM TANK AUXILIARY TANKS
FULL NEGATIVE TANK- LOCATED FORWARD
~" ' " OF CENTER OF BUOYANCY FOR DIVING
MOMENT.
• " . / LJGHT OVERALL
USUALLY KEPT EMPTY SUBMERGED AND SURFACED.
PROVIDES NEGATIVE BUOYANCY AND FORWARD M O t
MENT FOR FASTER DIVE. TANK'IS BLOWN BEFORE
ORDERED DEPTH IS REACHED.
L
ao- =~ •~ 0 ~ O
Nml~ll
BI G2
Divlnq . 60-
Trlm ©
i
4-O--
o 40-
o
WBT
Sutm 20-
,N ._:,_ J
I
'I, / I;} "O~'~LE~E~TER ~ i
API
/
[
it
~l
:
I
OFSTASILITYLEAO" ~ I] [I\ ~ !
' FP
O.STA
CE. . O,STA
CE J
hand can be later distributed within limits in could eventually be expended for alterations
various portions of the ship. It is a well-known with a cumulative center of gravity located at the
fact that weight estimates cannot possibly be ship's axis. In practice all margin remaining
accurate until construction is completed and hence when the ship is completed must be installed as
it has been customary to incorporate a weight lead ballast together with the lead ballast re-
margin in the design-weight summary. The quired for stability in order to bring the ship's
amount of margin can rarely be fixed on the basis weight up to the condition A-displacement and
of fact but rather on the basis of engineering thus permit the ship to dive when the variable
judgment. If the new submarine design is one load, variable ballast, and main ballast are
which differs from a previous one only by items added• Reballasting is usually required after
that cart be calculated with reasonable accuracy the inclining experiment and trim dive have been.
then a small margin is justified• In the more conducted and the results analyzed. Reballasting
usual ease where the design is quite different a may require the removal or addition of some .le3.d
much larger margin is warranted since a submarine ballast as well as its relocation longitudinally in
completed with excess ballast can still carry out the ship in order that the equilibrium polygon
all its functions whereas one that is overweight on will enclose the points representing the various
completion cannot dive without undergoing major arbitrary loading conditions.
alterations. The USS Tang (SS563) is an object Margins to compensate for weight growth
lesson in this respect. She was first lengthened during the building period and for essential future
on the building ways to gain buoyancy submerged growth are then vital to a successful design;
and later had to have two ballast tanks converted and. yet specification both of the amount of
to full pressure structure for the same purpose margin and of its vertical center is inadequate by
before she could be released for unrestricted opera- itself, since that amount can be expeuded only in
tions. one longitudinal position• At locations forward
Besides a margin to allow for changes during or aft of this position lesser amounts of margin
the detailed design and ship construction period are available. It is entirely possible to have 180
it is desirable to have a margin left when the ship tons of margin available on a 3000-ton submarine
is completed to allow for "must" additions to and yet discover that it is impossible to increase
the ship during her long service life. The Bureau the weight of an item such as the main reduction
of Ships now. specifies that completed submarines gear, located well aft in the ship, by a matter of
not only possess enough lead ballast to meet 10 tons because of the inability to balance out
stability criteria but that they also have a mini- the ship longitudinally. It is, therefore, neces-
mum of 20 tons of future development lead that sary not only to determine the maximum margin
Mises was the first to analyze the finite cylindrical (see Nomenclature) employed by Windenburg
shell. For very short lengths of cylinders be- [9] and analogous to the length/radius of gyra-
tween stiffeners, yon Mises found that as many as tion ratio of column theory is indicative of the
15-25 regular lobes could form upon reaching modes of failure in this respect. For approxima-
the critical buckling pressure. The validity of tion purposes, thinness factors, ~, of less than 0.8
the theories of von Mises was reasonably con- are generally associated with shell yielding,
firmed by systematic tests conducted by X-values greater than 1.0 with shell buckling;
Windenburg in the ,United States in the early and those between are in a transition zone.
1930's, and Windenburg's simplified expression To obtain the yield mode of failure it is then
for this mode of failure, formula (34) of reference necessary to have frames at relatively close
[9] 'is still applicable today, Just as for the intervals. Such frames cause considerable de-
buckling of a column, the critical buckling stress parture from the uniform circumferential and
is reduced materially with eccentricity which in longitudinal membrane stresses in a perfectly
this case is out-of-roundness of the shell. circular shell without stiffeners. With frames
Shell yieldiug between frames in the form of an it is obvious that the inward radial displacement
axisymmetric pleat is shown in Fig. 29. Whether of the shell is much greater at mid-bay than at
or not failure will occur by yielding or by buckling the stiffeners. Von Sanden and Gunther in 1921
depends upon the geometry and the yield strength [10] evaluated these effects and found the stresses
of the material. If the shell is relatively thin or strongly affected b y frame area and spacing.
the frames are widely spaced, buckling will They evolved two widely known formulas, (92)
1.2 +
+ SHIPS WITH P FROM 9 2 0
~+
l,l
++++ +~ • ~o(~.%..~. ,%.oM
1.3.
1.2.
IL u .
o~
II 0.t - -
• I
1.0,
'~ o.I
i
• e e 0.9
o.I - -
~ 0.8,
0.!
o.
>
<
0.4
,1,
0.6 0.8 1.0 1,2
,I ,I
1.4 h6 1,8 2,0
M.S.
Fig. 52
I
1940
144
I
1950
HTS ~
I
1960
HY-80 - -
tative submarines
and (92a) [10] or [11], that are still widely used for shell instability. Kendrick's theory has been
today. These formulas followed the Rankine reasonably confirmed by various model tests [17].
(principal stress) failure theory. Formula (92) A simplified form of Kendrick's method, placed
gives the pressure that results in the longitudinal in graphical form by Reynolds [18] is easy to
stress reaching the nominal yield of the material apply but it does produce slight errors under some
on the inside of the shell at the frame ring and conditions. Small imperfections in the structure
formula (92a) gives the pressure associated with may cause a sizable diminution in the critical
the circumferential stress reaching nominal yield pressure for over-all instability.
on the outside of the shell midway between frame There is some argument for designing a cylindri-
rings. The moments developed in the longi- cal pressure hull on the "one-boss shay" concept
• tudinal direction due to the pressure on the ends (see Weak [4]) so that collapse in all three man-
of a closed cylinder, neglected by von Sanden ners would occur simultaneously. Achievement
and Gunther, were included in a somewhat later of such a design even on paper would be excep-
analysis made by Salerno and Pulos [12]. In tional and in practice its achievement is well-
most cases the collapse pressures predicted by nigh impossible. Furthermore, there is ample
these formulations are on the conservative side. opinion, including that expressed in [4], that the
Lunchick [13] has developed a plastic-hinge minimum-weight design is that configuration
analysis, utilizing the reserve strength beyond which insures that failure occurs by yield. This
the initiation of yielding, which under some cir- opinion exists because both interframe and over-
cumstances predicts a collapse pressure in closer all instability failures can occur before the yield
• greement with experimental values although in strength of the material is reached, and such fail-
many cases, possibly because of imperfections in ures are also markedly susceptible to imperfec-
construction, its predictions are optimistic. tions in construction. It therefore appears reason-
Fig. 30 illustrates failure through general insta- able in developing a new design to establish the
bility, whose mechanism of failure is i n m a n y ways geometry in such a way that the collapse pres-
similar to that for shell instability between sures associated with interframe and over-all
frames. A satisfactory analysis for this type of instability are sufficiently higher than shell yield
failure was slow in being made but was finally to make certain that the latter will be the mode of
achieved by Kendrick [14] and [15], early in failure should it occur. This will ensure working
the past decade. Kaminsky [16] extended the material to its yield strength.
Keudrick's work for different end conditions. Fig. 31 shows a pressure 'factor, ~, versus
One of the most important results of this work slenderness ratio, X, plot for most U. S. submarines
was that the length of stiffened cylinders between built since 1940, as well as some of the many
bulkheads or very rigid deep frames is as im- models that have been tested at the Taylor Model
portant for general instability as is frame spacing Basin in the past decade. The $-X co-ordinates
iO. m
:t=i"t
0.6 -
i
Q
1940
I I
1950
I
1960
YFARS l
T HI"S q. >lYe0 - -
1940
I
• 1950
I
IS60
Fig. 33 Over-all structural efficiency factors for repre- YEARS
sentative submarines
Fig. 34 Modified pressure factors for representative
submarines
give a convenient representation of buckling
data. The pressure factor, ~b, is the collapse
pressure divided by the pressure, ~,h/R. The
latter is the "hoop stress," at which hoop-yielding I.I
occurs in an unstiffened cylinder based on the LC
Rankine-principal stress failure theory, where h is O . $ - -
the shell thickness and R is the mean shell radius. o5
O • I) O e •
purpose. Pressure tanks are available ranging ing methods employed at Taylor Model Basin. I t
from 10 in. to 12 ft diam and the largest tank is is probable that this large tank will be employed
capable of applying pressures of over 1500 psi. in the future to investigate particular phases of
Methods of test are described in [24]. Models to stress concentrations to try to confirm appropri-
be tested are constructed geometrically similar in ate small-scale techniques.
as m a n y aspects as possible to the tentative struc- The final verification lies in the completed sub-
tural design and of sufficient length to give equiva- marine. Unlike some foreign nations, the United
lent end effects. The hydrostatic pressure at States has not carried out tests involving failure
which failure occurs is identical with full scale if or near failure in the actual ship but reasonable
exact geometric similitude exists. This means verification of each new design has been obtained
that imperfect circularity in the model should through strain measurements taken during the
be the same as full scale, welding residual stresses initial deep dive of the first submarine of each
should be identical, yield strengths of material class. Gage locations are selected at locations
should be identical and if welding defects exist where strains can be compared with theoretical
they should be scaled. These conditions cannot calculations and also in areas of expected stress
always be met and at times can cause some doubt concentrations not subject to calculation or to
as to the adequacy of the model predictions. duplication in models. Data are evaluated at
Because of these doubts the Bureau of Ships various depths d u r i n g the descent to ensure satis-
decided in the later 1940's to confirm the validity factory operation of the test equipment and to
of small-scale model results in full scale. A 30- see whether or not the strain increments are as
ft-diam tank was built at Portsmouth Naval predicted. Generally agreement has been most
Shipyard, Fig. 36, for this purpose. This tank, satisfactory although there have been areas
completed in early 1953, is 75 ft long. I t is con- where, due to (a) local irregularities, (b) the ef-
structed of a welded cylindrical section with fects of encumbering structures such as large
hemispherical ends. To prepare a model for machinery foundations, and (c) welding residual
testing one of the hemispherical ends is cut away. stresses, large variations in strain have been ob-
The model is slid into the tank and welded to a served.
heavy mounting bulkhead near the fixed end as Based on analyses of the various model and
shown in Fig. 37. The movable hemisphere is full-scale test data, the Bureau of Ships has de-
then rewelded in place. Models are completely veloped modifications to the basic formulations
instrumented and are subjected to a series of that increase their accuracy in the type of sub-
tests culminating in failure. Four such tests were marine structures now employed by the U. S.
conducted and the results gave close enough cor- Navy. While further modifications will un-
relation to lend confidence to the small-scale test- doubtedly permit an even closer correlation be-
411 ii! • ~m
OO0
L
.(..
mid
|i
~1,,- m
ma 19EE 1940
YEARS
1950 " 1960
XZO~
z_m~- m
-q~z©
.~ Fig. 38 Variations in pressure-hull weight
CASE ~Z
ORIGINAL HORIZONTAL-W~ ~ ~FINAL PATH,SAME DIRECTION
PATH ~ ~""~'NAND DEPTH AS ORIGINALPATH
I I I I I I I I
Fig. 59 Various kinds of motion stability in vertical plane
T h e solution of equation (14) which is a cubic return to a horizontal path unless corrective ac-
in ~, yields three values for ~ corresponding to tion is taken.
~1, ~ , and ~8 in terms of the stability derivatives. (c) At very high speeds, for reasons which will
Several possibilities obviously exist concerning be discussed subsequently, all three values of
the nature of these indices the most common of are likely to become real. If any one of these is
which are as follows: positive, a and O will increase progressively with
(a) One value of ~ usually designated ~ is time (without oscillation) unless corrective ac-
real and the other two values, ~1 and ~8 are a con- tion is taken.
jugate pair of complex roots. Since terms with (d) If all values of ~ are real and negative,
complex exponents are equivalent to trigono- a and 0 will decrease with time and eventually
metric functions, the motion in this case will be the submarine will return to a new horizontal
oscillatory. If the real part of ~1 and ~8 as well pa.th at a different depth than originally without.
as ~2 are all negative, the oscillations will decay undergoing any oscillations as shown in Case I I I
with time and the submarine will eventually of Fig. 39.
return to a horizontal path (at a different depth As previously noted the prime designations
than originally) as shown in Case II in Fig. 39. used in equations (10), (11), and (14) indicate
(b) On the other hand, if the real part of al t h a t the quantities are nondimensionalized in
and ~8 is positive (a2 is usually a large, negative, accordance with [25]. F o r the force equation,
stable root), the amplitude of oscillation will (10), the nondimensionalizing factor is (p/2)
increase with time and the submarine will not L 2 V 2 and for the moment equation, (11), the
OVE/,~OOT[ \ ~ /Zo-OVENS.OOT
~NGLE--L . . . . . . . . ~ O E P T H ,
RUDDER ANGLE
L ,,. RUDDER ANGLE
TIME TO I I
REACH ~ ~ I ]I
EXECU.TEte ~ LTIME TO I
! CHECK PITCH, t¢ I Fig. 42 Definition diagram for Dieudonne spiral man-
I TIME TO I euver in horizontal plane
r~ CH'~ECK DEPTH, t t PI
v, ~ , ,
_ _
t z o.
I
8PB~V~, ~j. ""q Oe
c~mm~o~c~sm c~mm~, "o'
L~O lq* B" .6~ 1.01 .5]. 2.~ ~..2 4.6 .~2. .15 .17
20 ].~* 10' 1.z7 1.~ -93 ~.0 ~'.T ~c.~ .~ .~. .~6
~.6T .~.7o a..~5 ~.~. S.~ 7.1 ."~ .~ .SB
~o 1~;' 20' :~.oo ~.~ 1.~ -a.,i 5.7 6-9 .68 .~ .~
~ I zo-I ~.~ .gBJ Iz.mlz.mlz.zoll*.91 I~.~l~a, la.~ ]l .~1 I .z~ I.z7 I.zs
angle ~1 (.the checking angle ~ is taken equal to able for the first two submarines. Pertinent
8x), and of the execute angle of pitch, 00. The. stability, control and plane-rate information for
three principle quantities determined from the the five submarines is shown in Table 4.
tests are: Examining the first part of Table 3, it is seen
(a) The time to reach execute pitch angle, t,. that the variation of t / w i t h speed is small at the
(b) The overshoot pitch angle O0 (difference higher speeds. In fact, except for the effects
between 0~ and maximum 0). of metacentrie stability and plane rate, t / s h o u l d
(c) The overshoot change of depth z0 (differ- be a constant with speed for any given submarine.
ence between depth at execute pitch angle and This follows from the fact that the radius of the
extreme depth reached). turning circle of a submerged submarine has been
All of these items are directly related to the demonstrated many times to be a constant with
performance criteria (b) and (c) mentioned ear- speed. In real time, of course, the longer sub-
lier. Their numerical values are dependent marine will have a greater execute time than a
on • shorteJ: submarine all other things ibeing equal.
(a) The motion stability index, ~ (including The action of the metaeentric index, Met, tends
the effects of the metaeentric stability index, to increase t / beyond that what it would be if
M0), Md = 0. However, as speed is increased
(b) The controlindex, MjIu, M e t decreases as the square of the speed so that
(c) The preseleeted values of ship speed, V, t/should decrease with increasing speed on this
the initial stern plane deflection angle, 81, and the score. The fact that plane rate, 8/, is not infinite
pitch angle of execute, 0o, also tends to" increase t/. Since as shown in
(d) The ship length, • Table 4, ~,' decreases linearly with increasing
(e) The rate of stern plane deflection, ~,. speed, the tendency is for tot to increase on this
The ship length, L, and ship velocity, V, can score. Thus, the effect of increasing speed on
be used to nondimensionalize te into Me' and 8/ results in opposing effects on t,'
which may tend to cancel each other out, al-
tJ = to__V though it is reasonable to expect that the effect of
L Mot would be more important. This is in
which corresponds to ship lengths, of travel, z0 keeping with the results shown in the first part
into z0' = zo/L and fi, into ~,' = 8dL/4V, which of Table 3 for any given submarine.
corresponds to degrees deflection per quarter The comparison of the t / values among the
ship length of travel. Values of t/, 0o and z0' different submarines throughout Table 3 as a
for five different submarines are shown in Table 3. whole reveals the interesting fact that the stable
As can be seen only very isolated data are avail- submarine E with an excellent control index
~ PRESSURIZEDWATER I~
SUBMARINE NUCLEAR
POWERPLANTS
LIGHT SURFACE SHIP
STEAM PLANTS
LIGHT SURFACESHIP STEAM ~-
PLANTS PLUS FUEL
¢ TYFIC~LOlES~L-~,~-GTR:C
SUBMARINE
I I I 1 I I I I .~.~ ~ TYPICAL DIESEL- ELECTRIC
FLEETBOAT GUPPY (~RTER BARBEI. P&~UTILIJSSKATE SKIPdACKIHRESHER SUBMARINE WITH FUEL
1940 SSS76 SS580 SS(N)STIS~laT8 SSNm8 SS(N}593 ,T
Table 4 Stability and Control Parameters for Motions in the Vertical Plane
Metacentric
stability
Ship Dynamic stability index Control index --Plane rates index
--~., (R)-----~ MS,/I~ ~, &' Me
@1o
knots @20 knots
@10 knots @20 knots @10knots @20knots All speeds deg/l/4 ship length of All speeds
(sec)-l deg/sec 2 deg/sec travel ft-tons/deg
A Unstable Unstable --1.69 --6.76 3 14 7 --31.4
B Unstable Unstable --1.92 --7.69 7 28 14 -- 18.4
C -0.13 -0.05 --2.25 --9.01 6 24 12 --81. i
D --0.05 --0.05 --3.28 -- 13.1 5 15 7x/2 --33.2
E --0.04 --0.03 --4.67 --18.7 5 15 71/, --32.5
The ability to execute a steady-turning maneu- grees of rudder angle, The characteristics of the
ver with minimum tactical diameter, advance, Dieudonne spiral will be used as a stability index
transfer, loss of speed, and with minimum cross- in this section.
coupled motions such as roll. Data from both Dieudonne spiral tests and
This criterion is important to submarines both overshoot tests in the horizontal plane are s h o w n
submerged and on the. surface. On the surface in Table 5 for three of the submarines discussed in
additional criteria are applicable t h a t relate to the Tables 3 and 4. It is seen t h a t two of these three
submarine's ability to maneuver ahead and astern submarines are unstable in the horizontal plane
in close quarters. However, this section will be although they were stable in the vertical plane.
limited to maneuvering in the open sea and to Apparently, this degree of instability is tolerable
those items t h a t have not been treated adequately in the horizontal plane where the restrictions on
in earlier sections. movement are not as severe as in the vertical
One of the practical differences between mo- plane. Comparison with Table 3 indicates t h a t
tions in the horizontal and vertical planes is t h a t these submarines enter a maneuver in the hori-
full-scale motion stability is qualitatively evalu- zontal plane more rapidly than in the vertical
ated by different means in the two planes. In plane, but t h a t they suffer much larger overshoot
the vertical plane a simple test, called a meander yaw angles than overshoot pitch angles. Both of
test, can be used to evaluate whether a ship is di- these characteristics are manifestations of insta-
rectionally stable or not. In this test the stern bility although the absence of metacentric sta-
planes are deflected to a specified angle for a very bifity in the horizontal'plane is of some impor-
short time and then returned to their neutral tance. The absence of the M0-term is also evi-
angle. If the subsequent path followed by the dent in the fact that, in general, t / t e n d s to in-
submarine in the vertical plane is a decaying os- crease with increasing speed on the horizontal
cillation, the submarine is directionally stable. plane whereas it tended to decrease with increas-
If the path is an increasing oscillation, the sub- ing speed in the vertical plane. T h a t the over-
marine is directionally unstable. No such simple shoot angles of all of the submarines shown in
test applies to the horizontal plane because there, Table 5 are exceptionally large is evident by
as mentioned earlier, directional stability with comparison to the criteria for overshoot angles
controls fixed cannot exist and only straight- suggested in [28] which are also included in Table
fine stability is possible. For this kind of stability 5. The latter criteria were tentatively estab-
t h e Dieudonne spiral maneuver described in [28] fished on the basis of surface-ship performance.
and shown in Fig. 42 is appropriate. If the rate It seems evident t h a t an improvement in motion
of change of course versus rudder angle is a single stability in the horizontal plane would be desir-
continuous curve from right rudder to left rudder able for these submarines, particularly if this im-
and back as shown by the dotted line in Fig. 42 provement was achieved by means of larger all
the ship is stable. On the other hand, if this re- movable rudders. This would insure t h a t neither
lationship splits into two parts depending on the small turning diameter, nor the quick entry
whether the ship is initially swinging to the left or and exit characteristics of these submarines would
t o the right as shown by the solid curves in Fig. be impaired as their stability characteristics were
42, then the ship is unstable. The degree of in- improved.
stability is indicated both by the height of the Considerable doubt exists as to whether the
"hysteresis" loop, measured in degrees/second bridge fairwater (sail) t h a t exists on all subma-
and by the width of the loop measured in de- rines exerts a stabilizing or destabilizing influence
2/)OO ,~OO0
\
,O~OO
MEAN DEPTH
_z 64:0O
~, ,~o
~ ,o~o!
12,000
i*,jooo
I I I I
0 iO 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 io0
PERCENT OF OCEAN LESS THAN INDICATED DEPTH
ously mentioned of an increase in turning diame- in both the horizontal and vertical plg.ues with-
ter. The fact that the snap roll is still sizable out extending the span 6f the stern control sur-
~ i t h sail removed indicates that the net centri- faces beyond the maximum block dimensions of
petal force is still acting at a point above the cen- the submarine.
ter of gravity of the submarine. This is not sur- (c) Forward hydroplanes are far less effective
prising since submarine E has a modest deck than stern planes for both control and stability
structure and in addition, ~ e vertical center of in the vertical plane. They are redundant for
gravity of all submarines must lie below the axis high-speed operation. However, there is some
of symmetry in order to possess metaeentric sta- operational preference for them for slow-speed
bility. Furthermore, the snap roll is largely an control at periscope depth or in restricted shallow
overshoot phenomenon and hence can be very waters. Forward hydroplanes are also needed
large even with small excitation if the damping on submarines that are very unsymmetrical in
is low. The difference in the ratios of snap roll to the vertical plane for adequate depth control at
steady roll between submarine E with sail and low speeds.
submarine E without sail suggests that roll-damp- (d) Forward hydroplanes located on the sail
ing is greatly reduced by removal of the sail. offer several strong advantages over the more con-
Therefore, it can be concluded that the very ap- ventional bow location with no concomitant hy-
pendage that causes an increase in roll excitation drodynamic difficulties.
in a turn also results in an increase in roll:damp-
ing and that removal of that.appendage does not (e) It has been shown that at least two of the
submarines discussed do not possess straight-line
reduce the angle of roll as much as might Other-
stability in the horizontal plane whereas they are
wise be anticipated.
direetionally stable in the vertical plane. As a
A summary o f the more important design in-
result their overshoot angles in the horizontal
formation concerning stability and control in
plane are very large.
both the vertical and borizontal plane contained
in the previous sections is as follows: (f) The presence of the bridge fairwater (sail)
(a) Minimum submarine length for any fixed on submarines produces an uncertain effect on
displacement is conducive to minimum exit and stability in the horizontal plane, decreases the
entry time into any maneuver, and to minimum diameter of the turning d r d e and causes a very
turning diameter, with only a small penalty in large snap-roll angle on tight-turning, high-speed
required stabilizer area. submarines.
(b) The X-configuration of stern control sur- (g) 1~emoval of the sail decreases the roll ex-
face appears to offer the possibility of reasonably citation in a turn, but also decreases the roll
dealing with the emergency situation that would damping. As a result the reduction in snap roll
arise in the event of stern-plane jam at high caused by removal of the sail is not as dramatic as
speeds. It also provides greater control forces might otherwise be expected.
iNGREASING
prophet when he stated: "The development of
the best all-round boat to meet the conditions is Fig. 46 Collapse depth versus ratio of hull weight to
likely here also to lead to some increase in total displacement for various material#
displacement, which, eventually however, will
probably not exceed 200 tons." Today there are
some who would like to see future attack sub-
within the present state of knowledge. Extensive
marines built to a size not much greater than
research and development programs are required
double that stated by Spear and who consider
if a real reduction in size or increase in speed is to
that our latest high-speed attack submarines are
too large. The sacrifices that would be neces- come to pass. Such programs would have to be
directed towards reducing hull weights, machin-
sary to even approach such a size reduction today
ery weights, and a comparable reduction in
without the benefit of a very elaborate and costly
machinery volumes, manpower requirements and
research and development program would indeed
weights, and volumes required for military fea-
be formidable. For example, present-day sonar
tures; e.g., weapons and communications equip-
equipment in itself requires more displacement
than the total displacement mentioned by some ment.
Fig. 43 shows in percentages of light-ship dis-
as a desirable goal. If one considers all the equip-
ment that it is necessary to install to obtain the placement the weights devoted to hull structures
and to machinery for various classes of attack
characteristics of today's high-performance sub-
marines, one might rather wonder about not how submarines. These two groups of weights con-
stitute more than two-thirds of the ship's light
large these submarines have become but rather
how it has been possible to keep them so small. displacement. It can be seen that with the sin-
This point becomes clear if one compares the size gle exception of the Skipjack the percentage ap-
plicable to hull structures is reasonably constant.
of a Polaris submarine with that of a present-
day destroyer. The entire volume of the Polaris In Skipjack's ease HY-80 steel was employed not
to increase operating depth but to permit the in-
submarine is substantially less than that of the
destroyer and the former certainly packs a stallation of a heavier machinery plant in propor-
greater "deterrent punch." This is not to say tion to its size (as can be seen by the machinery
that the submarine cannot be reduced in size. percentages) than had been possible in previous
With the benefit of hindsight one could almost designs.
invariably rework the design of a completed sub- It is of interest to consider that portion of the
hull structure that would be required to form only
marine and either achieve the identical results on
the hull envelope to withstand the required sea
•a little less total displacement or improve the
ship's characteristics while retaining the same pressure. Based on the weight of structure per
displacement. However, if present character- unit volume shown in Yig. 38 and using the sur-
istics are maintained, then it is highly unlikely 8 Taken from a DTMB report by Heller, Willner and
that a major reduction in size will be achieved Krenske.
Discussion
Cdr. S. R. Heller, Jr., USN, Member: The authors to a single category, and usually this would deal
have done an admirable job in providing such with structure. The authors, however, have cited
broad coverage on a timely topic. Asmight have structural developments made at the Taylor
been expected because of the backgrounds of the Model Basin with which I am intimately familiar
anflaors, the presentation is a happy marriage and with which I wholeheartedly concur. In
of techniques used in the design office and in the particular, I am pleased to note that the a p -
classroom. praisal by the authors of the "one-hoss shay"
Under ordinary circumstances in discussing a concept pressure-hull structure eoincides with my
paper of this breadth I would confine my remarks own as presented in discussion of Admiral MeKee's
1959 paper [1] (references at end of the paper). Since arrangement problems have just been
I t may be of some interest to know that Mr. mentioned, it seems pertinent to add a note on a
Palermo is now engaged in extending the elastic recent development in the construction of mock-
analysis of bulkhead stiffening systems [21] into ups. After much study of the over-all arrange-
the plastic region. There are indications that ment problem in modern attack submarines which,
some weight reduction is possible without en- of course, result from the ever-increasing com-
dangering performance. Even more encouraging petition for space, the Arrangements group of
than this possible weight reduction is a distinct Portsmouth Naval Shipyard's Design Division
trend (on paper at least) toward the elimination concluded that mock-ups prepared with the con-
of bulkheads just as the authors recommend. ventional "centerline" cut did not serve ade-
Buried in the authors' commentary on high- quately as a three-dimensional design tool.
stress, low-cycle fatigue is an oblique reference to Their recommendations were to "cut" the mock-
areas of high stress concentration coupled with up by planes 45 deg of centerline-the same con-
high restraint and appreciable residual tension. figuration referred to by the authors as the
These undesirable details can and are being "de- " X - s t e r n " ; make the outboard and overhead
signed out" by the same sort of meticulous care sections portable on overhead tracks; and make
and ingenuity that are required to resolve k n o t t y certain key sections of the lower segment port-
arrangement problems. able on casters. These cuts are shown in Fig.
47 of this discussion. Fig. 48 shows the same searching examination of every detail no m a t t e r
mock-up but with movable sections open. This how minute and the surgical excision of the unes-
type of construction has tile added advantages of: sential is concurred in.
1 Permitting more people to work simul-
taneously. Capt. H. E. Saunders, USN (Ret), Honorary Member:
Now that more and more papers concerning the
2 Providing better over-all access.
modern military submarine are finding their way
3 Eliminates frequent removal of mocked-up
equipment. into our Transactions, I feel that it is most neces-
sary to keep the record straight, especially as far
4 With better access, better and more ac-
as its development is concerned.
curately detailed plans result.
I t has always been fashionable to poke fun at
Finally, I am extremely pleased to note that the someone else's ship design, especially of an earlier
authors did not neglect recommendations for dele- era. I have done it m y s e l f - - m u c h of it, in faef,
tion of features that are as anachronistic to the in m y earlier d a y s - - s o I suppose I can excuse
modern submarine, which operates at high speeds myself by saying that it is also natural. I would
and deep depths, as a muzzle-loading blunder- like to think, however, that in an era in which we
buss is to a m o d e m infantryman. All too often pride ourselves on our scientific achievements, we
tradition perpetuates what need cannot. The are learning to be more scientific in our analyses.
"~4000 ,o,o
i
~ 6000 \A '°'
E
"--
sooo 18200
,.oo
12000 I X ~300'
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0. Z -0,4 -0.6 -0.8
COEFFICIENT OF EXCESS BUOYANCY, p
0 20 40 60 SO I00 120 140 160 180
PRESSURE HULL WEIGHT AS % OF SUBMERSED DISPLACEMENTI IJ
Fig." 49
Table 7 Showing reduction in displacement of deep- the slope of the curves in Fig. 46 is identical to the
diving submarines by improved structural designs efficiency factor, p h i . " These implications m a y be
Reduction in more clearly revealed b y .the accompanying
Collapse Dis- Dis- displacement graph, Fig. 49, similar to Fig. 1 of reference [4]
depth, placement, placement, with improved of the paper. Also not mentioned b y the authors
psi phi-0.85 phi-1.10 design
is the important fact t h a t because of the frames
500 i000 1000 0
1000 1000 1000 0 required to defer instability, the efficiency factor
2000 1172 1103 69 is not constant, b u t increases with those designs
4000 2027 1596 431 for greater depth. The maximum theoretical
6000 8333 2777 5556
• Assume: Hull of HYO0; basic design of 1000 tons, value cannot be reached at moderate depths.
with volUme-limited design changing to weight-limited Also, going twice as deep does not require a struc-
at 1000 psi collapse. ~.
ture, t h a t is, nominally, twice as heavy, n
Fig. 46 of the paper also suggests improved
ing structural efficiency." The first, eta, reflects structural efficiency with materials other than
the benefit of utilizing improved materials. H ¥ 8 0 for moderate as well as deep depths. Do
Here, as with most other structures, the index the authors concur ?
of merit is the ratio of yield strength to material However, much benefit is derived from material
density. This efficiency factor simultaneously characteristics, the writer strongly believes t h a t
reveals the benefit of optimum proportioning of t h e designer must seek the lightest possible struc-
scantlings. The second efficiency index (in this ture by skillful choice of geometry. I t is at this
paper, phi) shows, exclusively, the influence of " m o m e n t of t r u t h " t h a t a design concept must
geometry. be adopted. T h e "low-lambda" and "one-hoss
T h e gain in structural efficiency by utilizing shay" proposed by the writer are but two of in-
HY80 instead of H T S is shown in Fig. 33. Fur- numerable possibilities; only experience can prove
ther gain from other materials is suggested in Fig. their relative merits.
46. Although not mentioned, a significant rela- The "low-lambda" concept emerged from ex-
tionship exists between the two plots; n a m d y , perimental observations in the course of verify-
ing the von Sanden-Gunther theory./1 While
" E. Wenk, Jr., R. E. Stark, and D. E. Peugh," Tests of the "S-G" analysis was found valid for elastic
the Yield Strength of Ring-Stiffened Cylindrical Shells behavior, it was discovered unduly conservative
Models BR-2 and BR-2A Subjected to Hydrostatic Pres-
sure," DTMB Confidential Report C-440, February 1964. when predicting yield strength. The conservatism
6
\ submarine.
This paper covers a very large range of sub-
marine design aspects and therefore touches only
lightly on the majority of the subjects. I t is
S
hoped that future authors will use this paper as a
starting point to develop further m a n y of the sub-
\\
I0
jects covered herein. If this is done, the United
_z
States can maintain a significant lead in the a r t
12 and science of submarine design.
1
deflect the smaller surface to a larger angle than
would be required if a larger surface were used.
If we find, in normal operation, the smaller sur-
face requires very large angles for a large part of
the time, then generally its control drag is higher
Wi'thou~ Foils
than that encountered with the larger surface,
which operates at smaller angles and more favor-
able lift-to-drag ratios. Dieudonne recognized
this problem in his historic series of papers t4 when
he stated as follows: "On a ship of large inertia
which only slowly assumes its proper angular veloc-
ity in steady-state turning, it is possible to steer
a practically straight course in spite of an insta- Drag Coeff., D'
bility of route, provided the rudder is set as a suf- Fig. 51
ficiently large angle from the moment the ship
assumes an angular turning velocity. Such a
maneuver is tricky but practicable, particularly
when the ship is equipped with a gyro compass.
The only thing that can be done in that case is to find how low the centrifugal acceleration is
continually to steer the ship with an appreciable "during maximum turns with present high-speed
rudder angle. This is certainly not favorable submarines. These accelerations are far lower
either to its speed or to its fuel consumption. than those occurring in racing automobiles or
The same maneuver is not practically possible on aircraft. One must not confuse the ability to
an unstable ship when it assumes its steady state change heading angle with ability to follow a
rapidly because the corrections cannot be made curved fl~ght path. If it is only heading change
quickly enough." which concerns us and not flight-path curvature,
Larger surfaces, particularly since they extend then we can afford to permit the submarine to
farther out of the boundary layer of the hull, spin like a top even though its flight path is only
have an added benefit by becoming more ef- slightly curved as a result. Certainly in some emer-
'fective as the span increases. Consequently, for gency situations, this may be a desirable maneuver
a given aspect ratio, the improvement is likely to since it allows the hull cross-flow drag to effectively
be more rapid than if predicted from surface area reduce the forward speed. However, if efficiency
alone. of maneuver is important, perhaps another
One concern which has been expressed in going criterion should be used, such as minimum speed
to larger surfaces is that the control-surface reduction permissible in a turn of a given radius.
hinge moments become larger. This, however, If this is the desired situation, then hydrofoils
does not have to be the case. With proper at- should be applied to the submarine since they are
tention to design, the center-of-pressure of the far more efficient (high L/D) in providing lateral
movable surface can be located close to the hinge forces than is the submarine hull itself. In other
line so that the control surfaces are essentially words, a submarine fitted with foils can maintain.a
balanced. For a completely movable control higher speed in a given turn than one without
surface, there will be a center-of-pressure shift foils assuming both have the same initial con-
with angle of attack. This shift is small, near ditions. Fig. 51 of this discussion illustrates a
zero angle of attack, but changes more rapidly typical polar curve for a submarine with foils
at higher angles where flow separation takes place. and one without.
Thus those surfaces with the least angle-of- The curves clearly show that, if large lift co-
attack change (near zero) will have the least efficients are required, then the least drag coef-
center-of-pressure travel expressed in percentage ficient is obtained b y using a submarine with
of chord length. If the chord length of the larger foils. T h e y also illustrate the obvious fact that
surface is not appreciably greater than that of the the drag at zero lift is higher for the submarine
smaller, it is possible to end up with less hinge with foils. Therefore, we can justify the applica-
moment for the larger control surface. Detailed tion of foils for purposes of (1) providing tight
design would have to determine the amount of ,turns, (2) for handling maneuvers efficiently
such changes. (with little loss of speed) or (8) for reducing the
Maneuverability. T o one concerned with ma- fuel consumption in the event that a large amount
neuverability of other vehicles, it'is often a.surpfis~ of maneuvering is to take place during the mis-
t
Naval Aichitectural Aspectsof Submarine Design 689
sion. However, for maximum speed, for fuel econ- 3 Providing the minimum control drag for a
omy in straight-line running and for flight con- specified mission. This should consider not only
ditions where maneuvering efficiency is unim- the drag due to control surfaces alone but the
portant, the conventional nonfoil configuration losses caused by wandering away from the de-
would probably be best. For any given craft, sired path.
the payoff between good maneuvering capability 4 Permitting most effective use of the operator
and good cruise efficiency would have to be in the control system consistent with a specified
studied carefully before any firm decision could level of skills developed through training.
be made concerning the use of foils. 5 Permitting compatibility with existing and
Incidentally, the addition of foils need not affect proi~osed automatic control systems which will,
the straight-line stability if the foils are located in routine "flight," permit hands-off operation
so that their centers-of-pressure are located at the of the craft.
center-of-mass of the submarine.
• I t is interesting to note that the sail on a sub-
marine such as Albacore contributes a lateral Authors' Closure
maneuver force roughly of the same magnitude
as that provided by the hull. I t has been sug- Commander Heller has noted that our ap-
gested that this structure should be removed in praisal of the "one-hoss shay" concept on the
order to eliminate the large roll cross-coupling design of pressure-hull structure coincides with
and lateral instability which it produces. While his own as presented in his discussion on Admiral
this removal does have these advantages plus the McKee's 1959 paper [1]. 1~ We consider this
important one of reducing drag to a minimum, discussion as well as Palermo's discussion on the
it unfortunately eliminates the sail's considerable same paper [1] well worth rereading on the part
contribution to maneuver force. To solve the roll- of those interesteci in this particular aspect.
coupling problem alone, one might consider apply- Throughout Commander Heller's discussion one
ing a keel to the submarine. This would reduce can note the prevailing healthy attitude through-
or eliminate the roll cross-coupling, add further to out all present-day submarine activities; namely,
the available maneuverable force, and by proper that all submarine features are being re-examined
placement add to the static stability in yaw. It with the intent of providing improvements which
might, however, increase drag so that this ap- in most cases will be evolutionary but in some are
prgach would have to be considered carefully. bound to be revolutionary. Commander Heller's.
In all of the foregoing discussion, no mention as well as Captain Jackson's amplifying remarks
has been made of the many size, weight, and on the use of quarter-scale mockups at Ports-
structural compromises and limitations which mouth Naval Shipyard are also in this category.
must be imposed upon the submarine design and They illustrate how it is possible to improve a
consequently will temper the above remarks. device, continually, even one .that is already
However, it is this writer's opinion that only by reasonably efficient.
carefully balancing these stability and control In response to Captain Saunders, we adhere to
considerations against their associated drag pen- our brief statements in the paper concerning the
alties and by weaving all these considerations into poor submerged performance and maneuverability
the preliminary and detail design processes can of the V-boats. It should be noted that this
the optimum submarine design be achieved. class of submarine was not repeated but that, as
Suggested Criteria. With the submarine now related in the paper, later development led to the
capable of operating at increasing speeds, it has much smaller Fleet Boats that were so successful
become a truly dynamic machine and there is in World W'ar II. As further support for our
need for new and definitive criteria for evaluating statement, a quote from The Submarine, a manual
its stability, control, and performance require- of the Submarine School in New London, Conn.,
ments. I t is suggested that submarine control concerning the V-boats is pertinent: "Their ex-
systems be evaluated on the bases of: treme size made them valuable for transport even
though it was a drawback in warfare because of the
1 Providing sufficient straight-line stability sacrifice of maneuverability to size."
to allow the submarine to maintain the specified There is recognition in the paper of the point of
accuracy of holding to its flight path both during philosophy raised by Commander Baylis. Direc-
straight-fine and in turning operations. tional stability in the vertical plane with controls
2 Providing the maximum required accelera- fixed is not mandatory. The human or the auto-
tion in a turn with a loss in speed no greater than matic sensor in the control Ioop can and does
a specified value. Rderences in the paper.