Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mohan A. Harihar - Complainant
Mohan A. Harihar - Complainant
Harihar - Complainant
7124 Avalon Drive, Acton, MA 01720 | 617.921.2526 (Mobile) | [email protected]
Date
Page 1
jurisdiction to rule here and stand accused of Treason under
ARTICLE III. By continuing to rule again here, the Complainant
necessarily brings incremental claims of Treason against ALL
five (5) Circuit judges associated with this (invalid) order.
District Judges Hillman and Delgado-Hernandez are NOT included
with these claims, as they have not been previously associated
with this litigation. HOWEVER, as with every accused officer of
the court associated with this litigation, Judges Hillman and
Delgado-Hernandez are respectfully given a SINGULAR opportunity
to take corrective action here, including (but not limited to)
sua sponte recusal. Any failure to do so will necessarily bring
evidenced judicial misconduct complaints against them.
I. COMPLAINANT’S DISCLOSURE
Page 2
2. US Inspector General - Michael Horowitz;
3. US Attorney General - Jeff Sessions;
4. Members of the US Senate and House of
Representatives;
5. House and Senate Judiciary Committees;
6. House Oversight Committee;
7. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);
8. Office of the Special Inspector General for the
Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP);
9. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC);
10. Federal Trade Commission (FTC);
11. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS);
12. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Page 3
DEMANDS ACCOUNTABILITY for evidenced allegations of judicial
misconduct which are irrefutable; noting that the accused have
yet to even reference the words - “TREASON, ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE,
or NATIONAL SECURITY”, anywhere in court record(s).
Page 4
Circuit Judge’s – Lynch, Selya, Boudin, Stahl and Lipez
were not considered replacements as mandated by Rule
25(f);
3.) Considering the PLETHORA of egregious judicial
misconduct evidenced by this federal judiciary, please
explain in detail WHY a TRANSFER to another council was
not considered under Rule 25(f);
4.) CLEARLY, there exists conflict with ACCURATELY
ASSESSING “the MERITS” of the complaint. Please provide
the details of ALL supported (Plaintiff/Appellant/
Complainant) arguments reviewed by the council, and how
specifically the council could possibly have arrived at
the conclusion(s) that would authorize Chief Judge
Howard to dispose of the complaint(s).
III. JURISDICTION
Page 5
IV. EVIDENCED TREASON TO THE CONSTITUTION UNDER ARTICLE III
Page 6
Complainant’s continued efforts to address, the District
(and Appeals) Court has failed to address/void all related
decisions which have been impacted. But that’s not all –
What has followed throughout the 3-year history of this
federal litigation is a PATTERN OF CORRUPT CONDUCT
exemplified by EVERY (District or Circuit) judge to follow.
This evidenced pattern is considered identical (or
synonymous) to that which mandated the recusal of Judge
Burroughs.
Page 7
8.) Tampering with Evidence – as evidenced in the
Middlesex Superior Court, and ignored;
9.) Denying Constitutional Rights – as evidenced;
10.) Automatically Ruling against PRO SE LITIGANTS –
as evidenced;
11.) Violating the Judicial Oath of Office and the
Code of Judicial Conduct – as evidenced;
12.) Allowing Perjury - When the judge knows the
testimony is perjured, the judge is suborning
perjury when he or she does nothing about it and
accepts the perjury as if it was fact;
13.) Premature Dismissal PRIOR to DISCOVERY – as
evidenced;
14.) Denying a Hearing - Hearings are dangerous for
dishonest judges as courtroom observers, media,
and the transcript of the hearing will force the
judges to be a little more honest;
15.) Denying a Jury Trial - Judges corrupt the
judicial process by depriving parties of a jury
trial. Juries can't be controlled by the judges
to ensure that their favored party wins, so
judges end cases before the people who should win
can reach a jury; and
16.) Ignoring the Impact of Recusal – as evidenced.
Page 8
receive a FAIR or JUST RESOLUTION in either of his civil
complaints.
Page 9
based on the record(s) that these referenced
officers of the Court appear determined to ensure
that this Trade Secret, designed to economically
assist the United States, NEVER comes to fruition.
While further investigation is needed to determine
the “WHY”, there can be NO DOUBT, that these
referenced officers of the Court have wrongfully
CONSPIRED to (at minimum) misappropriate a Trade
Secret. Further investigation is also necessary to
determine if additional parties play a role in this
conspiracy claim.
Page 10
HOMEOWNER, and on a grander scale – commit crimes of
ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE against THE UNITED STATES. These
evidenced crimes impact not only the individual
Complainant, but the Nation as a whole. As an American-Born
citizen, this CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR is UNACCEPTABLE and will NO
LONGER BE TOLERATED. These criminal allegations are not
hypothetical, there is NO GREY AREA HERE – it is BLACK AND
WHITE, clearly evidenced within the historical record(s),
and has been placed in FULL PUBLIC VIEW. The Complainant
has to live in constant fear for his safety and well-being,
knowing that both the Federal and State Court(s) will not
uphold the law. The Complainant is CERTAIN that ANY
OBJECTIVE OBSERVER, who has clear understanding of this
historical record will irrefutably AGREE with this
assessment. THEREFORE, CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS have now been
filed with the FBI against the following Federal (Circuit
and District) Court Judges for evidenced crimes including
(but not limited to) TREASON, CONSPIRACY, ECONOMIC
ESPIONAGE and others:
Page 11
Based on the evidenced record and each of the articulated
misconduct claims, please explain in detail HOW EXACTLY the
judicial council concluded that these claims have been
found to be patently without merit. In your explanation,
please show which documents reviewed contributed to your
decision, for EACH of the claims made. It’s also important
to note that five (5) out the of seven (7) judges who
issued the order, stand accused of misconduct including
(but not limited to) TREASON.
Page 12
be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of
law and have no legal force or effect.
Page 13
including Chief Justice Howard, for RULING WITHOUT
JURISDICTION;
Page 14
10. Failing to address Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights;
Page 15
22. Failing to address the well evidenced and
continued PATTERN of CORRUPT CONDUCT within this
litigation;
Page 16
HOPE, that the United States will take corrective steps in
restoring that faith.
Respectfully Submitted,
Mohan A. Harihar
Complainant
Page 17
Attachment A
Page 18
Attachment B
Page 19
Page 20
The CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TEXT BOX reads as follows:
I, Mohan A. Harihar, complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
DEFENDANTS:1.)US District Court Judge Allison Dale Burroughs;2.)US District Court Judge Denise J.
Casper;3.)US Chief Judge Jeffrey R. Howard (First Circuit)4.)US Circuit Judge Juan R. Torruella;5.)US
Circuit Judge William J. Kayatta, Jr.; 6.)US Circuit Judge David J. Barron;7.)US Circuit Judge O. Rogeriee
Thompson;8.)US Chief Judge Joseph N. LaPlante (US District Court(NH);9.)US District Court Judge John J.
McConnell, Jr. (US District Court (RI); 10.) US District Court Judge John David Levy (US District Court
(ME).
Contact Information: John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse,1 Courthouse Way, Boston, MA 02210,
Clerk's Office: 617-748-9057
ALLEGATIONS AND SUPPORTING FACTS: The crimes alleged against referenced officers of the Court
have occurred in the timeline associated with the associated litigation: HARIHAR v. US BANK et al,
Appeal No. 17-1381 (Lower Court Docket No. 15-cv-11880); HARIHAR v. THE UNITED STATES, Appeal No.
17-2074 (Lower Court Docket No. 17-cv-11109); and actions related to filed judicial misconduct
complaints/petitions.
The evidenced allegations conclusively show that (at minimum) 6 out of 10 referenced officers of the
court have ruled without jurisdiction, constituting an act(s) of Treason under Article III, Section 3 of the
Constitution. The individual and collective actions of these court officers also show the intentional and
collective CONSPIRACY to (at minimum) Misappropriate a Trade Secret (IP) designed to assist the United
States with economic growth/repair associated with the US Foreclosure Crisis. The complainant believes
that upon further investigation, additional (related) crimes committed by these officers will be
evidenced. The Complainant maintains the right to expand upon/file new claims if deemed necessary.
STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CAUSE: The Complainant states that these facts establish probable cause
that (at minimum) the following crimes have occurred: TREASON to the Constitution under ARTICLE III,
Section 3; ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE (Economic Espionage Act) 18 U.S. Code § 1831; MISPRISION OF
TREASON 18 U.S. Code § 2382; 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United
States.
Supporting Documents are part of the Court record(s) associated with the referenced litigation. Please
be advised, since this matter involves evidenced claims of TREASON and matters perceived to impact
National Security, the Complainant (by his interpretation of Federal Law) has necessarily
communicated these claims to the President. Members of Congress and appropriate agencies. The
PUBLIC has also been copied out of concerns for personal safety and security. Copies of this criminal
complaint will be delivered to the President's attention, filed with the Court and communicated to
other referenced parties as well.
Page 21
Page 22