Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Factors Influencing Brand Loyalty For Samsung Mobile User in Nepal - With Questionnaire
Factors Influencing Brand Loyalty For Samsung Mobile User in Nepal - With Questionnaire
Bikash Singh
172282
Supervisor
Lisa Whitehead
This master’s thesis is carried out as a part of the education at the University of Agder and
is therefore approved as a part of this education. However, this does not imply that the
University answers for the methods that are used or the conclusions that are drawn.
Brand loyalty is one of the key element to success for the business organization. There is a high
competition between the brand of the smart phone companies, so it is necessary to develop
customer trust to build brand loyalty. The study aims to identify the factors influencing brand
loyalty in Nepalese market. The model studies the effect of different independent variables that
determines brand loyalty. Regression analysis method is used for data analysis. We found that
there are two factors that significantly determines the brand loyalty in Nepalese market.
Page 2
Contents
1. INTRODUCTION 5
1.3 Purpose 7
1.4 Structure 7
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 8
3. METHODOLOGY 17
3.5 Measurement 19
Page 3
3.5.4 Brand Experience 21
4. FINDINGS 22
4.1 Demographics 23
5.2 Multicollinearity 44
6. DISCUSSION 50
REFERENCES 54
APPENDIX 62
Page 4
1. Introduction
Late in the 1990s, the emergence of mobile phone technology and the rise of telecommunication
industry was in rapid progress. Mobile sets appeared in the hands of average users for the first
time and were soon becoming the norms and portable to carry anywhere(Goodwin, 2016). The
first color screen phone was renovated in the year2002, and multimedia started in the year 2004-
2006. Finally, the trend of a smart phone was introduced first time ever in the year 2007(Prlog,
2008-2009).
''A Smartphone is a revolutionary and magical product that is literally five years ahead of any
other mobile phone'' (Arthur, 2012). Smart phones are not just an ordinary phone but a diverse
set of media capture capabilities. ''They do not only function as a phone including text messaging
and visual voicemail, but also as a camera phone, as a portable media player, and as an Internet
client with email, web browsing, and Wi-Fi connectivity''(Leyland, et al., 2010). Moreover,
Smart phones now run on processors with high processing speeds together with low power
consumptions which allows us to play games, browse the Web, and other applications including
the latest technology of virtual reality (Divestopedia & Institute, 2016). Virtual reality is an
artificial environment that is created with software and presented to the user in such a way that
the user suspends belief and accepts it as a real environment(2016, 2015a). The demand for
smart phones has been massive throughout the years. The worldwide Smartphone market grew
0.7% year over year in 2016Q2, with 344.7 million shipments, according to data from the
International Data Corporation(IDC, 2016). This slowing growth is primarily due to the decline
in developed markets such as United States, Canada, Japan and Western Europe. On the other
hand, China showed a mature growth pattern than any other countries and Android dominated
the market with an 87.6% share in 2016Q2. Samsung reasserted its global leadership with the
success of its new flagship devices(IDC, 2016). Samsung once again claimed its top spot
worldwide among smart phone market with a 22.8 % market share in 2016Q2. This retention of
position was in high success in midst range and huge success new Galaxy s7 and Galaxy s7 Edge
flagship devices. The large numbers of shipments happened in the regions like Southeast Asia,
the Middle East and Africa because of the high success of lower end models. Besides, other
Page 5
mobile companies like Apple, Huawei, OPPO, and Vivo are having the top five spots in the
market share worldwide (IDC, 2016).
Nepal is a small market for smart phone companies, but it’s a booming one. The number of
mobile subscriptions already outnumbers its population and there is a rapid demand for high
quality smart phone. According to the latest Management Information System (MIS) Report of
Nepal Telecommunication Authority (NTA), a single person subscribing to more than one
service, the mobile service penetration rate has hit 105.15 percent of the population, As of
February, the number of mobile subscriptions in Nepal stands at 27.85 million, against the total
population of 26.49 million(Khanal & Rijal, 2016).
Samsung mobiles have the strong market share among all the brand of smart phones in Nepal.
Samsung mobile covers around 50% of market shares in the Nepal's phone market(Dhungana,
2016). Samsung mobile company is the global market leader as well as in Nepal among the
smart phone companies.
Nepal is a landlocked country located between India and China. It covers are of 147,181 square
kilometres and the population is 29,033,914 by July 2016. (The world Factbook,2001). The
majority of the age structure is (25-54) years group people consisting of 35.99% of the total
population. Nepal is ranked inside top 52 mobile subscribers country in the world. The number
of subscribers has been rapidly increasing throughout the country. According to world fact book
report, mobile cellular subscribership base is increasing around 90% of the population living area
covered by mobile carriers(The world Factbook,2001). Nepal is one of the developing countries
with the low economy but the consumption of mobile phones are growing in a huge rate. so,
there is plenty of opportunity for mobile companies to sell their brands of phones and enhance
business.
The mobile phone has gained huge popularity throughout the world and has millions of users.
The former research on customer brand loyalty has been performed in mature surroundings (Son,
2010). There is the constant development of new products, changes in the technology and design
and shortens the life of the cell phone. The features, functions, looks of the smart phone changes
Page 6
through the short span of time. Therefore, most the population is reinforced to consume new
models(Li,2010). Thus, the brand loyalty in Samsung mobile will be an amazing area of
research.
1.3 Purpose
The purpose of the thesis is to find out the factors that are influencing the brand loyalty for the
Samsung mobile users in Nepal. The prime focus of research are the younger people who are
using Samsung brand and well educated people so that they provide meaningful answers to
research questionnaires.
1.4 Structure
The thesis is structured in the following ways. Literature review and hypotheses formation is
presented in chapter 2. Also, research methodology is covered in chapter 3, following by
findings and data analysis in chapter 4 and 5 respectively. The discussion section is presented in
chapter 6 while conclusion and recommendations are discussed in chapter 7. Finally, appendix is
presented at the end.
Page 7
2. Literature review
The literature review is divided in the following ways. The theories that support our research
study is discussed in this chapter. Brand loyalty i.e. the dependent variable is discussed in
chapter 2.1 and then all the independent variables are described. Chapter 2.2 covers perceive
brand quality, while 2.3 describes customer satisfaction. Brand image, brand experience, and
social media marketing are discussed in chapters 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 respectively. Finally, conceptual
framework and research hypotheses are developed in chapter 2.7.
Brand loyalty is the main subject of interest for marketing researchers. The previous research on
brand loyalty shows that spending expenses of loyal buyers are higher than non-loyal buyers. So,
brand loyal customers are considered to be a company`s most valuable group(Ganesh,2000). The
theories based on brand loyalty are defined based on two components; they are attitudinal loyalty
and behavioral loyalty(Russell,2007). There has been a lot focus on attitudinal brand loyalty
since it could not portray a satisfactory scenario of loyalty. Dick and Basu (1994, p. 100) a state
that “the behavioral definition is, consequently, insufficient to explain how and why brand
loyalty developed and modified up''. Further, they describe that behavioral loyalty is related to
proportional purchase, purchase sequence and the probability of purchase. Moreover, the
attitudinal components got more support from Kabiraj & Shanmugan (2011, p. 286), who
interpret “brand loyalty is the consumer's conscious or unconscious decision, expressed through
intention or behavior, to repurchase a brand continually”.
Brand loyalty can be described as, "a deeply held commitment to re-buy or re-patronize a
preferred product/service consistently in the future, causing a repetitive same brand or same
brand-set purchasing, despite situational influences and marketing efforts having the potential to
cause switching behavior” (Son K, et al., 2010). Dick and Basu (1994) explain there may be
positive as well as negative perception of the consumers towards the brand and the negative
perception may lead to patronize of the brand but in few occasions.
Page 8
Dick and Basu’s (1994) customer loyalty model is the combination on both attitude and behavior
loyalty. Moreover, they developed the conceptual framework for brand loyalty and defined
"loyalty is the result of the interaction between a customer’s relative attitude to a brand, and their
repeat purchase behavior for that brand". Further, the loyal group of customers was divided into
four types; true loyal, spurious loyal latent loyal and non-loyal. 'True loyal' customers were the
group of people with high attitudinal and behavioral loyalty, those with high behavioral loyalty,
but low attitudinal loyalty as 'spurious loyal', those with high attitudinal loyalty but low
behavioral loyalty as 'latent loyal', and those with low attitudinal and behavioral loyalty as 'non-
loyal'(Dick and Basu,1994).
The pattern in consuming durable and non-durable goods or consumption goods are not similar
Thiele & Bennett (2001). Customers make a purchase in consumption goods frequently while
the purchase of durable goods is made on rare occasions. Brand loyalty is a consumer attachment
to a high value of the brand (Aaker,1996). A consumer will deliver loyalty, trust for the brand in
regards to their beliefs and expectation. Also, they will get remained to their loyal brand and are
not carried away by the strategies of their competitor`s brand(Aaker,1996). He further describes
brand loyalty of customers in five different levels.
1) The consumers who often switch their brand and don’t consider to remain to the brand is a
switcher.
2) A Habitual Buyer is a group of loyal customers, but the loyalty may not necessarily be on
satisfaction and pride.
3) The consumers satisfied with the brand are satisfied buyers. They are the loyal customers
based on profit and loss, but the loyalty is not based on pride and familiarity of the brand.
4) The next level of consumers is those who liked the brand. Now, influence towards new
product is rare, but the consumer group yet openly does not express their pride to others
related to the brand.
5) Committed buyers are the group of consumers who feels proud towards the brand and
express their pride which results as a promotion of the brand.
Page 9
2.2 Perceived Brand Quality
(Aaker,1991) states the perceive quality of consumers has a great impact towards loyalty of the
brand and company success. It plays a vital role to maintain a warm relationship and trust inside
the customers. Thus, perceive quality grows stronger and keeps away from competitors.(Pappu,
Quester, & Cooksey, 2006) developed a parameter to measure the quality of durable goods.
According to them, easy access, serviceability, durability, performance and excellent feature
determine the quality towards brand loyal customers.
Perceived quality is defined as the consumers’ judgment about an entity's (service's) overall
excellence or superiority (Zeithaml, 1987). Rowely,1995 defines perceive quality in the service
sector is a kind of attitude, but different from the satisfaction, occurs as perception of
performance from their expectations. The main parameter for the brand loyalty is the perceived
quality(Gurbuz,2008). He explains that when the perceived quality is view most important
element of the brand, results in the occurrence of brand loyalty. The perceive brand quality
enhances the profitability of the company due to the influence in brand loyalty and the increase
of satisfied customers(Apéria & Back,2004).
(Kan,2002) defines perceive quality is the overall knowledge and experience applied while
making a purchase that includes the attributes like product benefit, durability, reliability, function
of the product. (Aaker,1996) defines the difference between perceiving quality and real quality.
It is because the customer gets negatively affected by the bad image of the product in the future
as well. Besides, the consumers will not believe the same product, even if its quality has been
upgraded later. Consumer examines a product quality from their past knowledge and experiences
which results in consumer subjective judgment in product quality(Holbrook & Corfman, 1985).
The previous studies based on customer satisfaction portray it has a direct and indirect impact on
the profitability of the firm. Luo and Homburg (2007) explain that customer satisfaction has a
positive influence on the profitability of the firm. Most of the studies are carried with the
relationship with the customer business pattern. (Chi and Qu, 2008; Faullant et al., 2008) states
that the brand Kotler & Armstrong (2010, p37) defines customer satisfaction as ``the extent to
which a product’s (whether goods or services) perceived performance matches a buyer’s
Page 10
expectations``. Customer satisfaction is a major driver information of the customer’s desires for
future purchase (Mittal & Kamakura, 2001). Customer Satisfaction is the overall accumulation of
customer expectation before the purchase and after purchase of the product Serkan & Gökhan
(2009).
Loyalty of the customer increase with the increase in customer satisfaction. Moreover, it leads to
positive word-of-mouth and enforces the repurchasing behavior.
According to Shukla (2004, p. 85), customer satisfaction is “customer’s psychological response
to his/her or her positive evaluation of the consumption outcome in relation to his/her
expectation''. Satisfaction is derived after the consumption of the product or service. The
customer evaluation of satisfaction is the comparison between the expected performances with
the actual performance(Shukla, 2004). The performance of the product or service is highly
influenced by the expectation of customer (Churchill & G. A,1982). The performance of the
brand depends upon the features and attributes that the customer expects. These characteristics
can be in the form of hardware, software, style or another functionality (Churchill & G. A,
1982). Customer satisfaction is one of the measures for finding the performance of the product
and organization relating to its competitive market environment(Hill & Alexander,2006).
(Santouridis & Trivellas,2010)mentions satisfied customers have high possibility to stick with
the existing product of the company while dissatisfied can switch easily to other alternative
brands.
The loyalty to the brand and positive attitude is determined by the satisfied customers. Moreover,
it enforces the loyal customer for repurchase of product again and again (Youl & John, 2010).
Further, many empirical studies on products showed that satisfaction leads towards positive
loyalty. The satisfied customer repurchases the product for the next time as well. Satisfaction is
the determining factor for brand loyalty, but in some condition, a satisfied customer might turn
towards other similar products (Youl & John,2010).To ensure repurchasing behavior, a satisfied
customer should also possess a positive attitude towards the customer product. The loyalty to the
brand and positive attitude is determined by the satisfied customers. Moreover, it enforces the
loyal customer for repurchase of product again and again (Youl & John, 2010).
Page 11
2.4 Brand image
(Keller, 1993) describes ``Brand image is the perceptions of the customers which are reflected by
the different associations they held in mind about the brand``. Keller further defines that images
are created by brand associations which is the perception inside the memory of the customer.
Images are those perceptions that customer think about the brand that appears in their
mind(Keller,1993). Brand image is a major factor for the organization to launch their products
and services successfully in the market(Coulter &zaltmen,1994). According to (Roth,1992)
brand image is the meaning consumers associated with the products.
Brand Image acts a major part of the proper judgment and evaluation of the product or service,
leading to influence in brand loyalty (Chen and Myagmarsuren,2001).Moreover, brand image
increases attitudinal and behavioral responsiveness of the followers. Brand image is defined as
“perceptions about a brand as reflected by the brand association held in consumer memory''(Lee.
H, Lee. C & Wu.C, 2011). They further state that consumers generally mix the tangible and
intangible characteristics of the brand through feeling and thoughts in their mind. And those
positive feelings and attitudes towards the brand results in the repurchase of the product.(Lee. H,
Lee. C&Wu. C, 2011). The major characteristics of the brand image are its uniqueness while
compare with its competing products. The uniqueness of the product may differ from each other
according to its color, packaging, weight, design, texture and others.
Brand image portrays the overall image and impression of the brand in the memory of the
customers (Upamannyu and Mathur 2012). Also, brand image displays the content of the brand
like reputation, function, brand name and overall values(Upamannyu and Mathur 2012).
The brand image plays a major role in repurchasing product, differentiating from its competitors,
adds attachment towards the brand for its customers(Aaker,1991). Kuusik (2007) concludes that
brand image is the most significant variable that increase the brand loyalty of the product or
service. Lazarevic (2011) states brand image is the most impressive measure to reach the goal of
brand loyalty. Therefore, a positive brand image leads firms to deliver their brand value to their
customers which reinforces the brand loyalty.
Page 12
2.5 Brand experience
Brand experience is subjective, internal consumer responses (sensations, feelings, and cognitions
and behavioral responses) evoked by brand related stimuli that are part of a brand’s design and
identity, packaging, communications, and environments (Brakus et al., 2009).According to him,
the consumer experience is generated from the interaction of consumer between tangible or
intangible brand that arises as consumer responses after consuming a brand. They further classify
brand experience into four major dimensions; sensory, affective, intellectual and behavioral. The
brand experience is the main motivating factor for brand repurchase (Brakus et al,2009). Ambler
et al.(2002) describes the brand experience is generated after the consumption of the product,
taking about the brand resulting the promotion and other marketing activities. The brand
experience in the service sector is created by the perception of the customers at every touch point
after being directly involved with the services or through any kind of advertisement
(Alloza,2008).
The major elements influencing brand loyalty are brand name, design, symbols, materials,
packaging, environment and others (Shim,2012). The brand experience reinforces positive
feelings and sentiments of their customers towards the brand, so it is considered to be valuable
driving factor for brand loyalty(Brakus et al,2009). The consumers having a positive brand using
experience,
Acknowledge the brand and supplier and these positive factors may lead to the re consumption
of the same brand(Goodson, 2011).
The importance of brand experience is that it not only increases the willingness to consume the
brand again, but also influence the willing, to try for its brand line
extensions(Kim&sullivan,1998). These brand extensions are the different products, but produced
by the same brand of company. These researchers conclude that there exists a strong relation
between brand experience and brand loyalty. The brand experience can be positive as well as
negative and the positive and the pleasant brand experience leads towards the customer
satisfaction and brand loyalty (Brakus et al,2009). A customer having strong and positive brand
experience will be reminded by the customer and it may result in repurchase of the brand (Houch
and Deighton,1989).Therefore, a pleasant and memorable brand experience will develop the trust
Page 13
and warm relationship with the customer that will develop brand loyalty in the future (da Motto
Filho,2012).
''Social media are the online means of communication, conveyance, collaboration and cultivation
among interconnected and interdependent networks of people, communities and organizations
enhanced by technological capabilities and mobility''.(Tuten &Sollomon,2015). (Kaplan
&Haenlein,2010) define social media as "a group of Internet based applications that build on the
ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0, which allows the creation and exchange
of user-generated content''. Social media are computer-mediated tools that allow people or
companies to create, share, or exchange information, career interests, ideas, and pictures/videos
in virtual communities and networks (authority & vanity, 2016).
Social media marketing is the use of social media to facilitate exchanges between consumers and
organizations. It is valuable to marketers because it provides inexpensive access to consumers
and a variety of ways to interact and engage customers at different points in the purchase cycle
(Tuten &Sollomon,2015). Social media marketing refers to the process of giving traffic or
attention through social media sites and makes the content more attractive and encourages reader
for sharing in social networking sites(Written, 2015).
Social media marketing is the effective utilization of resources and time that provides companies
to build a platform for creating brand loyalty of customers rather than the traditional
methods(Pollock et al., 2011). The companies can promote their brand through effective
utilization of social media such as social networking sites, content communities, virtual world,
blogs and others, that drives the brand loyalty of the consumer towards the product (Zarella,
2010; Kaplan and Haenlein, 2009; Weinberg, 2009). Moreover, social media encourage
consumers to share views and opinions to their friends and families about the product or service,
resulting the loyalty towards the brand. (Stileman, 2009; Mangold and Foulds, 2009). Also, the
communication between the customers works as an important tool for increasing brand
awareness, brand recognition and recall, and influences brand loyalty (Gunelius, 2011).
Social media marketing is a new and different concept in marketing than traditional ones because
it aims to influence brand image and loyalty through the special attention and brand building
Page 14
strategies(Gordhamer, n.d.). Firms appoint the social media consultants and expert to deliver
attractive offers and activities in the online environment, enhancing the brand loyal
customers(Coon, 2010).
2.7 Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses
The variables were taken into consideration from the previous studies. In this study, brand
loyalty is the dependent variable and brand image, perceived brand quality, customer
satisfaction, brand experience and social media marketing are the independent variables.
The conceptual framework is given below.
Perceive Brand
Quality
Customer
Satisfaction
Brand Image
dependent variable
Brand loyalty
Brand Experience
Social Media
Marketing
Page 15
2.7.2 Research hypothesis
There are several that are influencing brand loyalty of a Samsung mobiles. These include brand
image, perceived brand quality, customer satisfaction, brand experience and social media
marketing. We have formed five hypotheses and they are as follows.
H1: Perceived brand quality has a positive influence in determining the brand loyalty.
H2: The customer satisfaction positively influences the brand loyalty of Samsung phones.
H3: The brand experience of the customers positively affects brand loyal customers to buy a
Samsung mobile phone.
H4: Brand image has the positive influence in determining the brand loyalty of Samsung
phones.
H5: Social media marketing has a positive influence towards the brand loyalty of Samsung
mobile.
Page 16
3. Methodology
The Quantitative method was used in this research. Brand loyalty is used as dependent variable
while the independent variables are perceive brand quality, customer satisfaction, brand image,
brand experience and social media marketing. The data were collected through the questionnaire
method.
The topic on brand loyalty was interesting and understandable for the author. Samsung phones
was selected as the product of the study since it is hugely popular and is the market leader
throughout the world, which would be interesting. The research was decided to conduct in the
Nepalese market for Samsung mobile customers because it was easy for the author to reach the
target audiences.
Page 17
Quantitative method is used to meet the purpose of this study, estimate the quantitative effect of
the causal variables upon the variable that they influence. Brand loyalty is the dependent
variable, which is influenced by the independent variables. The independent variables are
customer satisfaction, brand quality, brand experience, brand image, and social media.
Dependent and independent variables have a linear relationship. By definition, linear relationship
is the proportional increase/decrease in independent variability will proportional increase
/decrease dependent variables.
Generally, data are collected by two methods. They are primary data collection and secondary
data collection method. The primary data collection method contains a questionnaire method,
interview, case study and others. On the other hand, the data which are already collected for
specific studies or research is the secondary data. The data collection process used in this study is
questionnaire method. The questionnaire was created through Google docs and distributed using
social media site like Facebook, where the link was sent to respondents to fill the questionnaire.
The questionnaire was created using seven-point Liker scale (one for `strongly disagree` to seven
`strongly agree`)
Population is stated as “the entire group of people, events, or things that researcher wishes to
investigate” (Sekaran, 1992,). A group of population who is currently using Samsung mobile
phones in Nepal are the population of study. The questionnaires were only distributed to those
people who were using the phones of Samsung brand. The age limits between 18-60 years old.
Also, well-educated group of respondents was selected so they could answer the questionnaire in
the meaningful way. Sampling refers to the procedure that the researcher uses to select a
sampling unit(Kent,2007). The sampling unit followed by the researcher is the online survey.
Probability and non-probability are the two types of sampling techniques used in research.
Probability sampling are those sampling those leads to random selection while the non -
Page 18
probability does not do that(Bryman & Bell, 2007). A probability sampling has non-zero chance
of the element to be selected which includes sampling likes simple random, systematic, multi
stage cluster. On the other hand, non- probability sampling consists sampling like convenience,
quota and snowball sampling(Bryman & Bell, 2007). In this research, convenience is used by the
researcher because it was easy to use, accessible, economical and short time consuming.
The questionnaire was collected through Google docs using social networking site like Facebook
and later the data was transferred into SPSS. Sampling size depends according research questions
and objectives (Saunders et, 2011). The limitation of time, money and other factors should be
considered before choosing sample size. The sample size of the study is 120 respondents from
Nepal that are using Samsung phones. A total of 186 questionnaires was sent online, out of them,
128 responses were recorded in Google docs. 120 responses were considered for data analysis
because the remaining of them were incomplete and disqualified.
3.5 Measurement
The measurement of independent variables was applied from the previous research papers that
has already verified and approved the valid and reliable measurements.
Reliability: According to Fisher(2010), the degree of results should be consistent with the
repetition of the research under the same condition and measured items. The results generated
should remain same under the same assumption. The reliability of primary data is crucial for the
study to ensure a high level of reliability. Questionnaires completed by respondents were auto
saved in Google docs and then exported to excel. Later, the responses were analyzed through
SPSS.
Validity: Validity refers to the measurement and strength of material used in research that are
responsible for generating results (Fisher, 2007). The validity of the research is related to the
methods used for collection of valid data and their analysis. A proper instrument used in the
research and valid measures are the important element in validity and they should meet all the
phase of validity throughout the research(Patton, 1999). The questionnaires designed for this
Page 19
research were taken from the conceptual framework which were important to generate a response
on brand loyalty.
Page 20
I think Samsung mobile is well- known and prestigious
I think Samsung phone has a reputation for high quality
I think Samsung is one of the top brands among Smartphone.
The seven-point liker scale was adopted from the research of Brakus et al. (2009). The former
author used to measure automobile experience in their study. The experience measure is covered
by the association of feelings, cognition, sensations and behavioral responses of the consumer
towards the brand. The questionnaire numbered from (18-21) are as below.
Page 21
from literature review from (Mangold and Foulds, 2009), (Freidman, 2011) and (Brito, 2011).
The questionnaires are as follows.
I believe social media plays important role in choosing a brand of smart phone.
Samsung mobile is very popular among my friends and families in social
networking sites like Facebook, whose suggestion and feedback makes me loyal
towards it.
The content on the Samsung mobile page group, websites are up to date and
attractive.
4. Findings
This chapter provides the graphical presentation or charts according to the findings of
questionnaire survey. It presents an overview of empirical findings.
Page 22
4.1 Demographics
The questionnaire consists of several parts that include demographic information and a seven
point Likert scale. The questionnaires nearly sent to 185 people who were currently using
Samsung mobiles and 134 responses were recorded. However, only 120 responses were accepted
because of incomplete responses and did not match nationality requirements to be in the
conducted research. The gender distribution consists of 57.5 percent of males and 42.5 percent of
females in total. The majority of the age group belong to (25-30) years with 54.2% followed by
(31-36) years with20.8%, (18-24) years group with 19.2 %. Then, (37-45) years groups cover
4.2% while the least of all is age above 46 with 1.7%.
Table 2: Gender
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Male 69 57.5 57.5 57.5
female 51 42.5 42.5 100.0
Total 120 100.0 100.0
Table 3: Age
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 18-24 23 19.2 19.2 19.2
25-30 65 54.2 54.2 73.3
31-36 25 20.8 20.8 94.2
37-45 5 4.2 4.2 98.3
46 above 2 1.7 1.7 100.0
Total 120 100.0 100.0
Page 23
Table 4: Education
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid high school 10 8.3 8.3 8.3
diploma 17 14.2 14.2 22.5
bachelor 37 30.8 30.8 53.3
master graduate 39 32.5 32.5 85.8
advance level 17 14.2 14.2 100.0
Total 120 100.0 100.0
The distribution of education level is seen in table3. The master graduate students are highest
with 32.5 percent following bachelor passed students with 30.8% . Diploma and advance level
respondents are third with equal of 14.2% and high school respondents are at least with 8.3%.
Page 24
Figure 2
When asked about above statement, 9.17% strongly agree, 25.83% agree and 32.50 % slightly
agree that Samsung offers durable products . The 16.67% of respondents were uncertain while
5.83% slightly disagree, 3.33% disagree and 6.67% strongly disagree with the statement.
Page 25
Figure 3
For the above question which was asked to respondents about the reliability of the
Samsung phone, 12.5% of respondents strongly agree, 26.67% agree and 26.67% again
slightly agree. But 15.83% of respondents remained uncertain, 11.67% slightly disagree,
3.33% disagree and 3.33% of respondents strongly disagree with the above statement.
figure 4
Page 26
For this question, a majority of respondents agree(18.33%strongly agreed, 35% agreed ,
21.33%slightly agreed) that Samsung mobile offers excellent features. Despite 15.83%
uncertain, while 5.83%slightly disagree, 3.33% disagree and 4.17% strongly disagree
with the above statement.
Figure 5
A shown in figure 5, 7.5% of the respondents strongly agree, 23.33% agree and 23.33%slighly
agree with the good quality of Samsung phone. On the other hand, 25% of the respondents
remain uncertain while 8.33% slightly disagree,5.83% disagree and 6.67% strongly disagree with
the good quality of phone.
Page 27
Figure 6
For the above question which was asked about the performance of the Samsung phone, 15.83%
of respondents strongly agree, 29.17% agree and 27.5% slightly agree. Besides, 12.5% of
respondents uncertain, 8.33% slightly disagree , 4.17% strongly disagree and 2.17% disagree
regarding the performance of phone.
Figure: 7
Page 28
For this question, a majority of respondents agree(7.5%strongly agreed, 33.33% agreed , 30%
slightly agreed) they are satisfied with using Samsung phones. Despite 11.67% uncertain, while
6.67% slightly disagree, 5.83% disagree and 5% strongly disagree with the above statement.
figure: 8
As shown in figure 8, 13.33% of the respondents strongly agree, 29.17% agree and 27.5%slighly
agree with the good quality of Samsung phone. On the other hand, 8.33% of the respondents
remain uncertain while 9.17% slightly disagree,5.83% disagree and 6.67% strongly disagree with
the statement above.
Page 29
figure: 9
For the above question which was asked about the functionality of the Samsung phone, 4.17% of
respondents strongly agree, 26.67% agree and 29.17% slightly agree. Besides, 17.5% of
respondents uncertain, 13.33% slightly disagree , 5% strongly disagree and 4.17% disagree
regarding the functionality of phone.
Page 30
Figure: 10
A shown in figure 10, 6.67% of the respondents strongly agree, 26.67% agree and 30.83%slighly
agree that they satisfied with the service provision of Samsung phone. On the other hand,
11.67% of the respondents remain uncertain while 14.17% slightly disagree,5.83% disagree and
4.17% strongly disagree with the statement above.
Page 31
4.4 Brand Image
Figure: 11
For this question, a majority of respondents agree(25%strongly agreed, 30.833% agreed ,
23.33% slightly agreed) that Samsung phones are fashionable. Despite 10.00% uncertain, while
4.17% slightly disagree, 2.5% disagree and 4.17% strongly disagree with the above statement.
Page 32
Figure 12
For the above question which was asked about the popularity of the Samsung phone, 23.33% of
respondents strongly agree, 30.83% agree and 24.17% slightly agree. Besides, 10% of
respondents uncertain, 5.83% slightly disagree , 3.33 strongly disagree and 2.5% disagree
regarding the functionality of phone.
Question 12: I think Samsung phone has a reputation for high quality
Figure 13
As shown in figure 14, 15% of the respondents strongly agree, 31.67% agree and 27.5%slighly
agree with the high reputation of Samsung phone. On the other hand, 15.83% of the respondents
Page 33
remain uncertain while 5% slightly disagree,2.5% disagree and 2.5% strongly disagree with the
statement above.
Question 13: I think Samsung is one of the top brands among Smartphone
Figure 14:
For this question, a majority of respondents agree(28.33%strongly agreed, 35% agreed , 15.83%
slightly agreed)that Samsung is one of the top brand phones. Despite 11.63% uncertain, while
2.5% slightly disagree, .84% disagree and 5.83% strongly disagree with the above statement.
Page 34
4.5 Brand Experience
Figure 15.
For the above question which was asked about the feelings and sentiments of the Samsung
phone, 5.83% of respondents strongly agree, 23.33% agree and 28.33% slightly agree. Besides,
23.33% of respondents uncertain, 8.33% slightly disagree , 7.5% strongly disagree and 3.33%
disagree regarding the feeling and sentiments towards the phone.
Page 35
Figure 16
For the above question, 4.17% of respondents strongly agree, 20.83% agree and 30.83% slightly
agree. Besides, 22.5% of respondents uncertain, 6.65% slightly disagree , 5% strongly disagree
and 6.67% disagree with the above statement.
Figure 17
Page 36
A shown in figure 7.5% of the respondents strongly agree, 18.33% agree and 30.83%slighly
agree with the above statement. On the other hand, 20% of the respondents remain uncertain
while 14.17% slightly disagree,5% disagree and 4.17% strongly disagree with the statement
above.
Figure 18
For this question above, a majority of respondents agree(11.67%strongly agreed, 26.05% agreed
, 21.05% slightly agreed) with the question above. Despite 15.13% uncertain, while 11.67%
slightly disagree, .4.2% disagree and 9.24% strongly disagree with the above statement.
Page 37
4.6 Brand loyalty
Figure 19.
For the above question which was asked about the favorable attitudes towards Samsung phone,
9.17% of respondents strongly agree, 27.5% agree and 27.5% slightly agree. Besides, 17.5% of
respondents uncertain, 10% slightly disagree , 5% strongly disagree and 3.33% disagree
regarding attitudes towards phone.
Page 38
Figure 20.
For this question, a majority of respondents agree(14.17%strongly agreed, 30% agreed , 22.5%
slightly agreed)that they recommend Samsung to their friends and families. Despite 14.17%
uncertain, while 8.33% slightly disagree, 6.67% disagree and 4.17% strongly disagree with the
above statement.
Figure 21.
Page 39
As shown in figure 21, 17% of the respondents strongly agree, 20% agree and 18.33%slighly
agree with the above statement. On the other hand, 14.17% of the respondents remain uncertain
while 14.17% slightly disagree,7.5% disagree and 11.67% strongly disagree with the statement
above.
Figure 22
For the above question which was asked about the loyalty towards Samsung phone, 10.83% of
respondents strongly agree, 20.83% agree and 20% slightly agree. Besides, 17.5% of respondents
uncertain, 15% slightly disagree , 8.33 strongly disagree and 7.5% disagree regarding the
statement.
Page 40
Question 22: I believe social media plays important role in choosing a brand of smart
phone
Figure 23.
For the above question which was asked about role of social media for choosing Samsung phone,
22.5% of respondents strongly agree, 24.17% agree and 15% slightly agree. Besides, 15% of
respondents uncertain, 7.5% slightly disagree , 5.67% strongly disagree and 9.17% disagree.
Question 23: Samsung mobile is very popular between my friends and families in social
networking sites
Page 41
Figure 24.
For this question, a majority of respondents agree(5.83% strongly agreed, 27.5% agreed ,
33.33% slightly agreed) that Samsung is popular in social networking sites. Despite 15.83%
uncertain, while 10% slightly disagree, 5.83% disagree and 1.67% strongly disagree with the
above statement.
Question 24: The content on the Samsung mobiles page group, websites are up to date
and attractive
Figure 25.
As shown in figure 11.67% of the respondents strongly agree, 24.17% agree and 23.33%slighly
agree with the above statement. On the other hand, 18.83% of the respondents remain uncertain
while 15% slightly disagree,5% disagree and 5% strongly disagree with the statement above.
Page 42
5. Result and analysis
A regression analysis is performed to identify factors that influence brand loyalty of Samsung
phone. Before running regression, data clearing and statistical test were performed in SPSS.
First, the normality test and after that linearity, reliability and validity are carried. They collect
data are passed through these tests. The regression analysis is performed by mean value of each
independent variables as well as the dependent variable. The mean value was calculated by
dividing the number of questions in each variable that are brand loyalty, perceive brand quality,
customer satisfaction, brand quality and social media marketing.
Page 43
Normality test estimates if the sample data determines if the sample population has been
distributed from normally distributed population or not. It is the statistical and graphical method
that tests if the sample data are normally distributed or not(Paul,2003). Meyers(2006) states
If the plotted data forms a straight diagonal line in the plots, it is said to be normally distributed
sample data. To check for normality, Skewnes's, Kurtosis, and Shapiro-Wilk test is done. The
Skewnes's should range between 1 to -1 and Kurtosis range between 3 to -3 to meet the criteria
of normality(Paul,2006). Also, the significant value(p) should be less than 0.5 for normal
distribution(Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C.,2014).
The data for the Samsung brand meet the criteria for the assumptions of normality. The
Skeweness and Kurtosis. Also, the Shapiro-Wilk test indicates the sample data is normally
distributed since (p<0.05).
5.2 Multicollinearity
The multicollinearity test is performed to find whether two or more independent predictors are
highly correlated to each other or not (Hinton, Murray, & Brownlow,2014). As a general rule of
thumb, the predictor value can be correlated with each other as 0.8 or else the problem of
multicollinearity occurs(Hinton,2014).
Collinearity Statistics Tolerance value is used to check for any collinearity in our data sample.
As a rule of thumb, a tolerance value below .1 indicates a serious problem of
multicollinearity(Hinton, 2014). From table 7 below, we can see that the tolerance value of all
the predictors are greater than 1. So, the problem of multicollinearity does not exist in Samsung
brand model.
The reliability of the questionnaire is measured by Cronbatch's alpha. The alpha value that is
greater than 0.75 is regarded as sensible and reliable(Hinton,2014).
The Cronbatch's alpha value of Samsung brand is .899 and satisfies the assumption of reliability.
Page 44
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.899 6
Table 2, below shows the regression model for the Samsung brand from SPSS.
Table 5
Change Statistics
R Adjusted R Std. Error of R Square F Sig. F
Model R Square Square the Estimate Change Change df1 df2 Change
1 .879a .773 .756 .784 .773 47.204 8 111 .000
a. Predictors: (Constant), media, Gender, Age, Education, experience, satisfaction, quality,
image
The R square value in the model summary of the Samsung brand shows the amount of variance
in the dependent variable that van be explained by the independent variables. For Samsung
brand, the independent variables(brand loyalty) together, gather for 77.3 percent of the variance
in the brand loyalty of Samsung phones. Also, a 22.7 percent change of dependent variables on
Samsung brand is explained by other variables that has not been listed in the regression model.
The R value (.879) is the multiple correlation coefficient between all the entered independent and
independent variables. R value measures the strength of the independent variables all together
associated with the dependent variable(brand loyalty).
Page 45
5.4 ANOVA output
ANOVA results in the variations in the dependent variable that is explained by the regression
and evaluates the general validity of the multiple regression Paul(2006).The ANOVA table is
produced below which test the significance of the regression model.
Table 6: ANOVAa
Sum of Mean
Model Squares df Square F Sig.
1 Regression 232.236 8 29.029 47.204 .000b
Residual 68.262 111 .615
Total 300.498 119
a. Dependent Variable: loyalty
b. Predictors: (Constant), media, Gender, Age, Education, experience,
satisfaction, quality, image
We can see in table 6 that sig. (p value)=0.000. As p<.05, our predictors are significantly better
than would be expected by chance. The regression line predicted by the independent variables
explains a significant amount of the variation in the independent variable. It can be normally
reported in a similar way to other ANOVAs: F(8,111) = 47.204; p < .05.
The next part of our analysis Table7, is the Coefficients table which shows the variables are
individually significant predictors of the dependent variable(brand loyalty). The multiple
Page 46
regression takes the form of equations that has a coefficient(b) of every predictor in the model
(Andy Field, 2009). The b value indicates the relationship between brand loyalty and all the
predictor. These coefficients determine whether the relationship is positive or negative. The beta
value indicates the average amount by which dependent increases when the independent variable
increases by one standard deviation when all other independent variables are held
constant(Hinton, 2014).
Table7: Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized Collinearity
Coefficients Coefficients Statistics
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF
1 (Constant) -.502 .452 -1.111 .269
Gender .043 .158 .013 .276 .783 .873 1.145
Age -.040 .090 -.021 -.447 .656 .902 1.108
Education -.064 .070 -.046 -.913 .363 .820 1.219
quality .081 .109 .064 .737 .462 .271 3.690
satisfaction .579 .090 .525 6.437 .000 .308 3.251
experience .505 .079 .447 6.383 .000 .418 2.392
image -.091 .101 -.079 -.902 .369 .265 3.769
media .016 .054 .016 .303 .762 .750 1.334
a. Dependent Variable: loyalty
The Unstandardized Coefficients B column gives the coefficients of the independent variable in
the regression equation of the model is
The Standardized Beta Coefficient column informs us of the contribution than an individual
variable makes in the model. The Beta weight is the average amount the brand loyalty increases
Page 47
by one standard deviation in all other predictors that are held constant. These are standardized to
compare them.
The regression coefficient beta(β), t test and significance level values are performed to test the
hypothesis. The variables are statistically significant (p<.05). This helps us to see the significant
predictor.
Control effect
Table 7 provides the coefficients(β), t value and the level of significance(p). The control
variables gender(p=.783), age(p=.656) and education(p=.363) are found to be not significant in
this model since the p value is greater than .05.
H1: Perceived brand quality has positive influence in determining the brand loyalty.
The result of the regression analysis from table 7 showed that perceive brand quality is not
statically significant to determine the brand loyalty of a Samsung phone. (β = .81, t=.737, p>.05).
Thus, H1 was not supported in this model.
H2: The customer satisfaction positively influences the brand loyalty of Samsung phones.
The result shows a significant relationship between the customer satisfaction and brand loyalty
brand loyalty of a Samsung phones. (β = .579, t=6.437, p<.05). Thus, H2 was supported.
H3: The brand experience of the customers positively affects brand loyal customers to buy
a Samsung mobile phone.
The result of the regression analysis that brand experience is statically significant to determine
the brand loyalty of Samsung phone. (β = .505, t=.6.383, p<.05). Thus, H3 was supported in this
model.
H4: Brand image has the positive influence in determining the brand loyalty of Samsung
phones.
Page 48
The result of the regression analysis from table 7 showed that brand image is not statically
significant to determine the brand loyalty of a Samsung phone. (β = -.91, t=.101, p>.05). Thus,
H4 was not supported in this model.
H5: Social media marketing has a positive influence towards the brand loyalty of Samsung
mobile.
The results have failed to show a significant relationship between social media marketing and
brand loyalty of Samsung phones. (β = .16, t=.16, p. >.05). Thus, H5 was rejected.
From the observation of table 7, we can see satisfaction(p<.05) and experience(p<.05) are found
be significant predictors. The other remaining predictors are not found to be significant since
their p value are greater than .05. The p value is greater than the minimum level(.05) in these
predictors(gender p=.783, age p= .656, education p= .363, quality p= .462, image p= .369, media
p= .762).
The Unstandardized Coefficient Std. Error column provides an estimate of the variability of the
coefficient(Hinton,2014).
Customer satisfaction (b=.579): The coefficient of customer satisfaction indicates that brand
loyalty increases by .579 unit, if the customer satisfaction has increased by 1 unit for the
Samsung mobile brand. The implication is only true if another independent variable, i.e. brand
experience is constant.
Brand experience (b=.505): The coefficient of brand experience indicates that the brand loyalty
increases by .505 unit, if the brand experience is increased by 1 unit for Samsung mobile brand.
The implication is only true if another independent variable, i.e. customer satisfaction is
constant.
Page 49
6. Discussion
From the regression analysis, we found out that customer satisfaction and brand experience are
significant and determining brand loyalty. Other independent variables i.e. perceive brand
quality, brand image, social media marketing and the control variable age, gender, and education
do not have significant influence to determine brand loyalty for Samsung phones. Customer
satisfaction and brand experience are the two independent variables that influence the brand
loyalty for Samsung brand.
Customer satisfaction and brand experience is the factor that determines the brand loyalty for
Samsung brand which is confirmed by the regression analysis. The loyalty to the brand and
positive attitude is determined by the satisfied customers. Moreover, it enforces the loyal
customer for repurchase of product again and again (Youl & John, 2010). The satisfied customer
repurchase the product for the next time as well and may turn into loyal customers. These
matches with the result of our analysis.
Page 50
Shukla(2004) argues satisfaction is based on an individual customer measure other than objective
standard. So, the brand performance rating in Samsung mobile is subjective.
(Chi and Qu, 2008; Faullant et al., 2008) states that the brand loyalty of the customer increase
with the increase in customer satisfaction and enforces the repurchasing behavior. So, these
arguments can be justifiable goes with the Samsung brand.
Kotler & Armstrong (2010) states customer satisfaction as the extent to which a product’s
perceived performance matches a buyer’s expectations. It seems that the performance of the
Samsung mobile has been able to meet the expectations of their users.
The performance of the product or service is highly influenced by the expectation of customer
(Churchill Jr, G. A,1982). The performance of the brand depends upon the features and attributes
that the customer expects. Samsung brand users are highly satisfied with the style, looks,
software, hardware and other functions of the phone. This means the customer are satisfied with
the overall performance of the phone. The customers that are satisfied with the brand has more
possibility to stick with the same brand rather than to change the brand in future.
Brand experience is another most determining factor that influences the brand loyalty for
Samsung phones. The regression analysis shows that brand experience is a determining factor in
the Nepalese market for determining brand loyalty. It is found that the Nepalese market for the
Samsung group has a similar pattern as referred by the theory part. Brakus et al,(2009) explains
the brand experience reinforces positive feelings and sentiments of their customers towards the
brand, so it is considered to be valuable driving factor for brand loyalty. These theory go with
our result and analysis. The regression analysis provides sufficient evidence that there is a
positive feeling towards the Samsung brand in the Nepalese market. The consumer experience is
generated from the interaction of consumer between tangible or intangible brand that arises as
consumer responses after consuming a brand (Brakus et al, 2009). The customer experience is
generated after the consumption of the Samsung brand. Brand experience is subjective, internal
consumer responses (sensations, feelings, cognitions and behavioral responses) evoked by brand
related stimuli that are part of a brand’s design and identity, packaging, communications, and
environments (Brakus et al., 2009). The Samsung brand experience is subjective and internal
consumer response like sensations, feelings, cognitions and behavioral responses that are driven
by the design, identity, packaging, communication and environment.
Page 51
A customer having strong and positive brand experience will be reminded by the customer and it
may result in repurchase of the brand(Houch and Deighton,1989). The positive brand experience
of the Samsung users will remember this brand for a long time and may repurchase the brand
again because of the pleasant brand experience. The organization`s core beliefs, attributes and
ethos which are the intangible brand related stimulus factor also influence the brand
experience(Goodson,2011). The customer has a pleasant experience of the brand also because of
the Samsung's customer friendly core beliefs, ethos, technological advancement and innovation
characteristics. The consumers having a positive brand using experience acknowledge the brand
and supplier and these positive factors may lead to the re consumption of the same
brand(Goodson, 2011).The customers having a positive experience towards Samsung are likely
to reuse again the same brand of phone. The importance of brand experience is that it not only
increase the willingness to consume the brand again, but also influence the willing, to try for its
brand line extensions(Kim& Sullivan,1998). The pleasant experience of customers not only leads
the repurchase of the Samsung phones, but also reinforces the sales in another product line of
Samsung like television, refrigerator, computer etc.
The past studies in brand loyalty have been carried in a business environment where the business
has reached its maturity and stability. There are limited studies done in the past about the factors
leading towards brand loyalty in a mobile phone. The thesis contributes by utilizing the available
knowledge on brand loyalty in relation to Samsung phone. It can come fruitful in understanding
consumer behavior in changeable environment. The market is considered to be unstable and
short time frame. The product life cycle is shorter and new entrants can enter into fierce
competition. The thesis can also be useful to the company leaders and managers to understand
the changes in the business environment driven by the rapid technological forces. It can be
beneficial to organizations to maintain the loyal customers and reinforce the sales again in near
future.
Page 52
7. Conclusion, limitations and future research
direction
In the conclusion, the smart phone has become a means of necessity in the modern world. The
use of smart phone has not only been limited to communicate with friends, families, business
personals but has a multi-purpose feature which includes data storage, camera, multimedia and
others. There has been high demand for smart phones technological advancement and
modification in the phones whenever they are introduced. Samsung mobile are one of the leading
sellers in Smartphone industries, but the competition is always tuff with other brands. Most the
Samsung mobile users is the young and middle age grouped people. They prefer phones with
technological advancement and prestigious phone that comes under economic cost.
The mobile phone industry is a quick changing industry with a dynamic market for cell phones.
A large number of the population has changeable consumer behavior because of the rapid
Page 53
technological changes and short life cycle of mobile phones. So, understanding the importance of
brand loyalty would be one of the key factors of success for the companies in near future.
There is some limitation in almost every study, so we have to compromise before considering
any kinds of generalization. The sampling design we have followed is no probability and we
need to consider the sample size before making any kinds of generalization. This means it will be
inappropriate to form a generalization beyond the same sample group. Also, the quantitative
methods were used to carry this study, however, the author can use both quantitative and
qualitative methods of study in near future.
In future research, it would be appropriate to include number of respondents and increase the
sample size. Also, the majority of the population was educated people used in this sample size,
but there may exist large number of uneducated people as well. So, the future researcher can
consider these factors. In this study, we used only five variables to predict factor influencing
brand loyalty for Samsung phones. However, there are other variables like switching cost,
attractiveness of product, customer product involvement and others. So, these other variables
may also affect to determine brand loyalty.
References
2016. (2015a, May ). What is virtual reality? - definition from WhatIs.Com. Retrieved December
1, 2016, from http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/virtual-reality
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: capitalizing on the value of a brand name New
York.
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California
management review, 38(3), 102-120.
Alexander, J., & Hill, N. (2006). Handbook of Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Measurement.
Page 54
Alloza, A. (2008). Brand engagement and brand experience at BBVA, the transformation of a
150 years old company. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(4), 371-379.
Ambler, T., Bhattacharya, C. B., Edell, J., Keller, K. L., Lemon, K. N., & Mittal, V. (2002).
Relating brandand customer perspectives on marketing management. Journal of Service
Research, 5(1), 13-25.
Apéria, T., & Back, R. (2004). Brand relations management: bridging the gap between brand
promise and brand delivery. Copenhagen Business School Pr.
authority, B. social, & vanity (2016). Social media. In Wikipedia. Retrieved from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media
Aydin, S., Özer, G., & Arasil, Ö. (2005). Customer loyalty and the effect of switching costs as a
moderator variable: A case in the Turkish mobile phone market. Marketing Intelligence &
Planning, 23(1), 89-103.
Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., & Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand experience: what is it? How is it
measured? Does it affect loyalty?. Journal of marketing, 73(3), 52-68.
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA.
Chen, C. F., & Myagmarsuren, O. (2011). Brand equity, relationship quality, relationship value,
and customer loyalty: Evidence from the telecommunications services. Total Quality
Management & Business Excellence, 22(9), 957-974.
Page 55
Chi, C. G. Q., & Qu, H. (2008). Examining the structural relationships of destination image,
tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty: An integrated approach. Tourism management, 29(4),
624-636.
Churchill Jr, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer
satisfaction. Journal of marketing research, 491-504.
Coulter, R. H., & Zaltman, G. (1994). Using the Zaltman metaphor elicitation technique to
understand brand images. NA-Advances in Consumer Research Volume 21.
Dhungana, S. (2016, May 23). More than 500, 000 phones registered in one and half months.
Retrieved December 1, 2016, from http://admin.myrepublica.com/economy/story/42892/more-
than-500-000-phones-registered-in-one-and-half-months.html
Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework.
Journal of the academy of marketing science, 22(2), 99-113.
Faullant, R., Matzler, K., & Füller, J. (2008). The impact of satisfaction and image on loyalty:
the case of Alpine ski resorts. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 18(2), 163-
178.
Page 56
Fisher, C. (2007). Researching and writing a dissertation: a guidebook for business students.
Pearson Education.
Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service
providers: an examination of the differences between switchers and stayers. Journal of
marketing, 64(3), 65-87.
Global smart phone market & industry chain report, 2008-2009. (2016, November ). Retrieved
December 1, 2016, from https://www.prlog.org/10192174-global-smart-phone-market-industry-
chain-report-20082009.html
Goodwin, R. (2016, November 16). The history of mobile phones from 1973 to 2008: The
handsets that made it ALL happen. Retrieved December 1, 2016, from
http://www.knowyourmobile.com/nokia/nokia-3310/19848/history-mobile-phones-1973-2008-
handsets-made-it-all-happen
Gordhamer, S. 4 ways social media is changing business. Retrieved December 1, 2016b, from
http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/social-media-business
Gunelius, S. (2011). 30-minute social media marketing. United States of American: McGraw-
Hill.
Gürbüz, E. (2008). Retail store branding in Turkey: its effect on perceived quality, satisfaction
and loyalty. EuroMed Journal of Business, 3(3), 286-304.
Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS explained. Routledge.
Hoch, S. J., & Deighton, J. (1989). Managing what consumers learn from experience. The
Journal of Marketing, 1-20.
Holbrook, M. B., & Corfman, K. P. (1985). Quality and value in the consumption experience:
Phaedrus rides again. Perceived quality, 31(2), 31-57.
Page 57
Hunt, K. A., & Keaveney, S. M. (1994). A process model of the effects of price promotions on
brand image. Psychology & Marketing, 11(6), 511-532.
IDC: Smartphone vendor market share. (2016). Retrieved December 1, 2016, from
http://www.idc.com/prodserv/smartphone-market-share.jsp
Kabiraj, S., & Shanmugan, J. (2011). Development of a conceptual framework for brand loyalty:
A Euro-Mediterranean perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 18(4), 285-299.
Kan, W. H. (2002). The Study of Relation between Product Value, Brand Trust, Brand Affect
and Brand Loyalty. Unpublished master thesis, Tamkang University, Taiwan.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and
opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
Khanal, R., & RIJAL, P. (2016, November 30). Mobile subscriptions outnumber population.
Retrieved December 1, 2016, from http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2016-06-
14/mobile-subscriptions-outnumber-population.html
Kim, B. D., & Sullivan, M. W. (1998). The effect of parent brand experience on line extension
trial and repeat purchase. Marketing Letters, 9(2), 181-193.
Page 58
Kuusik, A. (2007). Affecting customer loyalty: Do different factors have various influences in
different loyalty levels?. The University of Tartu Faculty of Economics and Business
Administration Working Paper, (58-2007).
Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). Resistance to brand switching when
a radically new brand is introduced: A social identity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing,
74(6), 128-146.
Lee, H. M., Lee, C. C., & Wu, C. C. (2011). Brand image strategy affects brand equity after
M&A. European Journal of Marketing, 45(7/8), 1091-1111.
Li, X., Ortiz, P. J., Browne, J., Franklin, D., Oliver, J. Y., Geyer, R., ... & Chong, F. T. (2010,
September). Smartphone evolution and reuse: Establishing a more sustainable model. In 2010
39th International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops (pp. 476-484). IEEE.
Luo, X., & Homburg, C. (2007). Neglected outcomes of customer satisfaction. Journal of
Marketing, 71(2), 133-149.
Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion
mix. Business horizons, 52(4), 357-365.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and
interpretation. Sage.
Mittal, V., & Kamakura, W. A. (2001). Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase behavior:
Investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. Journal of marketing
research, 38(1), 131-142.
Page 59
Newbold, P., & Carlson, W. C. (2003). Betty M. Thorne Statistics for Business and Economics
(Vol. 850). Prentice Hall.
Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health
services research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189.
Pitt, L. F., Parent, M., Junglas, I., Chan, A., & Spyropoulou, S. (2011). Integrating the
smartphone into a sound environmental information systems strategy: Principles, practices and a
research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 27-37.
Pollock, N., Jackson, N., Gefter, A., Walker, T. D., Friedersdorf, C., Graham, D. A., … Skurie, J.
(2011, July 11). Infographic: Using social media to build brand loyalty. . Retrieved from
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/07/infographic-using-social-media-to-
build-brand-loyalty/241701/
Roth, M. S. (1992). Depth versus breadth strategies for global brand image management. Journal
of Advertising, 21(2), 25-36.
Rowley, J. (1998). Quality measurement in the public sector: Some perspectives from the service
quality literature. Total Quality Management, 9(2-3), 321-333.
Rundle-Thiele, S., & Bennett, R. (2001). A brand for all seasons? A discussion of brand loyalty
approaches and their applicability for different markets. Journal of Product & Brand
Management, 10(1), 25-37.
Page 60
Santouridis, I., & Trivellas, P. (2010). Investigating the impact of service quality and customer
satisfaction on customer loyalty in mobile telephony in Greece. The TQM Journal, 22(3), 330-
343.
Saunders, M. N. (2011). Research methods for business students, 5/e. Pearson Education India.
Saunders, M. N. K. Lewis, p., and Thornhill, A.(2000). Research methods for business students.
Shim, S. I. (2012). Enhancing brand loyalty through brand experience: Application of online
flow theory (Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University).
Shukla, P. (2004). Effect of product usage, satisfaction and involvement on brand switching
behaviour. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 16(4), 82-104.
The world Factbook — central intelligence agency. (2001, January 1). Retrieved December 1,
2016, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/np.html
Upamannyu, N. K., & Mathur, G. (2013, January). Effect of brand trust, brand affect and brand
image on customer brand loyalty and consumer brand extension attitude in FMCG sector. In
PRIMA (Vol. 3, No. 2, p. 1). Publishing India Group.
Weinberg, T. (2009). The new community rules: Marketing on the social web. " O'Reilly Media,
Inc.".
Written. (2015, February 26). Social media marketing. Retrieved December 1, 2016, from
http://mashable.com/category/social-media-marketing/
Zarrella, D. (2009). The social media marketing book. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
Page 61
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model
and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of marketing, 2-22.
Appendix
Reflective Notes
The thesis was carried in the purpose of finding the factors that determine the brand loyalty of
Samsung mobile in Nepal. There has been rapid demand of Smart phone all over the world.
Also, there has been tuff competition between phones companies to sell their brands in the
market. However, few companies has only been able to achieve their goals and target. It has been
challenging for all companies to provide technological updates and progress in the system within
the economic range for customers. Samsung mobile is one of the company that has successfully
providing quality smart phones at a competitive price. Presently, Samsung mobile is the market
leader in Nepal and worldwide. It has been manufacturing smart phones from all the level of
consumers from the economic level to expensive ones. Similarly, the customers for Samsung
phone in Nepal are ranging from economic range to higher class of standard.
Brand loyalty is important subject of study in the modern business. A brand loyal customers not
only repurchase the phone but also recommends to others. There is high possibility for the
companies to be successful if they have high number of brand loyal customers. In this study, we
found out that customer satisfaction and consumer experience leads to the brand loyalty of the
Samsung phone in Nepal. The customer satisfaction means the overall satisfaction as they get
from the phone according to its price. And the pleasant experience that is generated after using
the phone also significantly determines the brand loyalty of the Samsung phone. However, there
are other different factors that affects the loyalty of customers. The context may differ from one
country to another , range of population, culture, economic ,social and technological factors.
One of them can be considered as economic factor. As we know that the spending limit of the
people is according to how much they can earn. May be, every one wishes to buy expensive and
advance phone but may not have economic capability. In reality, there are other different factors
Page 62
that leads to the purchase of smart phones rather than just a brand loyalty.
Samsung phones has been able to meet the customers need and preferences of their customer at
the present time. However, it is important for the company to maintain its trust in coming days as
well. The price of the phone and the technology capability is one of the reason for the success of
phone. The life cycle of the phones are very short because of the rapid change in the technology.
Also, the high competition in the market creates challenges for the managers and companies. So,
it is really important to managers of the company to build the trust and maintain the customer
loyalty. For instance, A latest release of the Samsung Galaxy note7 was banned from Samsung
company in August, 2016 just after few months of released. The highly expensive and
technologically advance was recalled and stopped it sales after there was defeat in batteries and
firing issues. Samsung not only recalled galaxy note 7 but also repaid to all their customers who
has already made a purchase. It was necessary for the purpose of customer safety as well as
maintain the trust for their customers. However, this incident lead a negative impacts on
Samsung users but did not lost the trust of the customers because of the customer oriented
behavior. So, it is really important to be focus on the satisfaction level of the customer because it
lead to the success for the company in future.
Mark one of the oval ranging from disagree to agree. ( the questionnaires are carried for the
academic research purpose)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 63
Samsung products are reliable
.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 64
I am satisfied using Samsung mobile experiences
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 65
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 66
I find Samsung phones interesting in a sensory way
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Strongly agree
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 67
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I believe social media plays important role in choosing a brand of smart phone.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Samsung mobile is very popular between my friends and families in Facebook , whose suggestion and feedback makes me
loyal towards it.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 68
The content on the Samsung mobiles are up to date and attractive .
Page 69
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. Age
2. Gender
Male
Female
bachelor /graduation
advance level
Page 70